Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

England and Wales Case Commentaries

Discretion to Decline Remittal in NMC Fitness to Practise Appeals: Proportionality, Purpose and Deference in The NMC v Ibrahim [2025] EWCA Civ 1631

Discretion to Decline Remittal in NMC Fitness to Practise Appeals: Proportionality, Purpose and Deference in The NMC v Ibrahim [2025] EWCA Civ 1631

Date: Dec 17, 2025
Discretion to Decline Remittal in NMC Fitness to Practise Appeals: Proportionality, Purpose and Deference in The Nursing and Midwifery Council v Ibrahim [2025] EWCA Civ 1631 1. Introduction The...
Interim Separation from Parents in Residential Assessments: C (A Child) [2025] EWCA Civ 1618 and the Duty to Undertake a Full Welfare Balancing Exercise

Interim Separation from Parents in Residential Assessments: C (A Child) [2025] EWCA Civ 1618 and the Duty to Undertake a Full Welfare Balancing Exercise

Date: Dec 17, 2025
Interim Separation from Parents in Residential Assessments: C (A Child) [2025] EWCA Civ 1618 and the Duty to Undertake a Full Welfare Balancing Exercise 1. Introduction The decision in C (A Child)...
Refurbished Branded Goods, Commercial Connection and the Limits of Trade Mark Exhaustion – Commentary on AGA Rangemaster Group Ltd v UK Innovations Group Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 1622

Refurbished Branded Goods, Commercial Connection and the Limits of Trade Mark Exhaustion – Commentary on AGA Rangemaster Group Ltd v UK Innovations Group Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 1622

Date: Dec 17, 2025
Refurbished Branded Goods, Commercial Connection and the Limits of Trade Mark Exhaustion: Commentary on AGA Rangemaster Group Ltd v UK Innovations Group Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 1622 1. Introduction This...
R v Cox [2025] EWCA Crim 1625: Sentencing Historic Sexual Abuse by Medical Professionals – Use of Modern Guidelines, Consecutive Sentences and Totality

R v Cox [2025] EWCA Crim 1625: Sentencing Historic Sexual Abuse by Medical Professionals – Use of Modern Guidelines, Consecutive Sentences and Totality

Date: Dec 15, 2025
R v Cox [2025] EWCA Crim 1625: Sentencing Historic Sexual Abuse by Medical Professionals – Use of Modern Guidelines, Consecutive Sentences and Totality 1. Introduction The decision in R v Cox [2025]...
Total Economic Consideration as “Amount Payable on the Transfer” in Gilt Strip Loss Relief: Commentary on Watts v HMRC [2025] EWCA Civ 1615

Total Economic Consideration as “Amount Payable on the Transfer” in Gilt Strip Loss Relief: Commentary on Watts v HMRC [2025] EWCA Civ 1615

Date: Dec 15, 2025
Total Economic Consideration as “Amount Payable on the Transfer” in Gilt Strip Loss Relief: Commentary on Watts v Revenue and Customs [2025] EWCA Civ 1615 1. Introduction The Court of Appeal’s...

    Re‑opening Criminal Injuries Compensation Awards for Psychiatric Harm:
    “Medical Condition” Does Not Include a Mere Change in Understanding –
    Commentary on LXR v First‑tier Tribunal (SEC) [2025] EWCA Civ 1608

Re‑opening Criminal Injuries Compensation Awards for Psychiatric Harm: “Medical Condition” Does Not Include a Mere Change in Understanding – Commentary on LXR v First‑tier Tribunal (SEC) [2025] EWCA Civ 1608

Date: Dec 15, 2025
Re‑opening Criminal Injuries Compensation Awards for Psychiatric Harm: “Medical Condition” Does Not Include a Mere Change in Understanding – Commentary on LXR, R (on the application of) v First‑tier...
Proprietary Estoppel as a Fifth “Exceptional Circumstance” for Syers Orders in Partnership Dissolutions: Commentary on Cobden v Cobden [2025] EWCA Civ 1612

Proprietary Estoppel as a Fifth “Exceptional Circumstance” for Syers Orders in Partnership Dissolutions: Commentary on Cobden v Cobden [2025] EWCA Civ 1612

Date: Dec 15, 2025
Proprietary Estoppel as a Fifth “Exceptional Circumstance” for Syers Orders in Partnership Dissolutions: Commentary on Cobden v Cobden [2025] EWCA Civ 1612 1. Introduction Cobden v Cobden is a...
Unlawful Act Manslaughter as a Substitute Verdict Where Murder is Quashed but Conspiracy to Rob Remains: Commentary on Gordon v R [2025] EWCA Crim 1611

Unlawful Act Manslaughter as a Substitute Verdict Where Murder is Quashed but Conspiracy to Rob Remains: Commentary on Gordon v R [2025] EWCA Crim 1611

Date: Dec 12, 2025
Unlawful Act Manslaughter as a Substitute Verdict Where Murder is Quashed but Conspiracy to Rob Remains: Commentary on Gordon v R [2025] EWCA Crim 1611 1. Introduction This commentary examines the...
Re B and the Limits of Acquiescence under the 1980 Hague Convention: Parental Intent, “Court Acquiescence” and Protective Measures

Re B and the Limits of Acquiescence under the 1980 Hague Convention: Parental Intent, “Court Acquiescence” and Protective Measures

Date: Dec 12, 2025
Re B and the Limits of Acquiescence under the 1980 Hague Convention: Parental Intent, “Court Acquiescence” and Protective Measures 1. Introduction This Court of Appeal decision in B, Re (1980 Hague...
Effective Group Relief Claims, Case 3 Distributions and the Reach of SDLT s.75A: Commentary on The Tower One St George Wharf Ltd v HMRC [2025] EWCA Civ 1588

Effective Group Relief Claims, Case 3 Distributions and the Reach of SDLT s.75A: Commentary on The Tower One St George Wharf Ltd v HMRC [2025] EWCA Civ 1588

Date: Dec 12, 2025
Effective Group Relief Claims, Case 3 Distributions and the Reach of SDLT s.75A Case: The Tower One St George Wharf Ltd v Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs [2025] EWCA Civ 1588...
Clear Non‑Contest Clauses and Waiver of Judicial Remedies in Cross‑Border Security Enforcement: Commentary on UNIK Bond SA v Catbalogan Holdings SARL [2025] EWCA Civ 1594

Clear Non‑Contest Clauses and Waiver of Judicial Remedies in Cross‑Border Security Enforcement: Commentary on UNIK Bond SA v Catbalogan Holdings SARL [2025] EWCA Civ 1594

Date: Dec 11, 2025
Clear Non‑Contest Clauses and Waiver of Judicial Remedies in Cross‑Border Security Enforcement Commentary on UNIK Bond SA v Catbalogan Holdings SARL [2025] EWCA Civ 1594 1. Introduction 1.1. The core...
No Service Charge Recovery for Pre‑Existing Structural Defects under Right‑to‑Buy Leases: Tower Hamlets v Brewster & Malting House Leaseholders

No Service Charge Recovery for Pre‑Existing Structural Defects under Right‑to‑Buy Leases: Tower Hamlets v Brewster & Malting House Leaseholders

Date: Dec 11, 2025
No Service Charge Recovery for Pre‑Existing Structural Defects under Right‑to‑Buy Leases Commentary on Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets v Various Leaseholders of Brewster...
Mather v Rattan: Reasonable Diligence, Reliance and Causation in Deceit

Mather v Rattan: Reasonable Diligence, Reliance and Causation in Deceit

Date: Dec 11, 2025
Mather v Rattan: Reasonable Diligence, Reliance and Causation in Deceit 1. Introduction The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mather v Rattan [2025] EWCA Civ 1596 refines and consolidates several...
Rehabilitation and the “Very Compelling Circumstances” Test under s.117C(6) NIAA: Commentary on Majera v SSHD [2025] EWCA Civ 1597

Rehabilitation and the “Very Compelling Circumstances” Test under s.117C(6) NIAA: Commentary on Majera v SSHD [2025] EWCA Civ 1597

Date: Dec 11, 2025
Rehabilitation and the “Very Compelling Circumstances” Test under s.117C(6) NIAA: Commentary on Majera v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2025] EWCA Civ 1597 1. Introduction This...
Real and Practical Entitlement to Possession: General Application of the Rossendale Principle in Non‑Domestic Rating – Commentary on Emeraldshaw Ltd v Sheffield Magistrates’ Court [2025] EWCA Civ 1601

Real and Practical Entitlement to Possession: General Application of the Rossendale Principle in Non‑Domestic Rating – Commentary on Emeraldshaw Ltd v Sheffield Magistrates’ Court [2025] EWCA Civ 1601

Date: Dec 11, 2025
Real and Practical Entitlement to Possession: General Application of the Rossendale Principle in Non‑Domestic Rating Commentary on Emeraldshaw Ltd, R (On the Application Of) v Sheffield Magistrates'...
D (A Child) (Recusal) [2025] EWCA Civ 1570 – Recusal, Apparent Bias and the Integrity of Prior Findings

D (A Child) (Recusal) [2025] EWCA Civ 1570 – Recusal, Apparent Bias and the Integrity of Prior Findings

Date: Dec 11, 2025
D (A Child) (Recusal) [2025] EWCA Civ 1570 – Recusal, Apparent Bias and the Integrity of Prior Findings 1. Introduction The Court of Appeal’s decision in D (A Child) (Recusal) [2025] EWCA Civ 1570...
Gibson v TSE Malta LP (t/a Betfair): Breach of Gambling Commission Licence Conditions Does Not Void Gambling Contracts

Gibson v TSE Malta LP (t/a Betfair): Breach of Gambling Commission Licence Conditions Does Not Void Gambling Contracts

Date: Dec 9, 2025
Gibson v TSE Malta LP (t/a Betfair): Breach of Gambling Commission Licence Conditions Does Not Void Gambling Contracts Introduction The Court of Appeal in Gibson v TSE Malta LP (t/a Betfair) [2025]...
Reasonableness of Service Charge Costs Under Long‑Term Contracts: Spender & Ors v Fit Nominee Ltd & Anor [2025] EWCA Civ 1578

Reasonableness of Service Charge Costs Under Long‑Term Contracts: Spender & Ors v Fit Nominee Ltd & Anor [2025] EWCA Civ 1578

Date: Dec 8, 2025
Reasonableness of Service Charge Costs Under Long‑Term Contracts: Spender & Ors v Fit Nominee Ltd & Anor [2025] EWCA Civ 1578 1. Introduction This Court of Appeal decision provides an important...
Real Risk, Not Mere Possibility: Interpreting “Could” in GEN 3.1 of Appendix FM – Commentary on Secretary of State for the Home Department v Khera [2025] EWCA Civ 1571

Real Risk, Not Mere Possibility: Interpreting “Could” in GEN 3.1 of Appendix FM – Commentary on Secretary of State for the Home Department v Khera [2025] EWCA Civ 1571

Date: Dec 8, 2025
Real Risk, Not Mere Possibility: Interpreting “Could” in GEN 3.1 of Appendix FM Commentary on Secretary of State for the Home Department v Khera [2025] EWCA Civ 1571 1. Introduction This Court of...

    Real Risk of Foreign Prosecution, Not Regulatory Confidentiality Alone, Justifies Withholding Disclosure:
    Commentary on Persons Identified in Schedule 1 to the RRAPC v Standard Chartered plc [2025] EWCA Civ 1581

Real Risk of Foreign Prosecution, Not Regulatory Confidentiality Alone, Justifies Withholding Disclosure: Commentary on Persons Identified in Schedule 1 to the RRAPC v Standard Chartered plc [2025] EWCA Civ 1581

Date: Dec 8, 2025
Real Risk of Foreign Prosecution, Not Regulatory Confidentiality Alone, Justifies Withholding Disclosure: Commentary on Persons Identified in Schedule 1 to the Re‑Re‑Amended Particulars of Claim v...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert