Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

juvenile-sentencing-guidelines:-iowa-supreme-court Case Commentaries

Clarifying Function-by-Function Analysis in RFC Determinations: Ward v. Dudek

Clarifying Function-by-Function Analysis in RFC Determinations: Ward v. Dudek

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Clarifying Function-by-Function Analysis in RFC Determinations: Ward v. Dudek 1. Introduction This commentary examines the unpublished Fourth Circuit decision in Donna Macklin Ward v. Leland C....
Strict Application of Claim Preclusion to Repetitive Pro Se Land Use Claims

Strict Application of Claim Preclusion to Repetitive Pro Se Land Use Claims

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Strict Application of Claim Preclusion to Repetitive Pro Se Land Use Claims 1. Introduction The appeal arises from Benedict Mohit’s pro se challenge to the City of Haines City’s land‐use regulations,...
Fully Deferred Suspension for Failure to Cooperate with Disciplinary Investigations Under Rules 8.1(c), 8.4(a) and 8.4(d)

Fully Deferred Suspension for Failure to Cooperate with Disciplinary Investigations Under Rules 8.1(c), 8.4(a) and 8.4(d)

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Fully Deferred Suspension for Failure to Cooperate with Disciplinary Investigations Under Rules 8.1(c), 8.4(a) and 8.4(d) Introduction In In Re: Timothy A. Meche, 2025-B-0229 (La. 4/29/25), the...
Defining Qualifying Preexisting Disabilities and Eliminating Load Factors in PTD Claims Under RSMo § 287.220.3

Defining Qualifying Preexisting Disabilities and Eliminating Load Factors in PTD Claims Under RSMo § 287.220.3

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Defining Qualifying Preexisting Disabilities and Eliminating Load Factors in PTD Claims Under RSMo § 287.220.3 Introduction This commentary examines the Supreme Court of Missouri’s en banc decision...
The Forensic Border Search Exception Reaffirmed: No Reasonable Suspicion Required for Electronic Device Searches at the Border

The Forensic Border Search Exception Reaffirmed: No Reasonable Suspicion Required for Electronic Device Searches at the Border

Date: Apr 30, 2025
The Forensic Border Search Exception Reaffirmed: No Reasonable Suspicion Required for Electronic Device Searches at the Border Introduction In United States v. Stephen Gordon Grimes, Jr., 23-12455...
Ex Post Facto Limits on Retroactive SVORA Amendments: Upholding Pre-2007 Registration Requirements

Ex Post Facto Limits on Retroactive SVORA Amendments: Upholding Pre-2007 Registration Requirements

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Ex Post Facto Limits on Retroactive SVORA Amendments: Upholding Pre-2007 Registration Requirements Introduction Clark v. State, 2025 MT 87, is a decision of the Supreme Court of Montana addressing...
Absence of EEOC Right-to-Sue Letter Does Not Defeat Claim Preclusion in Title VII Suits

Absence of EEOC Right-to-Sue Letter Does Not Defeat Claim Preclusion in Title VII Suits

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Absence of EEOC Right-to-Sue Letter Does Not Defeat Claim Preclusion in Title VII Suits Introduction Watkins v. Genesh, Inc., No. 24-3043 (10th Cir. Apr. 29, 2025) presents a critical question at the...
Reaffirming Prevailing-Party Status Through Judicially Sanctioned Relief in Post-Judgment Family Law Proceedings

Reaffirming Prevailing-Party Status Through Judicially Sanctioned Relief in Post-Judgment Family Law Proceedings

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Reaffirming Prevailing-Party Status Through Judicially Sanctioned Relief in Post-Judgment Family Law Proceedings Introduction In the Supreme Court of Tennessee’s October 4, 2023 session, Vanessa...
Disjunctive Interpretation of USSG §4C1.1(a)(10): Independent Disqualifiers for Sentence Reduction

Disjunctive Interpretation of USSG §4C1.1(a)(10): Independent Disqualifiers for Sentence Reduction

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Disjunctive Interpretation of USSG §4C1.1(a)(10): Independent Disqualifiers for Sentence Reduction Introduction United States v. Jones, 24-30236 (5th Cir. Apr. 29, 2025), presents the Fifth Circuit’s...
Jurisdictional Boundaries for Voluntary Dismissals and Contractual Fee Awards Post-Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i)

Jurisdictional Boundaries for Voluntary Dismissals and Contractual Fee Awards Post-Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i)

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Jurisdictional Boundaries for Voluntary Dismissals and Contractual Fee Awards Post-Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) Introduction AAA Gaming LLC and Illinois Gaming Investments, LLC (“Plaintiffs”) entered into a...
Clarifying the Standards for Postsentencing Standing Criminal Protective Orders under § 53a-40e

Clarifying the Standards for Postsentencing Standing Criminal Protective Orders under § 53a-40e

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Clarifying the Standards for Postsentencing Standing Criminal Protective Orders under § 53a-40e Introduction The Supreme Court of Connecticut’s decision in State v. Mieles, 345 Conn. ___ (2025),...
Baseline Suspension for Lawyer Negligence, Communication Failures, and Fee Misconduct Established in In Re: Louviere

Baseline Suspension for Lawyer Negligence, Communication Failures, and Fee Misconduct Established in In Re: Louviere

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Baseline Suspension for Lawyer Negligence, Communication Failures, and Fee Misconduct Established in In Re: Louviere Introduction In In Re: Drew M. Louviere, the Supreme Court of Louisiana addressed...
Reaffirmation of §3582(c)(1)(A) Framework: §3553(a) Assessment Before Extraordinary Circumstances

Reaffirmation of §3582(c)(1)(A) Framework: §3553(a) Assessment Before Extraordinary Circumstances

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Reaffirmation of §3582(c)(1)(A) Framework: §3553(a) Assessment Before Extraordinary Circumstances Introduction The Eleventh Circuit’s decision in United States v. Miguel Pedraza (No. 24-11944, April...
Material Omissions and Internal Relocation Standards in Asylum and CAT Adjudications

Material Omissions and Internal Relocation Standards in Asylum and CAT Adjudications

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Material Omissions and Internal Relocation Standards in Asylum and CAT Adjudications Introduction Hernandez-Hernandez v. Bondi is a Second Circuit summary order issued on April 29, 2025. Petitioners...
Clarifying the Two-Year Statute of Limitations for §1983 Medical Claims by Pretrial Detainees

Clarifying the Two-Year Statute of Limitations for §1983 Medical Claims by Pretrial Detainees

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Clarifying the Two-Year Statute of Limitations for §1983 Medical Claims by Pretrial Detainees Introduction The Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit’s decision in Kolak v. Backerville, No. 24-1182...
Specific Promise Requirement for In-Person Learning in Student-University Implied Contracts under New York Law

Specific Promise Requirement for In-Person Learning in Student-University Implied Contracts under New York Law

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Specific Promise Requirement for In-Person Learning in Student-University Implied Contracts under New York Law Introduction Beck v. Manhattan College, decided by the United States Court of Appeals...
From “Program Enrollment” to “Monthly Cash-Payment Eligibility”: The Supreme Court Adopts a Narrow, Month-By-Month SSI Standard for Medicare DSH Calculations

From “Program Enrollment” to “Monthly Cash-Payment Eligibility”: The Supreme Court Adopts a Narrow, Month-By-Month SSI Standard for Medicare DSH Calculations

Date: Apr 30, 2025
From “Program Enrollment” to “Monthly Cash-Payment Eligibility”: The Supreme Court Adopts a Narrow, Month-By-Month SSI Standard for Medicare DSH Calculations Introduction Advocate Christ Medical...
Establishing Uniform Procedural Deadlines for Delayed Appeals in the Ohio Supreme Court

Establishing Uniform Procedural Deadlines for Delayed Appeals in the Ohio Supreme Court

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Establishing Uniform Procedural Deadlines for Delayed Appeals in the Ohio Supreme Court Introduction On April 29, 2025, the Supreme Court of Ohio issued its case announcements (2025-Ohio-1483),...
Preserving the Status Quo: Prevailing-Party Attorney Fees for Defending Nonsuited Post-Divorce Petitions under Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-103(c)

Preserving the Status Quo: Prevailing-Party Attorney Fees for Defending Nonsuited Post-Divorce Petitions under Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-103(c)

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Preserving the Status Quo: Prevailing-Party Attorney Fees for Defending Nonsuited Post-Divorce Petitions under Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-103(c) Introduction In Vanessa Colley v. John S. Colley, III, the...
Harmless Procedural Error and Sentencing Discretion Under §3553(a) and §5G1.2: United States v. Rogers

Harmless Procedural Error and Sentencing Discretion Under §3553(a) and §5G1.2: United States v. Rogers

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Harmless Procedural Error and Sentencing Discretion Under §3553(a) and §5G1.2: United States v. Rogers Introduction In United States v. Patrick D. Rogers, No. 24-2125 (7th Cir. Apr. 29, 2025), the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert