Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

sienkiewicz-v-greif-(uk)-ltd:-upholding-the-fairchild-barker-exception-and-rejecting-the-& Case Commentaries

“Shiels Clarification”: Balancing Consecutive Sentences and the Principle of Totality in Domestic Coercive-Control Cases

“Shiels Clarification”: Balancing Consecutive Sentences and the Principle of Totality in Domestic Coercive-Control Cases

Date: Jul 4, 2025
“Shiels Clarification”: Balancing Consecutive Sentences and the Principle of Totality in Domestic Coercive-Control Cases Introduction The Court of Appeal’s decision in Shiels, R. v ([2025] EWCA Crim...
Doyle v Houston (2025): Trespass Injunctions ex debito justitiae Against Former Homeowners Post-Execution

Doyle v Houston (2025): Trespass Injunctions ex debito justitiae Against Former Homeowners Post-Execution

Date: Jul 4, 2025
Doyle v Houston (2025): Trespass Injunctions ex debito justitiae Against Former Home-Owners After Execution Introduction In Doyle v Houston ([2025] IEHC 373) Mr Justice Kennedy delivered what is...
“No Locus, No Claim” — High Court Clarifies the Consequences of Fraudulent Assertions and Permission-Based Occupation in Adverse Possession Cases (Von Geitz v O’Brien & Mazars [2025] IEHC 399)

“No Locus, No Claim” — High Court Clarifies the Consequences of Fraudulent Assertions and Permission-Based Occupation in Adverse Possession Cases (Von Geitz v O’Brien & Mazars [2025] IEHC 399)

Date: Jul 4, 2025
“No Locus, No Claim” — High Court Clarifies the Consequences of Fraudulent Assertions and Permission-Based Occupation in Adverse Possession Cases Commentary on Von Geitz v O’Brien & Mazars ([2025]...
“Extending Propensity: R v Blackman [2025] EWCA Crim 965 and the Admissibility of Dated Juvenile Drug-Supply Convictions”

“Extending Propensity: R v Blackman [2025] EWCA Crim 965 and the Admissibility of Dated Juvenile Drug-Supply Convictions”

Date: Jul 4, 2025
Extending Propensity: R v Blackman [2025] EWCA Crim 965 and the Admissibility of Dated Juvenile Drug-Supply Convictions 1. Introduction R v Blackman is a 2025 judgment of the Court of Appeal...
Re-defining “Reasonable Grounds” for Further and Better Discovery in Illegal-Adoption Litigation – A Commentary on Clarke v Saint Patrick's Guild (In Liquidation) & Ors [2025] IEHC 374

Re-defining “Reasonable Grounds” for Further and Better Discovery in Illegal-Adoption Litigation – A Commentary on Clarke v Saint Patrick's Guild (In Liquidation) & Ors [2025] IEHC 374

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Re-defining “Reasonable Grounds” for Further and Better Discovery in Illegal-Adoption Litigation Commentary on Clarke v Saint Patrick's Guild (In Liquidation) & Ors [2025] IEHC 374 1. Introduction...
Fareed v R – Clarifying the Admission of “Relatively Minor” Bad-Character
        Evidence to Correct a False Impression

Fareed v R – Clarifying the Admission of “Relatively Minor” Bad-Character Evidence to Correct a False Impression

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Fareed v R [2025] EWCA Crim 1063: Guidance on “Relatively Minor” Bad-Character Evidence Admitted to Correct a False Impression Court: Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), England & Wales Date of...
“The Burton Principle”: Choosing the Correct Modern Guideline for Historic Child-Sexual Offences

“The Burton Principle”: Choosing the Correct Modern Guideline for Historic Child-Sexual Offences

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“The Burton Principle”: Choosing the Correct Modern Guideline for Historic Child-Sexual Offences 1. Introduction In Burton, R. v ([2025] EWCA Crim 950) the England and Wales Court of Appeal (Criminal...
“Competent-Management” as an Implied Pre-Condition in Earn-Out Turnover Warranties – Commentary on Key Pest Ltd & Anor v Walsh [2025] IEHC 415

“Competent-Management” as an Implied Pre-Condition in Earn-Out Turnover Warranties – Commentary on Key Pest Ltd & Anor v Walsh [2025] IEHC 415

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“Competent-Management” as an Implied Pre-Condition in Earn-Out Turnover Warranties – Commentary on Key Pest Ltd & Anor v Walsh [2025] IEHC 415 1. Introduction Key Pest Limited and its associated...
The “McDonagh Principle”: Actual Serious Harm Elevates Robbery to Category B1 Regardless of Foreseeability

The “McDonagh Principle”: Actual Serious Harm Elevates Robbery to Category B1 Regardless of Foreseeability

Date: Jul 2, 2025
The “McDonagh Principle”: Actual Serious Harm Elevates Robbery to Category B1 Regardless of Foreseeability 1. Introduction McDonagh, R v ([2025] EWCA Crim 953) is a Court of Appeal (Criminal...
The Ahmed Principle: Extending the “Actual-Harm” Test to Firearms Offences within the Sentencing Guidelines

The Ahmed Principle: Extending the “Actual-Harm” Test to Firearms Offences within the Sentencing Guidelines

Date: Jul 2, 2025
The Ahmed Principle: Extending the “Actual-Harm” Test to Firearms Offences within the Sentencing Guidelines 1. Introduction Ahmed, R. v ([2025] EWCA Crim 943) concerns an application for leave to...
Expanding “Abuse of Trust” in Sentencing: The Precedential Effect of R v Glover-Stuart ([2025] EWCA Crim 1013)

Expanding “Abuse of Trust” in Sentencing: The Precedential Effect of R v Glover-Stuart ([2025] EWCA Crim 1013)

Date: Jul 2, 2025
Expanding “Abuse of Trust” in Sentencing: The Precedential Effect of R v Glover-Stuart ([2025] EWCA Crim 1013) 1. Introduction The Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) in R v Glover-Stuart addressed a...

        R v Clark [2025] EWCA Crim 931 – Disposal of the Weapon as an Independent Aggravating Factor and Administrative
        Correction of Youth Sentencing Defects

R v Clark [2025] EWCA Crim 931 – Disposal of the Weapon as an Independent Aggravating Factor and Administrative Correction of Youth Sentencing Defects

Date: Jul 2, 2025
R v Clark [2025] EWCA Crim 931 Disposal of the Weapon as an Independent Aggravating Factor and Administrative Correction of Youth Sentencing Defects Introduction R v Clark is a renewed application...
The “Semen-Analysis” Distinction: High Court Clarifies When Laboratory Testing Crosses the Line into Veterinary Diagnosis

The “Semen-Analysis” Distinction: High Court Clarifies When Laboratory Testing Crosses the Line into Veterinary Diagnosis

Date: Jul 2, 2025
The “Semen-Analysis” Distinction: High Court Clarifies When Laboratory Testing Crosses the Line into Veterinary Diagnosis 1. Introduction Veterinary Council of Ireland v Beavon ([2025] IEHC 387)...
Wolinska v. Commissioner of An Garda Síochána: A Refined Test for Balancing Public-Interest and Legal-Advice Privilege in Malicious-Prosecution Discovery

Wolinska v. Commissioner of An Garda Síochána: A Refined Test for Balancing Public-Interest and Legal-Advice Privilege in Malicious-Prosecution Discovery

Date: Jul 2, 2025
Wolinska v. Commissioner of An Garda Síochána & Ors – A Refined Test for Balancing Public-Interest and Legal-Advice Privilege in Malicious-Prosecution Discovery 1. Introduction The High Court of...
Hybrid Habitual Residence & Influenced Objections: The A.X. v. R.X. Clarification

Hybrid Habitual Residence & Influenced Objections: The A.X. v. R.X. Clarification

Date: Jul 2, 2025
Hybrid Habitual Residence & Influenced Objections: The A.X. v. R.X. Clarification 1. Introduction A.X. v. R.X. ([2025] IEHC 432) is a High Court of Ireland decision arising from the second set of...

Doctrine of Finality Prevails: Kennedy J Limits the Use of “Parallel” Plenary Proceedings to Stall Bankruptcy – A Commentary on Doherty v Blessville UnLtd Company [2025] IEHC 368

Doctrine of Finality Prevails: Kennedy J Limits the Use of “Parallel” Plenary Proceedings to Stall Bankruptcy – A Commentary on Doherty v Blessville UnLtd Company [2025] IEHC 368

Date: Jul 1, 2025
Doctrine of Finality Prevails: Kennedy J Limits the Use of “Parallel” Plenary Proceedings to Stall Bankruptcy Commentary on Doherty v Blessville UnLtd Company [2025] IEHC 368 1. Introduction Doherty...
Stewart v R ([2025] NICA 36):  The “Residual-Jurisdiction” Ceiling – Finality, Fresh Evidence and Late Sentence Appeals

Stewart v R ([2025] NICA 36): The “Residual-Jurisdiction” Ceiling – Finality, Fresh Evidence and Late Sentence Appeals

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Stewart v R ([2025] NICA 36): The “Residual-Jurisdiction” Ceiling – Finality, Fresh Evidence and Late Sentence Appeals Introduction Hazel Stewart’s notoriety stems from her conviction in 2011 for the...
“Sheridan v Glasgow” and the Outer House’s Re-Drawing of the Supervisory Boundary for Pre-Contractual Employment Decisions

“Sheridan v Glasgow” and the Outer House’s Re-Drawing of the Supervisory Boundary for Pre-Contractual Employment Decisions

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“Sheridan v Glasgow” and the Outer House’s Re-Drawing of the Supervisory Boundary for Pre-Contractual Employment Decisions 1. Introduction The decision of Lord Young in Petition of Thomas Sheridan...
“Sarwar v Phlo Technologies”: The Objective-Conduct Test for Implied Waiver & Personal Bar in Scots Company Law

“Sarwar v Phlo Technologies”: The Objective-Conduct Test for Implied Waiver & Personal Bar in Scots Company Law

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“Sarwar v Phlo Technologies”: The Objective-Conduct Test for Implied Waiver & Personal Bar in Scots Company Law 1. Introduction In Nadeem Sarwar v Phlo Technologies Ltd & Ors ([2025] CSOH 55) Lord...
The “Frontier-Science” Threshold: Campbell (aka Norris) v R ([2025] EWCA Crim 795)

The “Frontier-Science” Threshold: Campbell (aka Norris) v R ([2025] EWCA Crim 795)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
The “Frontier-Science” Threshold: Campbell (aka Norris) v R ([2025] EWCA Crim 795) 1. Introduction Campbell (formerly Colin Norris) was convicted in 2008 of murdering four elderly hospital patients...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert