Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

ex-parte-yerger:-supreme-court& Case Commentaries

Post-Bruen Endorsement of Federal Firearms Prohibitions: United States v. Greely, Branch & Burnett

Post-Bruen Endorsement of Federal Firearms Prohibitions: United States v. Greely, Branch & Burnett

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Post-Bruen Endorsement of Federal Firearms Prohibitions – A Sixth Circuit Commentary on United States v. Greely, Branch & Burnett Introduction The consolidated appeal in United States v. Demarcus...
“Post-Bruen Stability in Federal Firearms Law: The Sixth Circuit Re-Affirms
            the Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(o) and 922(g)(1)”

“Post-Bruen Stability in Federal Firearms Law: The Sixth Circuit Re-Affirms the Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(o) and 922(g)(1)”

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Post-Bruen Stability in Federal Firearms Law: The Sixth Circuit Re-Affirms the Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(o) and 922(g)(1) Introduction In United States v. Greely, Branch & Burnett...
Post-Bruen Endurance of Federal Firearms Prohibitions: Sixth Circuit Affirms Constitutionality of §§ 922(o) & 922(g)(1) and Clarifies Waiver of § 922(g)(3) Challenges

Post-Bruen Endurance of Federal Firearms Prohibitions: Sixth Circuit Affirms Constitutionality of §§ 922(o) & 922(g)(1) and Clarifies Waiver of § 922(g)(3) Challenges

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Post-Bruen Endurance of Federal Firearms Prohibitions: Sixth Circuit Affirms Constitutionality of §§ 922(o) & 922(g)(1) and Clarifies Waiver of § 922(g)(3) Challenges Introduction United States v....
When Forum-Selection Clauses Collide: The Sixth Circuit Limits Rule 12(b)(6) Dismissals Where Venue Agreements Are Factually Disputed

When Forum-Selection Clauses Collide: The Sixth Circuit Limits Rule 12(b)(6) Dismissals Where Venue Agreements Are Factually Disputed

Date: Jul 3, 2025
When Forum-Selection Clauses Collide: The Sixth Circuit Limits Rule 12(b)(6) Dismissals Where Venue Agreements Are Factually Disputed Introduction VCST International B.V. (“VCST”), a Belgian...
Hurd v. Dove: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms the Firm Waiver Rule and Confirms No Stand-Alone Cause of Action under the PLRA

Hurd v. Dove: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms the Firm Waiver Rule and Confirms No Stand-Alone Cause of Action under the PLRA

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Hurd v. Dove: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms the Firm Waiver Rule and Confirms No Stand-Alone Cause of Action under the PLRA 1. Introduction The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, in Hurd...

        United States v. Lee: The Tenth Circuit Establishes Broad Venue for
        § 2252 “Receipt” Offenses as Continuing Crimes

United States v. Lee: The Tenth Circuit Establishes Broad Venue for § 2252 “Receipt” Offenses as Continuing Crimes

Date: Jul 3, 2025
United States v. Lee: The Tenth Circuit Establishes Broad Venue for § 2252 “Receipt” Offenses as Continuing Crimes Introduction In United States v. Lee, No. 24-7015 (10th Cir. June 30 2025), the...

Rule 50 Specificity and the Limits of Constructive-Discharge Damages under the
FMLA – A Commentary on Ziccarelli v. Dart (7th Cir. 2025)

Rule 50 Specificity and the Limits of Constructive-Discharge Damages under the FMLA – A Commentary on Ziccarelli v. Dart (7th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Rule 50 Specificity and the Limits of Constructive-Discharge Damages under the FMLA – Commentary on Salvatore Ziccarelli v. Thomas Dart, 7th Cir. 2025 1. Introduction The Seventh Circuit’s decision...
Rodrigues da Silva v. Silveira da Silva – First Circuit Adopts a Holistic Totality-of-the-Circumstances Test for the “Now Settled” Defense under the Hague Convention

Rodrigues da Silva v. Silveira da Silva – First Circuit Adopts a Holistic Totality-of-the-Circumstances Test for the “Now Settled” Defense under the Hague Convention

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Rodrigues da Silva v. Silveira da Silva – First Circuit Adopts a Holistic Totality-of-the-Circumstances Test for the “Now Settled” Defense under the Hague Convention 1. Introduction In Rodrigues da...
The Burgos-Montes Doctrine: Untreated Serious Medical Needs as “Extraordinary and Compelling Reasons” and the Finality of Denials “Without Prejudice” in Compassionate-Release Litigation

The Burgos-Montes Doctrine: Untreated Serious Medical Needs as “Extraordinary and Compelling Reasons” and the Finality of Denials “Without Prejudice” in Compassionate-Release Litigation

Date: Jul 3, 2025
The Burgos-Montes Doctrine: Untreated Serious Medical Needs as “Extraordinary and Compelling Reasons” and the Finality of Denials “Without Prejudice” in Compassionate-Release Litigation Introduction...
“Sequential-Instruction Due-Process Clause Conflicts”: Commentary on Black v. Tennessee (606 U.S. ___-2025)

“Sequential-Instruction Due-Process Clause Conflicts”: Commentary on Black v. Tennessee (606 U.S. ___-2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“Sequential-Instruction Due-Process Clause Conflicts” Comprehensive Commentary on Black v. Tennessee, 606 U.S. ___ (2025) Introduction On 30 June 2025 the Supreme Court of the United States denied...
“Disruption” Cannot Trump Viewpoint Neutrality: A Commentary on Justice Thomas’s Statement in MacRae v. Mattos (2025)

“Disruption” Cannot Trump Viewpoint Neutrality: A Commentary on Justice Thomas’s Statement in MacRae v. Mattos (2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“Disruption” Cannot Trump Viewpoint Neutrality: A Commentary on Justice Thomas’s Statement in MacRae v. Mattos (606 U.S. ___ (2025)) 1. Introduction In MacRae v. Mattos, the Supreme Court declined to...
“Corrected Before Counted” — Alaska Supreme Court Validates Post-Filing Corrections to Initiative Petition Certifications

“Corrected Before Counted” — Alaska Supreme Court Validates Post-Filing Corrections to Initiative Petition Certifications

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“Corrected Before Counted” — Alaska Supreme Court Validates Post-Filing Corrections to Initiative Petition Certifications 1. Introduction In Medicine Crow v. Beecher, No. 7775 (Alaska June 27 2025),...

        Anchoring Notice: Alaska Supreme Court Requires Insurers to Obtain a USPS Certificate of Mailing for Non-Renewal Notices—Strict Statutory Compliance under AS 21.36.260 and New Guidance on Pre-Judgment Interest in Workers’ Compensation Policies

Anchoring Notice: Alaska Supreme Court Requires Insurers to Obtain a USPS Certificate of Mailing for Non-Renewal Notices—Strict Statutory Compliance under AS 21.36.260 and New Guidance on Pre-Judgment Interest in Workers’ Compensation Policies

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Anchoring Notice: Alaska Supreme Court Requires Insurers to Obtain a USPS Certificate of Mailing for Non-Renewal Notices—Strict Statutory Compliance under AS 21.36.260 and New Guidance on...
“The Voluntary-Acceptance Rule”: Supreme Court of West Virginia Clarifies When Failure to File Financial Disclosure Will Not Upset a Divorce Settlement (Anne Y. v. Daniel Y., 2025)

“The Voluntary-Acceptance Rule”: Supreme Court of West Virginia Clarifies When Failure to File Financial Disclosure Will Not Upset a Divorce Settlement (Anne Y. v. Daniel Y., 2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“The Voluntary-Acceptance Rule” Supreme Court of West Virginia Clarifies When Failure to File Financial Disclosure Will Not Upset a Divorce Settlement Introduction Anne Y. v. Daniel Y., decided on 27...
In re A.T., B.T., and N.T.:  Harmless-Error Review of Improperly Dismissing Parents Who Have Retained Rights from Post-Disposition Permanency Proceedings

In re A.T., B.T., and N.T.: Harmless-Error Review of Improperly Dismissing Parents Who Have Retained Rights from Post-Disposition Permanency Proceedings

Date: Jul 3, 2025
In re A.T., B.T., and N.T.: The Supreme Court of West Virginia Clarifies that Erroneously Excluding Parents (Whose Rights Are Intact) from Abuse-and-Neglect Permanency Hearings May Constitute...
Gilhuys v. Hardy County 911 Center: When Lack of Comparators Justifies Summary Judgment Despite Ongoing Discovery in WVHRA Actions

Gilhuys v. Hardy County 911 Center: When Lack of Comparators Justifies Summary Judgment Despite Ongoing Discovery in WVHRA Actions

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Gilhuys v. Hardy County 911 Center: When Lack of Comparators Justifies Summary Judgment Despite Ongoing Discovery in WVHRA Actions Introduction In Gilhuys v. Hardy County 911 Center, the Supreme...

Statutory History as an Intrinsic Aid: The Wisconsin Supreme Court Ends
Mandatory Collective Bargaining for the UW Hospitals & Clinics Authority

Statutory History as an Intrinsic Aid: The Wisconsin Supreme Court Ends Mandatory Collective Bargaining for the UW Hospitals & Clinics Authority

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Statutory History as an Intrinsic Aid: Service Employees International Union Healthcare Wisconsin v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission (2025 WI 29) Introduction In Service Employees...
State v. Ramirez (2025): Wisconsin Supreme Court Abolishes the “Cavalier Disregard” Standard in Speedy-Trial Jurisprudence

State v. Ramirez (2025): Wisconsin Supreme Court Abolishes the “Cavalier Disregard” Standard in Speedy-Trial Jurisprudence

Date: Jul 3, 2025
State v. Luis A. Ramirez (2025 WI 28): Wisconsin Supreme Court Abolishes the “Cavalier Disregard” Standard and Re-Aligns Speedy-Trial Analysis with Barker Citation: 2025 WI 28, Supreme Court of...
“In re A.H.” – Reaffirming the Constitutional Presumption of Fit Parental Custody and Defining the Bounds of Non-Parent Intervention in West Virginia

“In re A.H.” – Reaffirming the Constitutional Presumption of Fit Parental Custody and Defining the Bounds of Non-Parent Intervention in West Virginia

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“In re A.H.” – Reaffirming the Constitutional Presumption of Fit Parental Custody and Defining the Bounds of Non-Parent Intervention in West Virginia 1. Introduction In In re A.H., No. 23-596 (W. Va....
Reinstatement of the Parental-Fitness Presumption After Rehabilitation – Commentary on In re A.H. (W. Va. 2025)

Reinstatement of the Parental-Fitness Presumption After Rehabilitation – Commentary on In re A.H. (W. Va. 2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Reinstatement of the Parental-Fitness Presumption After Rehabilitation – Commentary on In re A.H. (Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia, 2025) 1. Introduction In re A.H. presented the Supreme...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert