Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now

India Columns

Interim Reliefs or Stay of Investigation Can Be Granted Only in the Rarest of Rare Cases

Interim Reliefs or Stay of Investigation Can Be Granted Only in the Rarest of Rare Cases

Date: Oct 18, 2022
The Supreme Court in Siddharth Mukesh Bhandari vs State of Gujarat categorically stated that the Court while exercising power u/s 482 CrPC can grant stay of investigation or any other interim relief...
In order to qualify for the High Court's protection under Article 227, litigants cannot be negligent in litigating properly before the lower courts: Delhi Court

In order to qualify for the High Court's protection under Article 227, litigants cannot be negligent in litigating properly before the lower courts: Delhi Court

Date: Oct 18, 2022
The Court made the comment in the case of Kailash Sewani Vs. Manish Kumar Chaudhary in a plea that was brought up in opposition to an order imposed on July 11, 2022, in a civil case where the...
According to the Delhi High Court, an intermediary would be qualified to seek protection under Section 79 of the Information Technology Act of 2000 unless an active role in the conduct of the offences as alleged is disclosed.

According to the Delhi High Court, an intermediary would be qualified to seek protection under Section 79 of the Information Technology Act of 2000 unless an active role in the conduct of the offences as alleged is disclosed.

Date: Oct 18, 2022
In some circumstances, the provision exempts the intermediary from obligation. It indicates that an intermediary is not responsible for any data, information, or communication links provided by a...
Analysis of Complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C.

Analysis of Complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C.

Date: Oct 17, 2022
The Anatomy of a Private Complaint: A Jurisprudential Analysis of Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 I. Introduction The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) provides a robust...
A judge cannot act as a mouthpiece of prosecution while deciding Discharge Application, must consider broad probabilities of case: Delhi HC

A judge cannot act as a mouthpiece of prosecution while deciding Discharge Application, must consider broad probabilities of case: Delhi HC

Date: Oct 14, 2022
Case Title: Shipali Sharma V. State & Anr If there was a possibility for both points of view and the judge is convinced that the evidence presented to him raised some but not serious suspicions about...
Yardstick for determining Infringement of Trade Dress is an overall impression of the design, subtle dissimilarities irrelevant: Delhi HC

Yardstick for determining Infringement of Trade Dress is an overall impression of the design, subtle dissimilarities irrelevant: Delhi HC

Date: Oct 14, 2022
Case Title: Diageo Brands B.V. & Anr. v. Great Galleon Ventures Limited The Delhi High Court prohibited the Defendant from violating the Plaintiff's registered design. The Court, however, declined to...
Supreme Court makes prior Sanction from competent authority mandatory to prosecute a government servant

Supreme Court makes prior Sanction from competent authority mandatory to prosecute a government servant

Date: Oct 14, 2022
Case Title: Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board & Anr V. Seema Kapoor  Justices S K Kaul and Hemant Gupta's bench made the statement. The purpose of Section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code...
One party cannot make a list of selected arbitrators and send it to the other party and ask to select the names from the list: Delhi High Court

One party cannot make a list of selected arbitrators and send it to the other party and ask to select the names from the list: Delhi High Court

Date: Oct 14, 2022
In case of Overnite Express Ltd v. DMRC the Delhi High court observed that one party cannot make a list of selected arbitrators and send it to the other party and ask to select the names from the...
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 prohibits the annulment of an arbitration award on the grounds that the evidence used by the arbitral tribunal does not meet those requirements: Delhi High Court

The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 prohibits the annulment of an arbitration award on the grounds that the evidence used by the arbitral tribunal does not meet those requirements: Delhi High Court

Date: Oct 14, 2022
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 prohibits the annulment of an arbitration award on the grounds that the evidence used by the arbitral tribunal does not meet those requirements. Was held in the case of...
Delhi High Court rejects WhatsApp and Meta appeals against the CCI investigation

Delhi High Court rejects WhatsApp and Meta appeals against the CCI investigation

Date: Oct 14, 2022
In case of  Whatsapp LLC v. CCI, Facebook v. CCI, following prima facie finding that WhatsApp's new privacy policy violated the Competition Act of 2000, the Competition Commission of India requested...
Essential Religious Practices in Indian Law

Essential Religious Practices in Indian Law

Date: Oct 13, 2022
The Doctrine of Essential Religious Practices in Indian Constitutional Law: Evolution, Application, and Critique Introduction The concept of "essential religious practices" (ERP) is a judicially...
Analysis of Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872

Analysis of Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872

Date: Oct 13, 2022
Unlawful Considerations and Objects: A Comprehensive Analysis of Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 Introduction Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (hereinafter "the Act") stands as...
Agreements Forbidden by Law in India

Agreements Forbidden by Law in India

Date: Oct 13, 2022
Agreements Forbidden by Law in India: An Analysis under Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 Introduction The Indian Contract Act, 1872 (hereinafter "the Contract Act"), forms the bedrock of...
It is not necessary by the Magistrate to record the statement of the public servant who filed the complaint in discharge of his official duty before issuing summons to the accused: Supreme Court

It is not necessary by the Magistrate to record the statement of the public servant who filed the complaint in discharge of his official duty before issuing summons to the accused: Supreme Court

Date: Oct 13, 2022
In case of Cheminova India Limited vs. State of Punjab Supreme Court held that before summoning the accused, the magistrate is not required to record the public servant's statement that he had filed...
Split Verdict delivered in the Hijab Case by the Supreme Court - Judges differ in opinion over freedom of choice against essential religious practice;

Split Verdict delivered in the Hijab Case by the Supreme Court - Judges differ in opinion over freedom of choice against essential religious practice;

Date: Oct 13, 2022
A batch of appeals lying before the Supreme Court challenging the Karnataka High Court judgement which restricted girl students from wearing Hijab as a part of uniform dress code resulted in a split...
Recovery of Demand against Issues decided in favour of Assessee is Unwarranted: Delhi High Court

Recovery of Demand against Issues decided in favour of Assessee is Unwarranted: Delhi High Court

Date: Oct 13, 2022
Case Title: Expeditors International of Washingtion V. ACIT (Delhi High Court) By basing its decision on a circular issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the Delhi High Court denied the...
Delhi High Court Directs DNRs To Appoint Grievance Officers Under IT Rules 2021.

Delhi High Court Directs DNRs To Appoint Grievance Officers Under IT Rules 2021.

Date: Oct 13, 2022
The Delhi High Court in Dabur India Limited V. Ashok Kumar And Ors And Other Connected Matters to curb the proliferation of imposter domain names directed various domain name registrars (DNRs) to...
Quashing of Cases Against Men Who Allegedly Raised Slogans Against PM Over Demonetization Decision In 2016

Quashing of Cases Against Men Who Allegedly Raised Slogans Against PM Over Demonetization Decision In 2016

Date: Oct 13, 2022
The Madras High Court in Jegan @ Ellamaran and others v. State and another quashed a case against 5 persons who had allegedly indulged in a protest and had raised various slogans against Prime...
Theobroma & Theos settle Trademark dispute before Delhi High Court

Theobroma & Theos settle Trademark dispute before Delhi High Court

Date: Oct 13, 2022
Case Title: Theos Food Pvt Ltd & Ors v. Theobroma Foods Pvt Ltd A settlement over the use of the THEOS/THEO trademarks was achieved between the two well-known confectionery companies. In a trademark...
There is no bar in the amendment of pleadings while filing additional documents in an application under Sec 7 of IBC: Supreme Court

There is no bar in the amendment of pleadings while filing additional documents in an application under Sec 7 of IBC: Supreme Court

Date: Oct 13, 2022
Whether there is a legal bar to the amendment of pleadings in a petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) or to the filing of additional documents aside from those...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert