Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

United Kingdom Case Commentaries

Balancing Fair Trial Rights and Public Interest: Insights from Flowers v. The Queen (Jamaica) [2000] UKPC 41

Balancing Fair Trial Rights and Public Interest: Insights from Flowers v. The Queen (Jamaica) [2000] UKPC 41

Date: Oct 31, 2000
Balancing Fair Trial Rights and Public Interest: Insights from Flowers v. The Queen (Jamaica) [2000] UKPC 41 Introduction Flowers v. The Queen (Jamaica) [2000] UKPC 41 is a landmark case adjudicated...
Cadogan Estates Limited v. McMahon [2000] UKHL 52: Clarifying Obligations in Statutory Tenancies

Cadogan Estates Limited v. McMahon [2000] UKHL 52: Clarifying Obligations in Statutory Tenancies

Date: Oct 27, 2000
Cadogan Estates Limited v. McMahon [2000] UKHL 52: Clarifying Obligations in Statutory Tenancies Introduction Cadogan Estates Limited v. McMahon ([2000] UKHL 52) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
White v. White: Establishing Equality as the Starting Point in Matrimonial Asset Division

White v. White: Establishing Equality as the Starting Point in Matrimonial Asset Division

Date: Oct 27, 2000
White v. White: Establishing Equality as the Starting Point in Matrimonial Asset Division Introduction White v. White ([2001] 1 All ER 1) is a landmark judgment delivered by the United Kingdom House...
Hinks v. R (2000): Establishing Precedent on Appropriation and Theft under the Theft Act 1968

Hinks v. R (2000): Establishing Precedent on Appropriation and Theft under the Theft Act 1968

Date: Oct 27, 2000
Hinks v. R (2000): Establishing Precedent on Appropriation and Theft under the Theft Act 1968 Introduction Hinks v. R ([2000] UKHL 53; [2000] 3 WLR 1590) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Ensuring Fair Trials Amidst Pre-Trial Publicity: Insights from Montgomery v. Her Majesty's Advocate

Ensuring Fair Trials Amidst Pre-Trial Publicity: Insights from Montgomery v. Her Majesty's Advocate

Date: Oct 20, 2000
Ensuring Fair Trials Amidst Pre-Trial Publicity: Insights from Montgomery v. Her Majesty's Advocate Introduction The case of Montgomery & Ors v. Her Majesty's Advocate and The Advocate General for...
Employment Appeal Tribunal in Abadeh v. British Telecommunications Plc Establishes Principles for Assessing Substantial Adverse Effects and Medical Evidence in Disability Discrimination Cases

Employment Appeal Tribunal in Abadeh v. British Telecommunications Plc Establishes Principles for Assessing Substantial Adverse Effects and Medical Evidence in Disability Discrimination Cases

Date: Oct 20, 2000
Employment Appeal Tribunal in Abadeh v. British Telecommunications Plc Establishes Principles for Assessing Substantial Adverse Effects and Medical Evidence in Disability Discrimination Cases...
Defining "Sued": Jurisdictional Clarifications Under the Lugano Convention in Canada Trust Co. v. Stolzenberg and Gamba

Defining "Sued": Jurisdictional Clarifications Under the Lugano Convention in Canada Trust Co. v. Stolzenberg and Gamba

Date: Oct 13, 2000
Defining "Sued": Jurisdictional Clarifications Under the Lugano Convention in Canada Trust Co. v. Stolzenberg and Gamba Introduction Canada Trust Company v. Stolzenberg and Gamba ([2000] UKHL 51) is...
Clarifying Disability Under the DDA 1995: Insights from Leonard v. Southern Derbyshire Chamber of Commerce

Clarifying Disability Under the DDA 1995: Insights from Leonard v. Southern Derbyshire Chamber of Commerce

Date: Oct 11, 2000
Clarifying Disability Under the DDA 1995: Insights from Leonard v. Southern Derbyshire Chamber of Commerce Introduction Leonard v. Southern Derbyshire Chamber of Commerce ([2001] IRLR 19) is a...
Limitations on Human Rights Appeals for Pre-October 2000 Asylum Decisions

Limitations on Human Rights Appeals for Pre-October 2000 Asylum Decisions

Date: Oct 7, 2000
Limitations on Human Rights Appeals for Pre-October 2000 Asylum Decisions Introduction The case of Selvaratnam Pardeepan, a Sri Lankan Tamil, presents a pivotal examination of the interplay between...
Constructive Dismissal as Detriment under the Race Relations Act 1976: Insights from Derby Specialist Fabrication Ltd v Burton

Constructive Dismissal as Detriment under the Race Relations Act 1976: Insights from Derby Specialist Fabrication Ltd v Burton

Date: Sep 29, 2000
Constructive Dismissal as Detriment under the Race Relations Act 1976: Insights from Derby Specialist Fabrication Ltd v Burton Introduction Derby Specialist Fabrication Ltd v. Burton ([2001] IRLR 69)...
Enhanced Protection Against Maternity-Related Discrimination in Employee Loyalty Schemes

Enhanced Protection Against Maternity-Related Discrimination in Employee Loyalty Schemes

Date: Sep 28, 2000
Enhanced Protection Against Maternity-Related Discrimination in Employee Loyalty Schemes: GUS Home Shopping Ltd v. Green & Anor Introduction The case of GUS Home Shopping Ltd v. Green & Anor ([2001]...
Expanded Interpretation of 'Sex' under the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 to Include Sexual Orientation: Macdonald v Ministry of Defence ([2001] 1 All ER 620)

Expanded Interpretation of 'Sex' under the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 to Include Sexual Orientation: Macdonald v Ministry of Defence ([2001] 1 All ER 620)

Date: Sep 20, 2000
Expanded Interpretation of 'Sex' under the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 to Include Sexual Orientation Introduction The case of Macdonald v. Ministry of Defence ([2001] 1 All ER 620) addresses...
Enhancing Procedural Fairness in Mercy Petitions: The Lewis v Attorney General of Jamaica Decision

Enhancing Procedural Fairness in Mercy Petitions: The Lewis v Attorney General of Jamaica Decision

Date: Sep 13, 2000
Enhancing Procedural Fairness in Mercy Petitions: The Lewis v Attorney General of Jamaica Decision Introduction The landmark case of Lewis, Patrick Taylor and Anthony McLeod, Christopher Brown,...
Recognition of UNMIK and KFOR as National Protection under the Refugee Convention: Implications from STARRED FD (2000)

Recognition of UNMIK and KFOR as National Protection under the Refugee Convention: Implications from STARRED FD (2000)

Date: Aug 31, 2000
Recognition of UNMIK and KFOR as National Protection under the Refugee Convention: Implications from STARRED FD (2000) Introduction The case of STARRED FD (Protection, UNMIK, Arif, IFA, Art1D)...
Smith v Regina: Clarifying the Reasonable Man Test in Provocation under the Homicide Act 1957

Smith v Regina: Clarifying the Reasonable Man Test in Provocation under the Homicide Act 1957

Date: Jul 28, 2000
Smith v Regina: Clarifying the Reasonable Man Test in Provocation under the Homicide Act 1957 Introduction Smith v Regina ([2001] 1 AC 146) is a landmark judgment delivered by the United Kingdom...
Phelps v. London Borough of Hillingdon and Others: Establishing Duty of Care in Education

Phelps v. London Borough of Hillingdon and Others: Establishing Duty of Care in Education

Date: Jul 28, 2000
Phelps v. London Borough of Hillingdon and Others: Establishing Duty of Care in Education Introduction Phelps v. Mayor Etc. of The London Borough of Hillingdon, Anderton and Clwyd County Council, and...
Duty of Care in Police Employment: Waters v. Commissioner of Police For The Metropolis ([2000] UKHL 50)

Duty of Care in Police Employment: Waters v. Commissioner of Police For The Metropolis ([2000] UKHL 50)

Date: Jul 28, 2000
Duty of Care in Police Employment: Waters v. Commissioner of Police For The Metropolis ([2000] UKHL 50) Introduction Waters v. Commissioner of Police For The Metropolis ([2000] UKHL 50) is a landmark...
Strict Liability in False Imprisonment: Evans v. Governor of Brockhill Prison [2000] UKHL 48

Strict Liability in False Imprisonment: Evans v. Governor of Brockhill Prison [2000] UKHL 48

Date: Jul 28, 2000
Strict Liability in False Imprisonment: Evans v. Governor of Brockhill Prison [2000] UKHL 48 Introduction The case of Evans v. Governor of Brockhill Prison [2000] UKHL 48 represents a pivotal moment...
Attorney General v. Blake: Pioneering Restitutionary Damages for Contractual Breaches in Public Interest

Attorney General v. Blake: Pioneering Restitutionary Damages for Contractual Breaches in Public Interest

Date: Jul 28, 2000
Attorney General v. Blake: Pioneering Restitutionary Damages for Contractual Breaches in Public Interest Introduction Attorney General v. Blake and Another ([2000] 1 AC 268) is a landmark judgment...
Lafarge Redlands Aggregates v. Shephard Hill: Clarifying Arbitration Procedures in Subcontracting Relationships

Lafarge Redlands Aggregates v. Shephard Hill: Clarifying Arbitration Procedures in Subcontracting Relationships

Date: Jul 28, 2000
Lafarge Redlands Aggregates v. Shephard Hill: Clarifying Arbitration Procedures in Subcontracting Relationships Introduction The case of Lafarge Redlands Aggregates Limited v. Shephard Hill Civil...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert