Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Calcutta High Court Case Commentaries

Remuneration Based on Profits vs. Profit Sharing: Insights from British Sugar Manufacturers v. Harris Inspector Of Taxes

Remuneration Based on Profits vs. Profit Sharing: Insights from British Sugar Manufacturers v. Harris Inspector Of Taxes

Date: Dec 17, 1937
Remuneration Based on Profits vs. Profit Sharing: Insights from British Sugar Manufacturers, Ltd. v. Harris Inspector Of Taxes Introduction British Sugar Manufacturers, Ltd. v. Harris Inspector Of...
Establishing Proprietary Rights of Government Grants in the Sunderbans: Surja Kanta Roy Choudhury v. Secretary Of State

Establishing Proprietary Rights of Government Grants in the Sunderbans: Surja Kanta Roy Choudhury v. Secretary Of State

Date: Dec 4, 1937
Establishing Proprietary Rights of Government Grants in the Sunderbans: Surja Kanta Roy Choudhury v. Secretary Of State Introduction The landmark case of Surja Kanta Roy Choudhury v. Secretary Of...
Crown Grants Act Empowering Civil Courts in Boundary Disputes: Nanda v. Banerji

Crown Grants Act Empowering Civil Courts in Boundary Disputes: Nanda v. Banerji

Date: Aug 21, 1937
Crown Grants Act Empowering Civil Courts in Boundary Disputes: Nanda v. Banerji Introduction The case of Jnanendra Nath Nanda v. Jadu Nath Banerji adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on August 20,...
Judicial Commentary: De Novo Trial and Misjoinder of Charges in Akhil Bandhu Ray And Others Accused v. Emperor

Judicial Commentary: De Novo Trial and Misjoinder of Charges in Akhil Bandhu Ray And Others Accused v. Emperor

Date: Aug 20, 1937
De Novo Trial and Misjoinder of Charges: Insights from Akhil Bandhu Ray And Others Accused v. Emperor Introduction The case of Akhil Bandhu Ray And Others Accused v. Emperor was adjudicated by the...
Hemanta Kumar Das v. Alliantz Und Stuttgarter Life Insurance Co. Ltd. - Precedent on Misrepresentation in Life Assurance Contracts

Hemanta Kumar Das v. Alliantz Und Stuttgarter Life Insurance Co. Ltd. - Precedent on Misrepresentation in Life Assurance Contracts

Date: Jul 29, 1937
Hemanta Kumar Das v. Alliantz Und Stuttgarter Life Insurance Co. Ltd. - Precedent on Misrepresentation in Life Assurance Contracts Introduction The case of Hemanta Kumar Das v. Alliantz Und...
Nirode Kali Roy Choudhury v. Rai Harendra Nath Choudhury: Clarification on Section 47 CPC and Execution Proceedings

Nirode Kali Roy Choudhury v. Rai Harendra Nath Choudhury: Clarification on Section 47 CPC and Execution Proceedings

Date: Jul 20, 1937
Nirode Kali Roy Choudhury v. Rai Harendra Nath Choudhury: Clarification on Section 47 CPC and Execution Proceedings Introduction Nirode Kali Roy Choudhury v. Rai Harendra Nath Choudhury is a landmark...
Enforceability of Compensation Agreements in Land Acquisition: Calcutta High Court’s Landmark Decision in Ananta Ram Banerjee v. Secretary Of State

Enforceability of Compensation Agreements in Land Acquisition: Calcutta High Court’s Landmark Decision in Ananta Ram Banerjee v. Secretary Of State

Date: Jul 10, 1937
Enforceability of Compensation Agreements in Land Acquisition: Calcutta High Court’s Landmark Decision in Ananta Ram Banerjee v. Secretary Of State Introduction The case of Ananta Ram Banerjee v....
Calcutta High Court Establishes Appeal as Decree in Sudhansu Bhusan Pandey v. Majho Bibi

Calcutta High Court Establishes Appeal as Decree in Sudhansu Bhusan Pandey v. Majho Bibi

Date: Jul 7, 1937
Calcutta High Court Establishes Appeal as Decree in Sudhansu Bhusan Pandey v. Majho Bibi Introduction The case of Sudhansu Bhusan Pandey v. Majho Bibi adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on July...
Implied Grant of Right of Way: Anna Poorna Datta v. Santosh Kumar Set Case Commentary

Implied Grant of Right of Way: Anna Poorna Datta v. Santosh Kumar Set Case Commentary

Date: May 27, 1937
Implied Grant of Right of Way: Anna Poorna Datta v. Santosh Kumar Set Introduction The case of Anna Poorna Datta v. Santosh Kumar Set adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on May 26, 1937, addresses...
Establishing Total Loss of Earning Capacity in Workmen's Compensation: East Indian Railway v. Ryan

Establishing Total Loss of Earning Capacity in Workmen's Compensation: East Indian Railway v. Ryan

Date: May 7, 1937
Establishing Total Loss of Earning Capacity in Workmen's Compensation: East Indian Railway v. Ryan Introduction The case of East Indian Railway Company v. Maurice Cecil Ryan is a seminal judgment...
Pashu Pati Datta v. Kelvin Jute Mills: Establishing the Succession of Compensation Rights to Heirs of Deceased Dependants

Pashu Pati Datta v. Kelvin Jute Mills: Establishing the Succession of Compensation Rights to Heirs of Deceased Dependants

Date: May 6, 1937
Pashu Pati Datta v. Kelvin Jute Mills: Establishing the Succession of Compensation Rights to Heirs of Deceased Dependants Introduction The case of Pashu Pati Datta v. Kelvin Jute Mills adjudicated by...
Resetting Limitation Period through Subsequent Compromise Orders: Insights from Kartik Chandra Mukherji v. Bata Krishna Ray

Resetting Limitation Period through Subsequent Compromise Orders: Insights from Kartik Chandra Mukherji v. Bata Krishna Ray

Date: Mar 16, 1937
Resetting Limitation Period through Subsequent Compromise Orders: Insights from Kartik Chandra Mukherji v. Bata Krishna Ray Introduction The case of Kartik Chandra Mukherji v. Bata Krishna Ray...
Calcutta High Court Establishes Wakf Managers Ineligible as Partners for Income Tax Firm Registration

Calcutta High Court Establishes Wakf Managers Ineligible as Partners for Income Tax Firm Registration

Date: Jan 26, 1937
Calcutta High Court Establishes Wakf Managers Ineligible as Partners for Income Tax Firm Registration Introduction The case of Messrs. Hoosen Kasam Dada, (A Firm) v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax,...
Calcutta High Court Establishes Civil Courts' Authority in Managing Private Debattars

Calcutta High Court Establishes Civil Courts' Authority in Managing Private Debattars

Date: Jan 12, 1937
Calcutta High Court Establishes Civil Courts' Authority in Managing Private Debattars Introduction The case of Bimal Krishna Ghosh v. Jnanendra Krishna Ghosh adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court on...
Recognition of Custom-Based Right of Pasturage in Asrab Ulla v. Kismat Ulla Haji Chaudhuri

Recognition of Custom-Based Right of Pasturage in Asrab Ulla v. Kismat Ulla Haji Chaudhuri

Date: Jan 6, 1937
Recognition of Custom-Based Right of Pasturage in Asrab Ulla v. Kismat Ulla Haji Chaudhuri Introduction The landmark judgment in Asrab Ulla v. Kismat Ulla Haji Chaudhuri, delivered by the Calcutta...
Annulment of Revenue Sale Due to Irregular Specification: Siba Das Chakravarty v. Hemchandra Kar

Annulment of Revenue Sale Due to Irregular Specification: Siba Das Chakravarty v. Hemchandra Kar

Date: Nov 28, 1936
Annulment of Revenue Sale Due to Irregular Specification: Siba Das Chakravarty v. Hemchandra Kar Introduction The case of Siba Das Chakravarty v. Hemchandra Kar was adjudicated by the Calcutta High...
Defining Criminal Conspiracy under Section 121-A IPC: A Comprehensive Commentary on Jitendra Nath Gupta And Others v. Emperor

Defining Criminal Conspiracy under Section 121-A IPC: A Comprehensive Commentary on Jitendra Nath Gupta And Others v. Emperor

Date: Jul 31, 1936
Defining Criminal Conspiracy under Section 121-A IPC: A Comprehensive Commentary on Jitendra Nath Gupta And Others v. Emperor Introduction The landmark case of Jitendra Nath Gupta And Others v....
Rash Behari Shaw v. Emperor: Defining Boundaries of Joint Trials and Conspiracy Under Cr PC Section 239

Rash Behari Shaw v. Emperor: Defining Boundaries of Joint Trials and Conspiracy Under Cr PC Section 239

Date: Jul 11, 1936
Rash Behari Shaw v. Emperor: Defining Boundaries of Joint Trials and Conspiracy Under Cr PC Section 239 Introduction The case of Rash Behari Shaw (Handa) And Others v. Emperor Opposite Party, decided...
Monindra Lal Chatterjee v. Hari Pada Ghose: Defining Agency Continuity and Limitation in Joint Principal Contexts

Monindra Lal Chatterjee v. Hari Pada Ghose: Defining Agency Continuity and Limitation in Joint Principal Contexts

Date: Jul 4, 1936
Monindra Lal Chatterjee v. Hari Pada Ghose: Defining Agency Continuity and Limitation in Joint Principal Contexts Introduction Monindra Lal Chatterjee v. Hari Pada Ghose is a significant judgment...
Creet v. Ganga Ram Gool Raj: Establishing Principles on Fraudulent Company Liquidation and Execution Sales

Creet v. Ganga Ram Gool Raj: Establishing Principles on Fraudulent Company Liquidation and Execution Sales

Date: May 23, 1936
Creet v. Ganga Ram Gool Raj: Establishing Principles on Fraudulent Company Liquidation and Execution Sales Introduction The case of Creet v. Ganga Ram Gool Raj adjudicated by the Calcutta High Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert