Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Calcutta High Court Case Commentaries

Calcutta High Court Reaffirms Judicial Discretion in Section 494(a) Cr PC for Evidence Gathering

Calcutta High Court Reaffirms Judicial Discretion in Section 494(a) Cr PC for Evidence Gathering

Date: Apr 10, 1936
Calcutta High Court Reaffirms Judicial Discretion in Section 494(a) Cr PC for Evidence Gathering Introduction In the landmark case of Harihar Sinha And Others v. Emperor Opposite Party (Calcutta High...
Land Acquisition Compensation and Apportionment: Landmark Decision in Collector Of Dacca v. Gholam Kuddus Choudhury

Land Acquisition Compensation and Apportionment: Landmark Decision in Collector Of Dacca v. Gholam Kuddus Choudhury

Date: Apr 1, 1936
Land Acquisition Compensation and Apportionment: Landmark Decision in Collector Of Dacca v. Gholam Kuddus Choudhury Introduction The case of Collector Of Dacca v. Gholam Kuddus Choudhury And Others,...
Irrevocability of Document Admission under Section 36 of the Stamp Act: Bhupati Nath Chakravarty v. Basanta Kumari Devi

Irrevocability of Document Admission under Section 36 of the Stamp Act: Bhupati Nath Chakravarty v. Basanta Kumari Devi

Date: Feb 22, 1936
Irrevocability of Document Admission under Section 36 of the Stamp Act: Bhupati Nath Chakravarty v. Basanta Kumari Devi Introduction The case of Bhupati Nath Chakravarty v. Basanta Kumari Devi was...
Affirming the Right to Sue under Section 26-B of the Bengal Tenancy Act: A Landmark Decision

Affirming the Right to Sue under Section 26-B of the Bengal Tenancy Act: A Landmark Decision

Date: Feb 8, 1936
Affirming the Right to Sue under Section 26-B of the Bengal Tenancy Act: A Landmark Decision Introduction The case of Maharaja Sashi Kanta Acharjya Bahadur v. Nasirabad Loan Office, Co., Ltd. stands...
Limits on Inherent Jurisdiction for Court Fee Refunds: Indu Bhusan Roy Choudhury v. Secy. Of State

Limits on Inherent Jurisdiction for Court Fee Refunds: Indu Bhusan Roy Choudhury v. Secy. Of State

Date: Jul 17, 1935
Limits on Inherent Jurisdiction for Court Fee Refunds: Indu Bhusan Roy Choudhury v. Secy. Of State Introduction The case of Indu Bhusan Roy Choudhury v. Secy. Of State adjudicated by the Calcutta...
Calcutta High Court's Landmark Interpretation of "Association of Individuals" under Section 3 of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1922

Calcutta High Court's Landmark Interpretation of "Association of Individuals" under Section 3 of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1922

Date: Jul 12, 1935
Calcutta High Court's Landmark Interpretation of "Association of Individuals" under Section 3 of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 Introduction The case of B.N. Elias, In Re adjudicated by the Calcutta...
Multiplicity of Subjects in Multi-Plaintiff Suits: The Haru Bepari Case

Multiplicity of Subjects in Multi-Plaintiff Suits: The Haru Bepari Case

Date: May 22, 1935
Multiplicity of Subjects in Multi-Plaintiff Suits: The Haru Bepari Case Introduction The Haru Bepari And Others v. Roy Kshitish Bhusan Roy Bahadur And Others case, adjudicated by the Calcutta High...
Establishing Limitation Periods in Reversioner's Possession: Hemendra Nath Roy Choudhury v. Jnanendra Prasanna Bhaduri

Establishing Limitation Periods in Reversioner's Possession: Hemendra Nath Roy Choudhury v. Jnanendra Prasanna Bhaduri

Date: May 15, 1935
Establishing Limitation Periods in Reversioner's Possession: Hemendra Nath Roy Choudhury v. Jnanendra Prasanna Bhaduri Introduction Hemendra Nath Roy Choudhury v. Jnanendra Prasanna Bhaduri is a...
Calcutta High Court Upholds Power to Punish General Criticism of Judiciary as Contempt of Court

Calcutta High Court Upholds Power to Punish General Criticism of Judiciary as Contempt of Court

Date: Apr 9, 1935
Calcutta High Court Upholds Power to Punish General Criticism of Judiciary as Contempt of Court Introduction The case of Tushar Kanti Ghosh, In Re was adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on April...
Association of Individuals Under Section 3 of the Indian Income Tax Act: B. N. Elias And Others, In Re.

Association of Individuals Under Section 3 of the Indian Income Tax Act: B. N. Elias And Others, In Re.

Date: Mar 12, 1935
Association of Individuals Under Section 3 of the Indian Income Tax Act: B. N. Elias And Others, In Re. Introduction The case of B. N. Elias And Others, In Re., adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court...
Limitations on Statutory Powers of Public Utilities: Insights from John Earnest Edward v. Jogendrachandra Ghosh

Limitations on Statutory Powers of Public Utilities: Insights from John Earnest Edward v. Jogendrachandra Ghosh

Date: Feb 6, 1935
Limitations on Statutory Powers of Public Utilities: Insights from John Earnest Edward v. Jogendrachandra Ghosh Introduction The case of John Earnest Edward v. Jogendrachandra Ghosh adjudicated by...
Kashiram Jhunjhunwalla v. Hurdut Rai Gopal Rai: Joint Trial of Criminal Breach of Trust and Falsification Under C.P.C.

Kashiram Jhunjhunwalla v. Hurdut Rai Gopal Rai: Joint Trial of Criminal Breach of Trust and Falsification Under C.P.C.

Date: Jan 26, 1935
Kashiram Jhunjhunwalla v. Hurdut Rai Gopal Rai: Joint Trial of Criminal Breach of Trust and Falsification Under C.P.C. Introduction The case of Kashiram Jhunjhunwalla v. (Firm) Hurdut Rai Gopal Rai...
Negligence in Procedural Compliance: Insights from Ghisulal-Ganeshi Lal v. Gumbhirmull-Pandya

Negligence in Procedural Compliance: Insights from Ghisulal-Ganeshi Lal v. Gumbhirmull-Pandya

Date: Dec 20, 1934
Negligence in Procedural Compliance: Insights from Ghisulal-Ganeshi Lal v. Gumbhirmull-Pandya Introduction The case of Ghisulal-Ganeshi Lal v. Gumbhirmull-Pandya, adjudicated by the Calcutta High...
Transportation for Life in Cases of Provoked Murder: The Landmark Judgment in Emperor v. Mominuddi Sardar

Transportation for Life in Cases of Provoked Murder: The Landmark Judgment in Emperor v. Mominuddi Sardar

Date: Sep 20, 1934
Transportation for Life in Cases of Provoked Murder: The Landmark Judgment in Emperor v. Mominuddi Sardar Introduction The case of Emperor v. Mominuddi Sardar Accused, adjudicated by the Calcutta...
Lea Badin v. Upendra Mohan Roy Choudhury: Clarifying the Scope of 'Judgment' Under Cl. 15, Letters Patent

Lea Badin v. Upendra Mohan Roy Choudhury: Clarifying the Scope of 'Judgment' Under Cl. 15, Letters Patent

Date: Sep 18, 1934
Lea Badin v. Upendra Mohan Roy Choudhury: Clarifying the Scope of 'Judgment' Under Cl. 15, Letters Patent Introduction Lea Badin v. Upendra Mohan Roy Choudhury is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
Estoppel and Royalty Claims on Revenue-Free Lakheraj Lands: Comprehensive Commentary on Kumar Raj Krishna Prosad Lal Singh Deo v. Barabani Coal Concern Ltd.

Estoppel and Royalty Claims on Revenue-Free Lakheraj Lands: Comprehensive Commentary on Kumar Raj Krishna Prosad Lal Singh Deo v. Barabani Coal Concern Ltd.

Date: Jul 21, 1934
Estoppel and Royalty Claims on Revenue-Free Lakheraj Lands: Comprehensive Commentary on Kumar Raj Krishna Prosad Lal Singh Deo v. Barabani Coal Concern Ltd. Introduction The case of Kumar Raj Krishna...
Limitation Periods in Execution Applications After Equitable Decree Cancellation: Insights from Jateendra Chandra Bandopadhyay v. Rebateemohan Das

Limitation Periods in Execution Applications After Equitable Decree Cancellation: Insights from Jateendra Chandra Bandopadhyay v. Rebateemohan Das

Date: Jul 11, 1934
Limitation Periods in Execution Applications After Equitable Decree Cancellation: Insights from Jateendra Chandra Bandopadhyay v. Rebateemohan Das Introduction The case of Jateendra Chandra...
Kshirodebihari Datta v. Mangobinda Panda: Expanding Third-Party Rights in Indian Contract Law

Kshirodebihari Datta v. Mangobinda Panda: Expanding Third-Party Rights in Indian Contract Law

Date: Mar 17, 1934
Kshirodebihari Datta v. Mangobinda Panda: Expanding Third-Party Rights in Indian Contract Law Introduction Kshirodebihari Datta v. Mangobinda Panda is a landmark judgment delivered by the Calcutta...
Standards for Injunctions and Attachments: Insights from Durga Das Das v. Nalin Chandra Nandan

Standards for Injunctions and Attachments: Insights from Durga Das Das v. Nalin Chandra Nandan

Date: Mar 10, 1934
Standards for Injunctions and Attachments: Insights from Durga Das Das v. Nalin Chandra Nandan Introduction The case of Durga Das Das v. Nalin Chandra Nandan adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on...
Reinforcement of Section 10 C.P.C.: Prevention of Parallel Suits in Partnership Dissolution – Durgaprasad v. Kantichandra Mukerji

Reinforcement of Section 10 C.P.C.: Prevention of Parallel Suits in Partnership Dissolution – Durgaprasad v. Kantichandra Mukerji

Date: Mar 6, 1934
Reinforcement of Section 10 C.P.C.: Prevention of Parallel Suits in Partnership Dissolution – Durgaprasad v. Kantichandra Mukerji Introduction The case of Durgaprasad v. Kantichandra Mukerji...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert