Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

juvenile-sentencing-guidelines:-iowa-supreme-court Case Commentaries

Distinct Scrutiny Standard for Privately Initiated Termination of Parental Rights in Nevada

Distinct Scrutiny Standard for Privately Initiated Termination of Parental Rights in Nevada

Date: Apr 25, 2025
Distinct Scrutiny Standard for Privately Initiated Termination of Parental Rights in Nevada Introduction In re Parental Rights as to R.A.S., 141 Nev. Advance Opinion 20 (Apr. 24, 2025), addresses a...
Permissible Regulation of Concealed Carry and Firearm Serialization Post-Bruen

Permissible Regulation of Concealed Carry and Firearm Serialization Post-Bruen

Date: Apr 25, 2025
Permissible Regulation of Concealed Carry and Firearm Serialization Post-Bruen Introduction In Cocking (Samuel) v. State, 141 Nev., Advance Opinion 21 (Apr. 24, 2025), the Supreme Court of Nevada...
Deference to Juvenile Courts in Termination Cases: Applying the Strictly Necessary Standard in In re D.S.

Deference to Juvenile Courts in Termination Cases: Applying the Strictly Necessary Standard in In re D.S.

Date: Apr 25, 2025
Deference to Juvenile Courts in Termination Cases: Applying the Strictly Necessary Standard in In re D.S. Introduction The Supreme Court of Utah’s decision in In re D.S., 2025 UT 11, clarifies how...
State v. Bradley: Broad Inapplicability of Spousal Privilege in RSA Chapter 632-A Proceedings

State v. Bradley: Broad Inapplicability of Spousal Privilege in RSA Chapter 632-A Proceedings

Date: Apr 25, 2025
State v. Bradley: Broad Inapplicability of Spousal Privilege in RSA Chapter 632-A Proceedings Introduction In State v. Bradley, 2025 N.H. 19, the Supreme Court of New Hampshire addressed the scope of...
Establishing an Objective “Obviousness” Standard Under NHRPC 4.4(a) to Prevent Third-Person Burdening

Establishing an Objective “Obviousness” Standard Under NHRPC 4.4(a) to Prevent Third-Person Burdening

Date: Apr 25, 2025
Establishing an Objective “Obviousness” Standard Under NHRPC 4.4(a) to Prevent Third-Person Burdening Introduction The Supreme Court of New Hampshire’s decision in Appeal of Hoppock, 2025 N.H. 18,...
Flight and Resistance to Arrest as Consciousness of Guilt: Admissibility Under KRE 404(b)

Flight and Resistance to Arrest as Consciousness of Guilt: Admissibility Under KRE 404(b)

Date: Apr 25, 2025
Flight and Resistance to Arrest as Consciousness of Guilt: Admissibility Under KRE 404(b) Introduction In Richard Gray v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, the Supreme Court of Kentucky reviewed the appeal...
Per Se Justification of a Property Owner’s Right to Exclude in Tortious Interference Claims

Per Se Justification of a Property Owner’s Right to Exclude in Tortious Interference Claims

Date: Apr 25, 2025
Per Se Justification of a Property Owner’s Right to Exclude in Tortious Interference Claims Introduction In In the Matter of the Certified Question: Diamond Quality, Inc. v. Dana Light Axle Products,...
Clarifying Palpable Error Review for Expert Testimony on Victim-Perpetrator Intimacy and Prosecutorial Rebuttal in Kentucky Murder Appeals

Clarifying Palpable Error Review for Expert Testimony on Victim-Perpetrator Intimacy and Prosecutorial Rebuttal in Kentucky Murder Appeals

Date: Apr 25, 2025
Clarifying Palpable Error Review for Expert Testimony on Victim-Perpetrator Intimacy and Prosecutorial Rebuttal in Kentucky Murder Appeals Introduction The Supreme Court of Kentucky’s unpublished...
Probation Tolling Jurisdiction: Court-Order Requirement under KRS 533.020(4)

Probation Tolling Jurisdiction: Court-Order Requirement under KRS 533.020(4)

Date: Apr 25, 2025
Probation Tolling Jurisdiction: Court-Order Requirement under KRS 533.020(4) Introduction In Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Darryl Ellery, the Kentucky Supreme Court clarified the jurisdictional limits...
Haleman v. Kentucky: Defining the Limits of Expert Hearsay and Palpable-Error Review in Child-Abuse Trials

Haleman v. Kentucky: Defining the Limits of Expert Hearsay and Palpable-Error Review in Child-Abuse Trials

Date: Apr 25, 2025
Haleman v. Commonwealth of Kentucky: Defining the Limits of Expert Hearsay and Palpable-Error Review in Child-Abuse Trials Introduction In Mark Haleman v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, the Supreme Court...
Mandatory Disbarment for Criminal Misconduct and Failure to Cooperate: In re Brinker

Mandatory Disbarment for Criminal Misconduct and Failure to Cooperate: In re Brinker

Date: Apr 25, 2025
Mandatory Disbarment for Criminal Misconduct and Failure to Cooperate: In re Brinker Introduction In In re: Dale Anthony Brinker, the Supreme Court of Kentucky considered the Board of Governors’...
Discretionary Cancellation of Lis Pendens: The Inherent-Power Doctrine Reaffirmed in Zwickel v. Underhill Land LLC

Discretionary Cancellation of Lis Pendens: The Inherent-Power Doctrine Reaffirmed in Zwickel v. Underhill Land LLC

Date: Apr 25, 2025
Discretionary Cancellation of Lis Pendens: The Inherent-Power Doctrine Reaffirmed in Zwickel v. Underhill Land LLC Introduction Zwickel v. Underhill Land LLC (2025 NY Slip Op 02384) is a Third...
People v. Cox (2025): No Sua Sponte Inquiry into Psychiatric Defenses after Competency Finding

People v. Cox (2025): No Sua Sponte Inquiry into Psychiatric Defenses after Competency Finding

Date: Apr 25, 2025
People v. Cox (2025): Appellate Division Clarifies that Trial Courts Are Not Required to Conduct a Sua Sponte Psychiatric-Defense Inquiry During Plea Allocution Once Competency Has Been Established...
Minor Discrepancies No Longer Defeat the Presumption of Regularity in Will Executions – Commentary on Matter of Ostrander (2025)

Minor Discrepancies No Longer Defeat the Presumption of Regularity in Will Executions – Commentary on Matter of Ostrander (2025)

Date: Apr 25, 2025
Minor Discrepancies No Longer Defeat the Presumption of Regularity in Will Executions – A Detailed Commentary on Matter of Ostrander (2025 NY Slip Op 02382) 1. Introduction The Appellate Division,...
Conditional Reinstatement and the “No-Solo Practice” Mandate: Matter of Crockett (2025) and the Elevated Public-Interest Test for Suspended Attorneys

Conditional Reinstatement and the “No-Solo Practice” Mandate: Matter of Crockett (2025) and the Elevated Public-Interest Test for Suspended Attorneys

Date: Apr 25, 2025
Conditional Reinstatement and the “No-Solo Practice” Mandate: Matter of Crockett (2025) and the Elevated Public-Interest Test for Suspended Attorneys I. Introduction Matter of Crockett, 237 A.D.3d...
Ensuring Definiteness in Oral Agreements and Viability of Quantum Meruit Claims Under California Law

Ensuring Definiteness in Oral Agreements and Viability of Quantum Meruit Claims Under California Law

Date: Apr 24, 2025
Ensuring Definiteness in Oral Agreements and Viability of Quantum Meruit Claims Under California Law Introduction 3074 Centreville LLC v. M.A. Cohen & Co., Inc. (Fourth Cir. Apr. 23, 2025) addresses...
Jurisdictional Limits on Review of BIA’s Lack-of-Prejudice Determinations in §1227(a)(1)(H) Waiver Reopenings

Jurisdictional Limits on Review of BIA’s Lack-of-Prejudice Determinations in §1227(a)(1)(H) Waiver Reopenings

Date: Apr 24, 2025
Jurisdictional Limits on Review of BIA’s Lack-of-Prejudice Determinations in §1227(a)(1)(H) Waiver Reopenings Introduction This commentary examines the Sixth Circuit’s decision in Jin Yin Zhou v....
Enforcement of Unambiguous Absolute Pollution Exclusions under New Mexico Law: Insurers’ No-Duty-to-Defend Rule for CERCLA Contamination Claims

Enforcement of Unambiguous Absolute Pollution Exclusions under New Mexico Law: Insurers’ No-Duty-to-Defend Rule for CERCLA Contamination Claims

Date: Apr 24, 2025
Enforcement of Unambiguous Absolute Pollution Exclusions under New Mexico Law: Insurers’ No-Duty-to-Defend Rule for CERCLA Contamination Claims Introduction Chisholm’s-Village Plaza LLC...
Crossland v. Indiana: Refining Standards for Impartial Juries, Venue Transfers, Peremptory Challenges, and Defense Rights

Crossland v. Indiana: Refining Standards for Impartial Juries, Venue Transfers, Peremptory Challenges, and Defense Rights

Date: Apr 24, 2025
Crossland v. Indiana: Refining Standards for Impartial Juries, Venue Transfers, Peremptory Challenges, and Defense Rights Introduction In Chelsea L. Crossland v. State of Indiana (Ind. 2025), the...
Clarifying the Specific-Threat Requirement in Eighth Amendment Deliberate Indifference Claims: Oliver v. Warden, Wilcox State Prison

Clarifying the Specific-Threat Requirement in Eighth Amendment Deliberate Indifference Claims: Oliver v. Warden, Wilcox State Prison

Date: Apr 24, 2025
Clarifying the Specific-Threat Requirement in Eighth Amendment Deliberate Indifference Claims Introduction In Anthony Oliver v. Warden Wilcox State Prison (11th Cir. 2025), the Court of Appeals for...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert