Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

United Kingdom Case Commentaries

The Extent of Witness Immunity in Criminal Proceedings: A Comprehensive Analysis of Darker and Others v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police (2000) UKHL 44

The Extent of Witness Immunity in Criminal Proceedings: A Comprehensive Analysis of Darker and Others v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police (2000) UKHL 44

Date: Jul 28, 2000
The Extent of Witness Immunity in Criminal Proceedings: A Comprehensive Analysis of Darker and Others v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police ([2000] UKHL 44) Introduction The case of Darker and...
Reaffirming Direct Loss Principles in Contractual Damages: A Detailed Analysis of Alfred McAlpine Construction Ltd v Panatown Ltd

Reaffirming Direct Loss Principles in Contractual Damages: A Detailed Analysis of Alfred McAlpine Construction Ltd v Panatown Ltd

Date: Jul 28, 2000
Reaffirming Direct Loss Principles in Contractual Damages: A Detailed Analysis of Alfred McAlpine Construction Ltd v Panatown Ltd Introduction Alfred McAlpine Construction Limited v. Panatown Limited...
State Immunity in Defamation Claims: The Precedent Set by Holland v. Lampen-Wolfe

State Immunity in Defamation Claims: The Precedent Set by Holland v. Lampen-Wolfe

Date: Jul 21, 2000
State Immunity in Defamation Claims: The Precedent Set by Holland v. Lampen-Wolfe Introduction Holland v. Lampen-Wolfe ([2000] 1 WLR 1573) is a landmark judgment delivered by the United Kingdom House...
Defining Patent Infringement: Making vs. Repair in United Wire Ltd v. Screen Repair Services

Defining Patent Infringement: Making vs. Repair in United Wire Ltd v. Screen Repair Services

Date: Jul 21, 2000
Defining Patent Infringement: Making vs. Repair in United Wire Ltd v. Screen Repair Services Introduction The case of United Wire Limited v. Screen Repair Services (Scotland) Limited and Another and...
Lubbe and Others v. Cape Plc: Establishing the Duty of Care for Parent Companies in Forum Non Conveniens Context

Lubbe and Others v. Cape Plc: Establishing the Duty of Care for Parent Companies in Forum Non Conveniens Context

Date: Jul 21, 2000
Lubbe and Others v. Cape Plc: Establishing the Duty of Care for Parent Companies in Forum Non Conveniens Context Introduction The case of Lubbe and Others v. Cape Plc ([2000] WLR 1545) represents a...
House of Lords Rules Against Differential Bonuses Undermining Guaranteed Annuity Rates: Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Hyman [2000] UKHL 39

House of Lords Rules Against Differential Bonuses Undermining Guaranteed Annuity Rates: Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Hyman [2000] UKHL 39

Date: Jul 21, 2000
House of Lords Rules Against Differential Bonuses Undermining Guaranteed Annuity Rates Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Hyman [2000] UKHL 39 Introduction The case of Equitable Life Assurance...
Arthur J.S Hall & Co. v. Simons and Barratt v. Ansell and Others: Re-examining Advocate Immunity in Civil and Criminal Proceedings

Arthur J.S Hall & Co. v. Simons and Barratt v. Ansell and Others: Re-examining Advocate Immunity in Civil and Criminal Proceedings

Date: Jul 21, 2000
Arthur J.S Hall & Co. v. Simons and Barratt v. Ansell and Others: Re-examining Advocate Immunity in Civil and Criminal Proceedings Introduction The case of Arthur J.S Hall & Co. v. Simons alongside...
Robinson v. The Post Office: Time Limitations in Employment Discrimination Claims

Robinson v. The Post Office: Time Limitations in Employment Discrimination Claims

Date: Jul 13, 2000
Robinson v. The Post Office: Time Limitations in Employment Discrimination Claims Introduction Robinson v. The Post Office ([2000] UKEAT 1209_99_1207) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Extension of Reasonable Time Guarantee to Appellate Proceedings under Section 10(1) of the Constitution of Mauritius

Extension of Reasonable Time Guarantee to Appellate Proceedings under Section 10(1) of the Constitution of Mauritius

Date: Jul 11, 2000
Extension of Reasonable Time Guarantee to Appellate Proceedings under Section 10(1) of the Constitution of Mauritius Introduction Darmalingum v. The State (Mauritius) [2000] UKPC 30 is a landmark...
Beedell v. West Ferry Printers Ltd: Reinforcing the Band of Reasonable Responses in Unfair Dismissal Cases

Beedell v. West Ferry Printers Ltd: Reinforcing the Band of Reasonable Responses in Unfair Dismissal Cases

Date: Jul 8, 2000
Beedell v. West Ferry Printers Ltd: Reinforcing the Band of Reasonable Responses in Unfair Dismissal Cases Introduction Beedell v. West Ferry Printers Ltd ([2000] UKEAT 135_00_0707) is a pivotal case...
Enforcing Environmental Impact Assessment Obligations: Precedent Set in Berkeley v. Secretary of State for the Environment

Enforcing Environmental Impact Assessment Obligations: Precedent Set in Berkeley v. Secretary of State for the Environment

Date: Jul 7, 2000
Enforcing Environmental Impact Assessment Obligations: Precedent Set in Berkeley v. Secretary of State for the Environment Introduction Berkeley v. Secretary of State for the Environment and Others...
Horvath v. Secretary of State For The Home Department: Defining Persecution and State Protection in Refugee Law

Horvath v. Secretary of State For The Home Department: Defining Persecution and State Protection in Refugee Law

Date: Jul 7, 2000
Horvath v. Secretary of State For The Home Department: Defining Persecution and State Protection in Refugee Law Introduction In the landmark case of Horvath v. Secretary of State For The Home...
Compensation for Injuriously Affected Land: House of Lords Establishes Key Precedents in Wildtree Hotels Ltd v Harrow

Compensation for Injuriously Affected Land: House of Lords Establishes Key Precedents in Wildtree Hotels Ltd v Harrow

Date: Jun 23, 2000
Compensation for Injuriously Affected Land: House of Lords Establishes Key Precedents in Wildtree Hotels Ltd v Harrow Introduction The case of Wildtree Hotels Ltd & Others v. London Borough of Harrow...
Admissibility of Similar Fact Evidence in Rape Cases: Insights from Z, R. v ([2000] 2 Cr App Rep 281)

Admissibility of Similar Fact Evidence in Rape Cases: Insights from Z, R. v ([2000] 2 Cr App Rep 281)

Date: Jun 23, 2000
Admissibility of Similar Fact Evidence in Rape Cases: Insights from Z, R. v ([2000] 2 Cr App Rep 281) Introduction The case of Z, R. v ([2000] 2 Cr App Rep 281) adjudicated by the United Kingdom...
Goodes v. East Sussex County Council: Clarifying the Scope of Highway Maintenance Duties

Goodes v. East Sussex County Council: Clarifying the Scope of Highway Maintenance Duties

Date: Jun 16, 2000
Goodes v. East Sussex County Council: Clarifying the Scope of Highway Maintenance Duties Introduction Goodes v. East Sussex County Council ([2000] 1 WLR 1356) is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
Defining Extraditable Offenses: Full Custodial Sentences and Supervised Release in Burke [2000] UKHL 35

Defining Extraditable Offenses: Full Custodial Sentences and Supervised Release in Burke [2000] UKHL 35

Date: Jun 16, 2000
Defining Extraditable Offenses: Full Custodial Sentences and Supervised Release in Burke [2000] UKHL 35 Introduction The case of Burke, In re [2000] UKHL 35 represents a pivotal moment in the...
Reinterpreting Knowledge in Disability Discrimination: London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham v. Farnsworth [2000] IRLR 691

Reinterpreting Knowledge in Disability Discrimination: London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham v. Farnsworth [2000] IRLR 691

Date: Jun 16, 2000
Reinterpreting Knowledge in Disability Discrimination: London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham v. Farnsworth [2000] IRLR 691 Introduction The case of London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham v....
Admissibility of Foreign-Obtained Intercept Evidence Under the Human Rights Act: R v P & Ors

Admissibility of Foreign-Obtained Intercept Evidence Under the Human Rights Act: R v P & Ors

Date: Jun 9, 2000
Admissibility of Foreign-Obtained Intercept Evidence Under the Human Rights Act: R v P & Ors ([2001] 2 All ER 58) Introduction The case of R v P & Ors ([2001] 2 All ER 58) is a landmark judgment...
Vento Factors: Defining Comparator Selection in Employment Discrimination Claims

Vento Factors: Defining Comparator Selection in Employment Discrimination Claims

Date: Jun 9, 2000
Vento Factors: Defining Comparator Selection in Employment Discrimination Claims Introduction The case of Chief Constable of West Yorkshire v. Vento ([2001] IRLR 124) is a seminal decision in the...
Defining Capital Gains Tax Consideration for Option Agreements: Insights from Garner v. Pounds Shipowners & Shipbreakers Ltd [2000] UKHL TC_72_561

Defining Capital Gains Tax Consideration for Option Agreements: Insights from Garner v. Pounds Shipowners & Shipbreakers Ltd [2000] UKHL TC_72_561

Date: May 19, 2000
Defining Capital Gains Tax Consideration for Option Agreements: Insights from Garner v. Pounds Shipowners & Shipbreakers Ltd [2000] UKHL TC_72_561 Introduction The case of Garner (H.M. Inspector of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert