Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

tenth-circuit-upholds-stringent-& Case Commentaries

Green v. McGee: Carving Out Punitive Damages from Set-Offs and Preserving Joint-and-Several Liability for Reckless Tortfeasors

Green v. McGee: Carving Out Punitive Damages from Set-Offs and Preserving Joint-and-Several Liability for Reckless Tortfeasors

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Green v. McGee: Carving Out Punitive Damages from Set-Offs and Preserving Joint-and-Several Liability for Reckless Tortfeasors 1. Introduction This commentary examines the South Carolina Supreme...
State v. Lavoie: Supreme Court of Hawaiʻi Restricts Expert-Fee Entitlements at Regular Sentencing and Adopts the “Aggregate” Test for HRS § 706-609 Resentencing Challenges

State v. Lavoie: Supreme Court of Hawaiʻi Restricts Expert-Fee Entitlements at Regular Sentencing and Adopts the “Aggregate” Test for HRS § 706-609 Resentencing Challenges

Date: Aug 15, 2025
State v. Lavoie: Supreme Court of Hawaiʻi Restricts Expert-Fee Entitlements at Regular Sentencing and Adopts the “Aggregate” Test for HRS § 706-609 Resentencing Challenges 1. Introduction In State v....
“Public Reprimand as a Stand-Alone Sanction for Lapsed or Non-Member Counsel” — Commentary on In Re Cruikshank, 22-90079 (2d Cir. Aug. 13, 2025)

“Public Reprimand as a Stand-Alone Sanction for Lapsed or Non-Member Counsel” — Commentary on In Re Cruikshank, 22-90079 (2d Cir. Aug. 13, 2025)

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“Public Reprimand as a Stand-Alone Sanction for Lapsed or Non-Member Counsel” Commentary on In Re Cruikshank, 22-90079 (2d Cir. Aug. 13, 2025) 1. Introduction In In Re Cruikshank, the United States...
Clarifying “Cause” for Dismissal of Involuntary Bankruptcy Petitions and the Limits of Appellate Jurisdiction over § 303(i) Fee Awards

Clarifying “Cause” for Dismissal of Involuntary Bankruptcy Petitions and the Limits of Appellate Jurisdiction over § 303(i) Fee Awards

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Clarifying “Cause” for Dismissal of Involuntary Bankruptcy Petitions and the Limits of Appellate Jurisdiction over § 303(i) Fee Awards 1. Introduction In Re: Valuex Research, LLC concerns creditors...
Clarifying Prevailing-Party Status and Recognising Joint Trademark Ownership: A Commentary on Zioness Movement, Inc. v. The Lawfare Project, Inc.

Clarifying Prevailing-Party Status and Recognising Joint Trademark Ownership: A Commentary on Zioness Movement, Inc. v. The Lawfare Project, Inc.

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Clarifying Prevailing-Party Status and Recognising Joint Trademark Ownership: Commentary on Zioness Movement, Inc. v. The Lawfare Project, Inc. (2d Cir. 2025) Introduction The Second Circuit's...

        “No Legislative Short-Cut to Article III”:  The Second Circuit Rejects 
        “Congressionally-Authorized Representational Standing” and Clarifies 
        Mootness Procedure —  Commentary on A.H. v. N.Y. State Dep’t of Health

“No Legislative Short-Cut to Article III”: The Second Circuit Rejects “Congressionally-Authorized Representational Standing” and Clarifies Mootness Procedure — Commentary on A.H. v. N.Y. State Dep’t of Health

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“No Legislative Short-Cut to Article III”: The Second Circuit Rejects “Congressionally-Authorized Representational Standing” and Clarifies Mootness Procedure — Commentary on A.H. v. N.Y. State Dep’t...
“The Carew Principle” – No Per-Se Duty on Defence Counsel to Pursue a Batson Remedy

“The Carew Principle” – No Per-Se Duty on Defence Counsel to Pursue a Batson Remedy

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“The Carew Principle” No Per-Se Duty on Defence Counsel to Pursue a Batson Remedy – Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 2025 1. Introduction In Carew v. Morton, the United States Court of...
“A Single Straw Breaks the Camel’s Back” – Isaacs v. Zimmerman and the Second Circuit’s Zero-Tolerance Approach to Discovery-Order Breaches

“A Single Straw Breaks the Camel’s Back” – Isaacs v. Zimmerman and the Second Circuit’s Zero-Tolerance Approach to Discovery-Order Breaches

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“A Single Straw Breaks the Camel’s Back” – Isaacs v. Zimmerman and the Second Circuit’s Zero-Tolerance Approach to Discovery-Order Breaches Introduction Isaacs v. Zimmerman, No. 23-7492 (2d Cir. Aug....
“The Comma That Wasn’t”: Second Circuit Restores Full Scope of Personal-Injury Liability Insurance and Safe-Harbor Protection in N.Y. Ins. Law § 1113(a)(13) & § 1213(e)

“The Comma That Wasn’t”: Second Circuit Restores Full Scope of Personal-Injury Liability Insurance and Safe-Harbor Protection in N.Y. Ins. Law § 1113(a)(13) & § 1213(e)

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“The Comma That Wasn’t”: Second Circuit Restores Full Scope of Personal-Injury Liability Insurance and Safe-Harbor Protection in N.Y. Ins. Law § 1113(a)(13) & § 1213(e) 1. Introduction Liberty...
The Post-Chevron Quid-Pro-Quo Doctrine: Second Circuit Affirms IRS Power to Net State Tax Credits against § 170 Charitable Deductions

The Post-Chevron Quid-Pro-Quo Doctrine: Second Circuit Affirms IRS Power to Net State Tax Credits against § 170 Charitable Deductions

Date: Aug 15, 2025
The Post-Chevron Quid-Pro-Quo Doctrine: Second Circuit Affirms IRS Power to Net State Tax Credits against § 170 Charitable Deductions Introduction The consolidated appeal New Jersey v. Bessent;...
“Reinforcing Objectivity”: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies the “Substantial-Evidence” Standard for Aesthetic Denials under the Telecommunications Act

“Reinforcing Objectivity”: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies the “Substantial-Evidence” Standard for Aesthetic Denials under the Telecommunications Act

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“Reinforcing Objectivity”: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies the “Substantial-Evidence” Standard for Aesthetic Denials under the Telecommunications Act Introduction In Gulfstream Towers, LLC v. Brevard...
Clarifying the “Prone-but-Uncuffed” Threshold: Excessive-Force Parameters Re-Drawn in Roe v. Redmond & Maertz (11th Cir. 2025)

Clarifying the “Prone-but-Uncuffed” Threshold: Excessive-Force Parameters Re-Drawn in Roe v. Redmond & Maertz (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Clarifying the “Prone-but-Uncuffed” Threshold: Excessive-Force Parameters Re-Drawn in Roe v. Redmond & Maertz (11th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction In August 2020 Clay County (Florida) deputies attempted...
“If the Motion Is Not Properly Filed, the Claim Is Waived” – The Eleventh Circuit’s Clarification of Speedy-Trial Waiver and COVID-Related Delay in United States v. Francisco Louis

“If the Motion Is Not Properly Filed, the Claim Is Waived” – The Eleventh Circuit’s Clarification of Speedy-Trial Waiver and COVID-Related Delay in United States v. Francisco Louis

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“If the Motion Is Not Properly Filed, the Claim Is Waived” – The Eleventh Circuit’s Clarification of Speedy-Trial Waiver and COVID-Related Delay in United States v. Francisco Louis 1. Introduction In...
The “Direct-Connection” Doctrine: Sixth Circuit Confirms FCC Authority to Mandate PII-Breach Reporting and Clarifies the Scope of CRA Disapprovals

The “Direct-Connection” Doctrine: Sixth Circuit Confirms FCC Authority to Mandate PII-Breach Reporting and Clarifies the Scope of CRA Disapprovals

Date: Aug 15, 2025
The “Direct-Connection” Doctrine: Sixth Circuit Confirms FCC Authority to Mandate PII-Breach Reporting and Clarifies the Scope of CRA Disapprovals Introduction In CTIA – The Wireless Association v....
The Sixth Circuit’s Two-Step Test for Affiliated Ute in Mixed Securities-Fraud Cases – Commentary on Diane Owens v. FirstEnergy Corp.

The Sixth Circuit’s Two-Step Test for Affiliated Ute in Mixed Securities-Fraud Cases – Commentary on Diane Owens v. FirstEnergy Corp.

Date: Aug 15, 2025
The Sixth Circuit’s Two-Step Test for Applying the Affiliated Ute Presumption in Mixed Omission / Misrepresentation Securities-Fraud Actions 1. Introduction In Diane Owens v. FirstEnergy Corporation,...
Mixed Securities-Fraud Actions After Owens v. FirstEnergy: The Sixth Circuit’s Two-Step Test for Affiliated Ute and the Reaffirmed Comcast Damages Mandate

Mixed Securities-Fraud Actions After Owens v. FirstEnergy: The Sixth Circuit’s Two-Step Test for Affiliated Ute and the Reaffirmed Comcast Damages Mandate

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Mixed Securities-Fraud Actions After Owens v. FirstEnergy: The Sixth Circuit’s Two-Step Test for Affiliated Ute and the Reaffirmed Comcast Damages Mandate 1. Introduction In Diane Owens v....
The Sixth Circuit’s Two-Step Test for Affiliated Ute in Mixed Securities-Fraud Actions: Commentary on Diane Owens v. FirstEnergy Corp.

The Sixth Circuit’s Two-Step Test for Affiliated Ute in Mixed Securities-Fraud Actions: Commentary on Diane Owens v. FirstEnergy Corp.

Date: Aug 15, 2025
The Sixth Circuit’s Two-Step Test for Affiliated Ute in Mixed Securities-Fraud Actions (Commentary on Diane Owens v. FirstEnergy Corporation, 23-3940/3943/3945/3946/3947, 6th Cir. Aug. 13 2025) 1....
Refining Reliance: Sixth Circuit Establishes Two-Step, Four-Factor Framework for Affiliated Ute Presumption in Mixed Securities-Fraud Cases

Refining Reliance: Sixth Circuit Establishes Two-Step, Four-Factor Framework for Affiliated Ute Presumption in Mixed Securities-Fraud Cases

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Refining Reliance: Sixth Circuit Establishes Two-Step, Four-Factor Framework for Affiliated Ute Presumption in Mixed Securities-Fraud Cases Introduction In Diane Owens v. FirstEnergy Corporation, the...
“Primarily Omissions” Re-Defined: Sixth Circuit’s Two-Step Test for Affiliated Ute and Rigorous Comcast Damages Review in Diane Owens v. FirstEnergy

“Primarily Omissions” Re-Defined: Sixth Circuit’s Two-Step Test for Affiliated Ute and Rigorous Comcast Damages Review in Diane Owens v. FirstEnergy

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“Primarily Omissions” Re-Defined: Sixth Circuit’s Two-Step Test for Affiliated Ute and Rigorous Comcast Damages Review in Diane Owens v. FirstEnergy 1. Introduction The United States Court of Appeals...
Reaffirming Exhaustion via Ginther Motions: Sixth Circuit Clarifies § 2254 Procedure in Fischer v. Nagy

Reaffirming Exhaustion via Ginther Motions: Sixth Circuit Clarifies § 2254 Procedure in Fischer v. Nagy

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Reaffirming Exhaustion via Ginther Motions: Sixth Circuit Clarifies § 2254 Procedure in Fischer v. Nagy 1 Introduction The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has once again...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert