Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

view Case Commentaries

MS v MM [2025] CSOH 113: Section 41 Family Law Act 1986 Has No Extra‑Territorial Effect

MS v MM [2025] CSOH 113: Section 41 Family Law Act 1986 Has No Extra‑Territorial Effect

Date: Dec 5, 2025
MS v MM [2025] CSOH 113: Section 41 Family Law Act 1986 Has No Extra‑Territorial Effect 1. Introduction This decision of the Outer House of the Court of Session, MS v MM and another ([2025] CSOH 113,...
Mandatory Ultrasound Referral for Fundal Height Discrepancies: Commentary on Claire Bayne or Wilkie v Tayside Health Board [2025] CSOH 111

Mandatory Ultrasound Referral for Fundal Height Discrepancies: Commentary on Claire Bayne or Wilkie v Tayside Health Board [2025] CSOH 111

Date: Dec 5, 2025
Mandatory Ultrasound Referral for Fundal Height Discrepancies: Commentary on Claire Bayne or Wilkie v Tayside Health Board [2025] CSOH 111 1. Introduction This case concerns catastrophic birth injury...
Clarifying Interim and Permanent Homelessness Duties under the Housing (Scotland) Act 1987: Commentary on Petition by Y v Glasgow City Council [2025] CSIH 30

Clarifying Interim and Permanent Homelessness Duties under the Housing (Scotland) Act 1987: Commentary on Petition by Y v Glasgow City Council [2025] CSIH 30

Date: Dec 5, 2025
Clarifying Interim and Permanent Homelessness Duties under the Housing (Scotland) Act 1987: Commentary on Petition by Y v Glasgow City Council [2025] CSIH 30 1. Introduction This Inner House decision...
Indirect Discrimination, Discretionary Exemptions and the Public Sector Equality Duty in Prison Mail Policies – Commentary on Petition of William Frederick Ian Beggs [2025] CSOH 112

Indirect Discrimination, Discretionary Exemptions and the Public Sector Equality Duty in Prison Mail Policies – Commentary on Petition of William Frederick Ian Beggs [2025] CSOH 112

Date: Dec 5, 2025
Indirect Discrimination, Discretionary Exemptions and the Public Sector Equality Duty in Prison Mail Policies Commentary on Petition of William Frederick Ian Beggs for Judicial Review [2025] CSOH 112...
Clarifying “Particular Vulnerability” and Deliberate Targeting in Kidnapping Sentencing: Commentary on R v Greenaway [2025] EWCA Crim 1568

Clarifying “Particular Vulnerability” and Deliberate Targeting in Kidnapping Sentencing: Commentary on R v Greenaway [2025] EWCA Crim 1568

Date: Dec 4, 2025
Clarifying “Particular Vulnerability” and Deliberate Targeting in Kidnapping Sentencing: Commentary on R v Greenaway [2025] EWCA Crim 1568 1. Introduction This Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)...
Unreasonable Conduct, Expert Evidence and Costs in Called‑In Planning Inquiries: Commentary on Halton BC v Secretary of State [2025] EWCA Civ 1566

Unreasonable Conduct, Expert Evidence and Costs in Called‑In Planning Inquiries: Commentary on Halton BC v Secretary of State [2025] EWCA Civ 1566

Date: Dec 4, 2025
Unreasonable Conduct, Expert Evidence and Costs in Called‑In Planning Inquiries: Commentary on Halton BC v Secretary of State [2025] EWCA Civ 1566 1. Introduction This Court of Appeal decision...
Evans v Care Quality Commission [2025] EWCA Civ 1556: Ideological Views, Mandatory Relevant Considerations and the Regulation of Gender-Affirming Treatment for Minors

Evans v Care Quality Commission [2025] EWCA Civ 1556: Ideological Views, Mandatory Relevant Considerations and the Regulation of Gender-Affirming Treatment for Minors

Date: Dec 4, 2025
Evans v Care Quality Commission [2025] EWCA Civ 1556: Ideological Views, Mandatory Relevant Considerations and the Regulation of Gender-Affirming Treatment for Minors 1. Introduction The decision in...
M.K. v B.K. [2025] IEHC 683 — Clarifying the Threshold for Transferring Divorce Proceedings to the High Court in Cases Involving Corporate Assets and Alleged Beneficial Ownership

M.K. v B.K. [2025] IEHC 683 — Clarifying the Threshold for Transferring Divorce Proceedings to the High Court in Cases Involving Corporate Assets and Alleged Beneficial Ownership

Date: Dec 4, 2025
M.K. v B.K. [2025] IEHC 683: Clarifying the Threshold for Transferring Divorce Proceedings to the High Court in Cases Involving Corporate Assets and Alleged Beneficial Ownership High Court of Ireland...
Serious Historic Convictions and the “Good Character” Test in Naturalisation: Commentary on Akande v Minister for Justice and Equality [2025] IEHC 679

Serious Historic Convictions and the “Good Character” Test in Naturalisation: Commentary on Akande v Minister for Justice and Equality [2025] IEHC 679

Date: Dec 4, 2025
Serious Historic Convictions and the “Good Character” Requirement in Naturalisation: Akande v Minister for Justice and Equality [2025] IEHC 679 1. Introduction This commentary analyses the judgment...
Finality of Executed Possession Orders and Rejection of “Private Process” Defences in Mortgage Litigation: Commentary on Start Mortgages DAC v Sullivan & Anor [2025] IEHC 681

Finality of Executed Possession Orders and Rejection of “Private Process” Defences in Mortgage Litigation: Commentary on Start Mortgages DAC v Sullivan & Anor [2025] IEHC 681

Date: Dec 4, 2025
Finality of Executed Possession Orders and Rejection of “Private Process” Defences in Mortgage Litigation: Commentary on Start Mortgages DAC v Sullivan & Anor [2025] IEHC 681 Court: High Court of...
No Duty to Cooperate in a Vacuum: Triggering the State’s Obligations in Safe Country of Origin Cases – Commentary on I.A. & M.M. v IPAT [2025] IEHC 672

No Duty to Cooperate in a Vacuum: Triggering the State’s Obligations in Safe Country of Origin Cases – Commentary on I.A. & M.M. v IPAT [2025] IEHC 672

Date: Dec 4, 2025
No Duty to Cooperate in a Vacuum: Triggering the State’s Obligations in Safe Country of Origin Cases 1. Introduction This commentary analyses the judgment of the High Court of Ireland in I.A. v The...
Herbert v An Coimisiún Pleanála: Development Plan Objectives, “High‑Level Checklists” and Exceptional Circumstances in Rural Housing

Herbert v An Coimisiún Pleanála: Development Plan Objectives, “High‑Level Checklists” and Exceptional Circumstances in Rural Housing

Date: Dec 4, 2025
Herbert v An Coimisiún Pleanála: Development Plan Objectives, “High‑Level Checklists” and Exceptional Circumstances in Rural Housing 1. Introduction The High Court decision in Herbert v An Coimisiún...
Clarifying Proof of Assignment and Linking of Loan and Charge in Summary Mortgage Possession: Commentary on Start Mortgages DAC & Mars Capital Finance Ireland DAC v Curtis [2025] IEHC 684

Clarifying Proof of Assignment and Linking of Loan and Charge in Summary Mortgage Possession: Commentary on Start Mortgages DAC & Mars Capital Finance Ireland DAC v Curtis [2025] IEHC 684

Date: Dec 4, 2025
Clarifying Proof of Assignment and Linking of Loan and Charge in Summary Mortgage Possession: Commentary on Start Mortgages DAC & Mars Capital Finance Ireland DAC v Curtis [2025] IEHC 684 1....
Misunderstanding the Commercial Effect of a Settlement is Not “Mutual Mistake”: Commentary on McCaughey v McCaughey [2025] IEHC 697

Misunderstanding the Commercial Effect of a Settlement is Not “Mutual Mistake”: Commentary on McCaughey v McCaughey [2025] IEHC 697

Date: Dec 4, 2025
Misunderstanding the Commercial Effect of a Settlement is Not “Mutual Mistake”: Commentary on McCaughey & IJM Timber Engineering Ltd v McCaughey & McCaughey Homes Ltd [2025] IEHC 697 1. Introduction...
Reasonably Arguable Case and No‑Fault Termination in Trade Mark Licensing: Commentary on Somnus GMC Waterford Ltd & Somnus GMC Carlow Ltd v Flynn & Mattress Mick Ltd [2025] IEHC 676

Reasonably Arguable Case and No‑Fault Termination in Trade Mark Licensing: Commentary on Somnus GMC Waterford Ltd & Somnus GMC Carlow Ltd v Flynn & Mattress Mick Ltd [2025] IEHC 676

Date: Dec 3, 2025
Reasonably Arguable Case and No‑Fault Termination in Trade Mark Licensing: Commentary on Somnus GMC Waterford Ltd & Somnus GMC Carlow Ltd v Flynn & Mattress Mick Ltd [2025] IEHC 676 1. Introduction...
Aarhus Compliance Findings as Binding Interpretations for EU Environmental Information Charges: Commentary on Save Leitrim Environmental and Biodiversity CLG v Commissioner for Environmental Information [No. 2] [2025] IEHC 663

Aarhus Compliance Findings as Binding Interpretations for EU Environmental Information Charges: Commentary on Save Leitrim Environmental and Biodiversity CLG v Commissioner for Environmental Information [No. 2] [2025] IEHC 663

Date: Dec 3, 2025
Aarhus Compliance Findings as Binding Interpretations for EU Environmental Information Charges: Commentary on Save Leitrim Environmental and Biodiversity CLG v Commissioner for Environmental...
The Eight‑Fold Test for Judicial Review in Irish Planning Law: Commentary on Reilly & Ors v An Coimisiún Pleanála [2025] IEHC 659

The Eight‑Fold Test for Judicial Review in Irish Planning Law: Commentary on Reilly & Ors v An Coimisiún Pleanála [2025] IEHC 659

Date: Dec 3, 2025
The Eight‑Fold Test for Judicial Review in Irish Planning Law: Commentary on Reilly & Ors v An Coimisiún Pleanála [2025] IEHC 659 1. Introduction The judgment of Humphreys J in Reilly & Ors v An...
Quinn v Garda Síochána Ombudsman Commission [2025] IEHC 650: The Scope of GSOC’s Duty to Inform Complainants and the Limited Procedural Rights of Complainants in Garda Disciplinary Investigations

Quinn v Garda Síochána Ombudsman Commission [2025] IEHC 650: The Scope of GSOC’s Duty to Inform Complainants and the Limited Procedural Rights of Complainants in Garda Disciplinary Investigations

Date: Dec 3, 2025
Quinn v Garda Síochána Ombudsman Commission [2025] IEHC 650: The Scope of GSOC’s Duty to Inform Complainants and the Limited Procedural Rights of Complainants in Garda Disciplinary Investigations 1....
O’Neill v Hudner [2025] IEHC 669: Just and Equitable Winding‑Up of a Near‑Insolvent Start‑Up and the Limits of the “Clean Hands” Bar

O’Neill v Hudner [2025] IEHC 669: Just and Equitable Winding‑Up of a Near‑Insolvent Start‑Up and the Limits of the “Clean Hands” Bar

Date: Dec 3, 2025
O’Neill v Hudner [2025] IEHC 669: Just and Equitable Winding‑Up of a Near‑Insolvent Start‑Up and the Limits of the “Clean Hands” Bar 1. Introduction This High Court decision by Quinn J in O’Neill v...
Oral Reasons, Garda Intelligence and Time Limits in Prison Transfer Judicial Review: Commentary on O’Beirne v Minister for Justice [2025] IEHC 671

Oral Reasons, Garda Intelligence and Time Limits in Prison Transfer Judicial Review: Commentary on O’Beirne v Minister for Justice [2025] IEHC 671

Date: Dec 3, 2025
Oral Reasons, Garda Intelligence and Time Limits in Prison Transfer Judicial Review: Commentary on O’Beirne v Minister for Justice [2025] IEHC 671 1. Introduction This commentary examines the High...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert