Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

juvenile-sentencing-guidelines:-iowa-supreme-court Case Commentaries

Qualified Immunity in Joint Administrative Searches and Emergency Evictions

Qualified Immunity in Joint Administrative Searches and Emergency Evictions

Date: May 31, 2025
Qualified Immunity in Joint Administrative Searches and Emergency Evictions 1. Introduction Belinda Marie Fitzpatrick owns two adjacent homes in Lansing, Michigan. In September 2021, a neighbor’s tip...
Enforcement of the Single Satisfaction Rule in Bankruptcy Preference Recoveries Under 11 U.S.C. § 550

Enforcement of the Single Satisfaction Rule in Bankruptcy Preference Recoveries Under 11 U.S.C. § 550

Date: May 31, 2025
Enforcement of the Single Satisfaction Rule in Bankruptcy Preference Recoveries Under 11 U.S.C. § 550 Introduction In Ad Hoc Group of Senior Secured Noteholders; DIP Lenders; Wilmington Savings Fund...
Neutral Laws with Discretionary Exemptions Trigger Strict Scrutiny & Robust Title VII Accommodation Standards

Neutral Laws with Discretionary Exemptions Trigger Strict Scrutiny & Robust Title VII Accommodation Standards

Date: May 31, 2025
Neutral Laws with Discretionary Exemptions Trigger Strict Scrutiny & Robust Title VII Accommodation Standards Introduction In Alexander Smith v. City of Atlantic City, 3rd Cir. No. 23-3265 (May 30,...
“Relaxed Irreparable-Harm” Standard for Government Stay Applications – A Commentary on Noem v. Doe (605 U.S. ___ 2025)

“Relaxed Irreparable-Harm” Standard for Government Stay Applications – A Commentary on Noem v. Doe (605 U.S. ___ 2025)

Date: May 31, 2025
“Relaxed Irreparable-Harm” Standard for Government Stay Applications – A Comprehensive Commentary on Noem v. Doe (605 U.S. ___ 2025) 1. Introduction In Noem v. Doe, the Supreme Court, by unexplained...
Clarifying Willfulness under the IEEPA: Knowledge of Unlawful Conduct without Specific Regulatory Awareness

Clarifying Willfulness under the IEEPA: Knowledge of Unlawful Conduct without Specific Regulatory Awareness

Date: May 31, 2025
Clarifying Willfulness under the IEEPA: Knowledge of Unlawful Conduct without Specific Regulatory Awareness Introduction United States v. Jalal Hajavi, decided May 30, 2025 by the Eleventh Circuit...
Final Compensability Determinations Trigger Mandatory Penalties for Late TTD Payments Under HRS § 386-92

Final Compensability Determinations Trigger Mandatory Penalties for Late TTD Payments Under HRS § 386-92

Date: May 31, 2025
Final Compensability Determinations Trigger Mandatory Penalties for Late TTD Payments Under HRS § 386-92 Introduction Costa v. County of Hawaiʻi, No. SCWC-18-0000119, decided May 30, 2025 by the...
Redemptive Tax Sale and Duty to Pay: Powell Rule Protects Subsurface Rights

Redemptive Tax Sale and Duty to Pay: Powell Rule Protects Subsurface Rights

Date: May 31, 2025
Redemptive Tax Sale and Duty to Pay: Powell Rule Protects Subsurface Rights Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Game Commission (“Appellant”) v. Thomas E. Proctor Heirs Trust...
Evaluating “Incapacitation” and Alternative Caregivers in Compassionate Release: United States v. Rosario-Cruzado

Evaluating “Incapacitation” and Alternative Caregivers in Compassionate Release: United States v. Rosario-Cruzado

Date: May 31, 2025
Evaluating “Incapacitation” and Alternative Caregivers in Compassionate Release: United States v. Rosario-Cruzado Introduction United States v. Iza Mar Rosario-Cruzado (4th Cir. 2025) addressed the...
Necessity of Demonstrating Pretext in Pregnancy Discrimination and ADA Claims for Probationary Employees

Necessity of Demonstrating Pretext in Pregnancy Discrimination and ADA Claims for Probationary Employees

Date: May 31, 2025
Necessity of Demonstrating Pretext in Pregnancy Discrimination and ADA Claims for Probationary Employees Introduction Sharise Parker v. Children’s National Medical Center, Inc. (4th Cir. 2025)...
Restrictive Equitable Estoppel for Non-Signatory Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements Under Maryland Law

Restrictive Equitable Estoppel for Non-Signatory Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements Under Maryland Law

Date: May 31, 2025
Restrictive Equitable Estoppel for Non-Signatory Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements Under Maryland Law Introduction The Fourth Circuit’s unpublished per curiam decision in Shamia Franklin v. Cleo...
Establishing the Temporal Boundaries of Protective Sweeps under the Fourth Amendment

Establishing the Temporal Boundaries of Protective Sweeps under the Fourth Amendment

Date: May 31, 2025
Establishing the Temporal Boundaries of Protective Sweeps under the Fourth Amendment Introduction United States v. Antoine Dwayne Riley, decided by the Sixth Circuit on May 30, 2025, addresses a...
Clarifying the Evidentiary Threshold for Monell §1983 Claims at Summary Judgment

Clarifying the Evidentiary Threshold for Monell §1983 Claims at Summary Judgment

Date: May 31, 2025
Clarifying the Evidentiary Threshold for Monell §1983 Claims at Summary Judgment 1. Introduction The Sixth Circuit’s decision in Bradford Gifford v. Hamilton County, Tennessee (25-5893, May 30, 2025)...
District Court Discretion in Competency Hearings and Waiver of Restitution Challenges Established in United States v. Barreto

District Court Discretion in Competency Hearings and Waiver of Restitution Challenges Established in United States v. Barreto

Date: May 31, 2025
District Court Discretion in Competency Hearings and Waiver of Restitution Challenges Established in United States v. Barreto Introduction United States v. Barreto, 23-6799-cr (2d Cir. May 30, 2025),...
Facial Unconstitutionality of §3806: Apprendi Protections for ARD-Based Sentencing Enhancements

Facial Unconstitutionality of §3806: Apprendi Protections for ARD-Based Sentencing Enhancements

Date: May 31, 2025
Facial Unconstitutionality of §3806: Apprendi Protections for ARD-Based Sentencing Enhancements Introduction Commonwealth v. Shifflett, G., Aplt. (No. 26 MAP 2024), decided May 30, 2025 by the...
Propensity-Free Chain Reasoning for Intent Under Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) Affirmed in United States v. Johnson

Propensity-Free Chain Reasoning for Intent Under Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) Affirmed in United States v. Johnson

Date: May 31, 2025
Propensity-Free Chain Reasoning for Intent Under Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) Affirmed in United States v. Johnson Introduction The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit’s decision in United States v....
Inordinate Delay as a Trigger for § 2254 Exhaustion Exception: Lindsey v. Neal

Inordinate Delay as a Trigger for § 2254 Exhaustion Exception: Lindsey v. Neal

Date: May 31, 2025
Inordinate Delay as a Trigger for § 2254 Exhaustion Exception: Lindsey v. Neal Introduction In Steven Lindsey v. Ron Neal, 7th Cir. No. 23-2789 (May 30, 2025), the United States Court of Appeals for...
United States v. Peppers: Constructive Amendment, Hearsay Against Interest & Extended Revocation Authority under §3583(i)

United States v. Peppers: Constructive Amendment, Hearsay Against Interest & Extended Revocation Authority under §3583(i)

Date: May 31, 2025
United States v. Peppers: Constructive Amendment, Hearsay Against Interest & Extended Revocation Authority under §3583(i) Introduction United States v. Peppers, 10th Cir. (May 30, 2025), addresses...
Prohibition on Civil Sanctions Against Prosecutors Under Iowa Rule 1.413 and Iowa Code § 619.19 in Criminal Cases

Prohibition on Civil Sanctions Against Prosecutors Under Iowa Rule 1.413 and Iowa Code § 619.19 in Criminal Cases

Date: May 31, 2025
Prohibition on Civil Sanctions Against Prosecutors Under Iowa Rule 1.413 and Iowa Code § 619.19 in Criminal Cases Introduction Theron M. Christensen, an assistant county attorney in Story County,...
Hodges v. Grand Rapids: Defining Qualified Immunity and Evidence Scope at the Pleading Stage

Hodges v. Grand Rapids: Defining Qualified Immunity and Evidence Scope at the Pleading Stage

Date: May 31, 2025
Hodges v. City of Grand Rapids: Defining Qualified Immunity and Evidence Scope at the Pleading Stage Introduction In Whitney Hodges v. City of Grand Rapids, Mich., the Sixth Circuit addressed the...
Clarifying Appellate Review of Sentencing: Correcting Oral/Written Discrepancies, Delegation to Probation, and Sentencing Adjustments in Conspiracy and §924(c) Cases

Clarifying Appellate Review of Sentencing: Correcting Oral/Written Discrepancies, Delegation to Probation, and Sentencing Adjustments in Conspiracy and §924(c) Cases

Date: May 31, 2025
Clarifying Appellate Review of Sentencing: Correcting Oral/Written Discrepancies, Delegation to Probation, and Sentencing Adjustments in Conspiracy and §924(c) Cases Introduction The consolidated...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert