Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

juvenile-sentencing-guidelines:-iowa-supreme-court Case Commentaries

Subjective Evaluation and Post-Hoc Pretext: Sixth Circuit’s Clarification of Evidence Sufficiency in Title VII Promotion Discrimination Claims

Subjective Evaluation and Post-Hoc Pretext: Sixth Circuit’s Clarification of Evidence Sufficiency in Title VII Promotion Discrimination Claims

Date: May 28, 2025
Subjective Evaluation and Post-Hoc Pretext: Sixth Circuit’s Clarification of Evidence Sufficiency in Title VII Promotion Discrimination Claims Introduction In Gayann Miller v. Suburban Mobility...
Limits on Third-Party Standing: Requirement of Close Relationship and Enforcement in Gelb v. Niblack

Limits on Third-Party Standing: Requirement of Close Relationship and Enforcement in Gelb v. Niblack

Date: May 28, 2025
Limits on Third-Party Standing: Requirement of Close Relationship and Enforcement in Gelb v. Niblack Introduction In Gelb v. Niblack, 24-2371 (2d Cir. May 27, 2025), pro se plaintiff Bernard Gelb...
Clarifying the Elements and Limits of Intimidation: State v. T. Dellar

Clarifying the Elements and Limits of Intimidation: State v. T. Dellar

Date: May 28, 2025
Clarifying the Elements and Limits of Intimidation: State v. T. Dellar Introduction State of Montana v. Tommy Jonathan Seth Dellar, decided May 27, 2025, by the Supreme Court of Montana, establishes...
Application of the Plain View Doctrine to Flashlight‐Illuminated Vehicle Searches and Multiple UPIS Convictions

Application of the Plain View Doctrine to Flashlight‐Illuminated Vehicle Searches and Multiple UPIS Convictions

Date: May 28, 2025
Application of the Plain View Doctrine to Flashlight‐Illuminated Vehicle Searches and Multiple UPIS Convictions Introduction State v. Roberts, 2025 MT 110 (Mont. 2025), presents two interrelated...
Reaffirming Reinstatement Standards Under SCR 22.305: Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Rosin

Reaffirming Reinstatement Standards Under SCR 22.305: Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Rosin

Date: May 28, 2025
Reaffirming Reinstatement Standards Under SCR 22.305: Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Rosin Introduction Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kevin R. Rosin, 2025 WI 18, is a Supreme Court of Wisconsin...
Strict Application of Six-Factor Test under WV Code § 23-4-1(f) for Ordinary Disease Compensation

Strict Application of Six-Factor Test under WV Code § 23-4-1(f) for Ordinary Disease Compensation

Date: May 28, 2025
Strict Application of Six-Factor Test under WV Code § 23-4-1(f) for Ordinary Disease Compensation Introduction This commentary examines the dissenting opinion in Brittany Foster v. PrimeCare Medical...
Suspension Standard for Judicial Misconduct: Impartiality, Decorum, and Public Confidence Established in Wisconsin v. Berz (2025 WI 17)

Suspension Standard for Judicial Misconduct: Impartiality, Decorum, and Public Confidence Established in Wisconsin v. Berz (2025 WI 17)

Date: May 28, 2025
Suspension Standard for Judicial Misconduct: Impartiality, Decorum, and Public Confidence Established in Wisconsin v. Berz (2025 WI 17) Introduction The Supreme Court of Wisconsin’s decision in...
Establishing the Comparator for “Excessive Demands” Under the EAJA

Establishing the Comparator for “Excessive Demands” Under the EAJA

Date: May 28, 2025
Establishing the Comparator for “Excessive Demands” Under the EAJA Introduction SEC v. Lemelson is a First Circuit decision clarifying how courts must apply the “excessive demand” provision of the...
Intrastate State-Legal Marijuana Commerce Remains Subject to Federal Regulation Under the Commerce Clause

Intrastate State-Legal Marijuana Commerce Remains Subject to Federal Regulation Under the Commerce Clause

Date: May 28, 2025
Intrastate State-Legal Marijuana Commerce Remains Subject to Federal Regulation Under the Commerce Clause Introduction Canna Provisions, Inc. v. Bondi is a First Circuit decision handed down on May...
Expressio Unius Exclusio: Omission of “Successors and Assigns” Language Precludes Covenants from Running with the Land

Expressio Unius Exclusio: Omission of “Successors and Assigns” Language Precludes Covenants from Running with the Land

Date: May 28, 2025
Expressio Unius Exclusio: Omission of “Successors and Assigns” Language Precludes Covenants from Running with the Land Introduction Snowshoe Mountain, Inc. v. Ruby Dog Holdings, LLC (4th Cir. May 27,...
Permissible Reliance on Specialist Diagnoses in §1983 Deliberate Indifference Claims

Permissible Reliance on Specialist Diagnoses in §1983 Deliberate Indifference Claims

Date: May 28, 2025
Permissible Reliance on Specialist Diagnoses in §1983 Deliberate Indifference Claims Introduction In Matthew Doughty v. Karl Hoffmann, No. 24-2306 (7th Cir. May 27, 2025), the Seventh Circuit...
United States v. Adams: Reaffirming the Beyond‐Reasonable‐Doubt Standard and the Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)

United States v. Adams: Reaffirming the Beyond‐Reasonable‐Doubt Standard and the Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)

Date: May 28, 2025
United States v. Adams: Reaffirming the Beyond‐Reasonable‐Doubt Standard and the Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) Introduction United States v. Adams is a 2025 decision by the Tenth Circuit...
Consent Does Not Defeat Aggravated Identity Theft: Sixth Circuit’s Broad Reading of “Without Lawful Authority” Under 18 U.S.C. § 1028A

Consent Does Not Defeat Aggravated Identity Theft: Sixth Circuit’s Broad Reading of “Without Lawful Authority” Under 18 U.S.C. § 1028A

Date: May 28, 2025
Consent Does Not Defeat Aggravated Identity Theft: Sixth Circuit’s Broad Reading of “Without Lawful Authority” Under 18 U.S.C. § 1028A Introduction United States v. Kelli Prather, decided May 27,...
Reaffirming Deference to Adverse Credibility Determinations Based on Cumulative Inconsistencies in Asylum Cases

Reaffirming Deference to Adverse Credibility Determinations Based on Cumulative Inconsistencies in Asylum Cases

Date: May 28, 2025
Reaffirming Deference to Adverse Credibility Determinations Based on Cumulative Inconsistencies in Asylum Cases Introduction In Singh v. Bondi (No. 23-6186, 2d Cir. May 27, 2025), the Second Circuit...
Reaffirming Plausibility Pleading in Employment Discrimination and Disability Claims

Reaffirming Plausibility Pleading in Employment Discrimination and Disability Claims

Date: May 28, 2025
Reaffirming Plausibility Pleading in Employment Discrimination and Disability Claims Introduction In McKinney v. County of Dutchess, 24-1195-cv (2d Cir. May 27, 2025), the United States Court of...
Affirmation of Third-Party Beneficiary Enforcement in Post-Divorce Pension Waivers

Affirmation of Third-Party Beneficiary Enforcement in Post-Divorce Pension Waivers

Date: May 28, 2025
Affirmation of Third-Party Beneficiary Enforcement in Post-Divorce Pension Waivers Introduction Culwick v. Wood, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on May 27, 2025,...
Employee Directive as Compliance with Ohio’s Public Records Act:  
         State ex rel. Ware v. Smith

Employee Directive as Compliance with Ohio’s Public Records Act: State ex rel. Ware v. Smith

Date: May 28, 2025
Employee Directive as Compliance with Ohio’s Public Records Act: State ex rel. Ware v. Smith Introduction In State ex rel. Ware v. Smith, Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-1856, decided May 27, 2025, the...
Stipulated Reinstatement under SCR 22.30(5)(b): Criteria and Application in Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kevin R. Rosin

Stipulated Reinstatement under SCR 22.30(5)(b): Criteria and Application in Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kevin R. Rosin

Date: May 28, 2025
Stipulated Reinstatement under SCR 22.30(5)(b): Criteria and Application in Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kevin R. Rosin Introduction Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kevin R. Rosin, 2025 WI 18...
Limiting “Context” Testimony under the Confrontation Clause: United States v. Soto-Sanchez

Limiting “Context” Testimony under the Confrontation Clause: United States v. Soto-Sanchez

Date: May 28, 2025
Limiting “Context” Testimony under the Confrontation Clause: United States v. Soto-Sanchez Introduction United States v. Soto-Sanchez, 24-1184 (1st Cir. May 27, 2025), presented the First Circuit...
FOIA Timeliness and Remedies Clarified: Delay Does Not Merit Declaratory Relief, FOIA Bars APA Claims — Libarov v. ICE

FOIA Timeliness and Remedies Clarified: Delay Does Not Merit Declaratory Relief, FOIA Bars APA Claims — Libarov v. ICE

Date: May 28, 2025
FOIA Timeliness and Remedies Clarified: Delay Does Not Merit Declaratory Relief, FOIA Bars APA Claims — Libarov v. ICE Introduction Sotir Libarov v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (No....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert