Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

reinforcing-the-implied-covenant-of-good-faith-in-commercial-development-contracts:-anthony& Case Commentaries

Establishing Vacancy Through Rule 37 Sanctions: A Commentary on Ohio Security Insurance Co. v. Best Inn Midwest, LLC

Establishing Vacancy Through Rule 37 Sanctions: A Commentary on Ohio Security Insurance Co. v. Best Inn Midwest, LLC

Date: Jul 12, 2025
Establishing Vacancy Through Rule 37 Sanctions: A Commentary on Ohio Security Insurance Company v. Best Inn Midwest, LLC Introduction The Seventh Circuit’s decision in Ohio Security Insurance Company...
Fourth Circuit Clarifies Reliance on Reliable Hearsay for the §2K2.1(b)(6)(B) Enhancement

Fourth Circuit Clarifies Reliance on Reliable Hearsay for the §2K2.1(b)(6)(B) Enhancement

Date: Jul 12, 2025
Fourth Circuit Clarifies Reliance on Reliable Hearsay for the §2K2.1(b)(6)(B) Enhancement United States v. Patrick Hilkah McManus, No. 23-4278 (4th Cir. July 10, 2025) – Unpublished but persuasive...
Loginov v. Sheridan Memorial Hospital: Tenth Circuit Affirms Broad Wyoming COVID-19 Health-Care Immunity and Reinforces Strict Rule 56(d) Affidavit Requirement

Loginov v. Sheridan Memorial Hospital: Tenth Circuit Affirms Broad Wyoming COVID-19 Health-Care Immunity and Reinforces Strict Rule 56(d) Affidavit Requirement

Date: Jul 12, 2025
Loginov v. Sheridan Memorial Hospital: Tenth Circuit Affirms Broad Wyoming COVID-19 Health-Care Immunity and Reinforces Strict Rule 56(d) Affidavit Requirement Introduction In Loginov v. Sheridan...
“From Speculation to Substantial Evidence” – The Tenth Circuit’s Clarification of the Personalized-Risk Standard for CAT Protection in Moundih v. Bondi

“From Speculation to Substantial Evidence” – The Tenth Circuit’s Clarification of the Personalized-Risk Standard for CAT Protection in Moundih v. Bondi

Date: Jul 12, 2025
“From Speculation to Substantial Evidence” The Tenth Circuit’s Clarification of the Personalized-Risk Standard for CAT Protection in Moundih v. Bondi 1. Introduction Case Name: Fonka Arouna Moundih...
Absolute Prosecutorial Immunity Now Encompasses the Initiation of Civil Enforcement Actions – A Commentary on Rodgers v. Torrez (10th Cir. 2025)

Absolute Prosecutorial Immunity Now Encompasses the Initiation of Civil Enforcement Actions – A Commentary on Rodgers v. Torrez (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 12, 2025
Absolute Prosecutorial Immunity Now Encompasses the Initiation of Civil Enforcement Actions: Rodgers v. Torrez, 82 F.4th ___ (10th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction Rodgers v. Torrez presented the U.S....
United States v. Bayless: Delineating the Outer Limits of Confrontation-Clause Impeachment and Rule 412 Exceptions

United States v. Bayless: Delineating the Outer Limits of Confrontation-Clause Impeachment and Rule 412 Exceptions

Date: Jul 12, 2025
United States v. Bayless: Delineating the Outer Limits of Confrontation-Clause Impeachment and Rule 412 Exceptions Introduction United States v. Bayless (10th Cir. July 10, 2025) addresses a...
Frazier v. Kuhn: Third Circuit Reaffirms that Alternative Religious Accommodations Defeat Likelihood of Success for Prisoner Preliminary Injunctions

Frazier v. Kuhn: Third Circuit Reaffirms that Alternative Religious Accommodations Defeat Likelihood of Success for Prisoner Preliminary Injunctions

Date: Jul 12, 2025
Frazier v. Kuhn: Third Circuit Reaffirms that Alternative Religious Accommodations Defeat Likelihood of Success for Prisoner Preliminary Injunctions 1. Introduction In Jasper Frazier v. Victoria L....
“No Grievance, No Federal Claim” – Third Circuit Clarifies that Temporary Grievance Filing Restrictions Do Not Excuse PLRA Exhaustion (Jackson v. Knapp, 2025)

“No Grievance, No Federal Claim” – Third Circuit Clarifies that Temporary Grievance Filing Restrictions Do Not Excuse PLRA Exhaustion (Jackson v. Knapp, 2025)

Date: Jul 12, 2025
“No Grievance, No Federal Claim” – Third Circuit Clarifies that Temporary Grievance Filing Restrictions Do Not Excuse PLRA Exhaustion (Commentary on Rhonshawn Jackson v. Knapp, 24-3183, 3d Cir. July...
“From Molestation-Pornography Nexus to Counsel Performance” – United States v. Galletta and the Expansive Reach of the Good-Faith Exception

“From Molestation-Pornography Nexus to Counsel Performance” – United States v. Galletta and the Expansive Reach of the Good-Faith Exception

Date: Jul 12, 2025
“From Molestation-Pornography Nexus to Counsel Performance” – United States v. Galletta and the Expansive Reach of the Good-Faith Exception 1. Introduction The Third Circuit’s not-precedential...
Clarifying the Wealth-Versus-Family Nexus in Persecution Claims – A Commentary on Wilde Olivares-Arteaga v. Attorney General (3d Cir. 2025)

Clarifying the Wealth-Versus-Family Nexus in Persecution Claims – A Commentary on Wilde Olivares-Arteaga v. Attorney General (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 12, 2025
Clarifying the Wealth-Versus-Family Nexus in Persecution Claims A Detailed Commentary on Wilde Olivares-Arteaga v. Attorney General United States, 3d Cir. July 9 2025 1. Introduction Wilde Daniel...
Clarifying Immunity and Rooker-Feldman in Post-Eviction § 1983 Litigation: A Commentary on Kemp v. Powers (5th Cir. 2025)

Clarifying Immunity and Rooker-Feldman in Post-Eviction § 1983 Litigation: A Commentary on Kemp v. Powers (5th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 12, 2025
Clarifying Immunity and Rooker-Feldman in Post-Eviction § 1983 Litigation: A Commentary on Kemp v. Powers (5th Cir. 2025) Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Docket No.: 25-30024   |  ...
United States v. Barrow: Fifth Circuit Affirms Officer’s Authority to Extend a Traffic Stop When Investigating a Plate-VIN Discrepancy — Even If the Discrepancy Originates from the Officer’s Own Typographical Error

United States v. Barrow: Fifth Circuit Affirms Officer’s Authority to Extend a Traffic Stop When Investigating a Plate-VIN Discrepancy — Even If the Discrepancy Originates from the Officer’s Own Typographical Error

Date: Jul 12, 2025
United States v. Barrow: Fifth Circuit Affirms Officer’s Authority to Extend a Traffic Stop When Investigating a Plate-VIN Discrepancy — Even If the Discrepancy Originates from the Officer’s Own...
The Sysco Doctrine: Heightened Particularity in Trade-Secret Pleading and the “Copyright-Disclosure Bar”

The Sysco Doctrine: Heightened Particularity in Trade-Secret Pleading and the “Copyright-Disclosure Bar”

Date: Jul 12, 2025
The Sysco Doctrine: Heightened Particularity in Trade-Secret Pleading and the “Copyright-Disclosure Bar” 1. Introduction Sysco Machinery Corporation v. DCS USA Corporation, No. 24-1675 (4th Cir....
Sheppheard v. Morrisey: Fourth Circuit Narrows Article III Standing—
“General Supervisory Authority” Alone Cannot Support Suit Against State Executives
over Prison Conditions

Sheppheard v. Morrisey: Fourth Circuit Narrows Article III Standing— “General Supervisory Authority” Alone Cannot Support Suit Against State Executives over Prison Conditions

Date: Jul 12, 2025
Sheppheard v. Morrisey: Fourth Circuit Narrows Article III Standing— “General Supervisory Authority” Alone Cannot Support Suit Against State Executives over Prison Conditions 1. Introduction In...
Contractor-Billed Waste Fees Exempt from Voter Approval:  A Commentary on Johnson v. City of Omaha, 319 Neb. 402 (2025)

Contractor-Billed Waste Fees Exempt from Voter Approval: A Commentary on Johnson v. City of Omaha, 319 Neb. 402 (2025)

Date: Jul 12, 2025
Contractor-Billed Waste Fees Exempt from Voter Approval: In-Depth Commentary on Johnson v. City of Omaha, 319 Neb. 402 (2025) 1. Introduction In Johnson v. City of Omaha, the Nebraska Supreme Court...
Gilmore v. Georgia DOC:  A Landmark on “Obvious Clarity,”  Qualified Immunity, and the Fourth-Amendment Limits on Strip-Searching Prison Visitors

Gilmore v. Georgia DOC: A Landmark on “Obvious Clarity,” Qualified Immunity, and the Fourth-Amendment Limits on Strip-Searching Prison Visitors

Date: Jul 12, 2025
Gilmore v. Georgia Department of Corrections Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (en banc) Decided 11 July 2025 1. Introduction Clarissa Gilmore v. Georgia Department of Corrections is one of...
State v. Sawyer: Nebraska Supreme Court Defines “Digital Abandonment” and Re-Affirms Liberal Joinder of Offenses

State v. Sawyer: Nebraska Supreme Court Defines “Digital Abandonment” and Re-Affirms Liberal Joinder of Offenses

Date: Jul 12, 2025
State v. Sawyer: Nebraska Supreme Court Defines “Digital Abandonment” and Re-Affirms Liberal Joinder of Offenses Introduction In State v. Sawyer, 319 Neb. 435 (2025), the Nebraska Supreme Court...
CBS Holdings, LLC v. Hexagon US Federal, Inc.:  A New Benchmark for Documentary Support and Peebles-Factor Analysis in Alabama Attorney-Fee Awards

CBS Holdings, LLC v. Hexagon US Federal, Inc.: A New Benchmark for Documentary Support and Peebles-Factor Analysis in Alabama Attorney-Fee Awards

Date: Jul 12, 2025
CBS Holdings, LLC v. Hexagon US Federal, Inc.: The Supreme Court of Alabama Demands Transparent, Substantiated Fee Petitions and Explicit Peebles-Factor Findings 1. Introduction CBS Holdings, LLC v....
The “Single-Document Judgment” Mandate and the Limits of Voluntary Dismissal: A Commentary on Elbert v. Keating, O'Gara (319 Neb. 390)

The “Single-Document Judgment” Mandate and the Limits of Voluntary Dismissal: A Commentary on Elbert v. Keating, O'Gara (319 Neb. 390)

Date: Jul 12, 2025
The “Single-Document Judgment” Mandate and the Futility of Voluntary Dismissal Tactics: Commentary on Elbert v. Keating, O'Gara, 319 Neb. 390 (2025) Introduction The Nebraska Supreme Court’s decision...
When PHC Felonies Eclipse MRTMA Misdemeanors: The Practical Effect of the Supreme Court’s Denial of Leave in People v. Julia Kathleen Soto

When PHC Felonies Eclipse MRTMA Misdemeanors: The Practical Effect of the Supreme Court’s Denial of Leave in People v. Julia Kathleen Soto

Date: Jul 12, 2025
When PHC Felonies Eclipse MRTMA Misdemeanors: The Practical Effect of the Supreme Court’s Denial of Leave in People v. Julia Kathleen Soto 1. Introduction Case name: People of the State of Michigan...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert