Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

reinforcing-the-implied-covenant-of-good-faith-in-commercial-development-contracts:-anthony& Case Commentaries

Oklahoma v. EPA: Individual SIP Disapprovals Are Regionally Reviewable – Refining the Venue Framework Under CAA §7607(b)(1)

Oklahoma v. EPA: Individual SIP Disapprovals Are Regionally Reviewable – Refining the Venue Framework Under CAA §7607(b)(1)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Oklahoma v. EPA: Individual SIP Disapprovals Are Regionally Reviewable – Refining the Venue Framework Under CAA §7607(b)(1) 1. Introduction In Oklahoma v. Environmental Protection Agency, 605 U.S....
“Intertwined-Issue Jury Right” — Perttu v. Richards Recasts the PLRA Exhaustion Debate

“Intertwined-Issue Jury Right” — Perttu v. Richards Recasts the PLRA Exhaustion Debate

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“Intertwined-Issue Jury Right” — Perttu v. Richards Recasts the PLRA Exhaustion Debate 1  Introduction Perttu v. Richards, 605 U.S. ___ (2025), is the Supreme Court’s first major encounter with the...

        Transgender Treatment Bans and Equal Protection: United States v. Skrmetti Establishes
        Rational-Basis Review for State Restrictions on Gender-Affirming Care for Minors

Transgender Treatment Bans and Equal Protection: United States v. Skrmetti Establishes Rational-Basis Review for State Restrictions on Gender-Affirming Care for Minors

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Transgender Treatment Bans and Equal Protection: United States v. Skrmetti (2025) Sets the Rational-Basis Benchmark Introduction In United States v. Skrmetti, No. 23-477 (June 18 2025), the U.S....
Substantial Compliance Suffices: Johnson v. Superior Court Clarifies Limits on Deferral and Recusal in Summary Criminal Contempt Under Connecticut Practice Book §§ 1-16 & 1-17

Substantial Compliance Suffices: Johnson v. Superior Court Clarifies Limits on Deferral and Recusal in Summary Criminal Contempt Under Connecticut Practice Book §§ 1-16 & 1-17

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Substantial Compliance Suffices: Johnson v. Superior Court Clarifies Limits on Deferral and Recusal in Summary Criminal Contempt Under Connecticut Practice Book §§ 1-16 & 1-17 Introduction Johnson v....
“Actual-Knowledge” Becomes the Touchstone: Delaware Clarifies Aider-and-Abettor Liability for Acquirers – Commentary on In re Columbia Pipeline Group, Inc. Merger Litigation (Del. Supr. 2025)

“Actual-Knowledge” Becomes the Touchstone: Delaware Clarifies Aider-and-Abettor Liability for Acquirers – Commentary on In re Columbia Pipeline Group, Inc. Merger Litigation (Del. Supr. 2025)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“Actual-Knowledge” Becomes the Touchstone: Delaware Clarifies Aider-and-Abettor Liability for Acquirers Commentary on In re Columbia Pipeline Group, Inc. Merger Litigation, 332 A.3d 349 (Del. Supr....
Clarifying the Dual Strickland-Scarborough Standard: The Delaware Supreme Court’s Decision in Lolley v. State (2025)

Clarifying the Dual Strickland-Scarborough Standard: The Delaware Supreme Court’s Decision in Lolley v. State (2025)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Clarifying the Dual Strickland-Scarborough Standard: The Delaware Supreme Court’s Decision in Lolley v. State (2025) 1. Introduction Lolley v. State is a 2025 ruling of the Delaware Supreme Court...
Harris Estate v. Reilly: Montana Supreme Court Requires Sanctions for Last-Minute Voluntary Dismissals under Rule 41(a)(2)

Harris Estate v. Reilly: Montana Supreme Court Requires Sanctions for Last-Minute Voluntary Dismissals under Rule 41(a)(2)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Harris Estate v. Reilly: Montana Supreme Court Requires Sanctions for Last-Minute Voluntary Dismissals under Rule 41(a)(2) Introduction In Estate of William Harris III v. Reilly, 2025 MT 126, the...
Knudsen v. University of Montana: 2025 MT 125 – Clarifying the Use of Regulatory Compliance Experts and the Scope of a University’s Fiduciary Duty

Knudsen v. University of Montana: 2025 MT 125 – Clarifying the Use of Regulatory Compliance Experts and the Scope of a University’s Fiduciary Duty

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Knudsen v. University of Montana: 2025 MT 125 – Clarifying the Use of Regulatory Compliance Experts and the Scope of a University’s Fiduciary Duty 1. Introduction Knudsen v. University of Montana...
Caldwell v. Caldwell: Judicial Duty to Verify Property Valuations Despite Parties’ Settlement Agreements

Caldwell v. Caldwell: Judicial Duty to Verify Property Valuations Despite Parties’ Settlement Agreements

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Caldwell v. Caldwell: Judicial Duty to Verify Property Valuations Despite Parties’ Settlement Agreements 1. Introduction In Marriage of: Caldwell, 2025 MT 127N, the Supreme Court of Montana addressed...
“Similar Means Similar”:  The Majority-Outcome Test for Out-of-State DUI Enhancements after State v. Lapointe

“Similar Means Similar”: The Majority-Outcome Test for Out-of-State DUI Enhancements after State v. Lapointe

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“Similar Means Similar”: The Majority-Outcome Test for Out-of-State DUI Enhancements after State v. Lapointe Introduction In State v. C. Lapointe, 2025 MT 124, the Supreme Court of Montana confronted...
Forcible-Felony Instruction as a De Facto “Defense-of-Others” Charge: Commentary on State v. C. Rossbach (2025)

Forcible-Felony Instruction as a De Facto “Defense-of-Others” Charge: Commentary on State v. C. Rossbach (2025)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Forcible-Felony Instruction as a De Facto “Defense-of-Others” Charge: A Comprehensive Commentary on State v. C. Rossbach, 2025 MT 128N Introduction State v. Cavey Little Rossbach, 2025 MT 128N, is a...
“Evasive-Driving Particularized Suspicion” – A Commentary on State v. H. Herzog (2025 MT 123)

“Evasive-Driving Particularized Suspicion” – A Commentary on State v. H. Herzog (2025 MT 123)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“Evasive-Driving Particularized Suspicion”: The Montana Supreme Court’s Refinement of Reasonable Suspicion in State v. Halie Maria Herzog 1. Introduction On 17 June 2025 the Supreme Court of Montana...
State v. Hunt (2025): Prosecutorial “Door-Opening” Limits Re-affirmed and Particularized Suspicion Refined

State v. Hunt (2025): Prosecutorial “Door-Opening” Limits Re-affirmed and Particularized Suspicion Refined

Date: Jun 20, 2025
State v. Hunt (2025 MT 122): Prosecutorial “Door-Opening” Limits Re-affirmed and Particularized Suspicion Refined Introduction The Supreme Court of Montana’s decision in State v. Nicole Lee Hunt,...
Commonwealth v. Hardy: Reaffirming Timeliness & Refining the “Actual Innocence” Standard in Pennsylvania Post-Conviction DNA Litigation

Commonwealth v. Hardy: Reaffirming Timeliness & Refining the “Actual Innocence” Standard in Pennsylvania Post-Conviction DNA Litigation

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Commonwealth v. Hardy: Reaffirming Timeliness & Refining the “Actual Innocence” Standard in Pennsylvania Post-Conviction DNA Litigation Introduction In Commonwealth v. Hardy (Pa. 2025) the Supreme...

        The “Totality-of-Circumstances Reasonableness Test” for Pedalcyclists:
        A Commentary on Commonwealth v. Linton (Pa. 2025)

The “Totality-of-Circumstances Reasonableness Test” for Pedalcyclists: A Commentary on Commonwealth v. Linton (Pa. 2025)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
The “Totality-of-Circumstances Reasonableness Test” for Pedalcyclists: Comprehensive Commentary on Commonwealth v. Linton, 11 WAP 2024 (Pa. 2025) 1. Introduction Commonwealth v. Linton marks the...
“Temporal Alignment” under HRS § 657-1.8:  Criminal Statutes in Force at the Time of Abuse Govern Civil Child-Sexual-Abuse Suits

“Temporal Alignment” under HRS § 657-1.8: Criminal Statutes in Force at the Time of Abuse Govern Civil Child-Sexual-Abuse Suits

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“Temporal Alignment” under HRS § 657-1.8: Criminal Statutes in Force at the Time of Abuse Govern Civil Child-Sexual-Abuse Suits Introduction In Foresman v. Foresman, 154 Haw. 46, cert. granted and...
Affirming the Presumption of Reliability in Credible-Fear Interviews: Commentary on Singh v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025)

Affirming the Presumption of Reliability in Credible-Fear Interviews: Commentary on Singh v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Affirming the Presumption of Reliability in Credible-Fear Interviews: Detailed Commentary on Singh v. Bondi, Second Circuit (2025) 1. Introduction Case name: Gurminder Singh v. Pamela Bondi, U.S....
Commentary – Re-affirming Complete § 301 LMRA Pre-emption over State-Law Challenges to Union-Negotiated COVID-19 Policies: Sullivan v. Gelb

Commentary – Re-affirming Complete § 301 LMRA Pre-emption over State-Law Challenges to Union-Negotiated COVID-19 Policies: Sullivan v. Gelb

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Re-affirming Complete § 301 LMRA Pre-emption over State-Law Challenges to Union-Negotiated COVID-19 Policies: Sullivan v. Gelb 1. Introduction Sullivan v. Gelb, No. 24-1917-cv (2d Cir. June 17 2025)...
United States v. Wilson: Reaffirming the “Strong Inference of Trustworthiness” Standard under
        Rule 804(b)(3) and Clarifying Evidentiary Sufficiency for “Use-of-Fire” Obstruction Offenses

United States v. Wilson: Reaffirming the “Strong Inference of Trustworthiness” Standard under Rule 804(b)(3) and Clarifying Evidentiary Sufficiency for “Use-of-Fire” Obstruction Offenses

Date: Jun 20, 2025
United States v. Wilson: Reaffirming the “Strong Inference of Trustworthiness” Standard under Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b)(3) and Clarifying Evidentiary Sufficiency for “Use-of-Fire” Obstruction...
When Flight and Vehicle Dominion Suffice: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Threshold for Knowledge in Constructive Possession of Narcotics (United States v. Youngblood, 2025)

When Flight and Vehicle Dominion Suffice: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Threshold for Knowledge in Constructive Possession of Narcotics (United States v. Youngblood, 2025)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
When Flight and Vehicle Dominion Suffice: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Threshold for Knowledge in Constructive Possession of Narcotics Commentary on United States v. Emmanuel Youngblood, No. 24-12647...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert