Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

federal Case Commentaries

Implied Threat Findings Uphold 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8)(C)(ii) Against Facial Second Amendment Challenge

Implied Threat Findings Uphold 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8)(C)(ii) Against Facial Second Amendment Challenge

Date: May 23, 2025
Implied Threat Findings Uphold 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8)(C)(ii) Against Facial Second Amendment Challenge Introduction United States v. Brown (10th Cir. May 22, 2025) addresses whether 18 U.S.C. §...
Reaffirming the “Clear and Unequivocal” Invocation Standard and AEDPA Deference in Federal Habeas Appeals: Ruhl v. Williams

Reaffirming the “Clear and Unequivocal” Invocation Standard and AEDPA Deference in Federal Habeas Appeals: Ruhl v. Williams

Date: May 23, 2025
Reaffirming the “Clear and Unequivocal” Invocation Standard and AEDPA Deference in Federal Habeas Appeals: Ruhl v. Williams Introduction Ruhl v. Williams is a 2025 decision of the United States Court...
Corroborated Identification and Video Evidence as a Sufficient Basis for Carjacking Convictions

Corroborated Identification and Video Evidence as a Sufficient Basis for Carjacking Convictions

Date: May 23, 2025
Corroborated Identification and Video Evidence as a Sufficient Basis for Carjacking Convictions Introduction This commentary examines the Eleventh Circuit’s decision in United States v. Jimmy Dale...
Miranda Custody Standard and Ineffective Assistance: Cook v. Florida DOC

Miranda Custody Standard and Ineffective Assistance: Cook v. Florida DOC

Date: May 23, 2025
Miranda Custody Standard and Ineffective Assistance: Cook v. Florida DOC Introduction This commentary examines the Eleventh Circuit’s decision in Royce W. Cook v. Secretary, Florida Department of...
Individualized Risk Requirement for CAT Relief Established in Ruvira Guerra v. U.S. Attorney General

Individualized Risk Requirement for CAT Relief Established in Ruvira Guerra v. U.S. Attorney General

Date: May 23, 2025
Individualized Risk Requirement for CAT Relief Established in Ruvira Guerra v. U.S. Attorney General Introduction Jose M. Ruvira Guerra, a Cuban national and lawful permanent resident of the United...
Facial Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8)(C)(ii) Firearm Prohibition Affirmed

Facial Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8)(C)(ii) Firearm Prohibition Affirmed

Date: May 23, 2025
Facial Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8)(C)(ii) Firearm Prohibition Affirmed Introduction The Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit addressed a facial Second Amendment challenge to 18...
Fifth Circuit Establishes Post-Dispute Negligence Standard for FCRA Furnishers

Fifth Circuit Establishes Post-Dispute Negligence Standard for FCRA Furnishers

Date: May 23, 2025
Fifth Circuit Establishes Post-Dispute Negligence Standard for FCRA Furnishers Introduction In Schultz v. HomeBridge Financial Services, Inc., No. 24-50193 (5th Cir. May 22, 2025), the Fifth Circuit...
When Statutes of Limitations Convert “Without Prejudice” Dismissals into “With Prejudice” Dismissals

When Statutes of Limitations Convert “Without Prejudice” Dismissals into “With Prejudice” Dismissals

Date: May 23, 2025
When Statutes of Limitations Convert “Without Prejudice” Dismissals into “With Prejudice” Dismissals Introduction In Ronald Earl Scherer v. JP Morgan Chase & Co., No. 24-11874 (11th Cir. May 22,...
Reaffirming the "One Central Reason" Standard and Distinct Acquiescence Test Under the CAT: Valverde Lopez v. Bondi

Reaffirming the "One Central Reason" Standard and Distinct Acquiescence Test Under the CAT: Valverde Lopez v. Bondi

Date: May 23, 2025
Reaffirming the "One Central Reason" Standard and Distinct Acquiescence Test Under the CAT: Valverde Lopez v. Bondi Introduction Valverde Lopez v. Bondi is a 2025 summary order from the United States...
Expanding Maritime Liens: Recognizing "Necessaries" for Vessel Conversions

Expanding Maritime Liens: Recognizing "Necessaries" for Vessel Conversions

Date: May 23, 2025
Expanding Maritime Liens: Recognizing "Necessaries" for Vessel Conversions Introduction John Bludworth Shipyard, L.L.C. (“JBS”) performed nearly $3 million of conversion work on three barges—Captain...
Kousisis v. United States (2025):  The Supreme Court Confirms that Fraudulent-Inducement Wire-Fraud Liability Does Not Depend on Proving Victim Economic Loss

Kousisis v. United States (2025): The Supreme Court Confirms that Fraudulent-Inducement Wire-Fraud Liability Does Not Depend on Proving Victim Economic Loss

Date: May 23, 2025
Kousisis v. United States (605 U.S. ___, 2025) The Supreme Court validates the “fraudulent-inducement” theory and rejects any freestanding economic-loss requirement under the Federal Wire-Fraud...
Limits on State Liability under Title II of the ADA: No Supervisory-Only Abrogation of Sovereign Immunity

Limits on State Liability under Title II of the ADA: No Supervisory-Only Abrogation of Sovereign Immunity

Date: May 23, 2025
Limits on State Liability under Title II of the ADA: No Supervisory-Only Abrogation of Sovereign Immunity 1. Introduction Y.A. v. Hamtramck Public Schools, decided May 22, 2025 by the Sixth Circuit,...
Rational Basis Validation of Violent Career Criminal Enhancements – Davis v. Florida DOC

Rational Basis Validation of Violent Career Criminal Enhancements – Davis v. Florida DOC

Date: May 23, 2025
Rational Basis Validation of Violent Career Criminal Enhancements Introduction Cody Edward Davis v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections (11th Cir., May 22, 2025) presents a challenge to...
Chen v. Noem: Administrative Delay Claims and Mootness—Voluntary Cessation and Capable of Repetition Exceptions Clarified

Chen v. Noem: Administrative Delay Claims and Mootness—Voluntary Cessation and Capable of Repetition Exceptions Clarified

Date: May 23, 2025
Chen v. Noem: Administrative Delay Claims and Mootness—Voluntary Cessation and Capable of Repetition Exceptions Clarified Introduction Chen v. Noem is a summary order issued by the United States...
Bergnes v. Zayas: Clarifying Standing Under § 1983 and Evidentiary Thresholds for Equal Protection Claims

Bergnes v. Zayas: Clarifying Standing Under § 1983 and Evidentiary Thresholds for Equal Protection Claims

Date: May 23, 2025
Bergnes v. Zayas: Clarifying Standing Under § 1983 and Evidentiary Thresholds for Equal Protection Claims Introduction In Bergnes v. Zayas, 24-2434 (2d Cir. May 22, 2025), the United States Court of...
“Provisional Presidential Removal Power” —  Trump v. Wilcox and the Supreme Court’s Shadow-Docket Recalibration of Humphrey’s Executor

“Provisional Presidential Removal Power” — Trump v. Wilcox and the Supreme Court’s Shadow-Docket Recalibration of Humphrey’s Executor

Date: May 23, 2025
“Provisional Presidential Removal Power” — Trump v. Wilcox and the Supreme Court’s Shadow-Docket Recalibration of Humphrey’s Executor Introduction On 22 May 2025 the Supreme Court, acting on its...
Broad Discretion for Upward Variances Under Section 3553(a): United States v. Walters

Broad Discretion for Upward Variances Under Section 3553(a): United States v. Walters

Date: May 23, 2025
Broad Discretion for Upward Variances Under Section 3553(a): United States v. Walters Introduction United States v. Walters (10th Cir. May 22, 2025) involved an appeal by Edward Walters from a...
Clarifying Standards for Present Sense Impressions and Alternative Perpetrator Evidence in Federal Criminal Trials

Clarifying Standards for Present Sense Impressions and Alternative Perpetrator Evidence in Federal Criminal Trials

Date: May 23, 2025
Clarifying Standards for Present Sense Impressions and Alternative Perpetrator Evidence in Federal Criminal Trials Introduction The Second Circuit’s summary order in United States v. Rodriguez, No....
Affirmation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8)(C)(ii): Disarming Individuals under Domestic-Violence Orders Survives Facial Second Amendment Challenge

Affirmation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8)(C)(ii): Disarming Individuals under Domestic-Violence Orders Survives Facial Second Amendment Challenge

Date: May 23, 2025
Affirmation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8)(C)(ii): Disarming Individuals under Domestic-Violence Orders Survives Facial Second Amendment Challenge 1. Introduction This commentary examines the Tenth...
Scope of Government’s Plea Promises and Restitution Authority Affirmed in US v. Jean-Gilles

Scope of Government’s Plea Promises and Restitution Authority Affirmed in US v. Jean-Gilles

Date: May 23, 2025
Scope of Government’s Plea Promises and Restitution Authority Affirmed in US v. Jean-Gilles Introduction United States v. Kevin Jean-Gilles is a 2025 Eleventh Circuit decision upholding a 235-month...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert