Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

reaffirmation-of-strict-liability-in-manufacturers& Case Commentaries

Misdesignated Notices Saved by FRAP 3(c)(7), “Some Day Intentions” Do Not Confer Equitable Standing, and Neutral Single‑Family Zoning Is Not Facially Discriminatory: Commentary on Be the Bush Recovery Ministries v. Coffee County

Misdesignated Notices Saved by FRAP 3(c)(7), “Some Day Intentions” Do Not Confer Equitable Standing, and Neutral Single‑Family Zoning Is Not Facially Discriminatory: Commentary on Be the Bush Recovery Ministries v. Coffee County

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Misdesignated Notices Saved by FRAP 3(c)(7), “Some Day Intentions” Do Not Confer Equitable Standing, and Neutral Single‑Family Zoning Is Not Facially Discriminatory: Commentary on Be the Bush...
A New Interpretation on Appeal Is a Forfeited Issue: The Eleventh Circuit Clarifies the Issue–Argument Divide in Gould v. Interface

A New Interpretation on Appeal Is a Forfeited Issue: The Eleventh Circuit Clarifies the Issue–Argument Divide in Gould v. Interface

Date: Oct 9, 2025
A New Interpretation on Appeal Is a Forfeited Issue: The Eleventh Circuit Clarifies the Issue–Argument Divide in Gould v. Interface Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Date: October...
Reaffirming Arreguin: First Circuit Requires the BIA to Identify Corroboration Before Heavily Relying on Non‑Conviction Police Reports to Deny Adjustment of Status

Reaffirming Arreguin: First Circuit Requires the BIA to Identify Corroboration Before Heavily Relying on Non‑Conviction Police Reports to Deny Adjustment of Status

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Reaffirming Arreguin: First Circuit Requires the BIA to Identify Corroboration Before Heavily Relying on Non‑Conviction Police Reports to Deny Adjustment of Status Introduction In Maurice v. Bondi,...
Pleading-Stage Constitutional Scrutiny of Municipal Tax Classifications: Equal Protection, Vagueness, and Dormant Commerce Clause Claims May Proceed; Zoning-Notice Attack Fails — Campus Crest v. City of Tuscaloosa

Pleading-Stage Constitutional Scrutiny of Municipal Tax Classifications: Equal Protection, Vagueness, and Dormant Commerce Clause Claims May Proceed; Zoning-Notice Attack Fails — Campus Crest v. City of Tuscaloosa

Date: Oct 8, 2025
Pleading-Stage Constitutional Scrutiny of Municipal Tax Classifications: Equal Protection, Vagueness, and Dormant Commerce Clause Claims May Proceed; Zoning-Notice Attack Fails Introduction In Campus...
Mississippi Supreme Court Authorizes $50 CLE Sponsor Application Fee as a Condition of Accreditation

Mississippi Supreme Court Authorizes $50 CLE Sponsor Application Fee as a Condition of Accreditation

Date: Oct 8, 2025
Mississippi Supreme Court Authorizes $50 CLE Sponsor Application Fee as a Condition of Accreditation Introduction This commentary examines the Mississippi Supreme Court’s administrative order in In...
Mississippi Supreme Court Adopts Official Civil Subpoena Forms (Forms 6–8) and Requires Conspicuous Ten‑Day Production Hold Under Rule 45

Mississippi Supreme Court Adopts Official Civil Subpoena Forms (Forms 6–8) and Requires Conspicuous Ten‑Day Production Hold Under Rule 45

Date: Oct 8, 2025
Mississippi Supreme Court Adopts Official Civil Subpoena Forms (Forms 6–8) and Requires Conspicuous Ten‑Day Production Hold Under Rule 45 Introduction In a rulemaking order titled “In re: The Rules...
Pleading-Stage Pathways Around the UCC Statute of Frauds: Joint Counsel’s Email May Qualify as a Merchant’s Confirmation, and Pre‑Closing Control May Constitute Receipt and Acceptance

Pleading-Stage Pathways Around the UCC Statute of Frauds: Joint Counsel’s Email May Qualify as a Merchant’s Confirmation, and Pre‑Closing Control May Constitute Receipt and Acceptance

Date: Oct 8, 2025
Pleading-Stage Pathways Around the UCC Statute of Frauds: Joint Counsel’s Email May Qualify as a Merchant’s Confirmation, and Pre‑Closing Control May Constitute Receipt and Acceptance Introduction In...
No Present Conveyance, No Deed: Mississippi High Court Holds “Upon Sale or My Death Shall Be Shared” Instruments Are Testamentary, Not Inter Vivos Conveyances

No Present Conveyance, No Deed: Mississippi High Court Holds “Upon Sale or My Death Shall Be Shared” Instruments Are Testamentary, Not Inter Vivos Conveyances

Date: Oct 8, 2025
No Present Conveyance, No Deed: Mississippi High Court Holds “Upon Sale or My Death Shall Be Shared” Instruments Are Testamentary, Not Inter Vivos Conveyances Introduction This commentary analyzes...
Including Profit in an Automaker’s “Destination Charge” Is Not Deceptive Under the NJCFA, and Manufacturers Owe No Disclosure Duty for Pass-Through Fees

Including Profit in an Automaker’s “Destination Charge” Is Not Deceptive Under the NJCFA, and Manufacturers Owe No Disclosure Duty for Pass-Through Fees

Date: Oct 5, 2025
Including Profit in an Automaker’s “Destination Charge” Is Not Deceptive Under the NJCFA, and Manufacturers Owe No Disclosure Duty for Pass-Through Fees Introduction In BCR Carpentry LLC v. FCA US...
“Claim-and-Denial” Ripeness Rule for Takings Challenges to Pennsylvania’s Unclaimed Property Custody

“Claim-and-Denial” Ripeness Rule for Takings Challenges to Pennsylvania’s Unclaimed Property Custody

Date: Oct 5, 2025
“Claim-and-Denial” Ripeness Rule for Takings Challenges to Pennsylvania’s Unclaimed Property Custody Case: Brian Dillow v. Treasurer of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Court: United States Court of...
Judicial Participation, Accurate Sentencing Warnings, and Time‑Limited Plea Offers Do Not Alone Render a Plea Involuntary: Commentary on Devine v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (3d Cir. 2025)

Judicial Participation, Accurate Sentencing Warnings, and Time‑Limited Plea Offers Do Not Alone Render a Plea Involuntary: Commentary on Devine v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 5, 2025
Judicial Participation, Accurate Sentencing Warnings, and Time‑Limited Plea Offers Do Not Alone Render a Plea Involuntary Introduction This commentary examines the Third Circuit’s non-precedential...
Mailing, Not Receipt, Triggers FTCA’s Six‑Month Deadline; COVID-Era Office Mail Protocols Do Not Justify Equitable Tolling

Mailing, Not Receipt, Triggers FTCA’s Six‑Month Deadline; COVID-Era Office Mail Protocols Do Not Justify Equitable Tolling

Date: Oct 5, 2025
Mailing, Not Receipt, Triggers FTCA’s Six‑Month Deadline; COVID-Era Office Mail Protocols Do Not Justify Equitable Tolling Case: Margarita Marshall v. United States Post Office, United States Postal...
United States v. Vargas: Contextual Use of Informant Recordings Does Not Implicate the Confrontation Clause; Compulsory Process Requires a Plausible Showing of Favorability

United States v. Vargas: Contextual Use of Informant Recordings Does Not Implicate the Confrontation Clause; Compulsory Process Requires a Plausible Showing of Favorability

Date: Oct 5, 2025
United States v. Vargas: Contextual Use of Informant Recordings Does Not Implicate the Confrontation Clause; Compulsory Process Requires a Plausible Showing of Favorability Introduction This...
United States v. Malcolm: Third Circuit affirms upward variance based on uncharged robberies and jail misconduct, clarifying § 924(c)/Guidelines interplay

United States v. Malcolm: Third Circuit affirms upward variance based on uncharged robberies and jail misconduct, clarifying § 924(c)/Guidelines interplay

Date: Oct 5, 2025
United States v. Malcolm: Third Circuit affirms upward variance based on uncharged robberies and jail misconduct, clarifying § 924(c)/Guidelines interplay Note: This Third Circuit disposition is “not...
Pending Rule 23(f) Petitions Do Not Divest District Courts of Authority to Revise Class-Certification Orders; Subclassing Purchasers and Exchangers Permissible in Merger-Related Securities Fraud

Pending Rule 23(f) Petitions Do Not Divest District Courts of Authority to Revise Class-Certification Orders; Subclassing Purchasers and Exchangers Permissible in Merger-Related Securities Fraud

Date: Oct 5, 2025
Pending Rule 23(f) Petitions Do Not Divest District Courts of Authority to Revise Class-Certification Orders; Subclassing Purchasers and Exchangers Permissible in Merger-Related Securities Fraud...
Electronic Receipt and Unsigned Company Certification Suffice for Cancelling Financed Policies under La. R.S. 9:3550(G)(3)

Electronic Receipt and Unsigned Company Certification Suffice for Cancelling Financed Policies under La. R.S. 9:3550(G)(3)

Date: Oct 5, 2025
Electronic Receipt and Unsigned Company Certification Suffice for Cancelling Financed Policies under La. R.S. 9:3550(G)(3) Introduction In Williams v. GoAuto Insurance, the United States Court of...
Temporary Telework That Precludes Essential In‑Person Duties Is Not a Reasonable ADA Accommodation: Fourth Circuit (Unpublished) Reaffirms Present‑Tense Essential‑Functions Test

Temporary Telework That Precludes Essential In‑Person Duties Is Not a Reasonable ADA Accommodation: Fourth Circuit (Unpublished) Reaffirms Present‑Tense Essential‑Functions Test

Date: Oct 5, 2025
Temporary Telework That Precludes Essential In‑Person Duties Is Not a Reasonable ADA Accommodation: Fourth Circuit (Unpublished) Reaffirms Present‑Tense Essential‑Functions Test Case: Donna M. Jones...
No §1983 End‑Run Around Habeas for McGirt‑Based Jurisdictional Challenges; Prospective Relief Against Judges Requires Ongoing Injury

No §1983 End‑Run Around Habeas for McGirt‑Based Jurisdictional Challenges; Prospective Relief Against Judges Requires Ongoing Injury

Date: Oct 5, 2025
No §1983 End‑Run Around Habeas for McGirt‑Based Jurisdictional Challenges; Prospective Relief Against Judges Requires Ongoing Injury Introduction In Davison v. Smith, No. 24-6256 (10th Cir. Oct. 3,...
Gatekeeping, Not Merits: The Tenth Circuit Reaffirms Burns/Dodson Limits on Habeas Review of Nonunanimous Court‑Martial Verdicts and Rejects “Missing Transcript” Attacks

Gatekeeping, Not Merits: The Tenth Circuit Reaffirms Burns/Dodson Limits on Habeas Review of Nonunanimous Court‑Martial Verdicts and Rejects “Missing Transcript” Attacks

Date: Oct 5, 2025
Gatekeeping, Not Merits: The Tenth Circuit Reaffirms Burns/Dodson Limits on Habeas Review of Nonunanimous Court‑Martial Verdicts and Rejects “Missing Transcript” Attacks Introduction In Livingston v....
Modoc Nation v. Shah: Collateral-Order Review of Denials of Tribal and State-Law Immunities; No Tribal Sovereign Immunity in Individual-Capacity Suits Against Tribal Officials

Modoc Nation v. Shah: Collateral-Order Review of Denials of Tribal and State-Law Immunities; No Tribal Sovereign Immunity in Individual-Capacity Suits Against Tribal Officials

Date: Oct 5, 2025
Modoc Nation v. Shah: Collateral-Order Review of Denials of Tribal and State-Law Immunities; No Tribal Sovereign Immunity in Individual-Capacity Suits Against Tribal Officials Court: United States...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert