Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

federal Case Commentaries


    Coco Rico, LLC v. Universal Insurance Co.: The First Circuit Tightens Evidentiary Standards
    for Consequential Damages and Caps Jury BI & EE Awards to the Proven Loss

Coco Rico, LLC v. Universal Insurance Co.: The First Circuit Tightens Evidentiary Standards for Consequential Damages and Caps Jury BI & EE Awards to the Proven Loss

Date: Jun 23, 2025
Coco Rico, LLC v. Universal Insurance Company (1st Cir. 2025): A Landmark on Evidentiary Rigor for Consequential Damages, Business-Interruption Caps, and “Obstinacy”–Based Fee Awards 1. Introduction...
“Commonsense Redressability” — Diamond Alternative Energy v. EPA and the Expansion of Article III Standing

“Commonsense Redressability” — Diamond Alternative Energy v. EPA and the Expansion of Article III Standing

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“Commonsense Redressability” — Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA and the Expansion of Article III Standing 1. Introduction Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. Environmental Protection Agency, 606...

        “No Retribution on Revocation” –  The Supervised-Release Principle in Esteras v. United States (2025)

“No Retribution on Revocation” – The Supervised-Release Principle in Esteras v. United States (2025)

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“No Retribution on Revocation” – The New Supervised-Release Principle in Esteras v. United States (606 U.S.___ 2025) I. Introduction On 20 June 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court, in Esteras v. United...
“Any Person Adversely Affected” Means What It Says:  FDA v. R. J. Reynolds Vapor Co. and the Expansion of Statutory Standing Under the Tobacco Control Act

“Any Person Adversely Affected” Means What It Says: FDA v. R. J. Reynolds Vapor Co. and the Expansion of Statutory Standing Under the Tobacco Control Act

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“Any Person Adversely Affected” Means What It Says: FDA v. R. J. Reynolds Vapor Co. (2025) and the Expansion of Statutory Standing Under the Tobacco Control Act 1. Introduction The United States...
Beyond “Minimum Contacts” – The U.S. Supreme Court Widens the Fifth-Amendment Horizon for Federal Personal-Jurisdiction in Anti-Terrorism Litigation

Beyond “Minimum Contacts” – The U.S. Supreme Court Widens the Fifth-Amendment Horizon for Federal Personal-Jurisdiction in Anti-Terrorism Litigation

Date: Jun 23, 2025
Beyond “Minimum Contacts” – The Fifth Amendment, Foreign Affairs, and the New Constitutional Standard for Federal Personal-Jurisdiction 1. Introduction In Fuld v. Palestine Liberation Organization,...
“Exclusive” No More?  McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp. and the Re-Opening of District-Court Review under the Hobbs Act

“Exclusive” No More? McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp. and the Re-Opening of District-Court Review under the Hobbs Act

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“Exclusive” No More? McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp. and the Re-Opening of District-Court Review under the Hobbs Act 1. Introduction On 20 June 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court...
Stanley v. City of Sanford — Cementing a Temporal Limit on “Qualified Individual” Status under ADA Title I

Stanley v. City of Sanford — Cementing a Temporal Limit on “Qualified Individual” Status under ADA Title I

Date: Jun 23, 2025
Stanley v. City of Sanford (2025): The Supreme Court Imposes a Temporal Boundary on Who Qualifies as a “Qualified Individual” under ADA Title I 1. Introduction Stanley v. City of Sanford, 606 U.S....
“Waivers Mean Waivers” – United States v. Nyandoro and the Fifth Circuit’s Re-Statement on Appeal Waivers, Factual-Insufficiency, and Second-Amendment Challenges

“Waivers Mean Waivers” – United States v. Nyandoro and the Fifth Circuit’s Re-Statement on Appeal Waivers, Factual-Insufficiency, and Second-Amendment Challenges

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“Waivers Mean Waivers” – United States v. Nyandoro and the Fifth Circuit’s Re-Statement on Appeal Waivers, Factual-Insufficiency, and Second-Amendment Challenges 1. Introduction United States v....
Beyond the Job: Stanley v. City of Sanford and the Temporal Limits of “Qualified Individual” Status Under the ADA

Beyond the Job: Stanley v. City of Sanford and the Temporal Limits of “Qualified Individual” Status Under the ADA

Date: Jun 21, 2025
Beyond the Job: Stanley v. City of Sanford and the Temporal Limits of “Qualified Individual” Status Under the ADA Introduction Stanley v. City of Sanford, 606 U.S. ___ (2025), is the Supreme Court’s...
From Zoning Grievance to Constitutional Claim: The Third Circuit Re-frames the “Conscience-Shocking” Test in Routine Land-Use Disputes

From Zoning Grievance to Constitutional Claim: The Third Circuit Re-frames the “Conscience-Shocking” Test in Routine Land-Use Disputes

Date: Jun 20, 2025
From Zoning Grievance to Constitutional Claim: The Third Circuit Re-frames the “Conscience-Shocking” Test in Routine Land-Use Disputes 1. Introduction John Seitz IV and his company, Hickory Hill...
Crandall v. McDonough: Confirming that District Courts Lack Jurisdiction over Stand-Alone Whistleblower Protection Act Claims

Crandall v. McDonough: Confirming that District Courts Lack Jurisdiction over Stand-Alone Whistleblower Protection Act Claims

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Crandall v. McDonough: Confirming that District Courts Lack Jurisdiction over Stand-Alone Whistleblower Protection Act Claims 1. Introduction In Kenneth Crandall v. Denis McDonough, the United States...
Clarifying the Evidentiary Threshold for “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” Post-Wilkinson – Commentary on Luis Tubon Guangatal v. Attorney General (3d Cir. 2025)

Clarifying the Evidentiary Threshold for “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” Post-Wilkinson – Commentary on Luis Tubon Guangatal v. Attorney General (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Clarifying the Evidentiary Threshold for “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” Post-Wilkinson Commentary on Luis Tubon Guangatal v. Attorney General (3d Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction The Third...
“Too Soon for Immunity” –  Third Circuit Clarifies that Qualified-Immunity Motions to Dismiss Must Fail When the Complaint States a Plausible Constitutional Violation but Lacks Facts to Assess “Clearly Established” Law

“Too Soon for Immunity” – Third Circuit Clarifies that Qualified-Immunity Motions to Dismiss Must Fail When the Complaint States a Plausible Constitutional Violation but Lacks Facts to Assess “Clearly Established” Law

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“Too Soon for Immunity” – Third Circuit Clarifies that Qualified-Immunity Motions to Dismiss Must Fail When the Complaint States a Plausible Constitutional Violation but Lacks Facts to Assess...
“Connected-To” Is Pure Fact: Fifth Circuit Bars Judicial Review of Causation Findings in VAWA Cancellation (Agwuegbo v. Bondi)

“Connected-To” Is Pure Fact: Fifth Circuit Bars Judicial Review of Causation Findings in VAWA Cancellation (Agwuegbo v. Bondi)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“Connected-To” Is Pure Fact: Fifth Circuit Bars Judicial Review of Causation Findings in VAWA Cancellation Commentary on Agwuegbo v. Bondi, No. 24-60388 (5th Cir. June 18 2025) 1. Introduction In...
Boone v. Rankin County: Fifth Circuit Adopts “Abuse-of-Discretion” Review for Compensatory Education Under IDEA

Boone v. Rankin County: Fifth Circuit Adopts “Abuse-of-Discretion” Review for Compensatory Education Under IDEA

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Boone v. Rankin County: Fifth Circuit Adopts “Abuse-of-Discretion” Review for Compensatory Education Under IDEA Introduction In Boone v. Rankin County Public School District, No. 23-60333 (5th Cir....
“Infancy in Arms” –  McCoy v. ATF and the Recognition of a Historical
‘Infancy Doctrine’ Limitation on Commercial Fire-Arm Sales

“Infancy in Arms” – McCoy v. ATF and the Recognition of a Historical ‘Infancy Doctrine’ Limitation on Commercial Fire-Arm Sales

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“Infancy in Arms” – McCoy v. ATF and the Recognition of a Historical ‘Infancy Doctrine’ Limitation on Commercial Fire-Arm Sales 1. Introduction In Joshua McCoy v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms...
Frazier v. Prince George’s County: No Article III Adverseness to Sitting Judges and No Quasi-Judicial Immunity for Municipalities in § 1983 Actions

Frazier v. Prince George’s County: No Article III Adverseness to Sitting Judges and No Quasi-Judicial Immunity for Municipalities in § 1983 Actions

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Frazier v. Prince George’s County: No Article III Adverseness to Sitting Judges and No Quasi-Judicial Immunity for Municipalities in § 1983 Actions Introduction In Robert Frazier v. Prince George’s...
“From ‘Sheer Surmise’ to Substantial Evidence” – The Second Circuit’s
Refinement of Cat’s-Paw Retaliation and the Post-2019 NYSHRL Standard in
Edelman v. NYU Langone

“From ‘Sheer Surmise’ to Substantial Evidence” – The Second Circuit’s Refinement of Cat’s-Paw Retaliation and the Post-2019 NYSHRL Standard in Edelman v. NYU Langone

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“From ‘Sheer Surmise’ to Substantial Evidence” – The Second Circuit’s Refinement of Cat’s-Paw Retaliation and the Post-2019 NYSHRL Standard in Edelman v. NYU Langone 1. Introduction In Edelman v. NYU...
“Certification of the Right to Record Inside Police Facilities” – A Commentary on Reyes v. City of New York (2d Cir. 2025)

“Certification of the Right to Record Inside Police Facilities” – A Commentary on Reyes v. City of New York (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“Certification of the Right to Record Inside Police Facilities” – A Commentary on Reyes v. City of New York (2d Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction The Second Circuit’s decision in Reyes v. City of New York,...
“No Relation-Back” Deportation:  Sixth Circuit Holds §1227(a)(2)(E)(i) Inapplicable to Crimes Committed while an Alien Was a Naturalized Citizen

“No Relation-Back” Deportation: Sixth Circuit Holds §1227(a)(2)(E)(i) Inapplicable to Crimes Committed while an Alien Was a Naturalized Citizen

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“No Relation-Back” Deportation: Sixth Circuit Holds §1227(a)(2)(E)(i) Inapplicable to Crimes Committed while an Alien Was a Naturalized Citizen 1. Introduction In Elfido Gonzalez Castillo v. Pamela...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert