Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

comprehensive-interpretation-of-& Case Commentaries

“Who Bears the Clock?” – First Circuit Clarifies Burden-Shifting and Tolling in Puerto Rico Medical-Malpractice Actions (Cruz-Cedeño v. Vega-Moral, 2025)

“Who Bears the Clock?” – First Circuit Clarifies Burden-Shifting and Tolling in Puerto Rico Medical-Malpractice Actions (Cruz-Cedeño v. Vega-Moral, 2025)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Who Bears the Clock?” – First Circuit Clarifies Burden-Shifting and Tolling in Puerto Rico Medical-Malpractice Actions Cruz-Cedeño v. Vega-Moral, No. 23-1609 (1st Cir. Aug. 8 2025) 1. Introduction...
“Every Person” Still Means “State Actor” – The Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms the State-Action Requirement in § 1983 Suits

“Every Person” Still Means “State Actor” – The Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms the State-Action Requirement in § 1983 Suits

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Every Person” Still Means “State Actor” – The Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms the State-Action Requirement in § 1983 Suits Introduction In Albert Clayton Simmons, II v. American Institute of Certified...
Peterka v. FDOC: Eleventh Circuit Confirms Minimal-Notice, Three-Step Grievance Suffices for Prison Email Censorship

Peterka v. FDOC: Eleventh Circuit Confirms Minimal-Notice, Three-Step Grievance Suffices for Prison Email Censorship

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Peterka v. FDOC: Eleventh Circuit Confirms Minimal-Notice, Three-Step Grievance Suffices for Prison Email Censorship Introduction In Daniel Jon Peterka v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections...

        Eleventh Circuit Clarifies View-Point Neutrality in Limited Public Forums:
        Habersham County’s “Impertinent or Derogatory Remarks” Rule Held
        Constitutionally Suspect

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies View-Point Neutrality in Limited Public Forums: Habersham County’s “Impertinent or Derogatory Remarks” Rule Held Constitutionally Suspect

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies View-Point Neutrality in Limited Public Forums: Habersham County’s “Impertinent or Derogatory Remarks” Rule Held Constitutionally Suspect 1. Introduction In Elena Lyadina...
Lopez v. Costco: Treating Physicians & Rule 26 Reports—Retroactive Force of Cedant and the Revived Duty to Issue Conditional New-Trial Rulings under Rule 50(c)(1)

Lopez v. Costco: Treating Physicians & Rule 26 Reports—Retroactive Force of Cedant and the Revived Duty to Issue Conditional New-Trial Rulings under Rule 50(c)(1)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Lopez v. Costco: Treating Physicians & Rule 26 Reports—Retroactive Force of Cedant and the Revived Duty to Issue Conditional New-Trial Rulings under Rule 50(c)(1) 1. Introduction Tania Maria Lopez, a...
United States v. Brown: Clarifying the “Imminence” Test for §2K2.1(b)(6)(B) Firearm-in-Connection Enhancements

United States v. Brown: Clarifying the “Imminence” Test for §2K2.1(b)(6)(B) Firearm-in-Connection Enhancements

Date: Aug 13, 2025
United States v. Brown: Clarifying the “Imminence” Test for §2K2.1(b)(6)(B) Firearm-in-Connection Enhancements Introduction In United States v. Gabriel Brown, No. 23-13804 (11th Cir. Aug. 7, 2025)...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Non-Retroactive Amendment 709 Cannot Be Used to Achieve “Zero-Point Offender” Relief Under Retroactive Amendment 821

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Non-Retroactive Amendment 709 Cannot Be Used to Achieve “Zero-Point Offender” Relief Under Retroactive Amendment 821

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Non-Retroactive Amendment 709 Cannot Be Used to Achieve “Zero-Point Offender” Relief Under Retroactive Amendment 821 Introduction United States v. Lawrence Lombardi,...
“Consult First, Act Later” – Wisconsin Affirms the Attorney’s Duty to Communicate Directly with Adjudged-Incompetent Clients (Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Thomas L. Frenn, 2025)

“Consult First, Act Later” – Wisconsin Affirms the Attorney’s Duty to Communicate Directly with Adjudged-Incompetent Clients (Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Thomas L. Frenn, 2025)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Consult First, Act Later” – Wisconsin Affirms the Attorney’s Duty to Communicate Directly with Adjudged-Incompetent Clients (Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Thomas L. Frenn, 2025 WI ___) Introduction...
A Cab v. Murray: Nevada Supreme Court Confirms District Courts’ Authority to Award Appellate Attorney Fees under the Minimum Wage Amendment

A Cab v. Murray: Nevada Supreme Court Confirms District Courts’ Authority to Award Appellate Attorney Fees under the Minimum Wage Amendment

Date: Aug 13, 2025
A Cab v. Murray: Nevada Supreme Court Confirms District Courts’ Authority to Award Appellate Attorney Fees under the Minimum Wage Amendment Introduction In A Cab Series, LLC f/k/a A Cab, LLC v....
“Beyond the Sirens” – Armenta v. Unified Fire (2025) and the Narrowing of the UGIA’s “Emergency Medical Assistance” Immunity

“Beyond the Sirens” – Armenta v. Unified Fire (2025) and the Narrowing of the UGIA’s “Emergency Medical Assistance” Immunity

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Beyond the Sirens” – Armenta v. Unified Fire (2025) and the Narrowing of the UGIA’s “Emergency Medical Assistance” Immunity Supreme Court of Utah – 2025 UT 26 – Decided 7 Aug 2025 1. Introduction In...
Utah Supreme Court Affirms Surface Owner’s Right to Uncompensated On-Site Use of Soil in Severed Estates — Comment on Genesis Aggregates B v. Toll Southwest (2025 UT 28)

Utah Supreme Court Affirms Surface Owner’s Right to Uncompensated On-Site Use of Soil in Severed Estates — Comment on Genesis Aggregates B v. Toll Southwest (2025 UT 28)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Utah Supreme Court Affirms Surface Owner’s Right to Uncompensated On-Site Use of Soil in Severed Estates Commentary on Genesis Aggregates B v. Toll Southwest, 2025 UT 28 Introduction Genesis...
Municipal Incorporation and the Doctrine of Mootness in Land-Use Referendum Litigation: Commentary on Haney v. Tooele County (2025 UT 30)

Municipal Incorporation and the Doctrine of Mootness in Land-Use Referendum Litigation: Commentary on Haney v. Tooele County (2025 UT 30)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Municipal Incorporation and the Doctrine of Mootness in Land-Use Referendum Litigation: A Comprehensive Commentary on Haney v. Tooele County, 2025 UT 30 1. Introduction Haney v. Tooele County (2025...
Flexible Deference to Bar Admissions Decisions: The Utah Supreme Court’s Refined Standard of Review in Long v. Utah State Bar

Flexible Deference to Bar Admissions Decisions: The Utah Supreme Court’s Refined Standard of Review in Long v. Utah State Bar

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Flexible Deference” to Bar Admissions Decisions: The Utah Supreme Court’s Refined Standard of Review in Long v. Utah State Bar (2025 UT 29) Introduction Case name: Long v. Utah State Bar, 2025 UT 29...
The “Federal-Origin Exception” to Utah’s EIDPA Suppression Rule – A Comprehensive Commentary on State v. Andrus (2025 UT 32)

The “Federal-Origin Exception” to Utah’s EIDPA Suppression Rule – A Comprehensive Commentary on State v. Andrus (2025 UT 32)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
The “Federal-Origin Exception” to Utah’s EIDPA Suppression Rule In-Depth Commentary on State v. Andrus, 2025 UT 32 (Supreme Court of Utah) 1. Introduction State v. Andrus presented Utah’s high court...
Objective Imminence as a Law-Like Mixed Question: Correctness Review of Pre-Trial Justification Rulings in Utah

Objective Imminence as a Law-Like Mixed Question: Correctness Review of Pre-Trial Justification Rulings in Utah

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Objective Imminence as a Law-Like Mixed Question: Correctness Review of Pre-Trial Justification Rulings in Utah 1. Introduction State v. Wilcox, 2025 UT 31, is the Utah Supreme Court’s first...
Talisker v. Midtown Acquisitions: Utah Supreme Court Validates Broad Contractual Waivers of Rule 69B Sheriff’s-Sale Protections

Talisker v. Midtown Acquisitions: Utah Supreme Court Validates Broad Contractual Waivers of Rule 69B Sheriff’s-Sale Protections

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Talisker v. Midtown Acquisitions: Utah Supreme Court Validates Broad Contractual Waivers of Rule 69B Sheriff’s-Sale Protections Introduction Talisker Partnership and a constellation of related...
“No Entity, No Title”: Wyoming Affirms That Estoppel-by-Deed Cannot Validate a Conveyance to a Non-Existent Corporation

“No Entity, No Title”: Wyoming Affirms That Estoppel-by-Deed Cannot Validate a Conveyance to a Non-Existent Corporation

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“No Entity, No Title”: Wyoming Affirms That Estoppel-by-Deed Cannot Validate a Conveyance to a Non-Existent Corporation Introduction In Kenneth R. Minshall v. Robin Griffin & Joy Osbon, 2025 WY 90,...
Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Clarifies a 20-Year Statute of Limitations for Mortgage Foreclosure Actions

Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Clarifies a 20-Year Statute of Limitations for Mortgage Foreclosure Actions

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Hawaiʻi Supreme Court Clarifies a 20-Year Statute of Limitations for Mortgage Foreclosures Introduction In The Bank of New York Mellon v. White, SCWC-21-0000400 (Aug. 7 2025), the Hawaiʻi Supreme...
Boehringer v. HHS – The Second Circuit Re-Affirms the “Voluntary Participation” Doctrine and Upholds IRA Drug-Price Negotiations

Boehringer v. HHS – The Second Circuit Re-Affirms the “Voluntary Participation” Doctrine and Upholds IRA Drug-Price Negotiations

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Department of Health & Human Services (2d Cir. 2025) Clarifying Voluntary Participation, Unconstitutional Conditions, and APA Exemption under the...
The “Substantial-Interdependence” Rule: Second Circuit Allows Joinder of Fraud and Tax Counts and Declines Per-Se Ineffective-Counsel Claim in United States v. Wynder

The “Substantial-Interdependence” Rule: Second Circuit Allows Joinder of Fraud and Tax Counts and Declines Per-Se Ineffective-Counsel Claim in United States v. Wynder

Date: Aug 13, 2025
The “Substantial-Interdependence” Rule: Second Circuit Allows Joinder of Fraud and Tax Counts and Declines Per-Se Ineffective-Counsel Claim in United States v. Wynder 1. Introduction In United States...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert