Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
“Reasonable Period” Redefined: State ex rel. Fenstermaker v. Phillips (2025) and the Automatic $1,000 Cap for Delayed Public-Records Compliance 1. Introduction Ohio’s Public Records Act (R.C. 149.43)...
“From Privileged Memo to Public Record” – The Ohio Supreme Court’s New Two-Track Rule on Transmittal E-mails and Unauthorized Forwards Commentary on State ex rel. Platt v. Montgomery Cty. Bd. of...
Within-Guidelines Sentences Are Not Inherently Reasonable: Welch, J., Urges Limits on Speculative Conduct and a Meaningful Proportionality Review in People v. McSorley Introduction In People of...
Beyond the Job: Stanley v. City of Sanford and the Temporal Limits of “Qualified Individual” Status Under the ADA Introduction Stanley v. City of Sanford, 606 U.S. ___ (2025), is the Supreme Court’s...
Jackson v. State Farm: Enforcing Contractual Choice-of-Law Clauses that Import a Foreign Statute of Limitations into Alabama Litigation Introduction Court & Date: Supreme Court of Alabama, 20 June...
Posey Has Teeth: Substantive Unreasonableness and the Limits of the “Presumption of Proportionality” for Within-Guidelines Sentences – Comment on People of Michigan v. Troy Cameron McSorley 1....
“Visual-Compactness” over Algorithms: Supreme Court Clarifies the Municipal Ward Law in Jersey City United Against the New Ward Map v. Jersey City Ward Commission 1. Introduction Following Jersey...
The “Thomas Rule” – Indiana Supreme Court Re-Affirms the Divide Between Pre-Election Challenges and Post-Election Contests Introduction Ross G. Thomas, chair of the Bartholomew County Democratic...
“The Roadmap Rule” – Independent Judicial Review & Strict Proof in Indiana CHINS Proceedings Introduction In In re E.K. (J.S. v. Indiana Department of Child Services), the Indiana Supreme Court...
“No Collateral-Adverse-Ruling Bar” – The Indiana Supreme Court’s Clarification of Trial Rule 53.1 in State ex rel. Gary Thoe, et al. v. Marion Superior Court 5 Introduction The Indiana Supreme...
“One Appeal, Many Parcels” – The Alabama Supreme Court Sanctions Consolidated Property-Tax Assessment Appeals Introduction In Walter F. Scott III v. Alabama Department of Revenue, SC-2025-0013 (Ala....
“Duty Over Autonomy” – The Florida Supreme Court Confirms Trial Judges Must Consider All Record Mitigation Even When the Self-Represented Defendant Objects Commentary on Steven J. Lorenzo v. State of...
Clarifying Ethical Boundaries for Departing Associates: Unauthorized Filings, Client Contact & Discovery Obligations under Florida Bar Rules A Comprehensive Commentary on The Florida Bar v. Alexa...
Kosor v. Southern Highlands: Nevada Supreme Court Holds NRS 38.310’s ADR Requirement is a Waivable Claim-Processing Rule, Not a Jurisdictional Bar Introduction The Supreme Court of Nevada, in Kosor,...
Whitley v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.: Nevada Supreme Court Limits the Calder “Effects” Test to Intentional Torts Introduction In Whitley v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 141 Nev., Adv. Op. 33 (2025), the...
Reaffirming the Primacy of “No-Waiver” Clauses in Planned Communities: Carpenter v. Southbay Homeowners Association, 2025 ND 114 Introduction Background. KJ Carpenter purchased a vacant lot in the...
Roth v. Meyer – The North Dakota Supreme Court Re-entrenches the “Special Rigor” Standard for Adverse Possession Among Family Members and Rejects Subjective Belief & Recorded Mortgages as Proof of...
From Zoning Grievance to Constitutional Claim: The Third Circuit Re-frames the “Conscience-Shocking” Test in Routine Land-Use Disputes 1. Introduction John Seitz IV and his company, Hickory Hill...
Crandall v. McDonough: Confirming that District Courts Lack Jurisdiction over Stand-Alone Whistleblower Protection Act Claims 1. Introduction In Kenneth Crandall v. Denis McDonough, the United States...