Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

reaffirming-tellabs:-sixth-circuit-establishes-correct-& Case Commentaries

United States v. Hernandez-Rodriguez: First Circuit Clarifies Reach of the Vertical Collective Knowledge Doctrine in Automobile-Exception Searches

United States v. Hernandez-Rodriguez: First Circuit Clarifies Reach of the Vertical Collective Knowledge Doctrine in Automobile-Exception Searches

Date: Aug 13, 2025
United States v. Hernandez-Rodriguez: First Circuit Clarifies Reach of the Vertical Collective Knowledge Doctrine in Automobile-Exception Searches 1. Introduction United States v....
Walker v. Newell: Vermont Supreme Court Reinforces Trial Judges’ Continuing Rule-403 Discretion over Stale Conviction Evidence in Punitive-Damages Trials

Walker v. Newell: Vermont Supreme Court Reinforces Trial Judges’ Continuing Rule-403 Discretion over Stale Conviction Evidence in Punitive-Damages Trials

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Walker v. Newell: Vermont Supreme Court Reinforces Trial Judges’ Continuing Rule-403 Discretion over Stale Conviction Evidence in Punitive-Damages Trials 1. Introduction Case Name: Christina Walker...
Vermont Supreme Court Endorses Reliance on Non-Rule Agency Policy in Child-Abuse Substantiation Proceedings – Commentary on In re Appeal of T.J. (2025)

Vermont Supreme Court Endorses Reliance on Non-Rule Agency Policy in Child-Abuse Substantiation Proceedings – Commentary on In re Appeal of T.J. (2025)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Vermont Supreme Court Endorses Reliance on Non-Rule Agency Policy in Child-Abuse Substantiation Proceedings Commentary on In re Appeal of T.J., 2025 VT ___ (Aug. 8, 2025) 1. Introduction The Vermont...
Event-Triggered Permit Conditions Upheld: Vermont Supreme Court Clarifies “Material Change” and the Condition-Subsequent Doctrine under Act 250 – Commentary on In re Costco Wholesale Administrative Decision, 2025 VT 44

Event-Triggered Permit Conditions Upheld: Vermont Supreme Court Clarifies “Material Change” and the Condition-Subsequent Doctrine under Act 250 – Commentary on In re Costco Wholesale Administrative Decision, 2025 VT 44

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Event-Triggered Permit Conditions Upheld: Vermont Supreme Court Clarifies “Material Change” and the Condition-Subsequent Doctrine under Act 250 Introduction The Supreme Court of Vermont in In re...
“Stagnation Suffices” – Vermont Supreme Court Clarifies the Single-Step
Change-in-Circumstances Standard under 33 V.S.A. § 5113(b)

“Stagnation Suffices” – Vermont Supreme Court Clarifies the Single-Step Change-in-Circumstances Standard under 33 V.S.A. § 5113(b)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Stagnation Suffices” – Vermont Supreme Court Clarifies the Single-Step Change-in-Circumstances Standard under 33 V.S.A. § 5113(b) 1. Introduction The Vermont Supreme Court’s entry order in In Re...
“Partial Progress Is Not Enough” – Vermont Supreme Court Clarifies the Doctrine of Parental Stagnation and the “Reasonable-Time” Standard in Termination-of-Parental-Rights Cases

“Partial Progress Is Not Enough” – Vermont Supreme Court Clarifies the Doctrine of Parental Stagnation and the “Reasonable-Time” Standard in Termination-of-Parental-Rights Cases

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Partial Progress Is Not Enough” – Vermont Supreme Court Clarifies the Doctrine of Parental Stagnation and the “Reasonable-Time” Standard in Termination-of-Parental-Rights Cases 1. Introduction In In...
Clarifying ICWA Inquiry Duties and Putative Fathers’ Due-Process Rights in Vermont – A Commentary on In re O.L., Juvenile (2025)

Clarifying ICWA Inquiry Duties and Putative Fathers’ Due-Process Rights in Vermont – A Commentary on In re O.L., Juvenile (2025)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Clarifying ICWA Inquiry Duties and Putative Fathers’ Due-Process Rights in Vermont – A Commentary on In re O.L., Juvenile (Vt. 2025) Introduction The Vermont Supreme Court’s decision in In re O.L.,...
Twombly v. Horne: Reaffirming the Appellant’s Duty to Perfect the Record and the Automatic Writ of Possession under Vermont’s Rent-Escrow Statute

Twombly v. Horne: Reaffirming the Appellant’s Duty to Perfect the Record and the Automatic Writ of Possession under Vermont’s Rent-Escrow Statute

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Twombly v. Horne: Reaffirming the Appellant’s Duty to Perfect the Record and the Automatic Writ of Possession under Vermont’s Rent-Escrow Statute Introduction Oliver Twombly v. Marcia Horne, 2025 VT...
Limiting Perry: Vermont Supreme Court Holds That Due-Process Notice in Property-Tax Grievances Need Not Be Mailed to Counsel

Limiting Perry: Vermont Supreme Court Holds That Due-Process Notice in Property-Tax Grievances Need Not Be Mailed to Counsel

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Limiting Perry: Vermont Supreme Court Holds That Due-Process Notice in Property-Tax Grievances Need Not Be Mailed to Counsel Introduction Salisbury AD 1, LLC v. Town of Salisbury, 2025 VT 43,...
Voluntary Absence at Restitution Hearings Constitutes Waiver: Commentary on State v. Brittany L. Knight (Vt. 2025)

Voluntary Absence at Restitution Hearings Constitutes Waiver: Commentary on State v. Brittany L. Knight (Vt. 2025)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Voluntary Absence at Restitution Hearings Constitutes Waiver: An In-Depth Commentary on State v. Brittany L. Knight, Supreme Court of Vermont (2025) I. Introduction Background: Brittany L. Knight...
Clarifying the Bailey Balancing Test: Negligent Evidence Destruction without Gross Negligence Is Insufficient for Dismissal in Vermont

Clarifying the Bailey Balancing Test: Negligent Evidence Destruction without Gross Negligence Is Insufficient for Dismissal in Vermont

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Clarifying the Bailey Balancing Test: Negligent Evidence Destruction without Gross Negligence Is Insufficient for Dismissal in Vermont Introduction State v. Eric M. Champagne, decided by the Vermont...
State v. Burket: Refining Plain-Error Review of Jury Instructions and Narrowing Drug-Testing Conditions in Vermont Probation Law

State v. Burket: Refining Plain-Error Review of Jury Instructions and Narrowing Drug-Testing Conditions in Vermont Probation Law

Date: Aug 13, 2025
State v. Burket: Refining Plain-Error Review of Jury Instructions and Narrowing Drug-Testing Conditions in Vermont Probation Law 1. Introduction In State v. Kelly Burket, 2025 VT ___ (Aug. 8, 2025),...
Parties’ Agreed Life-Insurance Obligations Survive Beyond Death – A Commentary on diMonda v. Lincoln National Corp., 2025 VT 45

Parties’ Agreed Life-Insurance Obligations Survive Beyond Death – A Commentary on diMonda v. Lincoln National Corp., 2025 VT 45

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Parties’ Agreed Life-Insurance Obligations Survive Beyond Death – The Vermont Supreme Court Reconciles Postmortem Maintenance Restrictions with Contractual Autonomy Commentary on Victoria diMonda v....
“Continuing-Conspiracy” Doctrine Reaffirmed: Post-Arrest Co-Conspirator Statements Admissible under Rule 801(d)(2)(E) — Commentary on United States v. Diego Fagundez, 11th Cir. (2025)

“Continuing-Conspiracy” Doctrine Reaffirmed: Post-Arrest Co-Conspirator Statements Admissible under Rule 801(d)(2)(E) — Commentary on United States v. Diego Fagundez, 11th Cir. (2025)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Continuing-Conspiracy” Doctrine Reaffirmed: Post-Arrest Co-Conspirator Statements Admissible under Rule 801(d)(2)(E) Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Diego Fagundez (11th Cir. 2025) I....
Ricker v. Nebraska Methodist – Solidifying Nebraska Courts’ Inherent Power to Exclude Late-Disclosed Experts

Ricker v. Nebraska Methodist – Solidifying Nebraska Courts’ Inherent Power to Exclude Late-Disclosed Experts

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Ricker v. Nebraska Methodist Health System, Inc. Affirming Courts’ Inherent Authority to Enforce Progression Orders by Excluding Late-Disclosed Expert Testimony 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of...
Extending Laches to Declaratory Quiet-Title Actions and Recognising Non-Party Prejudice: Commentary on Amerigold Holdings LLC v. Baker & Silverbow Mining LLC (Alaska 2025)

Extending Laches to Declaratory Quiet-Title Actions and Recognising Non-Party Prejudice: Commentary on Amerigold Holdings LLC v. Baker & Silverbow Mining LLC (Alaska 2025)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Extending Laches to Declaratory Quiet-Title Actions and Recognising Non-Party Prejudice A Commentary on Amerigold Holdings LLC v. Douglas Baker & Silverbow Mining LLC, Supreme Court of Alaska,...
Explained: The New Obligation on Alaska Courts to Justify
            Non-Insurance Solutions When Survivor Benefits Are Jeopardized —
            A Commentary on Sandvik v. Frazier (Alaska 2025)

Explained: The New Obligation on Alaska Courts to Justify Non-Insurance Solutions When Survivor Benefits Are Jeopardized — A Commentary on Sandvik v. Frazier (Alaska 2025)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Explained: The New Obligation on Alaska Courts to Justify Non-Insurance Solutions When Survivor Benefits Are Jeopardized — A Commentary on Sandvik v. Frazier (Alaska 2025) 1. Introduction Background....
“The ‘Before-Trial’ Rule” — Second Circuit Declares Post-Verdict Westfall Act Substitution Barred in Carroll v. Trump

“The ‘Before-Trial’ Rule” — Second Circuit Declares Post-Verdict Westfall Act Substitution Barred in Carroll v. Trump

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“The ‘Before-Trial’ Rule” — Second Circuit Declares Post-Verdict Westfall Act Substitution Barred in Carroll v. Trump Introduction In Carroll v. Trump, No. 24-644 (2d Cir. Aug. 8, 2025), the United...
Offensive Claim Preclusion Rebuffed: Second Circuit Clarifies the Limits of Bankruptcy Allowance Orders

Offensive Claim Preclusion Rebuffed: Second Circuit Clarifies the Limits of Bankruptcy Allowance Orders

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Offensive Claim Preclusion Rebuffed: Second Circuit Clarifies the Limits of Bankruptcy Allowance Orders 1. Introduction In Thermal Surgical, LLC v. Brown, the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Intrinsic-vs-404(b) Evidence Clarified: Commentary on United States v. Elijah Hakim (3d Cir. 2025)

Intrinsic-vs-404(b) Evidence Clarified: Commentary on United States v. Elijah Hakim (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Intrinsic-vs-404(b) Evidence Clarified: United States v. Elijah Hakim (3d Cir. 2025) Introduction United States v. Elijah Hakim, No. 23-1713, decided 8 August 2025 by the Court of Appeals for the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert