Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

England and Wales Case Commentaries

No AoS or CPR 11 application is required where service of the claim form was invalid and time has not been extended; “left for DX collection” is not service under CPR 7.5 — Bellway Homes Ltd v The Occupiers of Samuel Garside House [2025] EWCA Civ 1347

No AoS or CPR 11 application is required where service of the claim form was invalid and time has not been extended; “left for DX collection” is not service under CPR 7.5 — Bellway Homes Ltd v The Occupiers of Samuel Garside House [2025] EWCA Civ 1347

Date: Oct 24, 2025
No AoS or CPR 11 application is required where service of the claim form was invalid and time has not been extended; “left for DX collection” is not service under CPR 7.5 Commentary on Bellway Homes...
Figurative Trade Marks: Where the Picture and Description Align, the Image Defines the Sign — Independence of the Sieckmann Conditions Reaffirmed

Figurative Trade Marks: Where the Picture and Description Align, the Image Defines the Sign — Independence of the Sieckmann Conditions Reaffirmed

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Figurative Trade Marks: Where the Picture and Description Align, the Image Defines the Sign — Independence of the Sieckmann Conditions Reaffirmed Introduction In Babek International Ltd v Iceland...
R v Madaweni [2025] EWCA Crim 1427: Fresh psychiatric evidence on appeal—diminished responsibility requires a causal explanation; mental disorder may still mitigate on sentence

R v Madaweni [2025] EWCA Crim 1427: Fresh psychiatric evidence on appeal—diminished responsibility requires a causal explanation; mental disorder may still mitigate on sentence

Date: Oct 24, 2025
R v Madaweni [2025] EWCA Crim 1427: Fresh psychiatric evidence on appeal—diminished responsibility requires a causal explanation; mental disorder may still mitigate on sentence Court: England and...
R v WCU [2025] EWCA Crim 1414: Reaffirming the “exceptional” threshold for 30+ year sentences, tightening late guilty plea credit, and correcting the use of Special Custodial Sentences alongside Extended Sentences

R v WCU [2025] EWCA Crim 1414: Reaffirming the “exceptional” threshold for 30+ year sentences, tightening late guilty plea credit, and correcting the use of Special Custodial Sentences alongside Extended Sentences

Date: Oct 23, 2025
R v WCU [2025] EWCA Crim 1414: Reaffirming the “exceptional” threshold for 30+ year sentences, tightening late guilty plea credit, and correcting the use of Special Custodial Sentences alongside...
CPR 52.19 costs caps refused where service-charge recoupment would shift unrecovered appeal costs onto non‑appellant leaseholders

CPR 52.19 costs caps refused where service-charge recoupment would shift unrecovered appeal costs onto non‑appellant leaseholders

Date: Oct 22, 2025
CPR 52.19 costs caps refused where service-charge recoupment would shift unrecovered appeal costs onto non‑appellant leaseholders Introduction This commentary examines the England and Wales Court of...
School Exclusions: Governors’ Policy and DfE Guidance Set the Legal Test; Behaviour Policies Cannot Elevate the Threshold — Immaterial Errors and High‑Intensity Review Clarified in SAG v Governing Body of Winchmore School [2025] EWCA Civ 1335

School Exclusions: Governors’ Policy and DfE Guidance Set the Legal Test; Behaviour Policies Cannot Elevate the Threshold — Immaterial Errors and High‑Intensity Review Clarified in SAG v Governing Body of Winchmore School [2025] EWCA Civ 1335

Date: Oct 22, 2025
School Exclusions: Governors’ Policy and DfE Guidance Set the Legal Test; Behaviour Policies Cannot Elevate the Threshold — Immaterial Errors and High‑Intensity Review Clarified Case: SAG, R (On the...
Onuzi v SSHD: FTT’s role under s 40(3) confirmed as public-law review of causation; prolonged identity deception ordinarily material to naturalisation

Onuzi v SSHD: FTT’s role under s 40(3) confirmed as public-law review of causation; prolonged identity deception ordinarily material to naturalisation

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Onuzi v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2025] EWCA Civ 1337: FTT’s role under s 40(3) confirmed as public-law review of causation; prolonged identity deception ordinarily material to...
Automatic cessation of the main homelessness duty on acceptance of a Part VI offer; section 184 does not govern discharge decisions; challenges must run through the Part VII review/appeal scheme

Automatic cessation of the main homelessness duty on acceptance of a Part VI offer; section 184 does not govern discharge decisions; challenges must run through the Part VII review/appeal scheme

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Automatic cessation of the main homelessness duty on acceptance of a Part VI offer; section 184 does not govern discharge decisions; challenges must run through the Part VII review/appeal scheme...
JK [2025] EWCA Civ 1309 — Local authorities may use the parens patriae jurisdiction to secure a British child’s return from a non‑Contracting State notwithstanding an intention to issue care proceedings (Re M “sufficiently compelling” test affirmed; FLA 1986 largely irrelevant)

JK [2025] EWCA Civ 1309 — Local authorities may use the parens patriae jurisdiction to secure a British child’s return from a non‑Contracting State notwithstanding an intention to issue care proceedings (Re M “sufficiently compelling” test affirmed; FLA 1986 largely irrelevant)

Date: Oct 22, 2025
JK [2025] EWCA Civ 1309: Local authorities can secure a British child’s return under the inherent jurisdiction even where care proceedings are intended; Family Law Act 1986 largely irrelevant to...
Late Quantum-Phase Amendments and Litigation Holds: The Court of Appeal’s Four‑Stage Prejudice Analysis in ENRC v Dechert & SFO

Late Quantum-Phase Amendments and Litigation Holds: The Court of Appeal’s Four‑Stage Prejudice Analysis in ENRC v Dechert & SFO

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Late Quantum-Phase Amendments and Litigation Holds: The Court of Appeal’s Four‑Stage Prejudice Analysis in ENRC v Dechert & SFO Introduction This commentary examines the Court of Appeal’s judgment in...
Bradley v Abacus: Court of Appeal confines s.27A review to the “no reasonable landlord” test and clarifies the two‑stage allocation of service charge items

Bradley v Abacus: Court of Appeal confines s.27A review to the “no reasonable landlord” test and clarifies the two‑stage allocation of service charge items

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Bradley v Abacus: Court of Appeal confines s.27A review to the “no reasonable landlord” test and clarifies the two‑stage allocation of service charge items Introduction This Court of Appeal decision...
Blake & Ors v Fox: Court of Appeal reasserts Dingle for serious-harm causation, adopts “material contribution” for specific losses, and clarifies mitigation and media republication in libel

Blake & Ors v Fox: Court of Appeal reasserts Dingle for serious-harm causation, adopts “material contribution” for specific losses, and clarifies mitigation and media republication in libel

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Blake & Ors v Fox: Court of Appeal reasserts Dingle for serious-harm causation, adopts “material contribution” for specific losses, and clarifies mitigation and media republication in libel...
Ammori v SSHD: Deproscription/POAC is not an alternative to judicial review of an initial proscription; and respondents must meet CPR 52.8’s seven‑day limit when seeking permission to appeal refused JR grounds

Ammori v SSHD: Deproscription/POAC is not an alternative to judicial review of an initial proscription; and respondents must meet CPR 52.8’s seven‑day limit when seeking permission to appeal refused JR grounds

Date: Oct 22, 2025
New Principle: Initial Proscription Orders Are Directly Reviewable in the Administrative Court; Deproscription/POAC is not an available or adequate alternative remedy. CPR 52.8’s seven‑day time limit...
R v UCS [2025] EWCA Crim 1411: Half‑Release Confirmed for SOA 2003 s9/s10 and Robust Totality via Lead‑Count Uplift in Multi‑Incident Child Sexual Abuse

R v UCS [2025] EWCA Crim 1411: Half‑Release Confirmed for SOA 2003 s9/s10 and Robust Totality via Lead‑Count Uplift in Multi‑Incident Child Sexual Abuse

Date: Oct 22, 2025
R v UCS [2025] EWCA Crim 1411: Half‑Release Confirmed for SOA 2003 s9/s10 and Robust Totality via Lead‑Count Uplift in Multi‑Incident Child Sexual Abuse Introduction This Court of Appeal (Criminal...
R v Plumb [2025] EWCA Crim 1461: Attempted Murder Guideline may be used as a sentencing yardstick for soliciting/encouraging grave offences; no requirement to address Extended Determinate Sentences before imposing life where dangerousness and seriousness are satisfied

R v Plumb [2025] EWCA Crim 1461: Attempted Murder Guideline may be used as a sentencing yardstick for soliciting/encouraging grave offences; no requirement to address Extended Determinate Sentences before imposing life where dangerousness and seriousness are satisfied

Date: Oct 22, 2025
R v Plumb [2025] EWCA Crim 1461: Attempted Murder Guideline may be used as a sentencing yardstick for soliciting/encouraging grave offences; no requirement to address Extended Determinate Sentences...
Footwear as “Other Weapon” under Schedule 21: Fairness Prerequisite for Applying the 25‑Year Starting Point (Smith, R v [2025] EWCA Crim 1421)

Footwear as “Other Weapon” under Schedule 21: Fairness Prerequisite for Applying the 25‑Year Starting Point (Smith, R v [2025] EWCA Crim 1421)

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Footwear as “Other Weapon” under Schedule 21: Fairness Prerequisite for Applying the 25‑Year Starting Point Case: Smith, R. v — [2025] EWCA Crim 1421 Court: England and Wales Court of Appeal...

      Co-defendant Bad Character Evidence under s.101(1)(e) CJA 2003: When School CRIS Reports and Social Media Messages Supply “Substantial Probative Value” and the Required Jury Directions if Allegations Are Not Proved — R v Al‑Shumari [2025] EWCA Crim 1317

Co-defendant Bad Character Evidence under s.101(1)(e) CJA 2003: When School CRIS Reports and Social Media Messages Supply “Substantial Probative Value” and the Required Jury Directions if Allegations Are Not Proved — R v Al‑Shumari [2025] EWCA Crim 1317

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Co-defendant Bad Character Evidence under s.101(1)(e) CJA 2003: When School CRIS Reports and Social Media Messages Supply “Substantial Probative Value” and the Required Jury Directions if Allegations...
Open justice prevails over speculative harm in criminal appeals: Hartwell [2025] EWCA Crim 1450

Open justice prevails over speculative harm in criminal appeals: Hartwell [2025] EWCA Crim 1450

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Open justice prevails over speculative harm in criminal appeals: Hartwell [2025] EWCA Crim 1450 Introduction This commentary examines the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)’s decision in Hartwell,...
R v Mwila [2025] EWCA Crim 1425: Totality over Tallying — A Holistic Appellate Approach to Concurrent Sentences for Fatal and Serious-Injury Dangerous Driving, with No Requirement to Quantify Individual Adjustments

R v Mwila [2025] EWCA Crim 1425: Totality over Tallying — A Holistic Appellate Approach to Concurrent Sentences for Fatal and Serious-Injury Dangerous Driving, with No Requirement to Quantify Individual Adjustments

Date: Oct 17, 2025
R v Mwila [2025] EWCA Crim 1425: Totality over Tallying — A Holistic Appellate Approach to Concurrent Sentences for Fatal and Serious-Injury Dangerous Driving, with No Requirement to Quantify...
Sladden [2025] EWCA Crim 1410: High Threshold for Unduly Lenient Sentence References and Permissibility of Suspension in Category A1 Coercive Control Cases (Including Strangulation)

Sladden [2025] EWCA Crim 1410: High Threshold for Unduly Lenient Sentence References and Permissibility of Suspension in Category A1 Coercive Control Cases (Including Strangulation)

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Sladden [2025] EWCA Crim 1410: High Threshold for Unduly Lenient Sentence References and Permissibility of Suspension in Category A1 Coercive Control Cases (Including Strangulation) Introduction This...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert