Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

federal Case Commentaries

Sixth Circuit Clarifies Rule 801(d)(2)(D): HR Employees Who Merely Deliver Termination Decisions Are Not Opposing-Party Declarants

Sixth Circuit Clarifies Rule 801(d)(2)(D): HR Employees Who Merely Deliver Termination Decisions Are Not Opposing-Party Declarants

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Rule 801(d)(2)(D): HR Employees Who Merely Deliver Termination Decisions Are Not Opposing-Party Declarants Introduction In Pearlie R. Hill v. TK Elevator Manufacturing, Inc.,...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies: No Post‑Judgment Right to Unseal or Obtain Records Absent a Particularized Legal Need or Pending Proceeding — United States v. Geddes

Tenth Circuit Clarifies: No Post‑Judgment Right to Unseal or Obtain Records Absent a Particularized Legal Need or Pending Proceeding — United States v. Geddes

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Tenth Circuit Clarifies: No Post‑Judgment Right to Unseal or Obtain Records Absent a Particularized Legal Need or Pending Proceeding — United States v. Geddes Introduction In United States v. Geddes,...
Compatibility and Proximity Control: Third Circuit Reaffirms LCM Capability Under § 2K2.1(a)(3), Applies Perez’s Close‑Proximity Presumption, and Rejects Probationer’s Second Amendment Challenge

Compatibility and Proximity Control: Third Circuit Reaffirms LCM Capability Under § 2K2.1(a)(3), Applies Perez’s Close‑Proximity Presumption, and Rejects Probationer’s Second Amendment Challenge

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Compatibility and Proximity Control: Third Circuit Reaffirms LCM Capability Under § 2K2.1(a)(3), Applies Perez’s Close‑Proximity Presumption, and Rejects Probationer’s Second Amendment Challenge...
Equitable Estoppel Cannot Broaden “Between the Parties” Arbitration Clauses; Principal’s Waiver Extinguishes an Agent’s Ability to Compel Arbitration — Fucci v. First American Title Insurance Co. (10th Cir. 2025)

Equitable Estoppel Cannot Broaden “Between the Parties” Arbitration Clauses; Principal’s Waiver Extinguishes an Agent’s Ability to Compel Arbitration — Fucci v. First American Title Insurance Co. (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Equitable Estoppel Cannot Broaden “Between the Parties” Arbitration Clauses; Principal’s Waiver Extinguishes an Agent’s Ability to Compel Arbitration — Fucci v. First American Title Insurance Co....
Affirmance on Alternative Merits Grounds and Strict Limits on Pro Se Repleading: No First Amendment Bivens and WPA Applies Only to Federal Employees

Affirmance on Alternative Merits Grounds and Strict Limits on Pro Se Repleading: No First Amendment Bivens and WPA Applies Only to Federal Employees

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Affirmance on Alternative Merits Grounds and Strict Limits on Pro Se Repleading: No First Amendment Bivens and WPA Applies Only to Federal Employees Introduction In Jean Guillaume v. United States...
Second Circuit: Rule 37(b) Attorney Sanctions—Including MDL Leadership Removal and Common Benefit Restrictions—Are Not Immediately Appealable Under the Collateral Order Doctrine

Second Circuit: Rule 37(b) Attorney Sanctions—Including MDL Leadership Removal and Common Benefit Restrictions—Are Not Immediately Appealable Under the Collateral Order Doctrine

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Second Circuit: Rule 37(b) Attorney Sanctions—Including MDL Leadership Removal and Common Benefit Restrictions—Are Not Immediately Appealable Under the Collateral Order Doctrine Introduction In In...
Finality First: Second-in-Time §2255 Filings During a Pending Appeal Are “Second or Successive”; District Courts Must Consider §3553(a) When Asked to Modify Supervised-Release Conditions

Finality First: Second-in-Time §2255 Filings During a Pending Appeal Are “Second or Successive”; District Courts Must Consider §3553(a) When Asked to Modify Supervised-Release Conditions

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Finality First: Second-in-Time §2255 Filings During a Pending Appeal Are “Second or Successive”; District Courts Must Consider §3553(a) When Asked to Modify Supervised-Release Conditions Introduction...
New York Claim Preclusion Reaffirmed: “Convenient Trial Unit” Is Non‑Dispositive; Different Contracts Do Not Avoid Res Judicata When Tied to the Same Transactional Nucleus

New York Claim Preclusion Reaffirmed: “Convenient Trial Unit” Is Non‑Dispositive; Different Contracts Do Not Avoid Res Judicata When Tied to the Same Transactional Nucleus

Date: Sep 11, 2025
New York Claim Preclusion Reaffirmed: “Convenient Trial Unit” Is Non‑Dispositive; Different Contracts Do Not Avoid Res Judicata When Tied to the Same Transactional Nucleus Introduction This...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies Appeal-Waiver Cap Tied to a Fixed Offense Level: A Sentence Below the Level-35 Top End Is Unappealable Even If the Court Calculates a Higher Offense Level

Tenth Circuit Clarifies Appeal-Waiver Cap Tied to a Fixed Offense Level: A Sentence Below the Level-35 Top End Is Unappealable Even If the Court Calculates a Higher Offense Level

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Tenth Circuit Clarifies Appeal-Waiver Cap Tied to a Fixed Offense Level: A Sentence Below the Level-35 Top End Is Unappealable Even If the Court Calculates a Higher Offense Level Introduction In...
Principles-Based Sensitive-Places Doctrine: Third Circuit Upholds Most Location Bans, Invalidates Insurance Mandate and Private-Property Default in Koons v. Attorney General of New Jersey

Principles-Based Sensitive-Places Doctrine: Third Circuit Upholds Most Location Bans, Invalidates Insurance Mandate and Private-Property Default in Koons v. Attorney General of New Jersey

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Principles-Based Sensitive-Places Doctrine: Third Circuit Upholds Most Location Bans, Invalidates Insurance Mandate and Private-Property Default in Koons v. Attorney General of New Jersey...
Title VII Retaliation After a Sexual-Assault Report: Sixth Circuit Requires Proof of a Reasonable, Good‑Faith Belief in Nonconsent; Intrinsic Consent Evidence Not Barred by Rule 412

Title VII Retaliation After a Sexual-Assault Report: Sixth Circuit Requires Proof of a Reasonable, Good‑Faith Belief in Nonconsent; Intrinsic Consent Evidence Not Barred by Rule 412

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Title VII Retaliation After a Sexual-Assault Report: Sixth Circuit Requires Proof of a Reasonable, Good‑Faith Belief in Nonconsent; Intrinsic Consent Evidence Not Barred by Rule 412 Case: Samantha...
Nonjurisdictional Filing Defects and Estate Ownership of Product‑Line Successor Claims: Third Circuit’s Guidance in In re Whittaker Clark & Daniels

Nonjurisdictional Filing Defects and Estate Ownership of Product‑Line Successor Claims: Third Circuit’s Guidance in In re Whittaker Clark & Daniels

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Nonjurisdictional Filing Defects and Estate Ownership of Product‑Line Successor Claims: Third Circuit’s Guidance in In re Whittaker Clark & Daniels Introduction The Third Circuit’s precedential...
Recall Alone Is Not Enough for Article III Standing: Sixth Circuit Demands Plausible Contamination Allegations in Benefit-of-the-Bargain and Risk-of-Illness Suits

Recall Alone Is Not Enough for Article III Standing: Sixth Circuit Demands Plausible Contamination Allegations in Benefit-of-the-Bargain and Risk-of-Illness Suits

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Recall Alone Is Not Enough for Article III Standing: Sixth Circuit Demands Plausible Contamination Allegations in Benefit-of-the-Bargain and Risk-of-Illness Suits Case: Ward v. J.M. Smucker Co., No....
Eleventh Circuit Adopts Defendant‑Specific Reading of § 922(g)(1) and Limits “Imprisonment” to Actual Incarceration

Eleventh Circuit Adopts Defendant‑Specific Reading of § 922(g)(1) and Limits “Imprisonment” to Actual Incarceration

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Adopts Defendant‑Specific Reading of § 922(g)(1) and Limits “Imprisonment” to Actual Incarceration Introduction In United States v. Joshua Eugene Gaines, the Eleventh Circuit vacated...
United States v. Simpson: Violent Predicate Felonies—including Vehicular Flight—Sustain § 922(g)(1) Against As‑Applied Second Amendment Challenges

United States v. Simpson: Violent Predicate Felonies—including Vehicular Flight—Sustain § 922(g)(1) Against As‑Applied Second Amendment Challenges

Date: Sep 11, 2025
United States v. Simpson: Violent Predicate Felonies—including Vehicular Flight—Sustain § 922(g)(1) Against As‑Applied Second Amendment Challenges Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth...
No Individualized Dangerousness Inquiry for Drug‑Trafficking Felons under § 922(g)(1): The Fifth Circuit’s Per Se Rule Reaffirmed in United States v. Mancilla

No Individualized Dangerousness Inquiry for Drug‑Trafficking Felons under § 922(g)(1): The Fifth Circuit’s Per Se Rule Reaffirmed in United States v. Mancilla

Date: Sep 11, 2025
No Individualized Dangerousness Inquiry for Drug‑Trafficking Felons under § 922(g)(1): The Fifth Circuit’s Per Se Rule Reaffirmed in United States v. Mancilla Introduction In United States v....
Whittaker Clarifies: Filing Authority Is Nonjurisdictional, Sister‑State Receivers Cannot Strip a Board’s Bankruptcy Power, and Product‑Line Successor Claims Belong to the Estate

Whittaker Clarifies: Filing Authority Is Nonjurisdictional, Sister‑State Receivers Cannot Strip a Board’s Bankruptcy Power, and Product‑Line Successor Claims Belong to the Estate

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Whittaker Clarifies: Filing Authority Is Nonjurisdictional, Sister‑State Receivers Cannot Strip a Board’s Bankruptcy Power, and Product‑Line Successor Claims Belong to the Estate Introduction In a...
No Fifth Amendment Retaliation at Sentencing Without a Demonstrable Nexus: United States v. Johnathan Crawford (4th Cir. 2025)

No Fifth Amendment Retaliation at Sentencing Without a Demonstrable Nexus: United States v. Johnathan Crawford (4th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 11, 2025
No Fifth Amendment Retaliation at Sentencing Without a Demonstrable Nexus: United States v. Johnathan Crawford (4th Cir. 2025) Introduction In this unpublished but instructive decision, the Fourth...
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Third-Party Consent at Family Businesses and Reaffirms Broad Discretion in Public Contracting Under “Best-Interest” RFPs

Sixth Circuit Clarifies Third-Party Consent at Family Businesses and Reaffirms Broad Discretion in Public Contracting Under “Best-Interest” RFPs

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Third-Party Consent at Family Businesses and Reaffirms Broad Discretion in Public Contracting Under “Best-Interest” RFPs Introduction In Rockwood Auto Parts, Inc.; Rockwood...
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Retaliatory Refusal to Remedy Dangerous Prison Conditions as Actionable First Amendment Violation; Risk-Only COVID-19 Exposure Insufficient for Damages Standing

Sixth Circuit Clarifies Retaliatory Refusal to Remedy Dangerous Prison Conditions as Actionable First Amendment Violation; Risk-Only COVID-19 Exposure Insufficient for Damages Standing

Date: Sep 10, 2025
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Retaliatory Refusal to Remedy Dangerous Prison Conditions as Actionable First Amendment Violation; Risk-Only COVID-19 Exposure Insufficient for Damages Standing Introduction...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert