Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries

Fiscal Prudence over Formal Equality: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Cut-off Date for Fifth Pay Commission Pension Benefits

Fiscal Prudence over Formal Equality: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Cut-off Date for Fifth Pay Commission Pension Benefits

Date: Aug 20, 2025
Fiscal Prudence over Formal Equality: P&H High Court Affirms 01-12-2011 Cut-off for Fifth Pay Commission Benefits in Ram Lal Chumber & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Anr. 1. Introduction The Punjab &...
“Foundation First”: Bombay High Court Mandates Specific Pleadings and Affidavit for Secondary Evidence under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

“Foundation First”: Bombay High Court Mandates Specific Pleadings and Affidavit for Secondary Evidence under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

Date: Aug 20, 2025
“Foundation First”: Bombay High Court Mandates Specific Pleadings and Affidavit for Secondary Evidence under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 1. Introduction In Hindustan Petroleum Corporation...
Delhi High Court Re-Affirms “Partial-Severability” under Section 34 and Upholds Government-Linked Pricing of APM Gas

Delhi High Court Re-Affirms “Partial-Severability” under Section 34 and Upholds Government-Linked Pricing of APM Gas

Date: Aug 20, 2025
Delhi High Court Re-Affirms “Partial-Severability” under Section 34 and Upholds Government-Linked Pricing of APM Gas 1. Introduction In Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chemicals Ltd. v. GAIL (India)...
“Substance over Procedure” in Public Employment:  Balbir Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2025) and the Compulsory Regularisation of Long-Serving Daily Wagers

“Substance over Procedure” in Public Employment: Balbir Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2025) and the Compulsory Regularisation of Long-Serving Daily Wagers

Date: Aug 20, 2025
“Substance over Procedure” in Public Employment: Balbir Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2025) and the Compulsory Regularisation of Long-Serving Daily Wagers 1. Introduction CWP No. 3189 of 2025...
“The Pre-Deceased Spouse Exception” – Karnataka High Court Clarifies Eligibility for Compassionate Appointment

“The Pre-Deceased Spouse Exception” – Karnataka High Court Clarifies Eligibility for Compassionate Appointment

Date: Aug 20, 2025
“The Pre-Deceased Spouse Exception” – Karnataka High Court Clarifies Eligibility for Compassionate Appointment 1. Introduction The decision in Smt. Mantavva & Anr. v. The Divisional Controller,...
Stay‑Induced Delay as an Independent Article 21 Ground for Bail under UAPA: Commentary on Muhammed Bilal v. Union of India (2025 KER 61965)

Stay‑Induced Delay as an Independent Article 21 Ground for Bail under UAPA: Commentary on Muhammed Bilal v. Union of India (2025 KER 61965)

Date: Aug 20, 2025
Stay‑Induced Delay as an Independent Article 21 Ground for Bail under UAPA Case: Muhammed Bilal v. Union of India (2025 KER 61965) Court: High Court of Kerala (Division Bench) Bench: Raja...
Breathalyzer Outputs as Electronic Records: Patna High Court Mandates Section 65B Certification and Clinical Corroboration; Informant Cannot Investigate — Manoj Murmu v. State of Bihar

Breathalyzer Outputs as Electronic Records: Patna High Court Mandates Section 65B Certification and Clinical Corroboration; Informant Cannot Investigate — Manoj Murmu v. State of Bihar

Date: Aug 20, 2025
Breathalyzer Outputs as Electronic Records: Patna High Court Mandates Section 65B Certification and Clinical Corroboration; Informant Cannot Investigate Introduction This commentary examines the...
Delhi High Court Mandates Pre‑Bid Challenges for PAC Tenders: Non‑Participants Lack Locus to Contest Procurement

Delhi High Court Mandates Pre‑Bid Challenges for PAC Tenders: Non‑Participants Lack Locus to Contest Procurement

Date: Aug 20, 2025
Pre‑Bid Challenges Mandatory for PAC Tenders: Delhi High Court Clarifies Locus and Timelines for Judicial Review in Public Procurement Case: Rotoffset Corporation v. Security Printing and Minting...
“Sick and Infirm” Is Not an Automatic Bypass to PMLA’s Twin Conditions: Delhi High Court’s Gravity-Centric Bail Standard in Mega Economic Offences

“Sick and Infirm” Is Not an Automatic Bypass to PMLA’s Twin Conditions: Delhi High Court’s Gravity-Centric Bail Standard in Mega Economic Offences

Date: Aug 20, 2025
“Sick and Infirm” Is Not an Automatic Bypass to PMLA’s Twin Conditions: Delhi High Court’s Gravity-Centric Bail Standard in Mega Economic Offences Introduction In ARVIND DHAM v. Directorate of...
Suleman v. State of H.P. — The “Intent-and-Incitement” Threshold for Section 152 BNS (Sedition-type) Offences

Suleman v. State of H.P. — The “Intent-and-Incitement” Threshold for Section 152 BNS (Sedition-type) Offences

Date: Aug 20, 2025
Suleman v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2025 HHC 27866) Commentary: The High Court Re-defines the Reach of Section 152, Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023 Introduction The Himachal Pradesh High Court,...
PCDA(P) Cannot Alter Medical Board Disability Assessments; Rounding-off Applies to Superannuated Soldiers: J&K High Court affirms AFT in Union of India v. Shukar Singh

PCDA(P) Cannot Alter Medical Board Disability Assessments; Rounding-off Applies to Superannuated Soldiers: J&K High Court affirms AFT in Union of India v. Shukar Singh

Date: Aug 20, 2025
PCDA(P) Cannot Alter Medical Board Disability Assessments; Rounding-off Applies to Superannuated Soldiers: J&K High Court affirms AFT in Union of India v. Shukar Singh Introduction In Union of India...
"Once a State Forest, Always a Forest": Karnataka High Court’s boundary-based test, strict Section 20 exception, and a blueprint for unified geo-spatial land governance

"Once a State Forest, Always a Forest": Karnataka High Court’s boundary-based test, strict Section 20 exception, and a blueprint for unified geo-spatial land governance

Date: Aug 19, 2025
"Once a State Forest, Always a Forest": Karnataka High Court’s boundary-based test, strict Section 20 exception, and a blueprint for unified geo-spatial land governance Introduction In M/s Prakruti...
Pre-decisional Hearing Is Mandatory Before Removing Gram Panchayat Administrators Appointed After Dissolution: Rajasthan High Court’s Due Process Mandate under Section 38, Panchayati Raj Act, 1994

Pre-decisional Hearing Is Mandatory Before Removing Gram Panchayat Administrators Appointed After Dissolution: Rajasthan High Court’s Due Process Mandate under Section 38, Panchayati Raj Act, 1994

Date: Aug 19, 2025
State of Rajasthan (2025 RJ-JP 31054), holding that pre-decisional hearing is mandatory before removal of Panchayat Administrators appointed after dissolution, and reiterating constitutional...
“The Autonomy Cohabitation Doctrine” –  Madhya Pradesh High Court Affirms an Adult’s Right to Live-in with a Married Partner

“The Autonomy Cohabitation Doctrine” – Madhya Pradesh High Court Affirms an Adult’s Right to Live-in with a Married Partner

Date: Aug 19, 2025
“The Autonomy Cohabitation Doctrine” – Madhya Pradesh High Court Affirms an Adult’s Right to Live-in with a Married Partner 1. Introduction In Neeke Lal Mehra v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2025...
Colleges Excluded from CPCB Petrol Pump Distance Criteria: Kerala High Court Sets Textual Limits on PESO’s Approval Powers

Colleges Excluded from CPCB Petrol Pump Distance Criteria: Kerala High Court Sets Textual Limits on PESO’s Approval Powers

Date: Aug 19, 2025
Colleges Excluded from CPCB Petrol Pump Distance Criteria: Kerala High Court Sets Textual Limits on PESO’s Approval Powers Case: Bindhu Kuniparambath v. The Joint Chief Controller of Explosives, 2025...
Prosecution Lapses Are Not a Passport to Bail: Delhi High Court Prioritizes Merits and Victim Testimony in POCSO/BNS Cases

Prosecution Lapses Are Not a Passport to Bail: Delhi High Court Prioritizes Merits and Victim Testimony in POCSO/BNS Cases

Date: Aug 19, 2025
Prosecution Lapses Are Not a Passport to Bail: Delhi High Court Prioritizes Merits and Victim Testimony in POCSO/BNS Cases Introduction In Keshav Kumar @ Tushar v. State (GNCT) of Delhi and Anr....
Unconditional Apology Without Proof of Intent Suffices to Purge Criminal Contempt: Kerala High Court Clarifies the Threshold under Rule 14(a) of the 1988 Rules

Unconditional Apology Without Proof of Intent Suffices to Purge Criminal Contempt: Kerala High Court Clarifies the Threshold under Rule 14(a) of the 1988 Rules

Date: Aug 19, 2025
Unconditional Apology Without Proof of Intent Suffices to Purge Criminal Contempt: Kerala High Court Clarifies the Threshold under Rule 14(a) of the 1988 Rules Introduction In SUO MOTU v. Adv. K M...
No Inherent Power of Review: Bombay High Court Clarifies that Labour Courts Cannot Entertain Delay-Condonation Applications for Non-Maintainable Reviews

No Inherent Power of Review: Bombay High Court Clarifies that Labour Courts Cannot Entertain Delay-Condonation Applications for Non-Maintainable Reviews

Date: Aug 19, 2025
No Inherent Power of Review: Bombay High Court Clarifies that Labour Courts Cannot Entertain Delay-Condonation Applications for Non-Maintainable Reviews 1. Introduction This commentary examines the...
“Silent Desertion” as Conclusive Proof of Animus Deserendi: A Commentary on Anil Kumar Sonmani v. Shradha Tiwari (2025)

“Silent Desertion” as Conclusive Proof of Animus Deserendi: A Commentary on Anil Kumar Sonmani v. Shradha Tiwari (2025)

Date: Aug 19, 2025
“Silent Desertion” as Conclusive Proof of Animus Deserendi A Detailed Commentary on Anil Kumar Sonmani @ Anil Swami v. Smt. Shradha Tiwari (2025 CGHC 41430-DB) 1. Introduction In August 2025, the...
The “Reasonable Nexus” Doctrine: Kerala High Court Clarifies Timing of Vehicle Seizure under Section 52 of the Kerala Forest Act, 1961

The “Reasonable Nexus” Doctrine: Kerala High Court Clarifies Timing of Vehicle Seizure under Section 52 of the Kerala Forest Act, 1961

Date: Aug 19, 2025
The “Reasonable Nexus” Doctrine: Kerala High Court Clarifies Timing of Vehicle Seizure under Section 52 of the Kerala Forest Act, 1961 1. Introduction In A.M. Noushad v. State of Kerala (2025 KER...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert