Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Calcutta High Court Case Commentaries

Ameen Sharif v. Emperor: The Legal Interpretation of "Police Officer" in Section 25 of the Indian Evidence Act

Ameen Sharif v. Emperor: The Legal Interpretation of "Police Officer" in Section 25 of the Indian Evidence Act

Date: Feb 22, 1934
Ameen Sharif v. Emperor: The Legal Interpretation of "Police Officer" in Section 25 of the Indian Evidence Act Introduction The case of Ameen Sharif v. Emperor, adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court...
Judgment on Court's Authority to Revise Plaintiff's Valuation in Suits: Narayanganj Central Co-Operative Sale And Supply Society v. Mafijuddin Ahmad

Judgment on Court's Authority to Revise Plaintiff's Valuation in Suits: Narayanganj Central Co-Operative Sale And Supply Society v. Mafijuddin Ahmad

Date: Feb 22, 1934
Judgment on Court's Authority to Revise Plaintiff's Valuation in Suits: Narayanganj Central Co-Operative Sale And Supply Society v. Mafijuddin Ahmad Introduction The case of The Narayanganj Central...
Radha Kanta Pal v. Benode Behari Pal: Establishing Standards for Receiver Appointments in Partnership Dissolutions

Radha Kanta Pal v. Benode Behari Pal: Establishing Standards for Receiver Appointments in Partnership Dissolutions

Date: Dec 20, 1933
Radha Kanta Pal v. Benode Behari Pal: Establishing Standards for Receiver Appointments in Partnership Dissolutions Introduction The case of Radha Kanta Pal v. Benode Behari Pal adjudicated by the...
Presumption of Innocence and Burden of Proof in Robert Stuart Wauchope v. Emperor

Presumption of Innocence and Burden of Proof in Robert Stuart Wauchope v. Emperor

Date: Sep 1, 1933
Presumption of Innocence and Burden of Proof in Robert Stuart Wauchope v. Emperor Introduction The case of Robert Stuart Wauchope v. Emperor, adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on August 31,...
Finality of Criminal Appellate Judgments: Insights from Dahu Raut v. Emperor

Finality of Criminal Appellate Judgments: Insights from Dahu Raut v. Emperor

Date: Aug 30, 1933
Finality of Criminal Appellate Judgments: Insights from Dahu Raut v. Emperor Introduction Dahu Raut And Others v. Emperor Opposite Party, adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on August 29, 1933,...
Enforceability of Compromise Decrees: Hem Chandra Naskar v. Narendra Nath Bose (1933)

Enforceability of Compromise Decrees: Hem Chandra Naskar v. Narendra Nath Bose (1933)

Date: Aug 29, 1933
Enforceability of Compromise Decrees: Hem Chandra Naskar v. Narendra Nath Bose (1933) Introduction Hem Chandra Naskar and Another v. Narendra Nath Bose and Others, decided by the Calcutta High Court...
Presumption of Innocence and Burden of Proof in Criminal Breach of Trust: Major Robert Stuart Wauchope v. Emperor Opposite Party

Presumption of Innocence and Burden of Proof in Criminal Breach of Trust: Major Robert Stuart Wauchope v. Emperor Opposite Party

Date: Aug 25, 1933
Presumption of Innocence and Burden of Proof in Criminal Breach of Trust: Major Robert Stuart Wauchope v. Emperor Opposite Party Introduction The case of Major Robert Stuart Wauchope v. Emperor...
Reaffirmation of Executor De Son Tort Liability and Spoliator Presumptions in Hindu Law Succession: Shivaprasad Singh v. Prayagkumari Debee

Reaffirmation of Executor De Son Tort Liability and Spoliator Presumptions in Hindu Law Succession: Shivaprasad Singh v. Prayagkumari Debee

Date: Aug 12, 1933
Reaffirmation of Executor De Son Tort Liability and Spoliator Presumptions in Hindu Law Succession: Shivaprasad Singh v. Prayagkumari Debee Introduction Shivaprasad Singh v. Prayagkumari Debee,...
Asgarali Pradhania v. Emperor: Clarifying the Boundaries of Criminal Attempt in Miscarriage Cases

Asgarali Pradhania v. Emperor: Clarifying the Boundaries of Criminal Attempt in Miscarriage Cases

Date: Jul 22, 1933
Asgarali Pradhania v. Emperor: Clarifying the Boundaries of Criminal Attempt in Miscarriage Cases Introduction The landmark case of Asgarali Pradhania v. Emperor, adjudicated by the Calcutta High...
Effect of 'Naming a Sum' under Section 74: A Comprehensive Analysis of Mahadeoprasad v. Siemens (India) Ltd.

Effect of 'Naming a Sum' under Section 74: A Comprehensive Analysis of Mahadeoprasad v. Siemens (India) Ltd.

Date: Jun 27, 1933
Effect of 'Naming a Sum' under Section 74: A Comprehensive Analysis of Mahadeoprasad v. Siemens (India) Ltd. Introduction Mahadeoprasad v. Siemens (India) Ltd. is a seminal case adjudicated by the...
Hemchandra Ganguli v. Matilal Ganguli: Establishing the Burden of Proof in Joint Family Property Disputes Under Dayabhaga Law

Hemchandra Ganguli v. Matilal Ganguli: Establishing the Burden of Proof in Joint Family Property Disputes Under Dayabhaga Law

Date: May 16, 1933
Hemchandra Ganguli v. Matilal Ganguli: Establishing the Burden of Proof in Joint Family Property Disputes Under Dayabhaga Law Introduction The case of Hemchandra Ganguli v. Matilal Ganguli,...
Continuity of Jurisdiction in Execution Proceedings: Abdus Sattar v. Mohini Mohan Das And Others

Continuity of Jurisdiction in Execution Proceedings: Abdus Sattar v. Mohini Mohan Das And Others

Date: Feb 24, 1933
Continuity of Jurisdiction in Execution Proceedings: Abdus Sattar v. Mohini Mohan Das And Others Introduction The case of Abdus Sattar v. Mohini Mohan Das And Others was adjudicated by the Calcutta...
K.C Dhar v. Ahmad Bux: Affirming the Obligations of a Common Carrier

K.C Dhar v. Ahmad Bux: Affirming the Obligations of a Common Carrier

Date: Feb 11, 1933
K.C Dhar v. Ahmad Bux: Affirming the Obligations of a Common Carrier Introduction The case of K.C Dhar v. Ahmad Bux, adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on February 10, 1933, serves as a pivotal...
Distinguishing Capital and Revenue Expenditure in Agency Compensation: Anglo Persian Oil Co. Ltd. Judgment Analysis

Distinguishing Capital and Revenue Expenditure in Agency Compensation: Anglo Persian Oil Co. Ltd. Judgment Analysis

Date: Feb 9, 1933
Distinguishing Capital and Revenue Expenditure in Agency Compensation: Anglo Persian Oil Co. Ltd. Judgment Analysis Introduction The case of Anglo Persian Oil Co. Ltd., In Re adjudicated by the...
Judicial Superintendence in Conviction Appeals: Insights from Manmatha Nath Biswas v. Emperor Opposite Party

Judicial Superintendence in Conviction Appeals: Insights from Manmatha Nath Biswas v. Emperor Opposite Party

Date: Dec 3, 1932
Judicial Superintendence in Conviction Appeals: Insights from Manmatha Nath Biswas v. Emperor Opposite Party Introduction The case of Manmatha Nath Biswas v. Emperor Opposite Party (Calcutta High...
Succession of Shebaitship under Hindu Law: Monohar Mukherjee v. Bhupendra Nath Mukerjee

Succession of Shebaitship under Hindu Law: Monohar Mukherjee v. Bhupendra Nath Mukerjee

Date: Aug 20, 1932
Succession of Shebaitship under Hindu Law: Monohar Mukherjee v. Bhupendra Nath Mukerjee Introduction The case of Monohar Mukherjee v. Bhupendra Nath Mukerjee adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on...
Hemanta Kumari Debi v. Sefatulla Biswas: Precedent on Lease Renewal and Non-Joinder of Parties

Hemanta Kumari Debi v. Sefatulla Biswas: Precedent on Lease Renewal and Non-Joinder of Parties

Date: Jul 23, 1932
Hemanta Kumari Debi v. Sefatulla Biswas: Precedent on Lease Renewal and Non-Joinder of Parties Introduction The case of Hemanta Kumari Debi v. Sefatulla Biswas was adjudicated by the Calcutta High...
Withdrawal of Prosecution Under Section 494 of the Criminal Procedure Code: A Comprehensive Analysis of Giribala Dasi v. Mader Gazi

Withdrawal of Prosecution Under Section 494 of the Criminal Procedure Code: A Comprehensive Analysis of Giribala Dasi v. Mader Gazi

Date: Jun 16, 1932
Withdrawal of Prosecution Under Section 494 of the Criminal Procedure Code: A Comprehensive Analysis of Giribala Dasi v. Mader Gazi Introduction The case of Giribala Dasi Complainant v. Mader Gazi...
Calcutta High Court's Landmark Ruling on the Validity of Religious Property Dedications: Surendrakrishna Roy v. Shree Shree Ishwar Bhubaneshwari Thakurani

Calcutta High Court's Landmark Ruling on the Validity of Religious Property Dedications: Surendrakrishna Roy v. Shree Shree Ishwar Bhubaneshwari Thakurani

Date: May 14, 1932
Calcutta High Court's Landmark Ruling on the Validity of Religious Property Dedications Surendrakrishna Roy v. Shree Shree Ishwar Bhubaneshwari Thakurani Court: Calcutta High Court Date: May 13, 1932...
Jia Bai v. Joharmull Bothra: Affirming Surety Liability in Consent Decrees

Jia Bai v. Joharmull Bothra: Affirming Surety Liability in Consent Decrees

Date: Apr 15, 1932
Jia Bai v. Joharmull Bothra: Affirming Surety Liability in Consent Decrees Introduction The case of Jia Bai v. Joharmull Bothra, adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on April 14, 1932, presents a...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert