Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

sienkiewicz-v-greif-(uk)-ltd:-upholding-the-fairchild-barker-exception-and-rejecting-the-& Case Commentaries


LZLabs v IBM: Contractual Bars Trump Software-Directive Defences – A High Hurdle for Fact–Heavy TCC Appeals

LZLabs v IBM: Contractual Bars Trump Software-Directive Defences – A High Hurdle for Fact–Heavy TCC Appeals

Date: Jul 8, 2025
LZLabs v IBM: Contractual Bars Trump Software-Directive Defences – A High Hurdle for Fact-Heavy TCC Appeals 1. Introduction LZLabs GmbH & Others v IBM UK Ltd ([2025] EWCA Civ 842) is the Court of...
Beyond Habeas Corpus: High Court Clarifies the Scope of the Article 40.4 Court-Fee Exemption

Beyond Habeas Corpus: High Court Clarifies the Scope of the Article 40.4 Court-Fee Exemption

Date: Jul 8, 2025
Beyond Habeas Corpus: High Court Clarifies the Scope of the Article 40.4 Court-Fee Exemption 1. Introduction In McGreal v Concannon & Brown and McGreal v Courts Service Staff & Ors ([2025] IEHC 425)...
Ellis v Secretary of State for Justice: Re-Affirming the “Very Essence” Test for Prisoners’ Right to Education and Curbing Rolling Judicial Review

Ellis v Secretary of State for Justice: Re-Affirming the “Very Essence” Test for Prisoners’ Right to Education and Curbing Rolling Judicial Review

Date: Jul 5, 2025
Ellis v Secretary of State for Justice: Re-Affirming the “Very Essence” Test for Prisoners’ Right to Education and Curbing Rolling Judicial Review 1. Introduction In Ellis, R (On the Application Of)...
Preserving Zambrano Carers’ Entry Rights: Ahmad v SSHD and the Continued Availability of EEA Family Permits for Pre-Transition Applications

Preserving Zambrano Carers’ Entry Rights: Ahmad v SSHD and the Continued Availability of EEA Family Permits for Pre-Transition Applications

Date: Jul 5, 2025
Preserving Zambrano Carers’ Entry Rights: Ahmad v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2025] EWCA Civ 829) Introduction Ahmad v Secretary of State for the Home Department consolidates two...

    Shulman v. City of Edinburgh Council (2025):  Affirming Broad Local-Authority Discretion over Long-Term-Empty Council-Tax Discounts and the High Threshold for Tribunal Appeals

Shulman v. City of Edinburgh Council (2025): Affirming Broad Local-Authority Discretion over Long-Term-Empty Council-Tax Discounts and the High Threshold for Tribunal Appeals

Date: Jul 5, 2025
Shulman v. City of Edinburgh Council (Upper Tribunal – Local Taxation Chamber, 2025): Affirming Broad Local-Authority Discretion over Long-Term-Empty Council-Tax Discounts and the High Threshold for...
Re HMP (CA): Defining the Outer Limits of the Open-Justice Principle in Post-Care Proceedings

Re HMP (CA): Defining the Outer Limits of the Open-Justice Principle in Post-Care Proceedings

Date: Jul 5, 2025
Re HMP (CA): Defining the Outer Limits of the Open-Justice Principle in Post-Care Proceedings Introduction Re HMP ([2025] EWCA Civ 824) confronted the perennial tension between the press’ pursuit of...
Avoiding “Free Crimes”: Consecutive Sentencing and Headline Tariffs for Domestically-Aggravated Attempted Murder – Commentary on HMA v Budge [2025] HCJAC 27

Avoiding “Free Crimes”: Consecutive Sentencing and Headline Tariffs for Domestically-Aggravated Attempted Murder – Commentary on HMA v Budge [2025] HCJAC 27

Date: Jul 5, 2025
Avoiding “Free Crimes”: Consecutive Sentencing and Headline Tariffs for Domestically-Aggravated Attempted Murder – Commentary on HMA v Budge [2025] HCJAC 27 1. Introduction In HM Advocate v Budge the...
Reaffirming the Limits of Parity: Budhia v R and the “Totality Adjustment” for Co-Defendants Already Serving Sentences

Reaffirming the Limits of Parity: Budhia v R and the “Totality Adjustment” for Co-Defendants Already Serving Sentences

Date: Jul 5, 2025
Reaffirming the Limits of Parity: Budhia v R ([2025] EWCA Crim 818) and the “Totality Adjustment” for Co-Defendants Already Serving Sentences Introduction Budhia v R constitutes a significant Court...
The Essential-vs-Desirable Test for Sibling Contact Orders: Commentary on Re S (Placement Order Contact) [2025] EWCA Civ 823

The Essential-vs-Desirable Test for Sibling Contact Orders: Commentary on Re S (Placement Order Contact) [2025] EWCA Civ 823

Date: Jul 5, 2025
The Essential-vs-Desirable Test for Sibling Contact Orders: Commentary on Re S (Placement Order Contact) [2025] EWCA Civ 823 Introduction Re S (Placement Order Contact) is the Court of Appeal’s most...
Saipem SPA & Ors v Petrofac Ltd & Anor – Market-Tested Fairness as a Pre-Condition for New-Money Rewards under Part 26A

Saipem SPA & Ors v Petrofac Ltd & Anor – Market-Tested Fairness as a Pre-Condition for New-Money Rewards under Part 26A

Date: Jul 5, 2025
Saipem SPA & Ors v Petrofac Ltd & Anor Market-Tested Fairness as a Pre-Condition for New-Money Rewards under Part 26A Introduction This Court of Appeal decision ([2025] EWCA Civ 821) arises from an...
“Smith Clarification” – Proper Structuring of Post-Release Driving Disqualifications and the Totality Principle

“Smith Clarification” – Proper Structuring of Post-Release Driving Disqualifications and the Totality Principle

Date: Jul 5, 2025
“Smith Clarification” – Proper Structuring of Post-Release Driving Disqualifications and the Totality Principle Introduction In Smith, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 978 the Court of Appeal (Criminal...
Erosion of the Strike-Out Distinction & Clarification of Ministerial Non-Liability for Court Language Facilities – Commentary on O Cadhla v. An tAire Dlí agus Cirt & Ors

Erosion of the Strike-Out Distinction & Clarification of Ministerial Non-Liability for Court Language Facilities – Commentary on O Cadhla v. An tAire Dlí agus Cirt & Ors

Date: Jul 5, 2025
Erosion of the Strike-Out Distinction & Clarification of Ministerial Non-Liability for Court Language Facilities Comprehensive Commentary on O Cadhla v. An tAire Dlí agus Cirt agus Comhionannais &...
R v Pearl: The Identifiable-Risk Benchmark for Tailoring Sexual Harm Prevention Orders

R v Pearl: The Identifiable-Risk Benchmark for Tailoring Sexual Harm Prevention Orders

Date: Jul 5, 2025
R v Pearl: The Identifiable-Risk Benchmark for Tailoring Sexual Harm Prevention Orders 1. Introduction The Court of Appeal’s decision in Pearl, R v ([2025] EWCA Crim 994) revisits the principles...
The O’Grady Principle: When Clear Notice and an Unequivocal Waiver Cure Pre-Trial Counsel Difficulties in European Arrest Warrant “Trial-in-Absentia” Cases

The O’Grady Principle: When Clear Notice and an Unequivocal Waiver Cure Pre-Trial Counsel Difficulties in European Arrest Warrant “Trial-in-Absentia” Cases

Date: Jul 5, 2025
The O’Grady Principle: When Clear Notice and an Unequivocal Waiver Cure Pre-Trial Counsel Difficulties in European Arrest Warrant “Trial-in-Absentia” Cases 1. Introduction Minister for Justice v...
Elezi ([2025] EWCA Crim 964):  The “Incommensurability Principle” in Sentence Appeals for Kidnap and False Imprisonment

Elezi ([2025] EWCA Crim 964): The “Incommensurability Principle” in Sentence Appeals for Kidnap and False Imprisonment

Date: Jul 5, 2025
Elezi ([2025] EWCA Crim 964): Re-affirming the “Incommensurability Principle” in Sentence Appeals for Kidnap and False Imprisonment 1. Introduction In R v Elezi ([2025] EWCA Crim 964) the Court of...
From “Snapshot Habitability” to “Fundamental Characteristics”: The Court of Appeal’s Definitive Test for SDLT Residential Status

From “Snapshot Habitability” to “Fundamental Characteristics”: The Court of Appeal’s Definitive Test for SDLT Residential Status

Date: Jul 4, 2025
From “Snapshot Habitability” to “Fundamental Characteristics”: The Court of Appeal’s Definitive Test for SDLT Residential Status 1. Introduction Mudan & Anor v Revenue and Customs ([2025] EWCA Civ...
Standish v Standish – The Supreme Court Confines the Sharing Principle to Matrimonial Property and Re-defines “Matrimonialisation”

Standish v Standish – The Supreme Court Confines the Sharing Principle to Matrimonial Property and Re-defines “Matrimonialisation”

Date: Jul 4, 2025
Standish v Standish – The Supreme Court Confines the Sharing Principle to Matrimonial Property and Re-defines “Matrimonialisation” 1. Introduction Standish v Standish ([2025] UKSC 26) is the most...
Beyond Central Management and Control: Court of Appeal Clarifies “Place of Effective Management” as an Autonomous Tie-Breaker for Dual-Resident Trusts

Beyond Central Management and Control: Court of Appeal Clarifies “Place of Effective Management” as an Autonomous Tie-Breaker for Dual-Resident Trusts

Date: Jul 4, 2025
Beyond Central Management and Control: Court of Appeal Clarifies “Place of Effective Management” as an Autonomous Tie-Breaker for Dual-Resident Trusts 1. Introduction In Haworth & Ors v Commissioners...
“Any Person” May Request a Highway Crossover – The New Rule in Anwar v London Borough of Ealing Council [2025] EWCA Civ 813

“Any Person” May Request a Highway Crossover – The New Rule in Anwar v London Borough of Ealing Council [2025] EWCA Civ 813

Date: Jul 4, 2025
“Any Person” May Request a Highway Crossover – The New Rule in Anwar v London Borough of Ealing Council [2025] EWCA Civ 813 Introduction The Court of Appeal’s decision in Anwar v London Borough of...
White v 29 Buckland Crescent MCL: Settlement-Based Release Bars Subsequent Forfeiture Claims

White v 29 Buckland Crescent MCL: Settlement-Based Release Bars Subsequent Forfeiture Claims

Date: Jul 4, 2025
White v 29 Buckland Crescent Management Company Ltd ([2025] EWCA Civ 814) New Principle: Where a settlement agreement contains a broad mutual release and a narrowly drafted carve-out, the landlord is...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert