Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Bonafide Disciplinary Proceedings by Bar Council Have Statutory Indemnity Against Legal Action held Madras High Court in case of Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry v. VK Sethukumar and ors ....
The Supreme Court in Dauvaram Nirmalkar vs State of Chhattisgarh that by applying the "Sustained Provocation Principle" in the course of a murder trial can help in determining the gravity of...
Case Title: Shri B.K Parchure V. State According to the Delhi High Court, there is no necessity that the need for sanction be constantly delayed until a later stage of the proceedings. If the actions...
The Delhi High Court in M/S Maan Pharmaceuticals Ltd V. M/S Mindwave Healthcare Pvt. Ltd observed that mere non-filing of a 'legal proceedings certificate' is not a concealment of such a material...
The validity of Ministry of Home Affairs' notification dated April 26, 2013, specifying the officers competent for compounding the offences before institution of any prosecution, issued under sec....
In the case of Subramanian P v. State , the petitioner was accused of submitting a letter purportedly from ISRO exempting the company from paying an earnest money deposit while operating on behalf...
The Supreme Court in Satyajit Kumar and others versus State of Jharkhand and others quashed a notification of the Jharkhand Government granting 100% Reservation to the local residents in scheduled...
The Legal Contours of Charitable Objects in Indian Trusts Introduction Charitable trusts play a pivotal role in the socio-economic fabric of India, channeling resources towards a myriad of welfare...
The Delhi High Court in New Millennium Education Society & Anr V. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University & Anr directed the Bar Council of India (BCI) to constitute special expert teams to conduct...
The Allahabad High Court, in case of Raj Kishore @ Pappu v. State of U.P observed that the provisions of Section 106 of the Evidence Act cannot be invoked to place the onus of explaining how the...
The Delhi High Court in Anil Samaniya v/s Union Of India & Ors. has observed that since the State has the expertise and confidential information to evaluate threat perceptions of individuals, it is...
In case of Babu v. State of U.P. The Allahabad High Court was deliberating over an appeal filed by Babu, who had been found guilty by the Court of Additional Session Judge in Badaun in May 2013 under...
In case of Satakshi Mishra v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Secondary Edu. Dept. Lucknow And 4 Others, the Allahabad High Court stated that there is no specific time gap or difference between the...
The Supreme Court in Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. vs IVRCL AMR Joint Venture laid down that merely using words like “Arbitration” or “Arbitrator” does not make that document an Arbitration Agreement...
The Allahabad High Court in Poonam Kushwaha v. State Of U.P. And 3 Others observed that “The Habeas Corpus Petitions should not be used as a whip over the police to officials, just to serve out the...
The Supreme Court in Mandar Deepak Pawar vs State of Maharashtra quashed a rape case and differentiated between a false promise to marriage and a breach of promise which is made in good faith but...
The Supreme Court in Sunita Palita vs Panchami Stone Quarry categorically stated that it is not necessary to make an averment that a Managing Director or Joint Managing Directors were in charge of...
According to the Delhi High Court, whenever a party asserts a change in circumstances following the issuance of a maintenance order under Section 125 CrPC, the appropriate course of action would be...
The Law and Procedure of Private Complaints in India: A Scholarly Analysis Introduction The Indian criminal justice system provides multiple avenues for setting the law in motion. While the...
According to the Delhi High Court, the order issued under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act of 1961 is not an assessment for the purposes of Section 147, and as a result, the Assessing Officer...