Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

federal Case Commentaries

Undue Hardship in Pediatric Healthcare: Sixth Circuit affirms that exempting an unvaccinated employee from COVID-19 testing constitutes an undue hardship under Groff

Undue Hardship in Pediatric Healthcare: Sixth Circuit affirms that exempting an unvaccinated employee from COVID-19 testing constitutes an undue hardship under Groff

Date: May 15, 2025
Undue Hardship in Pediatric Healthcare: Sixth Circuit affirms that exempting an unvaccinated employee from COVID-19 testing constitutes an undue hardship under Groff Introduction In Wise v....
Expanding Defensive Collateral Estoppel: Brown v. Zabala and the Non-Mutual Preclusion of § 1983 Claims in the Eleventh Circuit

Expanding Defensive Collateral Estoppel: Brown v. Zabala and the Non-Mutual Preclusion of § 1983 Claims in the Eleventh Circuit

Date: May 15, 2025
Expanding Defensive Collateral Estoppel: Brown v. Zabala and the Non-Mutual Preclusion of § 1983 Claims in the Eleventh Circuit 1. Introduction In Marlon Brown v. Romeyn Zabala, the Eleventh Circuit...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Act-By-Act Westfall Analysis and Reaffirms Broad Judicial Immunity

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Act-By-Act Westfall Analysis and Reaffirms Broad Judicial Immunity

Date: May 15, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Act-By-Act Westfall Analysis and Reaffirms Broad Judicial Immunity 1. Introduction In Jonathan Mullane v. Federico A. Moreno, the Eleventh Circuit confronted a kaleidoscope...
“No Diligence, No Amendment” — The Eleventh Circuit’s Firm Re-affirmation of Rule 72(a) Waiver and Rule 16(b) Good-Cause Requirements in John Oirya v. Mando America Corp.

“No Diligence, No Amendment” — The Eleventh Circuit’s Firm Re-affirmation of Rule 72(a) Waiver and Rule 16(b) Good-Cause Requirements in John Oirya v. Mando America Corp.

Date: May 15, 2025
“No Diligence, No Amendment” — The Eleventh Circuit’s Firm Re-affirmation of Rule 72(a) Waiver and Rule 16(b) Good-Cause Requirements in John Oirya v. Mando America Corporation 1. Introduction The...
Stringent Mootness Standard for Voluntary Cessation of University Speech Policies

Stringent Mootness Standard for Voluntary Cessation of University Speech Policies

Date: May 15, 2025
Stringent Mootness Standard for Voluntary Cessation of University Speech Policies Introduction The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Speech First v. McCall (No. 23-50633, 2025)...
Restricting Federal Review of State Court Judgments: Rooker‐Feldman and State‐Actor Boundaries in Civil Rights Litigation

Restricting Federal Review of State Court Judgments: Rooker‐Feldman and State‐Actor Boundaries in Civil Rights Litigation

Date: May 15, 2025
Restricting Federal Review of State Court Judgments: Rooker‐Feldman and State‐Actor Boundaries in Civil Rights Litigation Introduction The appeal in Swenson I v. Vedder (3d Cir. No. 24-2652, 2025)...
Clarifying “Some Harm” as an Adverse Employment Action Under the ADEA: McCrorey v. City of Philadelphia

Clarifying “Some Harm” as an Adverse Employment Action Under the ADEA: McCrorey v. City of Philadelphia

Date: May 15, 2025
Clarifying “Some Harm” as an Adverse Employment Action Under the ADEA: McCrorey v. City of Philadelphia Introduction John McCrorey, a 61-year-old lieutenant in the Philadelphia Police Department’s...
United States v. Woods: The Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms the “Keene Statement” Harmless-Error Rule and Clarifies Single-Conspiracy Analysis in Pandemic-Relief Fraud

United States v. Woods: The Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms the “Keene Statement” Harmless-Error Rule and Clarifies Single-Conspiracy Analysis in Pandemic-Relief Fraud

Date: May 15, 2025
United States v. Woods: The Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms the “Keene Statement” Harmless-Error Rule and Clarifies Single-Conspiracy Analysis in Pandemic-Relief Fraud Introduction United States v....
Limiting the “Capable-of-Repetition-Yet-Evading-Review” Exception in SEC No-Action Letter Appeals

Limiting the “Capable-of-Repetition-Yet-Evading-Review” Exception in SEC No-Action Letter Appeals

Date: May 15, 2025
Limiting the “Capable-of-Repetition-Yet-Evading-Review” Exception in SEC No-Action Letter Appeals Introduction This case arises from a dispute between the National Center for Public Policy Research...
Clarifying Intended-Loss Calculations and Distinct Enhancements for Overseas Crypto Laundering; MVRA Restitution Without Express Request — United States v. Mitan

Clarifying Intended-Loss Calculations and Distinct Enhancements for Overseas Crypto Laundering; MVRA Restitution Without Express Request — United States v. Mitan

Date: May 15, 2025
Clarifying Intended-Loss Calculations and Distinct Enhancements for Overseas Crypto Laundering; MVRA Restitution Without Express Request — United States v. Mitan Introduction In United States v....
Turner v. Rocket Mortgage: The Eleventh Circuit Narrows “Shotgun Pleading” Dismissals and Affirms Escrow-Agent Fiduciary Duties

Turner v. Rocket Mortgage: The Eleventh Circuit Narrows “Shotgun Pleading” Dismissals and Affirms Escrow-Agent Fiduciary Duties

Date: May 14, 2025
Turner v. Rocket Mortgage: The Eleventh Circuit Narrows “Shotgun Pleading” Dismissals and Affirms Escrow-Agent Fiduciary Duties Introduction Mark A. Turner, a Florida homeowner on a fixed income,...
“Substantially Equal” Means Substantially Equal: Harris v. International Paper Co. and the Comparator Threshold Under the Equal Pay Act & Title VII

“Substantially Equal” Means Substantially Equal: Harris v. International Paper Co. and the Comparator Threshold Under the Equal Pay Act & Title VII

Date: May 14, 2025
“Substantially Equal” Means Substantially Equal: Harris v. International Paper Co. Clarifying Comparator and Pretext Requirements in Equal Pay Act & Title VII Litigation Introduction In Joni Harris...
Bankruptcy Appeal Limits: §363(m) Statutory Mootness and Non-Consensual Third-Party Releases

Bankruptcy Appeal Limits: §363(m) Statutory Mootness and Non-Consensual Third-Party Releases

Date: May 14, 2025
Bankruptcy Appeal Limits: §363(m) Statutory Mootness and Non-Consensual Third-Party Releases Introduction This commentary examines the Third Circuit’s May 13, 2025 decision in In re Boy Scouts of...
Statutory Finality of §363(b) Sales and Limits on Third-Party Release Appeals in In re Boy Scouts of America

Statutory Finality of §363(b) Sales and Limits on Third-Party Release Appeals in In re Boy Scouts of America

Date: May 14, 2025
Statutory Finality of §363(b) Sales and Limits on Third-Party Release Appeals in In re Boy Scouts of America Introduction The Third Circuit’s May 13, 2025 decision in In re Boy Scouts of America and...
Statutory Mootness Under § 363(m) and the Limits on Nonconsensual Third-Party Releases in Chapter 11 Plans

Statutory Mootness Under § 363(m) and the Limits on Nonconsensual Third-Party Releases in Chapter 11 Plans

Date: May 14, 2025
Statutory Mootness Under § 363(m) and the Limits on Nonconsensual Third-Party Releases in Chapter 11 Plans Introduction In In re Boy Scouts of America & Delaware BSA LLC (3d Cir. May 13, 2025), the...
Prevailing-Party Fee Awards Despite Plaintiff’s Nominal Victory: A Commentary on Advanced Analytics, Inc. v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.

Prevailing-Party Fee Awards Despite Plaintiff’s Nominal Victory: A Commentary on Advanced Analytics, Inc. v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.

Date: May 14, 2025
Prevailing-Party Fee Awards Despite Plaintiff’s Nominal Victory: A Commentary on Advanced Analytics, Inc. v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. Introduction In Advanced Analytics, Inc. v. Citigroup...
Retaliation Liability for Reasonable Accommodation Requests under M.G.L. c. 151B

Retaliation Liability for Reasonable Accommodation Requests under M.G.L. c. 151B

Date: May 14, 2025
Retaliation Liability for Reasonable Accommodation Requests under M.G.L. c. 151B Introduction Moore v. Industrial Demolition LLC (1st Cir. May 13, 2025) clarifies an important aspect of Massachusetts...
Unreviewability of the Attorney General’s “Substantial Federal Interest” Certification Under the JDA

Unreviewability of the Attorney General’s “Substantial Federal Interest” Certification Under the JDA

Date: May 14, 2025
Unreviewability of the Attorney General’s “Substantial Federal Interest” Certification Under the Federal Juvenile Delinquency Act Introduction This commentary examines the Tenth Circuit’s decision in...
Rigorous Pleading Standards for Partnership Formation and Related Tort Claims Under Rule 12(b)(6)

Rigorous Pleading Standards for Partnership Formation and Related Tort Claims Under Rule 12(b)(6)

Date: May 14, 2025
Rigorous Pleading Standards for Partnership Formation and Related Tort Claims Under Rule 12(b)(6) Introduction In Peykoff v. Cawley, the Fifth Circuit confronted a diversity suit arising from a...
Supervisory Liability and Qualified Immunity: The Need for On-Point Precedent in Excessive-Force Claims

Supervisory Liability and Qualified Immunity: The Need for On-Point Precedent in Excessive-Force Claims

Date: May 14, 2025
Supervisory Liability and Qualified Immunity: The Need for On-Point Precedent in Excessive-Force Claims Introduction In Dennis v. Pazen, 10th Cir. No. 23-1313 (May 13, 2025), the United States Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert