Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Approval-as-Injury: New York Recognizes Organizational Standing to Preemptively Challenge Certified Voting Machines and Permits Recasting of Article 78 Relief Introduction In Matter of Common Cause...
“When the Youth Court Lets Go” — Clarifying Chancery-Court Jurisdiction After Voluntary Youth-Court Relinquishment 1. Introduction K.S. v. M.D. and M.F.D. is the Mississippi Supreme Court’s most...
“Look-but-Don’t-Intimidate”: Simpson v. Commonwealth and the Permissible Use of Courtroom Barriers Consistent with the Confrontation Clause 1. Introduction Jamie Simpson appealed his 60-year sentence...
“Ross–Haydon Bridge Reconciliation Rule” Kentucky Supreme Court Clarifies Sovereign-Immunity Limits on Monetary Relief and Refund Actions Introduction On 14 August 2025 the Supreme Court of Kentucky...
“Due vs. Never-Due” Refunds: The Kentucky Supreme Court Re-draws the Sovereign-Immunity Line Commonwealth of Kentucky, Department of Revenue v. Long (2025) Introduction The consolidated decision in...
“Never-Due” v. “Due” Funds – A Commentary on Long v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, Department of Revenue (Ky. 2025) 1 · Introduction On 14 August 2025 the Supreme Court of Kentucky issued a consolidated...
Scarborough Refined: Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies Strickland-Prejudice Analysis for Missed Plea-Withdrawal Motions Introduction In Smith v. State, No. 179, 2024 (Del. Aug. 14, 2025), the Supreme...
Enhanced Disclosure & Gate-Keeping Standards for Historic Cell-Site Evidence: Commentary on Shawn Hollingsworth, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, Supreme Court of Kentucky (2025) Introduction The...
“Never-Due” Funds and the Limits of Sovereign Immunity: A Structured Commentary on Long v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (Ky. 2025) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of Kentucky’s consolidated decision in...
“The Reach of Waiver” – How Express Agreement Forecloses Appellate Review in Kentucky: A Structured Commentary on Kenny Dile, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (Ky. Sup. Ct., Aug. 14 2025) 1....
Beyond Water Quantity: Oregon Supreme Court Confirms Protection of Beneficial Use and Commands a Full Public-Interest Review in Water-Right Permitting Commentary on East Valley Water District v....
“A Reasonable Period of Time”: The Supreme Court of Ohio’s Clarification of Response Deadlines under R.C. 149.43 in State ex rel. Castellon v. Cuyahoga County Prosecutor’s Office (2025-Ohio-2787)...
“Enterprise-Activity Venue” in Ohio RICO Prosecutions: A Comprehensive Commentary on State v. Brown, 2025-Ohio-2804 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of Ohio’s decision in State v. Brown...
“No Prior Relationship, No Explicit Threat, Still Stalking” – State v. Crawl Creates a Clear Rule that a Mixed Pattern of Online Harassment and a Single Physical Intrusion Can Sustain a...
No Shortcut to the Supreme Court: Missouri’s Clarified Rule on Appellate Jurisdiction over Preliminary Injunctions 1. Introduction In Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood Great Plains v. State...
“The Rhodes Rule”: Missouri Supreme Court Re-Affirms that an Order Is Not Appealable Unless Every Requested Remedy—Legal and Equitable—Is Expressly Resolved 1. Introduction Kevin Rhodes, a former...
From “Merely Incidental” to “Substantial”: Missouri Supreme Court Redefines the Kidnapping Element in State v. Dustin Curtis Winter Introduction In State of Missouri v. Dustin Curtis Winter, No....
Equitable Estoppel Extended: Georgia Affirms Arbitrators’ Power to Bind Nonsignatories When Claims Are Inherently Intertwined Introduction Jackson et al. v. Stevenson et al., A24A1853 (Ga. Ct. App....