Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Bombay High Court Case Commentaries

Limitations on Discretion to Waive Penal Interest under Section 18A(6): Lata Mangeshkar v. Union Of India

Limitations on Discretion to Waive Penal Interest under Section 18A(6): Lata Mangeshkar v. Union Of India

Date: Nov 8, 1958
Limitations on Discretion to Waive Penal Interest under Section 18A(6): Lata Mangeshkar v. Union Of India Introduction The case of Lata Mangeshkar v. Union Of India And Others, adjudicated by the...
Clarification on the Retrospective Effect of Section 35(10) of the Income-Tax Act in Corporate Tax Rebates

Clarification on the Retrospective Effect of Section 35(10) of the Income-Tax Act in Corporate Tax Rebates

Date: Nov 7, 1958
Clarification on the Retrospective Effect of Section 35(10) of the Income-Tax Act in Corporate Tax Rebates Introduction The case of The New Shorrock Spg. and Mfg. Company Limited v. N.V Raval...
Magistrate's Jurisdiction in Special Offences: Insights from The State v. Shankar Bhaurao Khirode

Magistrate's Jurisdiction in Special Offences: Insights from The State v. Shankar Bhaurao Khirode

Date: Oct 31, 1958
Magistrate's Jurisdiction in Special Offences: Insights from The State v. Shankar Bhaurao Khirode Introduction The State v. Shankar Bhaurao Khirode is a landmark judgment delivered by the Bombay High...
Interpretation of Tribunal Orders in Income Tax Appeals: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay City I v. Indo-Aden Salt Works Co.

Interpretation of Tribunal Orders in Income Tax Appeals: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay City I v. Indo-Aden Salt Works Co.

Date: Oct 29, 1958
Interpretation of Tribunal Orders in Income Tax Appeals: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay City I v. Indo-Aden Salt Works Co. Introduction The landmark case of Commissioner Of...
Affirmation of Interest Deduction on Investment Loans: Ormerods (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax

Affirmation of Interest Deduction on Investment Loans: Ormerods (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax

Date: Oct 28, 1958
Affirmation of Interest Deduction on Investment Loans: Ormerods (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Ormerods (India) Private Limited v. Commissioner of...
Defining Electoral Agency and Corrupt Practices: A Commentary on Sudhir L. Hendre v. S.A. Dange And Others

Defining Electoral Agency and Corrupt Practices: A Commentary on Sudhir L. Hendre v. S.A. Dange And Others

Date: Oct 12, 1958
Defining Electoral Agency and Corrupt Practices: A Commentary on Sudhir L. Hendre v. S.A. Dange And Others Introduction The case of Sudhir Laxman Hendre v. Shripat Amrit Dange And Others, adjudicated...
Amarchand N. Shroff Estate: Defining Capital Receipts and the Scope of Section 24B in Income Tax Law

Amarchand N. Shroff Estate: Defining Capital Receipts and the Scope of Section 24B in Income Tax Law

Date: Oct 11, 1958
Amarchand N. Shroff Estate: Defining Capital Receipts and the Scope of Section 24B in Income Tax Law Introduction The case of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay City I, Bombay v. Amarchand N....
Affirming Allowable Deductions for Justified Compensation Under s.10(2)(xv) in F.E Dinshaw Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax

Affirming Allowable Deductions for Justified Compensation Under s.10(2)(xv) in F.E Dinshaw Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax

Date: Oct 9, 1958
Affirming Allowable Deductions for Justified Compensation Under s.10(2)(xv) in F.E Dinshaw Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax Introduction The case of M/S. F.E Dinshaw Ltd. v. The Commissioner Of...
Validity of Partnership Gifts and Deductibility of Expenses: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. New Digvijaysinhji Tin Factory

Validity of Partnership Gifts and Deductibility of Expenses: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. New Digvijaysinhji Tin Factory

Date: Oct 5, 1958
Validity of Partnership Gifts and Deductibility of Expenses: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. New Digvijaysinhji Tin Factory Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Ahmedabad...
Tax Exemption Eligibility for Newly Established Industrial Undertakings: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. The Gaekwar Foam And Rubber Company Limited

Tax Exemption Eligibility for Newly Established Industrial Undertakings: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. The Gaekwar Foam And Rubber Company Limited

Date: Oct 4, 1958
Tax Exemption Eligibility for Newly Established Industrial Undertakings: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. The Gaekwar Foam And Rubber Company Limited Introduction The case of Commissioner...
Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Shoorji Vallabhdas & Co.: Redefining Managing Agency Commission Taxation

Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Shoorji Vallabhdas & Co.: Redefining Managing Agency Commission Taxation

Date: Oct 2, 1958
Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Shoorji Vallabhdas & Co.: Redefining Managing Agency Commission Taxation Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay City I v. Shoorji Vallabhdas & Co....
Ratilal B. Daftari v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Defining Real Income in Sub-Partnerships

Ratilal B. Daftari v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Defining Real Income in Sub-Partnerships

Date: Oct 1, 1958
Ratilal B. Daftari v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Defining Real Income in Sub-Partnerships Introduction The case of Ratilal B. Daftari v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay City II adjudicated by the...
Forfeited Tender Deposits as Deductible Trading Losses: Narandas Mathuradas And Co. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax

Forfeited Tender Deposits as Deductible Trading Losses: Narandas Mathuradas And Co. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax

Date: Sep 25, 1958
Forfeited Tender Deposits as Deductible Trading Losses: Narandas Mathuradas And Co. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Narandas Mathuradas And Co., Bombay v. The Commissioner Of...
Limits of Implied Powers under the Minimum Wages Act: Commentary on Bidi Merchants v. State Of Bombay

Limits of Implied Powers under the Minimum Wages Act: Commentary on Bidi Merchants v. State Of Bombay

Date: Sep 24, 1958
Limits of Implied Powers under the Minimum Wages Act: Commentary on Bidi Leaves And Tobacco Merchants Association v. The State Of Bombay Introduction The case of Bidi Leaves And Tobacco Merchants...
Conditional Loss Carry-Forward under the Indian Income-Tax Act: Analysis of Indore Malwa United Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Conditional Loss Carry-Forward under the Indian Income-Tax Act: Analysis of Indore Malwa United Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Sep 24, 1958
Conditional Loss Carry-Forward under the Indian Income-Tax Act: An In-Depth Analysis of Indore Malwa United Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Indore Malwa United Mills...
Mandatory Utilization of Section 27 for Challenging Best Judgment Assessments under Section 23(4): Analysis of Mauladin Ayub v. Commissioner of Income-Tax

Mandatory Utilization of Section 27 for Challenging Best Judgment Assessments under Section 23(4): Analysis of Mauladin Ayub v. Commissioner of Income-Tax

Date: Sep 24, 1958
Mandatory Utilization of Section 27 for Challenging Best Judgment Assessments under Section 23(4) Mauladin Ayub v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay South, Bombay Court: Bombay High Court Date:...
Judicial Commentary: Removal of Civilian Employees in Defence Services – Tara Singh v. Union Of India

Judicial Commentary: Removal of Civilian Employees in Defence Services – Tara Singh v. Union Of India

Date: Sep 23, 1958
Judicial Commentary: Removal of Civilian Employees in Defence Services – Tara Singh v. Union Of India Introduction Tara Singh Ujagar Singh v. Union Of India is a landmark judgment delivered by the...
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards: East India Trading Co. v. Badat & Co.

Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards: East India Trading Co. v. Badat & Co.

Date: Sep 13, 1958
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards: East India Trading Co. v. Badat & Co. Introduction The case of East India Trading Co., New York v. Badat And Company, Bombay adjudicated by the Bombay High...
Impact of Intimation Requirements under the Bombay Land Requisition Act: State Of Bombay v. Morarji Cooverji

Impact of Intimation Requirements under the Bombay Land Requisition Act: State Of Bombay v. Morarji Cooverji

Date: Sep 10, 1958
Impact of Intimation Requirements under the Bombay Land Requisition Act: State Of Bombay v. Morarji Cooverji Introduction The case of State Of Bombay v. Morarji Cooverji adjudicated by the Bombay...
Chandrabhaga Sadashiv Veralkar v. Bhikachand Hansaji: Reinforcing the Boundaries of the Arbitration Act, 1940

Chandrabhaga Sadashiv Veralkar v. Bhikachand Hansaji: Reinforcing the Boundaries of the Arbitration Act, 1940

Date: Sep 9, 1958
Chandrabhaga Sadashiv Veralkar v. Bhikachand Hansaji: Reinforcing the Boundaries of the Arbitration Act, 1940 Introduction The case of Chandrabhaga Sadashiv Veralkar v. Bhikachand Hansaji adjudicated...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert