Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

juvenile-sentencing-guidelines:-iowa-supreme-court Case Commentaries

Upheld: Content-Neutral Age Restriction and Prior Restraint Safeguards in Adult-Entertainment Licensing

Upheld: Content-Neutral Age Restriction and Prior Restraint Safeguards in Adult-Entertainment Licensing

Date: Apr 24, 2025
Upheld: Content-Neutral Age Restriction and Prior Restraint Safeguards in Adult-Entertainment Licensing Introduction In Wacko’s Too, Inc. v. City of Jacksonville, a panel of the Eleventh Circuit...
Affirming Deference: Standards for New Trials and Jury Verdict Reviews in Feliciano-Muñoz v. Rebarber-Ocasio

Affirming Deference: Standards for New Trials and Jury Verdict Reviews in Feliciano-Muñoz v. Rebarber-Ocasio

Date: Apr 24, 2025
Affirming Deference: Standards for New Trials and Jury Verdict Reviews in Feliciano-Muñoz v. Rebarber-Ocasio Introduction Feliciano-Muñoz v. Rebarber-Ocasio is a First Circuit appellate decision...

        The Dual-Track Test for Fraudulent Conveyance Claims: Pine Valley Center, LLC v. Jacobs Refines Summary-Judgment Standards under former N.Y. Debtor & Creditor Law §§ 273 and 276

The Dual-Track Test for Fraudulent Conveyance Claims: Pine Valley Center, LLC v. Jacobs Refines Summary-Judgment Standards under former N.Y. Debtor & Creditor Law §§ 273 and 276

Date: Apr 24, 2025
The Dual-Track Test for Fraudulent Conveyance Claims: Pine Valley Center, LLC v. Jacobs Refines Summary-Judgment Standards under former N.Y. Debtor & Creditor Law §§ 273 and 276 1. Introduction In...
In re: Carl v. Williams – Establishing One-Year Suspension for Knowing Conversion of Client Funds

In re: Carl v. Williams – Establishing One-Year Suspension for Knowing Conversion of Client Funds

Date: Apr 24, 2025
In re: Carl v. Williams – Establishing One-Year Suspension for Knowing Conversion of Client Funds Introduction In In re: Carl v. Williams, 2025-B-0200 (La. 4/23/25), the Supreme Court of Louisiana...
Independent-Injury Rule under Rooker-Feldman and Limits of Claim Preclusion: Derek Thomas v. John Bartholomew, IV

Independent-Injury Rule under Rooker-Feldman and Limits of Claim Preclusion: Derek Thomas v. John Bartholomew, IV

Date: Apr 24, 2025
Independent-Injury Rule under Rooker-Feldman and Limits of Claim Preclusion: Derek Thomas v. John Bartholomew, IV Introduction Derek Thomas v. John Bartholomew, IV, decided April 23, 2025 by the...
Mitigating Secondary Effects Through Age-Based Regulation: Emperors, Inc. v. City of Jacksonville

Mitigating Secondary Effects Through Age-Based Regulation: Emperors, Inc. v. City of Jacksonville

Date: Apr 24, 2025
Mitigating Secondary Effects Through Age-Based Regulation: Emperors, Inc. v. City of Jacksonville Introduction Emperors, Inc. v. City of Jacksonville (11th Cir. Apr. 23, 2025) addresses the...
United States v. Williams: Reinforcing the Plain-Feel Doctrine in Protective Pat-Downs

United States v. Williams: Reinforcing the Plain-Feel Doctrine in Protective Pat-Downs

Date: Apr 24, 2025
United States v. Williams: Reinforcing the Plain-Feel Doctrine in Protective Pat-Downs Introduction United States v. Edwin Williams, 3d Cir. No. 23-1494 (Apr. 23, 2025), arises from a traffic stop in...
Equistar Chem v. Indeck Power: Clarifying Damage Recovery Limits and Condition Precedent Standards in Commercial Service Contracts

Equistar Chem v. Indeck Power: Clarifying Damage Recovery Limits and Condition Precedent Standards in Commercial Service Contracts

Date: Apr 24, 2025
Equistar Chem v. Indeck Power: Clarifying Damage Recovery Limits and Condition Precedent Standards in Commercial Service Contracts Introduction Equistar Chemicals, L.P. (“Equistar”) contracted with...
Reaffirmation of Twombly/Iqbal Pleading Standards in Bankruptcy Adversary Proceedings under 11 U.S.C. § 727

Reaffirmation of Twombly/Iqbal Pleading Standards in Bankruptcy Adversary Proceedings under 11 U.S.C. § 727

Date: Apr 24, 2025
Reaffirmation of Twombly/Iqbal Pleading Standards in Bankruptcy Adversary Proceedings under 11 U.S.C. § 727 Introduction This case—Lucky Investments, Inc. v. Rahim—arose out of a Chapter 7 bankruptcy...
Specific-Intent Requirement Bars Tort Claim for Refusal to Provide Affidavit of Merit

Specific-Intent Requirement Bars Tort Claim for Refusal to Provide Affidavit of Merit

Date: Apr 24, 2025
Specific-Intent Requirement Bars Tort Claim for Refusal to Provide Affidavit of Merit Introduction Harold R. Berk, a retired attorney, appealed the dismissal of his suit against the Rothman Institute...
Emergency Purposes Exception Under the TCPA Protects Local Government Robocalls During Public Health Crises

Emergency Purposes Exception Under the TCPA Protects Local Government Robocalls During Public Health Crises

Date: Apr 24, 2025
Emergency Purposes Exception Under the TCPA Protects Local Government Robocalls During Public Health Crises Introduction Silver v. City of Albuquerque, No. 23-2058 (10th Cir. Apr. 23, 2025), arises...
Absolute Pollution Exclusions Unambiguously Preclude Coverage Under New Mexico Law: No Duty to Defend CERCLA Claims

Absolute Pollution Exclusions Unambiguously Preclude Coverage Under New Mexico Law: No Duty to Defend CERCLA Claims

Date: Apr 24, 2025
Absolute Pollution Exclusions Unambiguously Preclude Coverage Under New Mexico Law: No Duty to Defend CERCLA Claims Introduction This commentary examines the Tenth Circuit’s April 23, 2025 decision...
Validation of Exclusive Administrative Forum Clauses under Section 11-35-4230

Validation of Exclusive Administrative Forum Clauses under Section 11-35-4230

Date: Apr 24, 2025
Validation of Exclusive Administrative Forum Clauses under Section 11-35-4230 Introduction The consolidated appeals in Intellectual Capital, Inc. v. Chief Procurement Officer (Appellate Case No....
Unambiguous Enforcement of Absolute Pollution Exclusions under New Mexico Law

Unambiguous Enforcement of Absolute Pollution Exclusions under New Mexico Law

Date: Apr 24, 2025
Unambiguous Enforcement of Absolute Pollution Exclusions under New Mexico Law Introduction This appeal arises from a diversity suit in New Mexico federal court in which Chisholm’s Village Plaza, LLC...
Lopez v. Neira: Reaffirming the Court’s Non-Delegable Duty to Define Post-Counseling Parental Access Schedules

Lopez v. Neira: Reaffirming the Court’s Non-Delegable Duty to Define Post-Counseling Parental Access Schedules

Date: Apr 24, 2025
Lopez v. Neira: Reaffirming the Court’s Non-Delegable Duty to Define Post-Counseling Parental Access Schedules Introduction In Matter of Lopez v. Neira (2025 NY Slip Op 02345), the Appellate...
Individualized Fitness Hearings Required: Categorical Ban on Parent–Child Cohabitation Unconstitutional

Individualized Fitness Hearings Required: Categorical Ban on Parent–Child Cohabitation Unconstitutional

Date: Apr 24, 2025
Individualized Fitness Hearings Required: Categorical Ban on Parent–Child Cohabitation Unconstitutional Introduction This case arises from Alabama’s Sex Offender Registration and Community...
Severability of Unenforceable Cost-Shifting Provisions in Arbitration Agreements

Severability of Unenforceable Cost-Shifting Provisions in Arbitration Agreements

Date: Apr 24, 2025
Severability of Unenforceable Cost-Shifting Provisions in Arbitration Agreements Introduction In Jamie Gavin et al. v. Lady Jane’s Haircuts for Men Holding Co., LLC et al., the Sixth Circuit...
Proportional Attorney Fee Awards under the Rhode Island Open Meetings Act: Discretion and Proportionality Affirmed

Proportional Attorney Fee Awards under the Rhode Island Open Meetings Act: Discretion and Proportionality Affirmed

Date: Apr 24, 2025
Proportional Attorney Fee Awards under the Rhode Island Open Meetings Act: Discretion and Proportionality Affirmed Introduction John Cullen v. Albion Fire District et al. (No. 2024-195-Appeal,...
Clarifying “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship”under IIRIRA: Mendez Nolasco v. Bondi

Clarifying “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship”under IIRIRA: Mendez Nolasco v. Bondi

Date: Apr 24, 2025
Clarifying “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” under IIRIRA: Mendez Nolasco v. Bondi Introduction In Mendez Nolasco v. Bondi, 23-1947 (1st Cir. Apr. 23, 2025), the First Circuit addressed...
Owners Insurance Co. v. Walsh: Non-Stacking of UIM Benefits When No Scheduled Vehicle Is Involved

Owners Insurance Co. v. Walsh: Non-Stacking of UIM Benefits When No Scheduled Vehicle Is Involved

Date: Apr 24, 2025
Owners Insurance Co. v. Walsh: Non-Stacking of UIM Benefits When No Scheduled Vehicle Is Involved Introduction Owners Insurance Company v. Jeffrey Walsh is a 2025 Fourth Circuit decision clarifying...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert