Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

juvenile-sentencing-guidelines:-iowa-supreme-court Case Commentaries

Rigorous Application of Comparator Evidence and Discovery Diligence in Title VII Summary Judgment

Rigorous Application of Comparator Evidence and Discovery Diligence in Title VII Summary Judgment

Date: May 1, 2025
Rigorous Application of Comparator Evidence and Discovery Diligence in Title VII Summary Judgment Introduction This commentary examines the Third Circuit’s decision in Deborah Bennett v. SEPTA, which...
Clarifying the Two-Hour BAC Testing Rule and Juror Impartiality in DUI Convictions

Clarifying the Two-Hour BAC Testing Rule and Juror Impartiality in DUI Convictions

Date: May 1, 2025
Clarifying the Two-Hour BAC Testing Rule and Juror Impartiality in DUI Convictions Introduction This commentary examines the Nevada Supreme Court’s decision in Gonzales (Cristian) v. State, decided...
Establishing the “Minimum Adverse Environmental Impact” and Public‐Need Standard for Ohio Solar Farms: In re Harvey Solar I, L.L.C. (2025-Ohio-1503)

Establishing the “Minimum Adverse Environmental Impact” and Public‐Need Standard for Ohio Solar Farms: In re Harvey Solar I, L.L.C. (2025-Ohio-1503)

Date: May 1, 2025
Establishing the “Minimum Adverse Environmental Impact” and Public-Need Standard for Ohio Solar Farms Introduction In In re Application of Harvey Solar I, L.L.C. (2025-Ohio-1503), the Supreme Court...
Plain-Meaning Interpretation of “In Connection With” Under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B)

Plain-Meaning Interpretation of “In Connection With” Under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B)

Date: May 1, 2025
Plain-Meaning Interpretation of “In Connection With” Under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) Introduction United States v. Alphonso L. James is a pivotal Eleventh Circuit decision clarifying how sentencing...
Recoverability of Future Lost Wages of a Child Murder Victim as Restitution

Recoverability of Future Lost Wages of a Child Murder Victim as Restitution

Date: May 1, 2025
Recoverability of Future Lost Wages of a Child Murder Victim as Restitution Introduction In E.H. v. Hon. Slayton, 2025 Ariz. LEXIS ___, the Arizona Supreme Court addressed whether the future lost...
Rational Understanding Supersedes Delusional Beliefs: Clarifying Competency to be Executed

Rational Understanding Supersedes Delusional Beliefs: Clarifying Competency to be Executed

Date: May 1, 2025
Rational Understanding Supersedes Delusional Beliefs: Clarifying Competency to be Executed Introduction The Supreme Court of Florida’s decision in Jeffrey G. Hutchinson v. State of Florida (No....
Minimal Explanatory Requirement for Within-Guidelines Sentences in § 3582(c)(2) Resentencing

Minimal Explanatory Requirement for Within-Guidelines Sentences in § 3582(c)(2) Resentencing

Date: May 1, 2025
Minimal Explanatory Requirement for Within-Guidelines Sentences in § 3582(c)(2) Resentencing Introduction United States v. Eagle, 10th Cir. No. 24-7040 (Apr. 30, 2025), addresses the scope of a...
Consistency Mandate for Firearm Findings in §3582(c)(2) Sentence Reduction Proceedings

Consistency Mandate for Firearm Findings in §3582(c)(2) Sentence Reduction Proceedings

Date: May 1, 2025
Consistency Mandate for Firearm Findings in §3582(c)(2) Sentence Reduction Proceedings Introduction This commentary examines United States v. Salas, No. 24-10097 (5th Cir. Apr. 30, 2025), in which...
Rubinstein v. Bank of America: Clarifying RICO Accrual and Equitable Tolling in Mortgage Fraud Claims

Rubinstein v. Bank of America: Clarifying RICO Accrual and Equitable Tolling in Mortgage Fraud Claims

Date: May 1, 2025
Rubinstein v. Bank of America: Clarifying RICO Accrual and Equitable Tolling in Mortgage Fraud Claims Introduction In Rubinstein v. Bank of America NA, the Third Circuit addressed a protracted...
Clarifying the Threshold for Convention Against Torture Relief: Aggregate Risk and Chain-of-Events Analysis

Clarifying the Threshold for Convention Against Torture Relief: Aggregate Risk and Chain-of-Events Analysis

Date: May 1, 2025
Clarifying the Threshold for Convention Against Torture Relief: Aggregate Risk and Chain-of-Events Analysis Introduction Juan José Paredes Alfaro, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitioned the...
Kelly v. State: Amendments to Successive Post-Conviction Petitions & Juvenile Sentencing Standards

Kelly v. State: Amendments to Successive Post-Conviction Petitions & Juvenile Sentencing Standards

Date: May 1, 2025
Kelly v. State: Amendments to Successive Post-Conviction Petitions & Juvenile Sentencing Standards Introduction McKinley Kelly v. State of Indiana is a 2025 Indiana Supreme Court decision that...
Automatic Reversal for Denial of Counsel in Probation Revocation Proceedings

Automatic Reversal for Denial of Counsel in Probation Revocation Proceedings

Date: May 1, 2025
Automatic Reversal for Denial of Counsel in Probation Revocation Proceedings Introduction In Matthew C. Skamfer v. Phillip A. Grassmann, 2025 WI 45, file no. 2025AP000952 (Apr. 30, 2025), the Supreme...
Palmetto Pointe v. Tri-County Roofing: Covenant-Not-to-Execute Setoff Under S.C. Code §15-38-50

Palmetto Pointe v. Tri-County Roofing: Covenant-Not-to-Execute Setoff Under S.C. Code §15-38-50

Date: May 1, 2025
Palmetto Pointe v. Tri-County Roofing: Covenant-Not-to-Execute Setoff Under S.C. Code §15-38-50 Introduction In Palmetto Pointe at Peas Island Condominium Property Owners Association, Inc. and Jack...
Reasoned Denial of Compassionate Release: Defining “Extraordinary and Compelling Reasons” under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) and U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13

Reasoned Denial of Compassionate Release: Defining “Extraordinary and Compelling Reasons” under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) and U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13

Date: May 1, 2025
Reasoned Denial of Compassionate Release: Defining “Extraordinary and Compelling Reasons” under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) and U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13 Introduction In United States v. Luis Batista, No....
Interlocutory Orders and NRCP 54(b): Distinguishing Theories of Liability from Claims for Relief

Interlocutory Orders and NRCP 54(b): Distinguishing Theories of Liability from Claims for Relief

Date: May 1, 2025
Interlocutory Orders and NRCP 54(b): Distinguishing Theories of Liability from Claims for Relief Introduction The Nevada Supreme Court’s decision in Richardson v. Peters, D.O., 88800 (Apr. 30 2025),...
Jurisdictional Limits on Appeals of Consent Judgment Interpretations: Nunez v. City of New York

Jurisdictional Limits on Appeals of Consent Judgment Interpretations: Nunez v. City of New York

Date: May 1, 2025
Jurisdictional Limits on Appeals of Consent Judgment Interpretations: Nunez v. City of New York Introduction Nunez v. City of New York, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second...
Reinforcement of Adverse Credibility Standards: Inconsistencies and Corroboration in Asylum Adjudications

Reinforcement of Adverse Credibility Standards: Inconsistencies and Corroboration in Asylum Adjudications

Date: May 1, 2025
Reinforcement of Adverse Credibility Standards: Inconsistencies and Corroboration in Asylum Adjudications Introduction In Huang v. Bondi, No. 23-6540 (2d Cir. Apr. 30, 2025), the Second Circuit...
Wire Fraud and Traditional Property Interests:  
        Recognizing Wages and Benefits as “Money or Property”  
        and Restricting the “Right to Control” Theory

Wire Fraud and Traditional Property Interests: Recognizing Wages and Benefits as “Money or Property” and Restricting the “Right to Control” Theory

Date: May 1, 2025
Wire Fraud and Traditional Property Interests: Recognizing Wages and Benefits as “Money or Property” and Restricting the “Right to Control” Theory 1. Introduction United States v. Nadege Auguste...
Temporal Sufficiency for Differential Pay: The New “During a National Emergency” Rule in Feliciano v. Department of Transportation

Temporal Sufficiency for Differential Pay: The New “During a National Emergency” Rule in Feliciano v. Department of Transportation

Date: May 1, 2025
Temporal Sufficiency for Differential Pay: The New “During a National Emergency” Rule in Feliciano v. Department of Transportation I. Introduction On 30 April 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court delivered...
Restricting Federal Jurisdiction Over State-Law Claims Involving Federal Tax Code Interpretation

Restricting Federal Jurisdiction Over State-Law Claims Involving Federal Tax Code Interpretation

Date: May 1, 2025
Restricting Federal Jurisdiction Over State-Law Claims Involving Federal Tax Code Interpretation Introduction AMTAX Holdings 227, LLC v. CohnReznick LLP, decided April 30, 2025 by the Second Circuit,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert