Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Bombay High Court Case Commentaries

Mandate of Section 342 CrPC in Summons-Cases Affirmed in G.S. Fernandez v. Emperor

Mandate of Section 342 CrPC in Summons-Cases Affirmed in G.S. Fernandez v. Emperor

Date: Aug 25, 1920
Mandate of Section 342 CrPC in Summons-Cases Affirmed in G.S. Fernandez v. Emperor Introduction The case of G.S. Fernandez v. Emperor adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on August 24, 1920, serves...
Inherent Judicial Powers in Re-Admitting Appeals for Minors: Insights from Sonubai v. Gaikwad

Inherent Judicial Powers in Re-Admitting Appeals for Minors: Insights from Sonubai v. Gaikwad

Date: Aug 20, 1920
Inherent Judicial Powers in Re-Admitting Appeals for Minors: Insights from Sonubai v. Gaikwad Introduction The landmark case of Sonubai v. Shivajirao Krishnarao Gopalrao Gaikwad, adjudicated by the...
Manilal Motilal v. Firm Gokal Das Rowji: Pioneering Jurisprudence on Arbitration Awards in Civil Suits

Manilal Motilal v. Firm Gokal Das Rowji: Pioneering Jurisprudence on Arbitration Awards in Civil Suits

Date: Jul 21, 1920
Manilal Motilal v. Firm Gokal Das Rowji: Pioneering Jurisprudence on Arbitration Awards in Civil Suits Introduction The landmark case of Manilal Motilal, A Firm v. Firm Gokal Das Rowji was...
Mandatory Requirement of Substantive Relief in Preemption Rights Claims: Insights from Charan Das v. Amir Khan

Mandatory Requirement of Substantive Relief in Preemption Rights Claims: Insights from Charan Das v. Amir Khan

Date: Jul 7, 1920
Mandatory Requirement of Substantive Relief in Preemption Rights Claims: Insights from Charan Das v. Amir Khan Introduction The case of Charan Das v. Amir Khan adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on...
Limitation Framework for Guardian-Induced Property Transfers: Insights from Fakirappa Limanna Patil v. Lumanna

Limitation Framework for Guardian-Induced Property Transfers: Insights from Fakirappa Limanna Patil v. Lumanna

Date: Dec 20, 1919
Limitation Framework for Guardian-Induced Property Transfers: Insights from Fakirappa Limanna Patil v. Lumanna Introduction The case of Fakirappa Limanna Patil v. Lumanna, adjudicated by the Bombay...
Jurisdictional Authority in Multi-Jurisdictional Litigation: Insights from Mulchand Raichand v. Gill & Co.

Jurisdictional Authority in Multi-Jurisdictional Litigation: Insights from Mulchand Raichand v. Gill & Co.

Date: Aug 1, 1919
Jurisdictional Authority in Multi-Jurisdictional Litigation: Insights from Mulchand Raichand v. Gill & Co. Introduction The case of Mulchand Raichand v. Gill & Co. adjudicated by the Bombay High...
Validation of Liquidator's Agreements Under Enemy Trading Act: Insights from Wolf & Sons v. Dadyba, Khimji & Co.

Validation of Liquidator's Agreements Under Enemy Trading Act: Insights from Wolf & Sons v. Dadyba, Khimji & Co.

Date: Aug 1, 1919
Validation of Liquidator's Agreements Under Enemy Trading Act: Insights from Wolf & Sons v. Dadyba, Khimji & Co. Introduction The case of Wolf & Sons v. Dadyba, Khimji & Co. adjudicated by the Bombay...
Sale of Security Property in Execution Proceedings: Ambalal Bapubhai Gujarati v. Narayan Tatyaba Bhosale

Sale of Security Property in Execution Proceedings: Ambalal Bapubhai Gujarati v. Narayan Tatyaba Bhosale

Date: Jan 30, 1919
Sale of Security Property in Execution Proceedings: Ambalal Bapubhai Gujarati v. Narayan Tatyaba Bhosale Introduction Ambalal Bapubhai Gujarati v. Narayan Tatyaba Bhosale, adjudicated by the Bombay...
Scope and Limitations of Section 8 of the Arbitration Act in Multi-Arbitrator Appointments: Insights from Gopalji Kuverji v. Morarji Jeram Naranji

Scope and Limitations of Section 8 of the Arbitration Act in Multi-Arbitrator Appointments: Insights from Gopalji Kuverji v. Morarji Jeram Naranji

Date: Jan 17, 1919
Scope and Limitations of Section 8 of the Arbitration Act in Multi-Arbitrator Appointments: Insights from Gopalji Kuverji v. Morarji Jeram Naranji Introduction The landmark case of Gopalji Kuverji v....
Clarifying Tenancy Forfeiture: Insights from Maharaja Of Jeypore v. Rukmini Pattamahadevi

Clarifying Tenancy Forfeiture: Insights from Maharaja Of Jeypore v. Rukmini Pattamahadevi

Date: Jan 13, 1919
Clarifying Tenancy Forfeiture: Insights from Maharaja Of Jeypore v. Rukmini Pattamahadevi Introduction Maharaja Of Jeypore v. Rukmini Pattamahadevi is a seminal judgment delivered by the Bombay High...
Liability of Sons for Father's Decretal Debt under Mitakshara Law: Insights from Hakmant Kashinath Joshi v. Ganesh Annaji Pujari

Liability of Sons for Father's Decretal Debt under Mitakshara Law: Insights from Hakmant Kashinath Joshi v. Ganesh Annaji Pujari

Date: Dec 21, 1918
Liability of Sons for Father's Decretal Debt under Mitakshara Law: Insights from Hakmant Kashinath Joshi v. Ganesh Annaji Pujari 1. Introduction The case of Hakmant Kashinath Joshi v. Ganesh Annaji...
Estoppel and Alienation Rights of a Hindu Widow: Rangasami Gounden v. Nachiappa Gounden

Estoppel and Alienation Rights of a Hindu Widow: Rangasami Gounden v. Nachiappa Gounden

Date: Dec 17, 1918
Estoppel and Alienation Rights of a Hindu Widow: Rangasami Gounden v. Nachiappa Gounden Introduction The case of Rangasami Gounden v. Nachiappa Gounden, adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on...
Jurisdiction of Civil Courts vis-à-vis Special Tribunals under the Sea Customs Act: Ganesh Mahadev Jamsandekar v. Secretary Of State For India

Jurisdiction of Civil Courts vis-à-vis Special Tribunals under the Sea Customs Act: Ganesh Mahadev Jamsandekar v. Secretary Of State For India

Date: Jul 24, 1918
Jurisdiction of Civil Courts vis-à-vis Special Tribunals under the Sea Customs Act Introduction The case of Ganesh Mahadev Jamsandekar v. Secretary Of State For India was adjudicated by the Bombay...
Interpretation and Sufficiency of Notices to Quit in Tenancy Ejectment: Harihar Banerji v. Ramsashi Ray

Interpretation and Sufficiency of Notices to Quit in Tenancy Ejectment: Harihar Banerji v. Ramsashi Ray

Date: Jun 11, 1918
Interpretation and Sufficiency of Notices to Quit in Tenancy Ejectment: Harihar Banerji v. Ramsashi Ray Introduction Harihar Banerji v. Ramsashi Ray is a landmark appellate case adjudicated by the...
No Co-Parcenary Rights in Impartible Zemindaris: Insights from Sri Rajah Rama Rao v. Rajah Of Pittapur

No Co-Parcenary Rights in Impartible Zemindaris: Insights from Sri Rajah Rama Rao v. Rajah Of Pittapur

Date: May 3, 1918
No Co-Parcenary Rights in Impartible Zemindaris: Insights from Sri Rajah Rama Rao v. Rajah Of Pittapur Introduction The case of Sri Rajah Rama Rao v. Rajah Of Pittapur adjudicated by the Bombay High...
Rights of Minor Co-Parceners in Execution Sales: Hanmandas Ramdayal v. Valabhdas Shankardas

Rights of Minor Co-Parceners in Execution Sales: Hanmandas Ramdayal v. Valabhdas Shankardas

Date: Mar 2, 1918
Rights of Minor Co-Parceners in Execution Sales: Hanmandas Ramdayal v. Valabhdas Shankardas Introduction The case of Hanmandas Ramdayal v. Valabhdas Shankardas adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on...
Maternal Entitlement in Hindu Partition: Analysis of Raoji Bhikaji Kondkar v. Anant Laxman Kondkar

Maternal Entitlement in Hindu Partition: Analysis of Raoji Bhikaji Kondkar v. Anant Laxman Kondkar

Date: Jan 31, 1918
Maternal Entitlement in Hindu Partition: Analysis of Raoji Bhikaji Kondkar v. Anant Laxman Kondkar Introduction The case of Raoji Bhikaji Kondkar v. Anant Laxman Kondkar, adjudicated by the Bombay...
Surajmal B. Mehta v. B.G Horniman & Others: Clarifying the Defence of Fair Comment in Defamation Law

Surajmal B. Mehta v. B.G Horniman & Others: Clarifying the Defence of Fair Comment in Defamation Law

Date: Nov 6, 1917
Surajmal B. Mehta v. B.G Horniman & Others: Clarifying the Defence of Fair Comment in Defamation Law Introduction The case of Surajmal B. Mehta v. B.G Horniman & Others, adjudicated by the Bombay...
Exclusion of Female Heirs in Family Custom: Insights from H.H. Mir Abdul Hussain Khan v. Mussammat Bibi Sona Dero

Exclusion of Female Heirs in Family Custom: Insights from H.H. Mir Abdul Hussain Khan v. Mussammat Bibi Sona Dero

Date: Oct 31, 1917
Exclusion of Female Heirs in Family Custom: Insights from H.H. Mir Abdul Hussain Khan v. Mussammat Bibi Sona Dero Introduction The case of H.H. Mir Abdul Hussain Khan v. Mussammat Bibi Sona Dero,...
Extending Appeal Periods in Abatement Cases: Insights from H.H. Brij Indar Singh v. Lala Kanshi Ram

Extending Appeal Periods in Abatement Cases: Insights from H.H. Brij Indar Singh v. Lala Kanshi Ram

Date: Jul 20, 1917
Extending Appeal Periods in Abatement Cases: Insights from H.H. Brij Indar Singh v. Lala Kanshi Ram Introduction The case of H.H. Brij Indar Singh v. Lala Kanshi Ram, adjudicated by the Bombay High...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert