Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

reinforcing-the-implied-covenant-of-good-faith-in-commercial-development-contracts:-anthony& Case Commentaries

“Present-Obligation, Not Past-Residence” – Indiana Supreme Court Refines Cross-State Sex-Offender Registration Rules (Peters v. Quakenbush, 2025)

“Present-Obligation, Not Past-Residence” – Indiana Supreme Court Refines Cross-State Sex-Offender Registration Rules (Peters v. Quakenbush, 2025)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“Present-Obligation, Not Past-Residence” – Indiana Supreme Court Refines Cross-State Sex-Offender Registration Rules (Gage Peters v. Dennis J. Quakenbush II & Lloyd Arnold, Ind. Sup. Ct. No....
The “Thomas Rule” – Indiana Supreme Court Re-Affirms the Divide Between Pre-Election Challenges and Post-Election Contests

The “Thomas Rule” – Indiana Supreme Court Re-Affirms the Divide Between Pre-Election Challenges and Post-Election Contests

Date: Jun 20, 2025
The “Thomas Rule” – Indiana Supreme Court Re-Affirms the Divide Between Pre-Election Challenges and Post-Election Contests Introduction Ross G. Thomas, chair of the Bartholomew County Democratic...
“The Roadmap Rule” – Independent Judicial Review & Strict Proof in Indiana CHINS Proceedings

“The Roadmap Rule” – Independent Judicial Review & Strict Proof in Indiana CHINS Proceedings

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“The Roadmap Rule” – Independent Judicial Review & Strict Proof in Indiana CHINS Proceedings Introduction In In re E.K. (J.S. v. Indiana Department of Child Services), the Indiana Supreme Court...

        “No Collateral-Adverse-Ruling Bar” – The Indiana Supreme Court’s Clarification of Trial Rule 53.1 in State ex rel. Gary Thoe v. Marion Superior Court 5

“No Collateral-Adverse-Ruling Bar” – The Indiana Supreme Court’s Clarification of Trial Rule 53.1 in State ex rel. Gary Thoe v. Marion Superior Court 5

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“No Collateral-Adverse-Ruling Bar” – The Indiana Supreme Court’s Clarification of Trial Rule 53.1 in State ex rel. Gary Thoe, et al. v. Marion Superior Court 5 Introduction The Indiana Supreme...
“One Appeal, Many Parcels” – The Alabama Supreme Court Sanctions Consolidated Property-Tax Assessment Appeals

“One Appeal, Many Parcels” – The Alabama Supreme Court Sanctions Consolidated Property-Tax Assessment Appeals

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“One Appeal, Many Parcels” – The Alabama Supreme Court Sanctions Consolidated Property-Tax Assessment Appeals Introduction In Walter F. Scott III v. Alabama Department of Revenue, SC-2025-0013 (Ala....
“Duty Over Autonomy” – The Florida Supreme Court Confirms Trial Judges Must Consider All Record Mitigation Even When the Self-Represented Defendant Objects (Commentary on Steven J. Lorenzo v. State of Florida, No. SC2023-0539)

“Duty Over Autonomy” – The Florida Supreme Court Confirms Trial Judges Must Consider All Record Mitigation Even When the Self-Represented Defendant Objects (Commentary on Steven J. Lorenzo v. State of Florida, No. SC2023-0539)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“Duty Over Autonomy” – The Florida Supreme Court Confirms Trial Judges Must Consider All Record Mitigation Even When the Self-Represented Defendant Objects Commentary on Steven J. Lorenzo v. State of...
Clarifying Ethical Boundaries for Departing Associates: Unauthorized Filings, Client Contact & Discovery Obligations under Florida Bar Rules – A Commentary on The Florida Bar v. Alexa Martinez (2025)

Clarifying Ethical Boundaries for Departing Associates: Unauthorized Filings, Client Contact & Discovery Obligations under Florida Bar Rules – A Commentary on The Florida Bar v. Alexa Martinez (2025)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Clarifying Ethical Boundaries for Departing Associates: Unauthorized Filings, Client Contact & Discovery Obligations under Florida Bar Rules A Comprehensive Commentary on The Florida Bar v. Alexa...
Kosor v. Southern Highlands: Nevada Supreme Court Holds NRS 38.310’s ADR Requirement is a Waivable Claim-Processing Rule, Not a Jurisdictional Bar

Kosor v. Southern Highlands: Nevada Supreme Court Holds NRS 38.310’s ADR Requirement is a Waivable Claim-Processing Rule, Not a Jurisdictional Bar

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Kosor v. Southern Highlands: Nevada Supreme Court Holds NRS 38.310’s ADR Requirement is a Waivable Claim-Processing Rule, Not a Jurisdictional Bar Introduction The Supreme Court of Nevada, in Kosor,...
Whitley v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.: Nevada Supreme Court Limits the Calder “Effects” Test to Intentional Torts

Whitley v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.: Nevada Supreme Court Limits the Calder “Effects” Test to Intentional Torts

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Whitley v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.: Nevada Supreme Court Limits the Calder “Effects” Test to Intentional Torts Introduction In Whitley v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 141 Nev., Adv. Op. 33 (2025), the...
Reaffirming the Primacy of “No-Waiver” Clauses in Planned Communities: An Analysis of Carpenter v. Southbay HOA (2025 ND 114)

Reaffirming the Primacy of “No-Waiver” Clauses in Planned Communities: An Analysis of Carpenter v. Southbay HOA (2025 ND 114)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Reaffirming the Primacy of “No-Waiver” Clauses in Planned Communities: Carpenter v. Southbay Homeowners Association, 2025 ND 114 Introduction Background. KJ Carpenter purchased a vacant lot in the...
Roth v. Meyer – The North Dakota Supreme Court Re-entrenches the “Special Rigor” Standard for Adverse Possession Among Family Members and Rejects Subjective Belief & Recorded Mortgages as Proof of Hostile Claim

Roth v. Meyer – The North Dakota Supreme Court Re-entrenches the “Special Rigor” Standard for Adverse Possession Among Family Members and Rejects Subjective Belief & Recorded Mortgages as Proof of Hostile Claim

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Roth v. Meyer – The North Dakota Supreme Court Re-entrenches the “Special Rigor” Standard for Adverse Possession Among Family Members and Rejects Subjective Belief & Recorded Mortgages as Proof of...
From Zoning Grievance to Constitutional Claim: The Third Circuit Re-frames the “Conscience-Shocking” Test in Routine Land-Use Disputes

From Zoning Grievance to Constitutional Claim: The Third Circuit Re-frames the “Conscience-Shocking” Test in Routine Land-Use Disputes

Date: Jun 20, 2025
From Zoning Grievance to Constitutional Claim: The Third Circuit Re-frames the “Conscience-Shocking” Test in Routine Land-Use Disputes 1. Introduction John Seitz IV and his company, Hickory Hill...
Crandall v. McDonough: Confirming that District Courts Lack Jurisdiction over Stand-Alone Whistleblower Protection Act Claims

Crandall v. McDonough: Confirming that District Courts Lack Jurisdiction over Stand-Alone Whistleblower Protection Act Claims

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Crandall v. McDonough: Confirming that District Courts Lack Jurisdiction over Stand-Alone Whistleblower Protection Act Claims 1. Introduction In Kenneth Crandall v. Denis McDonough, the United States...
Clarifying the Evidentiary Threshold for “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” Post-Wilkinson – Commentary on Luis Tubon Guangatal v. Attorney General (3d Cir. 2025)

Clarifying the Evidentiary Threshold for “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” Post-Wilkinson – Commentary on Luis Tubon Guangatal v. Attorney General (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Clarifying the Evidentiary Threshold for “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” Post-Wilkinson Commentary on Luis Tubon Guangatal v. Attorney General (3d Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction The Third...
“Too Soon for Immunity” –  Third Circuit Clarifies that Qualified-Immunity Motions to Dismiss Must Fail When the Complaint States a Plausible Constitutional Violation but Lacks Facts to Assess “Clearly Established” Law

“Too Soon for Immunity” – Third Circuit Clarifies that Qualified-Immunity Motions to Dismiss Must Fail When the Complaint States a Plausible Constitutional Violation but Lacks Facts to Assess “Clearly Established” Law

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“Too Soon for Immunity” – Third Circuit Clarifies that Qualified-Immunity Motions to Dismiss Must Fail When the Complaint States a Plausible Constitutional Violation but Lacks Facts to Assess...
“Connected-To” Is Pure Fact: Fifth Circuit Bars Judicial Review of Causation Findings in VAWA Cancellation (Agwuegbo v. Bondi)

“Connected-To” Is Pure Fact: Fifth Circuit Bars Judicial Review of Causation Findings in VAWA Cancellation (Agwuegbo v. Bondi)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“Connected-To” Is Pure Fact: Fifth Circuit Bars Judicial Review of Causation Findings in VAWA Cancellation Commentary on Agwuegbo v. Bondi, No. 24-60388 (5th Cir. June 18 2025) 1. Introduction In...
Boone v. Rankin County: Fifth Circuit Adopts “Abuse-of-Discretion” Review for Compensatory Education Under IDEA

Boone v. Rankin County: Fifth Circuit Adopts “Abuse-of-Discretion” Review for Compensatory Education Under IDEA

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Boone v. Rankin County: Fifth Circuit Adopts “Abuse-of-Discretion” Review for Compensatory Education Under IDEA Introduction In Boone v. Rankin County Public School District, No. 23-60333 (5th Cir....
“Infancy in Arms” –  McCoy v. ATF and the Recognition of a Historical
‘Infancy Doctrine’ Limitation on Commercial Fire-Arm Sales

“Infancy in Arms” – McCoy v. ATF and the Recognition of a Historical ‘Infancy Doctrine’ Limitation on Commercial Fire-Arm Sales

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“Infancy in Arms” – McCoy v. ATF and the Recognition of a Historical ‘Infancy Doctrine’ Limitation on Commercial Fire-Arm Sales 1. Introduction In Joshua McCoy v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms...
Frazier v. Prince George’s County: No Article III Adverseness to Sitting Judges and No Quasi-Judicial Immunity for Municipalities in § 1983 Actions

Frazier v. Prince George’s County: No Article III Adverseness to Sitting Judges and No Quasi-Judicial Immunity for Municipalities in § 1983 Actions

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Frazier v. Prince George’s County: No Article III Adverseness to Sitting Judges and No Quasi-Judicial Immunity for Municipalities in § 1983 Actions Introduction In Robert Frazier v. Prince George’s...
“Conflict-Based Recusal as Good Cause” – The New Standard for Extending Time to Serve the Nevada Attorney General in Petitions for Judicial Review

“Conflict-Based Recusal as Good Cause” – The New Standard for Extending Time to Serve the Nevada Attorney General in Petitions for Judicial Review

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“Conflict-Based Recusal as Good Cause” – The New Standard for Extending Time to Serve the Nevada Attorney General in Petitions for Judicial Review 1. Introduction In Lombardo v. Nevada Commission on...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert