Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Bombay High Court Case Commentaries

Liability of Sons for Father's Decretal Debt under Mitakshara Law: Insights from Hakmant Kashinath Joshi v. Ganesh Annaji Pujari

Liability of Sons for Father's Decretal Debt under Mitakshara Law: Insights from Hakmant Kashinath Joshi v. Ganesh Annaji Pujari

Date: Dec 21, 1918
Liability of Sons for Father's Decretal Debt under Mitakshara Law: Insights from Hakmant Kashinath Joshi v. Ganesh Annaji Pujari 1. Introduction The case of Hakmant Kashinath Joshi v. Ganesh Annaji...
Estoppel and Alienation Rights of a Hindu Widow: Rangasami Gounden v. Nachiappa Gounden

Estoppel and Alienation Rights of a Hindu Widow: Rangasami Gounden v. Nachiappa Gounden

Date: Dec 17, 1918
Estoppel and Alienation Rights of a Hindu Widow: Rangasami Gounden v. Nachiappa Gounden Introduction The case of Rangasami Gounden v. Nachiappa Gounden, adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on...
Jurisdiction of Civil Courts vis-à-vis Special Tribunals under the Sea Customs Act: Ganesh Mahadev Jamsandekar v. Secretary Of State For India

Jurisdiction of Civil Courts vis-à-vis Special Tribunals under the Sea Customs Act: Ganesh Mahadev Jamsandekar v. Secretary Of State For India

Date: Jul 24, 1918
Jurisdiction of Civil Courts vis-à-vis Special Tribunals under the Sea Customs Act Introduction The case of Ganesh Mahadev Jamsandekar v. Secretary Of State For India was adjudicated by the Bombay...
Interpretation and Sufficiency of Notices to Quit in Tenancy Ejectment: Harihar Banerji v. Ramsashi Ray

Interpretation and Sufficiency of Notices to Quit in Tenancy Ejectment: Harihar Banerji v. Ramsashi Ray

Date: Jun 11, 1918
Interpretation and Sufficiency of Notices to Quit in Tenancy Ejectment: Harihar Banerji v. Ramsashi Ray Introduction Harihar Banerji v. Ramsashi Ray is a landmark appellate case adjudicated by the...
No Co-Parcenary Rights in Impartible Zemindaris: Insights from Sri Rajah Rama Rao v. Rajah Of Pittapur

No Co-Parcenary Rights in Impartible Zemindaris: Insights from Sri Rajah Rama Rao v. Rajah Of Pittapur

Date: May 3, 1918
No Co-Parcenary Rights in Impartible Zemindaris: Insights from Sri Rajah Rama Rao v. Rajah Of Pittapur Introduction The case of Sri Rajah Rama Rao v. Rajah Of Pittapur adjudicated by the Bombay High...
Rights of Minor Co-Parceners in Execution Sales: Hanmandas Ramdayal v. Valabhdas Shankardas

Rights of Minor Co-Parceners in Execution Sales: Hanmandas Ramdayal v. Valabhdas Shankardas

Date: Mar 2, 1918
Rights of Minor Co-Parceners in Execution Sales: Hanmandas Ramdayal v. Valabhdas Shankardas Introduction The case of Hanmandas Ramdayal v. Valabhdas Shankardas adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on...
Maternal Entitlement in Hindu Partition: Analysis of Raoji Bhikaji Kondkar v. Anant Laxman Kondkar

Maternal Entitlement in Hindu Partition: Analysis of Raoji Bhikaji Kondkar v. Anant Laxman Kondkar

Date: Jan 31, 1918
Maternal Entitlement in Hindu Partition: Analysis of Raoji Bhikaji Kondkar v. Anant Laxman Kondkar Introduction The case of Raoji Bhikaji Kondkar v. Anant Laxman Kondkar, adjudicated by the Bombay...
Surajmal B. Mehta v. B.G Horniman & Others: Clarifying the Defence of Fair Comment in Defamation Law

Surajmal B. Mehta v. B.G Horniman & Others: Clarifying the Defence of Fair Comment in Defamation Law

Date: Nov 6, 1917
Surajmal B. Mehta v. B.G Horniman & Others: Clarifying the Defence of Fair Comment in Defamation Law Introduction The case of Surajmal B. Mehta v. B.G Horniman & Others, adjudicated by the Bombay...
Exclusion of Female Heirs in Family Custom: Insights from H.H. Mir Abdul Hussain Khan v. Mussammat Bibi Sona Dero

Exclusion of Female Heirs in Family Custom: Insights from H.H. Mir Abdul Hussain Khan v. Mussammat Bibi Sona Dero

Date: Oct 31, 1917
Exclusion of Female Heirs in Family Custom: Insights from H.H. Mir Abdul Hussain Khan v. Mussammat Bibi Sona Dero Introduction The case of H.H. Mir Abdul Hussain Khan v. Mussammat Bibi Sona Dero,...
Extending Appeal Periods in Abatement Cases: Insights from H.H. Brij Indar Singh v. Lala Kanshi Ram

Extending Appeal Periods in Abatement Cases: Insights from H.H. Brij Indar Singh v. Lala Kanshi Ram

Date: Jul 20, 1917
Extending Appeal Periods in Abatement Cases: Insights from H.H. Brij Indar Singh v. Lala Kanshi Ram Introduction The case of H.H. Brij Indar Singh v. Lala Kanshi Ram, adjudicated by the Bombay High...
Limits on Mortgage of Joint Family Property Under Mitakshara Law: Sahu Ram Chandra v. Bhup Singh

Limits on Mortgage of Joint Family Property Under Mitakshara Law: Sahu Ram Chandra v. Bhup Singh

Date: Mar 10, 1917
Limits on Mortgage of Joint Family Property Under Mitakshara Law: Sahu Ram Chandra v. Bhup Singh Introduction Sahu Ram Chandra v. Bhup Singh is a landmark judgment delivered by the Bombay High Court...
Champsey Dossa v. Gordhandas Kessowji: Partnership Rights within Licensed Salt Manufacturing

Champsey Dossa v. Gordhandas Kessowji: Partnership Rights within Licensed Salt Manufacturing

Date: Feb 17, 1917
Champsey Dossa v. Gordhandas Kessowji: Partnership Rights within Licensed Salt Manufacturing Introduction The case of Champsey Dossa v. Gordhandas Kessowji was adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on...
Bapu Apaji Potdar v. Kashinath Sadoba Gulmire: Enforceability of Sale Agreements without Registered Conveyance

Bapu Apaji Potdar v. Kashinath Sadoba Gulmire: Enforceability of Sale Agreements without Registered Conveyance

Date: Dec 23, 1916
Bapu Apaji Potdar v. Kashinath Sadoba Gulmire: Enforceability of Sale Agreements without Registered Conveyance 1. Introduction Bapu Apaji Potdar v. Kashinath Sadoba Gulmire is a landmark judgment...
Court-Sale Purchasers’ Rights in Share Transfer: Analysis of Manilal Brijlal Shah v. Gordhan Spinning And Manufacturing Company, Limited

Court-Sale Purchasers’ Rights in Share Transfer: Analysis of Manilal Brijlal Shah v. Gordhan Spinning And Manufacturing Company, Limited

Date: Sep 8, 1916
Court-Sale Purchasers’ Rights in Share Transfer: Analysis of Manilal Brijlal Shah v. Gordhan Spinning And Manufacturing Company, Limited Introduction The case of Manilal Brijlal Shah v. Gordhan...
Equitable Subrogation in Mortgage Payments: Insights from Tangya Fala v. Trimbak Daga

Equitable Subrogation in Mortgage Payments: Insights from Tangya Fala v. Trimbak Daga

Date: Jul 26, 1916
Equitable Subrogation in Mortgage Payments: Insights from Tangya Fala v. Trimbak Daga Introduction The case of Tangya Fala v. Trimbak Daga, adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on July 25, 1916,...
Adoption Validity and Evidence: Insights from Diwakar v. Chandanlal

Adoption Validity and Evidence: Insights from Diwakar v. Chandanlal

Date: Jul 25, 1916
Adoption Validity and Evidence: Insights from Diwakar v. Chandanlal Introduction The case of Diwakar v. Chandanlal adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on July 24, 1916, revolves around the...
Regulation IV of 1827 Supersedes Mahomedan Pre-emption Rights in Khandesh District

Regulation IV of 1827 Supersedes Mahomedan Pre-emption Rights in Khandesh District

Date: Nov 17, 1915
Regulation IV of 1827 Supersedes Mahomedan Pre-emption Rights in Khandesh District Introduction The case of Mahomed Beg Amin Beg v. Narayan Meghaji Patil was adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on...
Clarifying the Doctrine of Impossibility: Insights from Karl Ettlinger v. Chagandas

Clarifying the Doctrine of Impossibility: Insights from Karl Ettlinger v. Chagandas

Date: Aug 7, 1915
Clarifying the Doctrine of Impossibility: Insights from Karl Ettlinger v. Chagandas Introduction The case of Karl Ettlinger v. Chagandas was adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on August 6, 1915....
Validity of Hindu Adoption Without Datta Homam in Same Gotra: Bal Gangadhar Tilak v. Shri Shriniwas Pandit (1915)

Validity of Hindu Adoption Without Datta Homam in Same Gotra: Bal Gangadhar Tilak v. Shri Shriniwas Pandit (1915)

Date: Mar 27, 1915
Establishing the Validity of Hindu Adoption Under Same Gotra Without Datta Homam: Bal Gangadhar Tilak v. Shri Shriniwas Pandit (1915) Introduction The case of Bal Gangadhar Tilak v. Shri Shriniwas...
Establishing Compensation Claims Under Void Mortgages: Insights from Javerbhai Jorabhai v. Gordhan Narsi

Establishing Compensation Claims Under Void Mortgages: Insights from Javerbhai Jorabhai v. Gordhan Narsi

Date: Dec 23, 1914
Establishing Compensation Claims Under Void Mortgages: Insights from Javerbhai Jorabhai v. Gordhan Narsi Introduction The case of Javerbhai Jorabhai v. Gordhan Narsi adjudicated by the Bombay High...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert