Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

state Case Commentaries

Thin Risk Screens Are Not Enough: Third Department Affirms Family Court’s Authority to Demand a Thorough Sex Offender Evaluation and Treatment Before Reunification, Despite Agency Neutrality

Thin Risk Screens Are Not Enough: Third Department Affirms Family Court’s Authority to Demand a Thorough Sex Offender Evaluation and Treatment Before Reunification, Despite Agency Neutrality

Date: Feb 21, 2025
Thin Risk Screens Are Not Enough: Third Department Affirms Family Court’s Authority to Demand a Thorough Sex Offender Evaluation and Treatment Before Reunification, Despite Agency Neutrality...
County Lines Matter: Third Department Holds Different County DAs Are Not the Same “Party” for Criminal Collateral Estoppel

County Lines Matter: Third Department Holds Different County DAs Are Not the Same “Party” for Criminal Collateral Estoppel

Date: Feb 21, 2025
County Lines Matter: Third Department Holds Different County DAs Are Not the Same “Party” for Criminal Collateral Estoppel Introduction In The People of the State of New York v. William Kent, 2025...
Email Service to the Attorney General Satisfies KRS 418.075—and Must Accompany Each Appeal; ALJ Discretion over AMA Guides Reaffirmed

Email Service to the Attorney General Satisfies KRS 418.075—and Must Accompany Each Appeal; ALJ Discretion over AMA Guides Reaffirmed

Date: Feb 21, 2025
Email Service to the Attorney General Satisfies KRS 418.075—and Must Accompany Each Appeal; ALJ Discretion over AMA Guides Reaffirmed Introduction This memorandum opinion of the Supreme Court of...
Reaffirming ALJ Discretion in Kentucky PTD Awards: Minor Impairment and Temporary Return to Work Do Not Preclude PTD Under Stumbo/McNutt

Reaffirming ALJ Discretion in Kentucky PTD Awards: Minor Impairment and Temporary Return to Work Do Not Preclude PTD Under Stumbo/McNutt

Date: Feb 21, 2025
Reaffirming ALJ Discretion in Kentucky PTD Awards: Minor Impairment and Temporary Return to Work Do Not Preclude PTD Under Stumbo/McNutt Introduction In Pikeville Medical Center v. Baker, the Supreme...
Kentucky Supreme Court Clarifies “Resident Relative” for Unemancipated Minors: Undefined “Resides Primarily” Is Ambiguous; Physical Presence Is Not Controlling

Kentucky Supreme Court Clarifies “Resident Relative” for Unemancipated Minors: Undefined “Resides Primarily” Is Ambiguous; Physical Presence Is Not Controlling

Date: Feb 21, 2025
Kentucky Supreme Court Clarifies “Resident Relative” for Unemancipated Minors: Undefined “Resides Primarily” Is Ambiguous; Physical Presence Is Not Controlling Introduction In Jessica Hill v. State...
Deliberate Design May Form Moments Before—But Not At—the Fatal Act; Permissive Malice Inference from Deadly-Weapon Use Reaffirmed

Deliberate Design May Form Moments Before—But Not At—the Fatal Act; Permissive Malice Inference from Deadly-Weapon Use Reaffirmed

Date: Feb 21, 2025
Deliberate Design May Form Moments Before—But Not At—the Fatal Act; Permissive Malice Inference from Deadly-Weapon Use Reaffirmed Introduction In Watts v. State (No. 2023-KA-00893-SCT, decided...
Opening-Statement Confrontation Violations and Pervasive Misconduct Bar Retrial Under Article II, Section 15: State v. Lensegrav (N.M. 2025)

Opening-Statement Confrontation Violations and Pervasive Misconduct Bar Retrial Under Article II, Section 15: State v. Lensegrav (N.M. 2025)

Date: Feb 21, 2025
Opening-Statement Confrontation Violations and Pervasive Misconduct Bar Retrial Under Article II, Section 15: State v. Lensegrav (N.M. 2025) Introduction In State v. Desiree Lensegrav, the New Mexico...
Clarifying the Extinguishment Rule in New Mexico: Dismissal With Prejudice of the Agent Does Not Bar Vicarious Liability Absent a Valid Release or Merits Exoneration

Clarifying the Extinguishment Rule in New Mexico: Dismissal With Prejudice of the Agent Does Not Bar Vicarious Liability Absent a Valid Release or Merits Exoneration

Date: Feb 21, 2025
Clarifying the Extinguishment Rule in New Mexico: Dismissal With Prejudice of the Agent Does Not Bar Vicarious Liability Absent a Valid Release or Merits Exoneration Introduction In Trujillo v....
Storm-in-Progress Does Not Extinguish Structural Sidewalk Defect Claims; Municipality Shielded by Prior Written Notice While Abutting Landowners Face Special-Use Exposure for Driveway Aprons

Storm-in-Progress Does Not Extinguish Structural Sidewalk Defect Claims; Municipality Shielded by Prior Written Notice While Abutting Landowners Face Special-Use Exposure for Driveway Aprons

Date: Feb 21, 2025
Storm-in-Progress Does Not Extinguish Structural Sidewalk Defect Claims; Municipality Shielded by Prior Written Notice While Abutting Landowners Face Special-Use Exposure for Driveway Aprons...
Unfounded Abuse Allegations Do Not Defeat Grandparent Visitation: Third Department Clarifies Standing and Best-Interests Under DRL § 72

Unfounded Abuse Allegations Do Not Defeat Grandparent Visitation: Third Department Clarifies Standing and Best-Interests Under DRL § 72

Date: Feb 21, 2025
Unfounded Abuse Allegations Do Not Defeat Grandparent Visitation: Third Department Clarifies Standing and Best-Interests Under DRL § 72 Introduction In Dianne SS. v. Jamie TT., 2025 N.Y. Slip Op....
No Vouching, Full Cross-Examination: Third Department Orders New Trial and Severance Where Investigator Credibility Opinions and Cross-Examination Limits Skewed the Jury’s Core Credibility Determinations

No Vouching, Full Cross-Examination: Third Department Orders New Trial and Severance Where Investigator Credibility Opinions and Cross-Examination Limits Skewed the Jury’s Core Credibility Determinations

Date: Feb 21, 2025
No Vouching, Full Cross-Examination: Third Department Orders New Trial and Severance Where Investigator Credibility Opinions and Cross-Examination Limits Skewed the Jury’s Core Credibility...
Custodial Gatekeeping as a Material Change: Third Department Holds that Refusal to Share Information and Flex Parenting Time Justifies Modification

Custodial Gatekeeping as a Material Change: Third Department Holds that Refusal to Share Information and Flex Parenting Time Justifies Modification

Date: Feb 21, 2025
Custodial Gatekeeping as a Material Change: Third Department Holds that Refusal to Share Information and Flex Parenting Time Justifies Modification Introduction In In the Matter of Michelle EE. v....
Service Of Objections Must Be Made On Counsel: Third Department Declares Noncompliant Family Court Orders Void Where Prejudice Is Shown

Service Of Objections Must Be Made On Counsel: Third Department Declares Noncompliant Family Court Orders Void Where Prejudice Is Shown

Date: Feb 21, 2025
Service Of Objections Must Be Made On Counsel: Third Department Declares Noncompliant Family Court Orders Void Where Prejudice Is Shown Introduction In In the Matter of Lea R. Andersen v. Christopher...
Ramirez Is Not a Constitutional Floor: First Department Upholds Fully Masked Voir Dire and Reaffirms Licensing as a Proviso in Weapon Possession Cases

Ramirez Is Not a Constitutional Floor: First Department Upholds Fully Masked Voir Dire and Reaffirms Licensing as a Proviso in Weapon Possession Cases

Date: Feb 21, 2025
Ramirez Is Not a Constitutional Floor: First Department Upholds Fully Masked Voir Dire and Reaffirms Licensing as a Proviso in Weapon Possession Cases Introduction In The People of the State of New...
Third Department Clarifies: Internal Hospital Policies Do Not Define the Standard of Care in Fall-Risk Cases; Expert Disputes on 12‑Hour Reassessments and Assisted‑Fall Causation Preclude Summary Judgment

Third Department Clarifies: Internal Hospital Policies Do Not Define the Standard of Care in Fall-Risk Cases; Expert Disputes on 12‑Hour Reassessments and Assisted‑Fall Causation Preclude Summary Judgment

Date: Feb 21, 2025
Third Department Clarifies: Internal Hospital Policies Do Not Define the Standard of Care in Fall-Risk Cases; Expert Disputes on 12‑Hour Reassessments and Assisted‑Fall Causation Preclude Summary...
No “Election-Case” Laches in Quo Warranto: Burden Remains on Respondent and Delay Runs from Unequivocal Ouster

No “Election-Case” Laches in Quo Warranto: Burden Remains on Respondent and Delay Runs from Unequivocal Ouster

Date: Feb 21, 2025
No “Election-Case” Laches in Quo Warranto: Burden Remains on Respondent and Delay Runs from Unequivocal Ouster Case: The State ex rel. N[gu y]en et al. v. Lawson et al., 2025-Ohio-507 (Supreme Court...
Jennings clarifies Utah’s bail standard: intent may be inferred from repeated stabbing; self-defense at bail requires both subjective belief and objective reasonableness

Jennings clarifies Utah’s bail standard: intent may be inferred from repeated stabbing; self-defense at bail requires both subjective belief and objective reasonableness

Date: Feb 21, 2025
Jennings clarifies Utah’s bail standard: intent may be inferred from repeated stabbing; self-defense at bail requires both subjective belief and objective reasonableness Introduction In State of Utah...
Violent-Offender Status Requires a Qualifying Offense of Conviction; Serial Drive‑By Shootings Are Properly Joined as “Same or Similar” Offenses

Violent-Offender Status Requires a Qualifying Offense of Conviction; Serial Drive‑By Shootings Are Properly Joined as “Same or Similar” Offenses

Date: Feb 21, 2025
KRS 439.3401, dismissal for grand jury misconduct, joinder of serial drive-by shootings, prosecutorial disqualification, and admissibility of inmate correspondence."> Violent-Offender Status Requires...
Pleading Controls: Kentucky Supreme Court Holds the Dog‑Bite Strict‑Liability Statute Cannot Defeat an Unpled Negligence Claim at the CR 12.02(f) Stage

Pleading Controls: Kentucky Supreme Court Holds the Dog‑Bite Strict‑Liability Statute Cannot Defeat an Unpled Negligence Claim at the CR 12.02(f) Stage

Date: Feb 21, 2025
Pleading Controls: The Dog‑Bite Strict‑Liability Statute Does Not Bar a Common‑Law Negligence Claim That Was Not Pled Introduction In Kimberly Deramos v. Anderson Communities, Inc., the Supreme Court...
Constitutional Minimum, Not Perfection: Minor Deviations from Inventory-Search Policy Do Not Invalidate a Lawful Impound Search

Constitutional Minimum, Not Perfection: Minor Deviations from Inventory-Search Policy Do Not Invalidate a Lawful Impound Search

Date: Feb 21, 2025
Constitutional Minimum, Not Perfection: Minor Deviations from Inventory-Search Policy Do Not Invalidate a Lawful Impound Search Introduction In The People of the State of New York v. Brandon...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert