Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Passage of Time as a Standalone Ground for Dismissal: High Court applies Kirwan’s five‑year inactivity rule and clarifies what counts as a “step in the proceedings” Introduction This commentary...
“All Just Claims” Means What It Says: High Court Clarifies Receivers’ Duties Under Equitable Execution to Account for Third‑Party Proprietary Interests Introduction In Massey & Ors v Kennedy & Ors...
Unpleaded Climate Points Cannot Be Certified; EIA Does Not Require State‑Wide Cumulative Traffic GHG Assessment — Commentary on Friends of Killymooney Lough v An Coimisiún Pleanála (No. 2) [2025]...
Contractual Estoppel from Settlement Recitals Bars Post‑Settlement Challenges to Mortgagee’s Power of Sale Commentary on Donlon & Anor v Promontoria (Aran) Ltd & Ors [2025] IEHC 568 (High Court,...
O’Pray v R: Maturity Discounts for Young Adults and s.322 Uplifts to Murder Minimum Terms Clarified Introduction This commentary examines the decision of the England and Wales Court of Appeal...
No Bad Faith in Pressing for Preferred FRAND Forum Absent Legitimate Objection: ‘First Seised’ Not Determinative and Interim Licences Should Be Jurisdiction‑Neutral Case: Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd...
“Necessary in the Interests of Justice”: Supreme Court sets the framework for non‑party access to court audio records, notice to victims, and limits on dissemination — Smith v DPP (30 October 2025)...
Smith v The Director of Public Prosecutions [2025] IESC 42: Conditional, Purpose‑Limited Access to Court Audio and Transcripts under Order 123—No “Direct Line” from Open Justice to Record Access...
Ambulatory Defined Terms and Deferred Consideration: “Reduction/Release” of a Zone of Influence—not Mere Permission—Triggers Payment; Rectification Requires a Proved Outward Accord Introduction In...
Consequences, Not Formalism: Return-Date Omission Not Fatal to Parliamentary Election Petitions; Retrospective Validation of Service Under CPR 6.15(2) Permitted Case: Moore v Royal Mail Group Ltd &...
Re D (Threshold Findings and Final Orders at IRH): No “Deemed Proof” of Threshold — Court of Appeal mandates express s.31(2) findings and adequate reasons; Standard Form Orders para 148 to be...
Late-stage amendments adding new professional negligence claims refused absent expert evidence and where limitation and prejudice concerns arise Introduction In Lunney & Anor v Canny & Anor...
R v L: High Court reaffirms MN/Kemmy approach—Personal Injuries Guidelines inapplicable to child sexual abuse damages; exemplary damages affirmed and costs measured in default Case: R v L (Approved)...
R v BVA [2025] EWCA Crim 1359: Covert filming integral to the sexual act can vitiate consent under section 74 SOA 2003 Court: Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), 29 October 2025 Introduction This...
Wilson v HB (SWA) Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 1360: Schedules of Loss cannot expand the pleadings; in agreed no‑cost remediation cases only residual “blight” is potentially recoverable Introduction This...
From Tick‑Boxes to Evidence: Court of Appeal clarifies COBS 3.5 assessments and requires the FOS to consider contributory negligence where client misstatements enable access to high‑risk CFD...
K‑H (Children) (Care Orders: Proportionality): Proven Facts, Not Suspicions — Re‑centering Risk and Proportionality in Public Law Care Decisions Citation: [2025] EWCA Civ 1368 Court: Court of Appeal...
Only Binding Law Creates a “Special Legal Regime” for Article 13 PVD; Non‑Taxation of NHS Hospital Parking Significantly Distorts Competition Introduction In Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation...
Excess Domestic Custody Alone Is Not Oppressive: Broad-Fairness Review of Section 14 and High Threshold for Article 3 Mental-Health Objections in Extradition Case: Appeal under section 26 of the...
No Implied Anti‑Whip Rule in Article 12: Council Nomination Votes for the Presidency Are Political and Non‑Justiciable — Stack v The Attorney General & Ors [2025] IEHC 561 Court: High Court of...