Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

first-circuit-reinforces-first-amendment-protections-for-secret-audio-recording-of-police-in-public:-interpretation-of-massachusetts& Case Commentaries

Eleventh Circuit Holds Court‑Ordered Batterers’ Intervention Programs Are Government Speech, Foreclosing Free Speech and Free Exercise Challenges to State‑Mandated Curricula

Eleventh Circuit Holds Court‑Ordered Batterers’ Intervention Programs Are Government Speech, Foreclosing Free Speech and Free Exercise Challenges to State‑Mandated Curricula

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Holds Court‑Ordered Batterers’ Intervention Programs Are Government Speech, Foreclosing Free Speech and Free Exercise Challenges to State‑Mandated Curricula Introduction In Joseph...
Part‑Specific Proof or No Price Increase: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Supplier Obligations, Upholds Severe Rule 37 Sanctions, and Elevates Settlement Memoranda in Defining Contract Scope

Part‑Specific Proof or No Price Increase: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Supplier Obligations, Upholds Severe Rule 37 Sanctions, and Elevates Settlement Memoranda in Defining Contract Scope

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Part‑Specific Proof or No Price Increase: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Supplier Obligations, Upholds Severe Rule 37 Sanctions, and Elevates Settlement Memoranda in Defining Contract Scope Introduction...
Reaffirming the “Verifying Medical Evidence” Rule and Expert Causation for Delay-Based Eighth Amendment Claims: Commentary on McMillen v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. (7th Cir. 2025)

Reaffirming the “Verifying Medical Evidence” Rule and Expert Causation for Delay-Based Eighth Amendment Claims: Commentary on McMillen v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. (7th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Reaffirming the “Verifying Medical Evidence” Rule and Expert Causation for Delay-Based Eighth Amendment Claims: Commentary on McMillen v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. (7th Cir. 2025) Introduction In...
Fourth Circuit Clarifies Vaccine Act Exhaustion: Special Masters’ Timeliness Rulings Are Preclusive; Gardasil’s Table Listing Upheld Under the Presentment Clause

Fourth Circuit Clarifies Vaccine Act Exhaustion: Special Masters’ Timeliness Rulings Are Preclusive; Gardasil’s Table Listing Upheld Under the Presentment Clause

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Fourth Circuit Clarifies Vaccine Act Exhaustion: Special Masters’ Timeliness Rulings Are Preclusive; Gardasil’s Table Listing Upheld Under the Presentment Clause Introduction In a published decision...
Fourth Circuit Clarifies: Special Masters’ Timeliness Rulings Under the Vaccine Act Are Preclusive Gatekeepers to Tort Suits; Gardasil’s Table Addition Comports with the Presentment Clause

Fourth Circuit Clarifies: Special Masters’ Timeliness Rulings Under the Vaccine Act Are Preclusive Gatekeepers to Tort Suits; Gardasil’s Table Addition Comports with the Presentment Clause

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Fourth Circuit Clarifies: Special Masters’ Timeliness Rulings Under the Vaccine Act Are Preclusive Gatekeepers to Tort Suits; Gardasil’s Table Addition Comports with the Presentment Clause...
Timeliness Determinations Under the Vaccine Act Are Binding in Subsequent Tort Suits; Gardasil’s Addition to the Vaccine Injury Table Upheld Under the Presentment Clause

Timeliness Determinations Under the Vaccine Act Are Binding in Subsequent Tort Suits; Gardasil’s Addition to the Vaccine Injury Table Upheld Under the Presentment Clause

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Timeliness Determinations Under the Vaccine Act Are Binding in Subsequent Tort Suits; Gardasil’s Addition to the Vaccine Injury Table Upheld Under the Presentment Clause Introduction This published...
Agency Implementation of Presidential Orders Remains Reviewable Under the APA Absent a No‑Discretion Mandate: The First Circuit’s Denial of a Stay in Orr v. Trump

Agency Implementation of Presidential Orders Remains Reviewable Under the APA Absent a No‑Discretion Mandate: The First Circuit’s Denial of a Stay in Orr v. Trump

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Agency Implementation of Presidential Orders Remains Reviewable Under the APA Absent a No‑Discretion Mandate: The First Circuit’s Denial of a Stay in Orr v. Trump Introduction This commentary...
Decisionmaker’s Interview Remark About Female Suitability Can Defeat Summary Judgment; Strategic Waiver Limits Babb Protection for Federal ADEA Claims — Commentary on Warner v. DeJoy (1st Cir. 2025)

Decisionmaker’s Interview Remark About Female Suitability Can Defeat Summary Judgment; Strategic Waiver Limits Babb Protection for Federal ADEA Claims — Commentary on Warner v. DeJoy (1st Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Decisionmaker’s Interview Remark About Female Suitability Can Defeat Summary Judgment; Strategic Waiver Limits Babb Protection for Federal ADEA Claims — Commentary on Warner v. DeJoy (1st Cir. 2025)...
Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Reaffirms Non-Appealability of Orders Vacating Arbitration Awards with Rehearing; Clarifies Final-Judgment Protocols in Special Proceedings

Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Reaffirms Non-Appealability of Orders Vacating Arbitration Awards with Rehearing; Clarifies Final-Judgment Protocols in Special Proceedings

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Reaffirming the Non-Appealability of Orders Vacating Arbitration Awards with Rehearing under HRS § 658A-28 and Mandating “In Aid of Jurisdiction” Remands for Final Judgments in Special Proceedings...
Baltas v. Chapdelaine: No Qualified Immunity for Blanket Denial of Access to Existing Congregate Religious Services Absent Penological Justification

Baltas v. Chapdelaine: No Qualified Immunity for Blanket Denial of Access to Existing Congregate Religious Services Absent Penological Justification

Date: Sep 8, 2025
No Qualified Immunity for Blanket Denial of Access to Existing Congregate Religious Services Absent Penological Justification Introduction In Baltas v. Chapdelaine, No. 22-2813-cv (2d Cir. Sept. 3,...
“Direct and Significant” Means What It Says: Second Circuit Clarifies CEA § 2(i)(1) Extraterritorial Reach and Confirms No Artificial-Price Element for Rule 180.1 Fraud

“Direct and Significant” Means What It Says: Second Circuit Clarifies CEA § 2(i)(1) Extraterritorial Reach and Confirms No Artificial-Price Element for Rule 180.1 Fraud

Date: Sep 8, 2025
“Direct and Significant” Means What It Says: Second Circuit Clarifies CEA § 2(i)(1) Extraterritorial Reach and Confirms No Artificial-Price Element for Rule 180.1 Fraud Introduction United States v....
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies ALJ Articulation Duties and Appeals Council’s Materiality Review of New Evidence under the 2017 Regulations

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies ALJ Articulation Duties and Appeals Council’s Materiality Review of New Evidence under the 2017 Regulations

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies ALJ Articulation Duties and Appeals Council’s Materiality Review of New Evidence under the 2017 Regulations Introduction In Bryan Dubose v. Commissioner of Social Security,...
Surplus-or-Standing: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that a Chapter 7 Debtor’s “Party in Interest” Status Under § 502 Does Not Bypass Article III Redressability

Surplus-or-Standing: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that a Chapter 7 Debtor’s “Party in Interest” Status Under § 502 Does Not Bypass Article III Redressability

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Surplus-or-Standing: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that a Chapter 7 Debtor’s “Party in Interest” Status Under § 502 Does Not Bypass Article III Redressability Introduction This commentary analyzes the...
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA Reach into Foreign EEZs, No Nexus Requirement, and Denial of Minor‑Role Reductions for Go‑Fast Crews

Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA Reach into Foreign EEZs, No Nexus Requirement, and Denial of Minor‑Role Reductions for Go‑Fast Crews

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA Reach into Foreign EEZs, No Nexus Requirement, and Denial of Minor‑Role Reductions for Go‑Fast Crews Introduction This commentary analyzes the Eleventh Circuit’s...
Jones-Stage Objections Preserve Challenges to Supervised-Release Conditions; Minor-Contact Restrictions Upheld in SORNA Failure-to-Register Sentences (United States v. Louis‑Jean, 11th Cir. 2025)

Jones-Stage Objections Preserve Challenges to Supervised-Release Conditions; Minor-Contact Restrictions Upheld in SORNA Failure-to-Register Sentences (United States v. Louis‑Jean, 11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Jones-Stage Objections Preserve Challenges to Supervised-Release Conditions; Minor-Contact Restrictions Upheld in SORNA Failure-to-Register Sentences Introduction This commentary analyzes the...
EEZ as “High Seas,” No U.S. Nexus Required, and Narrow Minor‑Role Relief for Go‑Fast Crews: Eleventh Circuit’s Consolidated MDLEA Ruling in United States v. Jhon Henry Alvarado‑Valencia (and Codefendants)

EEZ as “High Seas,” No U.S. Nexus Required, and Narrow Minor‑Role Relief for Go‑Fast Crews: Eleventh Circuit’s Consolidated MDLEA Ruling in United States v. Jhon Henry Alvarado‑Valencia (and Codefendants)

Date: Sep 8, 2025
EEZ as “High Seas,” No U.S. Nexus Required, and Narrow Minor‑Role Relief for Go‑Fast Crews: Eleventh Circuit’s Consolidated MDLEA Ruling in United States v. Jhon Henry Alvarado‑Valencia (and...
EEZ-as-High-Seas, No-Nexus Requirement, and a Narrow Minor-Role Inquiry Under the MDLEA: Commentary on United States v. Quijije‑Mero (11th Cir. 2025)

EEZ-as-High-Seas, No-Nexus Requirement, and a Narrow Minor-Role Inquiry Under the MDLEA: Commentary on United States v. Quijije‑Mero (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 8, 2025
EEZ-as-High-Seas, No-Nexus Requirement, and a Narrow Minor-Role Inquiry Under the MDLEA: Commentary on United States v. Quijije‑Mero (11th Cir. 2025) Introduction In United States v. Jhon Yandry...
EEZ Equals “High Seas” for Felonies Clause: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA’s Extraterritorial Reach and No‑Nexus Rule; Minor‑Role Reductions Narrow for Go‑Fast Couriers

EEZ Equals “High Seas” for Felonies Clause: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA’s Extraterritorial Reach and No‑Nexus Rule; Minor‑Role Reductions Narrow for Go‑Fast Couriers

Date: Sep 8, 2025
EEZ Equals “High Seas” for Felonies Clause: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA’s Extraterritorial Reach and No‑Nexus Rule; Minor‑Role Reductions Narrow for Go‑Fast Couriers Introduction In a...
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA’s Reach Into Foreign EEZs and Rejects Nexus Requirement; Affirms Denial of Minor‑Role Adjustments for Go‑Fast Crew

Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA’s Reach Into Foreign EEZs and Rejects Nexus Requirement; Affirms Denial of Minor‑Role Adjustments for Go‑Fast Crew

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA’s Reach Into Foreign EEZs and Rejects Nexus Requirement; Affirms Denial of Minor‑Role Adjustments for Go‑Fast Crew Introduction In United States v. Juan Manuel...
EEZ Is “High Seas” for Felonies Clause; No Nexus Requirement Under the MDLEA; and Role Reductions Must Be Gauged Against Relevant Conduct: Commentary on United States v. Lauro Aguilar-Gomez (11th Cir. Sept. 3, 2025)

EEZ Is “High Seas” for Felonies Clause; No Nexus Requirement Under the MDLEA; and Role Reductions Must Be Gauged Against Relevant Conduct: Commentary on United States v. Lauro Aguilar-Gomez (11th Cir. Sept. 3, 2025)

Date: Sep 8, 2025
EEZ Is “High Seas” for Felonies Clause; No Nexus Requirement Under the MDLEA; and Role Reductions Must Be Gauged Against Relevant Conduct Case: United States v. Lauro Aguilar-Gomez (consolidated with...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert