Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Bombay High Court Case Commentaries

Raja Narayanlal Bansilal v. Maneck Phiroze Mistry: Upholding Corporate Oversight without Compromising Fundamental Rights

Raja Narayanlal Bansilal v. Maneck Phiroze Mistry: Upholding Corporate Oversight without Compromising Fundamental Rights

Date: Sep 4, 1958
Raja Narayanlal Bansilal v. Maneck Phiroze Mistry: Upholding Corporate Oversight without Compromising Fundamental Rights Introduction In the landmark case of Raja Narayanlal Bansilal v. Maneck...
Customs Order as Quasi-Judicial: Glaxo Laboratories v. Venkateswaran

Customs Order as Quasi-Judicial: Glaxo Laboratories v. Venkateswaran

Date: Aug 27, 1958
Customs Order as Quasi-Judicial: Glaxo Laboratories v. Venkateswaran Introduction Glaxo Laboratories (India) Private Ltd. v. A.V Venkateswaran is a landmark judgment delivered by the Bombay High...
Three-Year Limitation on Re-Assessment Notices under Section 11(2) - Messrs Bisesar, House v. The State Of Bombay

Three-Year Limitation on Re-Assessment Notices under Section 11(2) - Messrs Bisesar, House v. The State Of Bombay

Date: Jul 24, 1958
Three-Year Limitation on Re-Assessment Notices under Section 11(2) - Messrs Bisesar, House v. The State Of Bombay Introduction The case of Messrs Bisesar, House v. The State Of Bombay was adjudicated...
Mandamus in Public Utility and Municipal Disputes: Insights from Nagpur CIO v. Nagpur Electric Light

Mandamus in Public Utility and Municipal Disputes: Insights from Nagpur CIO v. Nagpur Electric Light

Date: Jul 17, 1958
Mandamus in Public Utility and Municipal Disputes: Insights from Nagpur CIO v. Nagpur Electric Light Introduction The case of Corporation Of The City Of Nagpur Through Chief Executive Officer Of The...
Retrospective Protection of Tenant Rights under Section 43C Proviso: Patel Jethabhai v. Somabhai Sursang

Retrospective Protection of Tenant Rights under Section 43C Proviso: Patel Jethabhai v. Somabhai Sursang

Date: Jul 16, 1958
Retrospective Protection of Tenant Rights under Section 43C Proviso: Patel Maganbhai Jethabhai v. Somabhai Sursang Introduction The case of Patel Maganbhai Jethabhai v. Somabhai Sursang, decided by...
Interpretation of Section 12(3)(b) of the Bombay Rents Act: Insights from Kalidas Bhavan v. Bhagvandas Sakalchand

Interpretation of Section 12(3)(b) of the Bombay Rents Act: Insights from Kalidas Bhavan v. Bhagvandas Sakalchand

Date: Jun 26, 1958
Interpretation of Section 12(3)(b) of the Bombay Rents Act: Insights from Kalidas Bhavan v. Bhagvandas Sakalchand Introduction The case of Kalidas Bhavan v. Bhagvandas Sakalchand adjudicated by the...
Supremacy of Railway Code Rules over the Payment of Wages Act in S.P Awate v. C.P Fernandes

Supremacy of Railway Code Rules over the Payment of Wages Act in S.P Awate v. C.P Fernandes

Date: Jun 18, 1958
Supremacy of Railway Code Rules over the Payment of Wages Act in S.P Awate v. C.P Fernandes Introduction S.P Awate v. C.P Fernandes is a pivotal judgment delivered by the Bombay High Court on June...
Interpretation of Section 42(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act in Mazagaon Dock Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Income Tax

Interpretation of Section 42(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act in Mazagaon Dock Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Income Tax

Date: May 13, 1958
Interpretation of Section 42(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act in Mazagaon Dock Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Income Tax Introduction Mazagaon Dock Ltd., a Bombay-based private limited company engaged in...
Successor State Liability for Actionable Wrongs: Insights from W.W. Joshi v. State of Bombay

Successor State Liability for Actionable Wrongs: Insights from W.W. Joshi v. State of Bombay

Date: May 13, 1958
Successor State Liability for Actionable Wrongs: Insights from W.W. Joshi v. State of Bombay Introduction The case of W.W. Joshi And Ors. v. State Of Bombay And Ors. adjudicated by the Bombay High...
Extinguishment of Mulgiras Rights and Levy of Cess: Western India Theatres Ltd. v. Ishwarbhai Somabhai Patel

Extinguishment of Mulgiras Rights and Levy of Cess: Western India Theatres Ltd. v. Ishwarbhai Somabhai Patel

Date: May 3, 1958
Extinguishment of Mulgiras Rights and Levy of Cess: Western India Theatres Ltd. v. Ishwarbhai Somabhai Patel 1. Introduction The case of Western India Theatres Ltd. v. Ishwarbhai Somabhai Patel was...
Relief from Liability under Section 633: Analysis of In Re: Tolaram Jalan And Ors. v. Unknown

Relief from Liability under Section 633: Analysis of In Re: Tolaram Jalan And Ors. v. Unknown

Date: May 1, 1958
Relief from Liability under Section 633: Analysis of In Re: Tolaram Jalan And Ors. v. Unknown Introduction The case of In Re: Tolaram Jalan And Ors. v. Unknown adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on...
S. Framji v. Union Of India: Affirmation of Non-Contractual Nature of Government Service Conditions

S. Framji v. Union Of India: Affirmation of Non-Contractual Nature of Government Service Conditions

Date: Apr 26, 1958
S. Framji v. Union Of India: Affirmation of Non-Contractual Nature of Government Service Conditions Introduction The case of S. Framji v. Union Of India, adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on April...
Protection Against Wrongful Possession Orders: Insights from K.M. Motwani v. Albert Sequeira

Protection Against Wrongful Possession Orders: Insights from K.M. Motwani v. Albert Sequeira

Date: Apr 24, 1958
Protection Against Wrongful Possession Orders: Insights from K.M. Motwani v. Albert Sequeira Introduction The case of K.M. Motwani v. Albert Sequeira, adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on April...
Limitation Act: Interpretation of Deposits Under Article 145 – Dhanraj Mills Ltd. v. Laxmi Cotton Traders

Limitation Act: Interpretation of Deposits Under Article 145 – Dhanraj Mills Ltd. v. Laxmi Cotton Traders

Date: Apr 18, 1958
Limitation Act: Interpretation of Deposits Under Article 145 – Dhanraj Mills Ltd. v. Laxmi Cotton Traders Introduction The case of Dhanraj Mills Ltd. v. Laxmi Cotton Traders adjudicated by the Bombay...
Rectification of Tax Assessment Orders: Shantilal Rawji v. N.C Nair

Rectification of Tax Assessment Orders: Shantilal Rawji v. N.C Nair

Date: Apr 2, 1958
Rectification of Tax Assessment Orders: Shantilal Rawji v. N.C Nair Introduction The case of Shantilal Rawji v. N.C Nair adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on April 1, 1958, presents a pivotal...
Clarification on Section 44 vs Section 26(2) of the Income-Tax Act: Insights from B.M Desai v. V. Ramamurthy

Clarification on Section 44 vs Section 26(2) of the Income-Tax Act: Insights from B.M Desai v. V. Ramamurthy

Date: Apr 1, 1958
Clarification on Section 44 vs Section 26(2) of the Income-Tax Act: Insights from B.M Desai v. V. Ramamurthy Introduction The landmark judgment in B.M Desai v. V. Ramamurthy, delivered by the Bombay...
Comprehensive Legal Commentary on Messrs Chhotalal Devchand v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay City II, Bombay

Comprehensive Legal Commentary on Messrs Chhotalal Devchand v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay City II, Bombay

Date: Mar 25, 1958
Flexible Interpretation of Partnership Deeds under Section 26A: Insights from Messrs Chhotalal Devchand v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay Introduction The landmark case of Messrs Chhotalal...
Affirmation of Lis Pendens under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act in Maintenance Suits: Balwankar v. Gulbile

Affirmation of Lis Pendens under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act in Maintenance Suits: Balwankar v. Gulbile

Date: Mar 25, 1958
Affirmation of Lis Pendens under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act in Maintenance Suits: Balwankar v. Gulbile Introduction The case of Krishnaji Pandharinath Balwankar v. Anusayabai Sidram...
Deduction of Interest on Borrowed Capital for Business Expansion: Insights from The Calico Dyeing And Printing Works v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay City II

Deduction of Interest on Borrowed Capital for Business Expansion: Insights from The Calico Dyeing And Printing Works v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay City II

Date: Mar 25, 1958
Deduction of Interest on Borrowed Capital for Business Expansion: Insights from The Calico Dyeing And Printing Works v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay City II 1. Introduction The case of The...
Clarifying Charitable Trust Income Exemption: Commissioner of Income-Tax v. M/S Walchand Diamond Jubilee Trust

Clarifying Charitable Trust Income Exemption: Commissioner of Income-Tax v. M/S Walchand Diamond Jubilee Trust

Date: Mar 21, 1958
Clarifying Charitable Trust Income Exemption: Commissioner of Income-Tax v. M/S Walchand Diamond Jubilee Trust Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay City II, Bombay v. M/S....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert