Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Affidavits Aren’t Enough: Herrera-Ramirez v. Bondi and the Evidentiary Threshold for Motions to Reopen

Affidavits Aren’t Enough: Herrera-Ramirez v. Bondi and the Evidentiary Threshold for Motions to Reopen

Date: Jul 10, 2025
Affidavits Aren’t Enough: Herrera-Ramirez v. Bondi and the Evidentiary Threshold for Motions to Reopen Introduction Herrera-Ramirez v. Bondi, No. 24-9549 (10th Cir. Jul. 8, 2025), marks an important...
The “Eight-Second Qualified-Immunity Gap”:  Salgado v. Smith and the Limits of Clearly Established Excessive-Force Claims

The “Eight-Second Qualified-Immunity Gap”: Salgado v. Smith and the Limits of Clearly Established Excessive-Force Claims

Date: Jul 10, 2025
The “Eight-Second Qualified-Immunity Gap”: Salgado v. Smith and the Limits of Clearly Established Excessive-Force Claims Introduction Salgado v. Smith, No. 24-2068 (10th Cir. July 8, 2025), arises...
Stark v. Reliance Standard – Tenth Circuit Bars Recovery of Pre-Litigation Administrative Attorney’s Fees under ERISA § 502(a)(3)

Stark v. Reliance Standard – Tenth Circuit Bars Recovery of Pre-Litigation Administrative Attorney’s Fees under ERISA § 502(a)(3)

Date: Jul 10, 2025
Stark v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co. Tenth Circuit Declines Equitable Surcharge for Pre-Litigation Attorney’s Fees under ERISA § 502(a)(3) 1. Introduction Stark v. Reliance Standard Life...
United States v. Kroeker: Tenth Circuit Confirms Internet Use Alone Does Not Prove “In Interstate Commerce” for § 2252A(a)(5)(B) Possession and Sanctions Jury Use of Dost Factors

United States v. Kroeker: Tenth Circuit Confirms Internet Use Alone Does Not Prove “In Interstate Commerce” for § 2252A(a)(5)(B) Possession and Sanctions Jury Use of Dost Factors

Date: Jul 10, 2025
United States v. Kroeker: Tenth Circuit Confirms Internet Use Alone Does Not Prove “In Interstate Commerce” for § 2252A(a)(5)(B) Possession and Sanctions Jury Use of Dost Factors Introduction United...
“Clarifying Appeal Waivers After United States v. Medina” – A Comprehensive Commentary

“Clarifying Appeal Waivers After United States v. Medina” – A Comprehensive Commentary

Date: Jul 10, 2025
Clarifying Appeal Waivers: The Tenth Circuit’s Refined Hahn Framework in United States v. Medina Introduction On 8 July 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit issued an...
Tenth Circuit Narrows Collateral-Order Review of Litigation-Privilege Denials: Commentary on Vivos Therapeutics, Inc. v. Ortho-Tain, Inc. (10th Cir. 2025)

Tenth Circuit Narrows Collateral-Order Review of Litigation-Privilege Denials: Commentary on Vivos Therapeutics, Inc. v. Ortho-Tain, Inc. (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 10, 2025
Tenth Circuit Narrows Collateral-Order Review of Litigation-Privilege Denials Comprehensive Commentary on Vivos Therapeutics, Inc. v. Ortho-Tain, Inc., 24-1061 (10th Cir. July 8, 2025) 1....
Beach v. Wyoming DOC: Tenth Circuit Re-Affirms Limits on the Continuing-Wrong Doctrine, PLRA Injunctive Relief, and Threat-Only Eighth Amendment Claims

Beach v. Wyoming DOC: Tenth Circuit Re-Affirms Limits on the Continuing-Wrong Doctrine, PLRA Injunctive Relief, and Threat-Only Eighth Amendment Claims

Date: Jul 8, 2025
Beach v. Wyoming DOC: Tenth Circuit Re-Affirms Limits on the Continuing-Wrong Doctrine, PLRA Injunctive Relief, and Threat-Only Eighth Amendment Claims 1. Introduction Jesse Allan Jewett Beach, an...

        Rusk v. Beutler: The Tenth Circuit BAP Affirms a Stream-lined
        “Good-Cause & No-Prejudice” Test for Attorney Withdrawal
        and Re-emphasises Strict Compliance with Local Motion-Practice Rules

Rusk v. Beutler: The Tenth Circuit BAP Affirms a Stream-lined “Good-Cause & No-Prejudice” Test for Attorney Withdrawal and Re-emphasises Strict Compliance with Local Motion-Practice Rules

Date: Jul 5, 2025
Rusk v. Beutler: The Tenth Circuit BAP Affirms a Stream-lined “Good-Cause & No-Prejudice” Test for Attorney Withdrawal and Re-emphasises Strict Compliance with Local Motion-Practice Rules I....
Crick v. Rogers: Denial of a State Evidentiary Hearing as a Merits Adjudication – Re-affirming “Double Deference” Under AEDPA

Crick v. Rogers: Denial of a State Evidentiary Hearing as a Merits Adjudication – Re-affirming “Double Deference” Under AEDPA

Date: Jul 5, 2025
Crick v. Rogers: Denial of a State Evidentiary Hearing as a Merits Adjudication – Re-affirming “Double Deference” Under AEDPA 1. Introduction Crick v. Rogers, No. 24-6190 (10th Cir. July 3, 2025), is...
Tenth Circuit Reinforces Timeliness and Non-Jurisdictional Treatment of Defective NTAs – Comment on Lopez-Vega v. Garland

Tenth Circuit Reinforces Timeliness and Non-Jurisdictional Treatment of Defective NTAs – Comment on Lopez-Vega v. Garland

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Tenth Circuit Reinforces Timeliness and Non-Jurisdictional Treatment of Defective NTAs Commentary on Lopez-Vega v. Garland, No. 24-9537 (10th Cir. July 2 2025) Introduction Lopez-Vega v. Garland is...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies “Mixed-Accuracy” Informant Reliability for Probable Cause – Commentary on United States v. Harris (2025)

Tenth Circuit Clarifies “Mixed-Accuracy” Informant Reliability for Probable Cause – Commentary on United States v. Harris (2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Tenth Circuit Clarifies “Mixed-Accuracy” Informant Reliability for Probable Cause Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Harris, No. 24-8050 (10th Cir. July 2, 2025) Introduction United States...
No Harm, No Causation, No Standing: Hudson v. The Boppy Company Reinforces Traceability in Benefit-of-the-Bargain Class Actions

No Harm, No Causation, No Standing: Hudson v. The Boppy Company Reinforces Traceability in Benefit-of-the-Bargain Class Actions

Date: Jul 3, 2025
No Harm, No Causation, No Standing: Hudson v. The Boppy Company Reinforces Traceability in Benefit-of-the-Bargain Class Actions 1. Introduction The Tenth Circuit’s decision in Hudson v. The Boppy...
From Recklessness to Intent: The “Moore Standard” for Inferring Intent under U.S.S.G. § 2A2.2(b)(2)(B)

From Recklessness to Intent: The “Moore Standard” for Inferring Intent under U.S.S.G. § 2A2.2(b)(2)(B)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
From Recklessness to Intent: The “Moore Standard” for Inferring Intent under U.S.S.G. § 2A2.2(b)(2)(B) Introduction United States v. Moore, No. 24-2161 (10th Cir. 2025) presented the Court of Appeals...
Hurd v. Dove: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms the Firm Waiver Rule and Confirms No Stand-Alone Cause of Action under the PLRA

Hurd v. Dove: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms the Firm Waiver Rule and Confirms No Stand-Alone Cause of Action under the PLRA

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Hurd v. Dove: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms the Firm Waiver Rule and Confirms No Stand-Alone Cause of Action under the PLRA 1. Introduction The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, in Hurd...

        United States v. Lee: The Tenth Circuit Establishes Broad Venue for
        § 2252 “Receipt” Offenses as Continuing Crimes

United States v. Lee: The Tenth Circuit Establishes Broad Venue for § 2252 “Receipt” Offenses as Continuing Crimes

Date: Jul 3, 2025
United States v. Lee: The Tenth Circuit Establishes Broad Venue for § 2252 “Receipt” Offenses as Continuing Crimes Introduction In United States v. Lee, No. 24-7015 (10th Cir. June 30 2025), the...
“Knowing-and-Voluntary” Appeal Waivers in Immigration Proceedings: The Tenth Circuit’s Clarification in Saleem v. Garland

“Knowing-and-Voluntary” Appeal Waivers in Immigration Proceedings: The Tenth Circuit’s Clarification in Saleem v. Garland

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“Knowing-and-Voluntary” Appeal Waivers in Immigration Proceedings: The Tenth Circuit’s Clarification in Saleem v. Garland Introduction On 26 June 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the...
“One Strike Further”: Hale-El v. Doe and the Tenth Circuit’s Clarification that
           (1) a Mis-Captioned Notice of Appeal Does Not Defeat Jurisdiction and
           (2) Frivolous Prisoner Appeals Trigger PLRA Strikes and IFP Denials

“One Strike Further”: Hale-El v. Doe and the Tenth Circuit’s Clarification that (1) a Mis-Captioned Notice of Appeal Does Not Defeat Jurisdiction and (2) Frivolous Prisoner Appeals Trigger PLRA Strikes and IFP Denials

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“One Strike Further”: Hale-El v. Doe and the Tenth Circuit’s Clarification that (1) a Mis-Captioned Notice of Appeal Does Not Defeat Jurisdiction and (2) Frivolous Prisoner Appeals Trigger PLRA...
Tartt v. USD 475: Clarifying Decision-Maker Knowledge & Affidavit Admissibility in Title VII Litigation

Tartt v. USD 475: Clarifying Decision-Maker Knowledge & Affidavit Admissibility in Title VII Litigation

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Tartt v. Unified School District No. 475 Clarifying Decision-Maker Knowledge and Affidavit Admissibility in Title VII Litigation Introduction Merrier A. Jackson Tartt, an experienced Black educator...
Clarifying Appellate Duty: Gilberti v. Cheney and the Tenth Circuit’s Reinforcement of Rule 42.1 Dismissals for Failure to Prosecute

Clarifying Appellate Duty: Gilberti v. Cheney and the Tenth Circuit’s Reinforcement of Rule 42.1 Dismissals for Failure to Prosecute

Date: Jun 29, 2025
Clarifying Appellate Duty: Gilberti v. Cheney and the Tenth Circuit’s Reinforcement of Rule 42.1 Dismissals for Failure to Prosecute 1. Introduction On 26 June 2025, the United States Court of...
Establishing the “Knowing and Voluntary” Standard for Appeal Waivers in Immigration Proceedings – A Commentary on Saleem v. Garland (10th Cir. 2025)

Establishing the “Knowing and Voluntary” Standard for Appeal Waivers in Immigration Proceedings – A Commentary on Saleem v. Garland (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 29, 2025
Establishing the “Knowing and Voluntary” Standard for Appeal Waivers in Immigration Proceedings – A Commentary on Saleem v. Garland (10th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction In Saleem v. Garland, the United...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert