Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Bombay High Court Case Commentaries

Section 41 Mandates Vicarious Taxation of Trustees: Insights from The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Ahmedabad v. M/S. Balwantrai Jethalal Vaidya

Section 41 Mandates Vicarious Taxation of Trustees: Insights from The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Ahmedabad v. M/S. Balwantrai Jethalal Vaidya

Date: Mar 19, 1958
Section 41 Mandates Vicarious Taxation of Trustees: Insights from The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Ahmedabad v. M/S. Balwantrai Jethalal Vaidya Introduction The case of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,...
Leasing Business Assets as Ongoing Business Activity Under Section 24(2): Insights from Commissioner of Income-Tax v. National Mills Co. Ltd.

Leasing Business Assets as Ongoing Business Activity Under Section 24(2): Insights from Commissioner of Income-Tax v. National Mills Co. Ltd.

Date: Mar 18, 1958
Leasing Business Assets as Ongoing Business Activity Under Section 24(2): Insights from Commissioner of Income-Tax v. National Mills Co. Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner of Income-Tax,...
Limits on Appellate Assistant Commissioner's Assessment Powers: Shapoorji Pallonji Mistry v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Limits on Appellate Assistant Commissioner's Assessment Powers: Shapoorji Pallonji Mistry v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Mar 15, 1958
Limits on Appellate Assistant Commissioner's Assessment Powers: Shapoorji Pallonji Mistry v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Shapoorji Pallonji Mistry v. The Commissioner Of...
Independent Assessment of Penal Proceedings under Section 28(1)(c): Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Messrs Gokuldas Harivallabhdas

Independent Assessment of Penal Proceedings under Section 28(1)(c): Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Messrs Gokuldas Harivallabhdas

Date: Mar 15, 1958
Independent Assessment of Penal Proceedings under Section 28(1)(c): Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Messrs Gokuldas Harivallabhdas Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Ahmedabad v....
Procedural Fairness in Arbitration: Insights from Vinayak Vishnu Sahasrabudhe v. B.G Gadre And Others

Procedural Fairness in Arbitration: Insights from Vinayak Vishnu Sahasrabudhe v. B.G Gadre And Others

Date: Mar 12, 1958
Procedural Fairness in Arbitration: Insights from Vinayak Vishnu Sahasrabudhe v. B.G Gadre And Others Introduction The case of Vinayak Vishnu Sahasrabudhe v. B.G Gadre And Others adjudicated by the...
Deductibility of Destruction of Stock-in-Trade Due to Enemy Action - Pohoomal Bros. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax

Deductibility of Destruction of Stock-in-Trade Due to Enemy Action - Pohoomal Bros. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax

Date: Mar 11, 1958
Deductibility of Destruction of Stock-in-Trade Due to Enemy Action Introduction The case of Pohoomal Bros. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Bombay City adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on March 10,...
J.P Tiwari v. Bhimraj Harlalka: Enhancing the Boundaries of Insolvency Proceedings

J.P Tiwari v. Bhimraj Harlalka: Enhancing the Boundaries of Insolvency Proceedings

Date: Feb 26, 1958
J.P Tiwari v. Bhimraj Harlalka: Enhancing the Boundaries of Insolvency Proceedings Introduction The case of J.P Tiwari v. Bhimraj Harlalka adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on February 25, 1958...
Contempt of Court and Inherent Jurisdiction: Comprehensive Analysis of The State Of Bombay v. P.

Contempt of Court and Inherent Jurisdiction: Comprehensive Analysis of The State Of Bombay v. P.

Date: Feb 20, 1958
Contempt of Court and Inherent Jurisdiction: Comprehensive Analysis of The State Of Bombay v. P. Introduction The case The State Of Bombay v. P. adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on February 19,...
Dossibai Nanabhoy Jeejeebhoy v. P.M Bharucha: Landmark Judgment on Land Compensation Apportionment

Dossibai Nanabhoy Jeejeebhoy v. P.M Bharucha: Landmark Judgment on Land Compensation Apportionment

Date: Feb 6, 1958
Dossibai Nanabhoy Jeejeebhoy v. P.M Bharucha: Landmark Judgment on Land Compensation Apportionment Introduction The case of Dossibai Nanabhoy Jeejeebhoy v. P.M Bharucha, adjudicated by the Bombay...
Inherent Powers of High Courts in Cancelling Bail for Bailable Offences: Mondkar v. Hussain

Inherent Powers of High Courts in Cancelling Bail for Bailable Offences: Mondkar v. Hussain

Date: Jan 15, 1958
Inherent Powers of High Courts in Cancelling Bail for Bailable Offences: Mondkar v. Hussain Introduction Madhukar Purshottam Mondkar And Another v. Talab Haji Hussain And Others Opponents is a...
Resolution of Deadlock in Public Trusts: Insights from Institute Indo-Portuguese v. Dr. T. Borges

Resolution of Deadlock in Public Trusts: Insights from Institute Indo-Portuguese v. Dr. T. Borges

Date: Jan 8, 1958
Resolution of Deadlock in Public Trusts: Insights from Institute Indo-Portuguese v. Dr. T. Borges Introduction The case of Institute Indo-Portuguese v. Dr. T. Borges, adjudicated by the Bombay High...
Interpreting 'Legal Character' under Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act: Insights from Major General Shanta Shamsher J.B.R. Rana v. Kamani Brothers

Interpreting 'Legal Character' under Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act: Insights from Major General Shanta Shamsher J.B.R. Rana v. Kamani Brothers

Date: Jan 7, 1958
Interpreting 'Legal Character' under Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act: Insights from Major General Shanta Shamsher J.B.R. Rana v. Kamani Brothers Private Limited Introduction Major General...
Valuation of Reliefs in Declaratory Suits: Insights from Chhotalal Kalidas v. Laxmidas Mayaram

Valuation of Reliefs in Declaratory Suits: Insights from Chhotalal Kalidas v. Laxmidas Mayaram

Date: Dec 13, 1957
Valuation of Reliefs in Declaratory Suits: Insights from Chhotalal Kalidas v. Laxmidas Mayaram Introduction The case of Chhotalal Kalidas v. Laxmidas Mayaram, adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on...
Ciba Ltd. v. South Indian Manufacturing Co.: Upholding Public Interest in Trade Mark Registration

Ciba Ltd. v. South Indian Manufacturing Co.: Upholding Public Interest in Trade Mark Registration

Date: Dec 4, 1957
Ciba Ltd. v. South Indian Manufacturing Co.: Upholding Public Interest in Trade Mark Registration Introduction The case of Ciba Ltd. v. M. Ramalingam And S. Subramaniam Trading In The Name Of South...
Enforceability of Arbitration Clauses in Commercial Contracts: Insights from Middle East Trading Co. v. New National Mills Ltd.

Enforceability of Arbitration Clauses in Commercial Contracts: Insights from Middle East Trading Co. v. New National Mills Ltd.

Date: Nov 21, 1957
Enforceability of Arbitration Clauses in Commercial Contracts: Insights from Middle East Trading Co. v. New National Mills Ltd. Introduction The case of Middle East Trading Co., Bombay 3 v. New...
Comprehensive Interpretation of "Contesting Candidates" under Section 82(a) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951: Establishing Mandatory Joinder of All Contesting Candidates in Election Petitions – Y.B. Chavan v. K.T Mangalmurti

Comprehensive Interpretation of "Contesting Candidates" under Section 82(a) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951: Establishing Mandatory Joinder of All Contesting Candidates in Election Petitions – Y.B. Chavan v. K.T Mangalmurti

Date: Nov 21, 1957
Comprehensive Interpretation of "Contesting Candidates" under Section 82(a) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951: Establishing Mandatory Joinder of All Contesting Candidates in Election...
Limitation Periods in Declaratory Suits: Vithoba Bhanji v. Vithal Sakroo - A Landmark Commentary

Limitation Periods in Declaratory Suits: Vithoba Bhanji v. Vithal Sakroo - A Landmark Commentary

Date: Nov 19, 1957
Limitation Periods in Declaratory Suits: Vithoba Bhanji v. Vithal Sakroo - A Landmark Commentary Introduction The case of Vithoba Bhanji and Others v. Vithal Sakroo and Others, adjudicated by the...
Anande v. Borkar: Clarifying "Office of Profit" and Electoral Disqualification

Anande v. Borkar: Clarifying "Office of Profit" and Electoral Disqualification

Date: Nov 15, 1957
Anande v. Borkar: Clarifying "Office of Profit" and Electoral Disqualification Introduction The case of Dr. Deorao Laxman Anande v. Keshav Laxman Borkar was adjudicated by the Bombay High Court on...
Malan v. State of Bombay (1957): Defining Abetment of Bigamy under Section 107 IPC

Malan v. State of Bombay (1957): Defining Abetment of Bigamy under Section 107 IPC

Date: Nov 1, 1957
Malan v. State of Bombay (1957): Defining Abetment of Bigamy under Section 107 IPC Introduction Malan v. State of Bombay is a landmark judgment delivered by the Bombay High Court on October 31, 1957....
Establishing Judicial Boundaries in Municipal Authority: Insights from Nathubhai Dhulaji v. The Municipal Corporation, Bombay

Establishing Judicial Boundaries in Municipal Authority: Insights from Nathubhai Dhulaji v. The Municipal Corporation, Bombay

Date: Oct 12, 1957
Establishing Judicial Boundaries in Municipal Authority: Insights from Nathubhai Dhulaji v. The Municipal Corporation, Bombay 1. Introduction The case of Nathubhai Dhulaji v. The Municipal...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert