Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Bombay High Court Case Commentaries

The Limits of Estoppel in Property Transfers: A Comprehensive Analysis of Pandurang Krishnaji v. Markandeya Tukaram

The Limits of Estoppel in Property Transfers: A Comprehensive Analysis of Pandurang Krishnaji v. Markandeya Tukaram

Date: Oct 26, 1921
The Limits of Estoppel in Property Transfers: A Comprehensive Analysis of Pandurang Krishnaji v. Markandeya Tukaram Introduction The case of Pandurang Krishnaji v. Markandeya Tukaram adjudicated by...
Kuthali Moothavar v. Peringati Kunharankutty: Affirming Clear Title through Adequate Possession Standards

Kuthali Moothavar v. Peringati Kunharankutty: Affirming Clear Title through Adequate Possession Standards

Date: Jul 19, 1921
Kuthali Moothavar v. Peringati Kunharankutty: Affirming Clear Title through Adequate Possession Standards Introduction The case of Kuthali Moothavar v. Peringati Kunharankutty, adjudicated by the...
Priority of Maternal Uncles in Hindu Inheritance under Mitakshara: Vedachela Mudaliar v. Subramania Mudaliar

Priority of Maternal Uncles in Hindu Inheritance under Mitakshara: Vedachela Mudaliar v. Subramania Mudaliar

Date: Jul 8, 1921
Priority of Maternal Uncles in Hindu Inheritance under Mitakshara: Vedachela Mudaliar v. Subramania Mudaliar Introduction The case of Vedachela Mudaliar v. Subramania Mudaliar adjudicated by the...
Reaffirming Hindu Math Autonomy: Comprehensive Analysis of Vidya Varuthi Thirtha v. Balusami Ayyar

Reaffirming Hindu Math Autonomy: Comprehensive Analysis of Vidya Varuthi Thirtha v. Balusami Ayyar

Date: Jul 6, 1921
Reaffirming Hindu Math Autonomy: Comprehensive Analysis of Vidya Varuthi Thirtha v. Balusami Ayyar Introduction The case of Vidya Varuthi Thirtha v. Balusami Ayyar, adjudicated by the Bombay High...
Estoppel Through Consent in Hindu Widow's Gift: Basappa v. Fakirappa

Estoppel Through Consent in Hindu Widow's Gift: Basappa v. Fakirappa

Date: Jul 6, 1921
Estoppel Through Consent in Hindu Widow's Gift: Basappa v. Fakirappa Introduction Basappa v. Fakirappa is a landmark case adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on July 5, 1921. The case revolves...
Property Transfer Through Brokers and Estoppel: Insights from Fazal D. Allana v. Mangaldas M. Pakvasa

Property Transfer Through Brokers and Estoppel: Insights from Fazal D. Allana v. Mangaldas M. Pakvasa

Date: Jul 1, 1921
Property Transfer Through Brokers and Estoppel: Insights from Fazal D. Allana v. Mangaldas M. Pakvasa Introduction The case of Fazal D. Allana v. Mangaldas M. Pakvasa, adjudicated by the Bombay High...
Invalidity of Mortgage Bonds Due to Fraudulent Registration Practices: Insights from Mathura Prasad v. Chandra Narayan Chowdhury (1921)

Invalidity of Mortgage Bonds Due to Fraudulent Registration Practices: Insights from Mathura Prasad v. Chandra Narayan Chowdhury (1921)

Date: Mar 22, 1921
Invalidity of Mortgage Bonds Due to Fraudulent Registration Practices: Insights from Mathura Prasad v. Chandra Narayan Chowdhury (1921) Introduction The case of Mathura Prasad v. Chandra Narayan...
Charitable Trusts and Religious Authority: Analysis of Advocate-General Of Bombay v. Yusuf Ali Ebrahim

Charitable Trusts and Religious Authority: Analysis of Advocate-General Of Bombay v. Yusuf Ali Ebrahim

Date: Mar 20, 1921
Charitable Trusts and Religious Authority: Analysis of Advocate-General Of Bombay v. Yusuf Ali Ebrahim Introduction The case of Advocate-General Of Bombay v. Yusuf Ali Ebrahim, adjudicated by the...
Expanding Appellate Jurisdiction: The Power to Remand in Ex Parte Decree Cases as Established in Jethalal Girdhar v. Varajlal Bhaishankar

Expanding Appellate Jurisdiction: The Power to Remand in Ex Parte Decree Cases as Established in Jethalal Girdhar v. Varajlal Bhaishankar

Date: Feb 22, 1921
Expanding Appellate Jurisdiction: The Power to Remand in Ex Parte Decree Cases as Established in Jethalal Girdhar v. Varajlal Bhaishankar Introduction The case of Jethalal Girdhar v. Varajlal...
Contradictory Statements and Alternative Charges: Establishing Precedent in Purshottam Ishvar Amin v. Emperor

Contradictory Statements and Alternative Charges: Establishing Precedent in Purshottam Ishvar Amin v. Emperor

Date: Oct 12, 1920
Contradictory Statements and Alternative Charges: Establishing Precedent in Purshottam Ishvar Amin v. Emperor Introduction The case of Purshottam Ishvar Amin v. Emperor was adjudicated by the Bombay...
Mandate of Section 342 CrPC in Summons-Cases Affirmed in G.S. Fernandez v. Emperor

Mandate of Section 342 CrPC in Summons-Cases Affirmed in G.S. Fernandez v. Emperor

Date: Aug 25, 1920
Mandate of Section 342 CrPC in Summons-Cases Affirmed in G.S. Fernandez v. Emperor Introduction The case of G.S. Fernandez v. Emperor adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on August 24, 1920, serves...
Inherent Judicial Powers in Re-Admitting Appeals for Minors: Insights from Sonubai v. Gaikwad

Inherent Judicial Powers in Re-Admitting Appeals for Minors: Insights from Sonubai v. Gaikwad

Date: Aug 20, 1920
Inherent Judicial Powers in Re-Admitting Appeals for Minors: Insights from Sonubai v. Gaikwad Introduction The landmark case of Sonubai v. Shivajirao Krishnarao Gopalrao Gaikwad, adjudicated by the...
Manilal Motilal v. Firm Gokal Das Rowji: Pioneering Jurisprudence on Arbitration Awards in Civil Suits

Manilal Motilal v. Firm Gokal Das Rowji: Pioneering Jurisprudence on Arbitration Awards in Civil Suits

Date: Jul 21, 1920
Manilal Motilal v. Firm Gokal Das Rowji: Pioneering Jurisprudence on Arbitration Awards in Civil Suits Introduction The landmark case of Manilal Motilal, A Firm v. Firm Gokal Das Rowji was...
Mandatory Requirement of Substantive Relief in Preemption Rights Claims: Insights from Charan Das v. Amir Khan

Mandatory Requirement of Substantive Relief in Preemption Rights Claims: Insights from Charan Das v. Amir Khan

Date: Jul 7, 1920
Mandatory Requirement of Substantive Relief in Preemption Rights Claims: Insights from Charan Das v. Amir Khan Introduction The case of Charan Das v. Amir Khan adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on...
Limitation Framework for Guardian-Induced Property Transfers: Insights from Fakirappa Limanna Patil v. Lumanna

Limitation Framework for Guardian-Induced Property Transfers: Insights from Fakirappa Limanna Patil v. Lumanna

Date: Dec 20, 1919
Limitation Framework for Guardian-Induced Property Transfers: Insights from Fakirappa Limanna Patil v. Lumanna Introduction The case of Fakirappa Limanna Patil v. Lumanna, adjudicated by the Bombay...
Jurisdictional Authority in Multi-Jurisdictional Litigation: Insights from Mulchand Raichand v. Gill & Co.

Jurisdictional Authority in Multi-Jurisdictional Litigation: Insights from Mulchand Raichand v. Gill & Co.

Date: Aug 1, 1919
Jurisdictional Authority in Multi-Jurisdictional Litigation: Insights from Mulchand Raichand v. Gill & Co. Introduction The case of Mulchand Raichand v. Gill & Co. adjudicated by the Bombay High...
Validation of Liquidator's Agreements Under Enemy Trading Act: Insights from Wolf & Sons v. Dadyba, Khimji & Co.

Validation of Liquidator's Agreements Under Enemy Trading Act: Insights from Wolf & Sons v. Dadyba, Khimji & Co.

Date: Aug 1, 1919
Validation of Liquidator's Agreements Under Enemy Trading Act: Insights from Wolf & Sons v. Dadyba, Khimji & Co. Introduction The case of Wolf & Sons v. Dadyba, Khimji & Co. adjudicated by the Bombay...
Sale of Security Property in Execution Proceedings: Ambalal Bapubhai Gujarati v. Narayan Tatyaba Bhosale

Sale of Security Property in Execution Proceedings: Ambalal Bapubhai Gujarati v. Narayan Tatyaba Bhosale

Date: Jan 30, 1919
Sale of Security Property in Execution Proceedings: Ambalal Bapubhai Gujarati v. Narayan Tatyaba Bhosale Introduction Ambalal Bapubhai Gujarati v. Narayan Tatyaba Bhosale, adjudicated by the Bombay...
Scope and Limitations of Section 8 of the Arbitration Act in Multi-Arbitrator Appointments: Insights from Gopalji Kuverji v. Morarji Jeram Naranji

Scope and Limitations of Section 8 of the Arbitration Act in Multi-Arbitrator Appointments: Insights from Gopalji Kuverji v. Morarji Jeram Naranji

Date: Jan 17, 1919
Scope and Limitations of Section 8 of the Arbitration Act in Multi-Arbitrator Appointments: Insights from Gopalji Kuverji v. Morarji Jeram Naranji Introduction The landmark case of Gopalji Kuverji v....
Clarifying Tenancy Forfeiture: Insights from Maharaja Of Jeypore v. Rukmini Pattamahadevi

Clarifying Tenancy Forfeiture: Insights from Maharaja Of Jeypore v. Rukmini Pattamahadevi

Date: Jan 13, 1919
Clarifying Tenancy Forfeiture: Insights from Maharaja Of Jeypore v. Rukmini Pattamahadevi Introduction Maharaja Of Jeypore v. Rukmini Pattamahadevi is a seminal judgment delivered by the Bombay High...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert