Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

clarifying-state-action-doctrine:-acgme&amp Case Commentaries

“Intent to Confine” Suffices: Eleventh Circuit Holds False-Imprisonment Judgments Are Nondischargeable under § 523(a)(6) Despite Debtor’s Good-Faith Belief

“Intent to Confine” Suffices: Eleventh Circuit Holds False-Imprisonment Judgments Are Nondischargeable under § 523(a)(6) Despite Debtor’s Good-Faith Belief

Date: Aug 6, 2025
“Intent to Confine” Suffices: Eleventh Circuit Holds False-Imprisonment Judgments Are Nondischargeable under § 523(a)(6) Despite Debtor’s Good-Faith Belief 1. Introduction The Court of Appeals for...
“Isolated Attorney Endorsements” and Strickland Prejudice: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Ineffective-Assistance Analysis under AEDPA

“Isolated Attorney Endorsements” and Strickland Prejudice: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Ineffective-Assistance Analysis under AEDPA

Date: Aug 6, 2025
“Isolated Attorney Endorsements” and Strickland Prejudice: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Ineffective-Assistance Analysis under AEDPA Introduction In Eric Benson Skeens v. Ron Neal, the United States...
Forfeiture at the Hearing: Cain v. Bisignano Solidifies the Seventh Circuit Rule on Vocational-Expert Objections and Reaffirms the “Minimal Articulation” Standard

Forfeiture at the Hearing: Cain v. Bisignano Solidifies the Seventh Circuit Rule on Vocational-Expert Objections and Reaffirms the “Minimal Articulation” Standard

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Forfeiture at the Hearing: Cain v. Bisignano Solidifies the Seventh Circuit Rule on Vocational-Expert Objections and Reaffirms the “Minimal Articulation” Standard Introduction In Jonathan D. Cain v....
Seventh Circuit Tightens the Nexus and Relocation Requirements in Cartel-Violence Claims:  P.A-V. v. Bondi (2025)

Seventh Circuit Tightens the Nexus and Relocation Requirements in Cartel-Violence Claims: P.A-V. v. Bondi (2025)

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Seventh Circuit Tightens the Nexus and Relocation Requirements in Cartel-Violence Claims: Commentary on P. A.-V. v. Bondi, 21-2737 (7th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction P. A.-V. v. Bondi is the latest in a...
The “Otherwise-Applicable Guideline Range” Doctrine: Seventh Circuit Re-Affirms Deference to Commentary When Calculating Career-Offender Sentences under § 4B1.1(c)(2)

The “Otherwise-Applicable Guideline Range” Doctrine: Seventh Circuit Re-Affirms Deference to Commentary When Calculating Career-Offender Sentences under § 4B1.1(c)(2)

Date: Aug 6, 2025
The “Otherwise-Applicable Guideline Range” Doctrine: United States v. Daniel Stewart (7th Cir. 2025) Introduction In United States v. Daniel Stewart, the Seventh Circuit tackled a thorny question in...
Extending the Moeller Symmetry: Alaska Supreme Court Requires Symmetrical Custody Analysis for Significant In-State Relocations and Re-Affirms the Statutory Preference for Joint Legal Custody

Extending the Moeller Symmetry: Alaska Supreme Court Requires Symmetrical Custody Analysis for Significant In-State Relocations and Re-Affirms the Statutory Preference for Joint Legal Custody

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Extending the Moeller Symmetry: Alaska Supreme Court Requires Symmetrical Custody Analysis for Significant In-State Relocations and Re-Affirms the Statutory Preference for Joint Legal Custody...
Retributive Force vs. Reasonable Discipline: Alaska Supreme Court Clarifies Limits of Parental Corporal Discipline

Retributive Force vs. Reasonable Discipline: Alaska Supreme Court Clarifies Limits of Parental Corporal Discipline

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Retributive Force vs. Reasonable Discipline: Alaska Supreme Court Clarifies Limits of Parental Corporal Discipline 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of Alaska’s decision in Peter R. v. B.M.R., a...
Wolffe v. Wolffe (Alaska 2025): Reaffirming Mandatory Ramsey-Credit Findings and Clarifying Ambiguous Retirement-Asset Awards

Wolffe v. Wolffe (Alaska 2025): Reaffirming Mandatory Ramsey-Credit Findings and Clarifying Ambiguous Retirement-Asset Awards

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Wolffe v. Wolffe (Alaska 2025): Reaffirming Mandatory Ramsey-Credit Findings and Clarifying Ambiguous Retirement-Asset Awards Introduction In Randall Ward Wolffe v. Robin Wolffe, No. 7779 (Alaska...
When Consumer-Protection Claims “Sound in Fraud”: Eleventh Circuit Requires Rule 9(b) Particularity for FDUTPA Allegations

When Consumer-Protection Claims “Sound in Fraud”: Eleventh Circuit Requires Rule 9(b) Particularity for FDUTPA Allegations

Date: Aug 6, 2025
When Consumer-Protection Claims “Sound in Fraud”: Eleventh Circuit Requires Rule 9(b) Particularity for FDUTPA Allegations 1. Introduction In Alin Pop v. LuliFama.com LLC, No. 24-11048 (11th Cir....
Partial-Withdrawal Credits Must Be Applied at “Step Two” of the MPPAA Formula – 
            Commentary on Perfection Bakeries Inc. v. Retail, Wholesale & Department Store Int’l Union Pension Fund

Partial-Withdrawal Credits Must Be Applied at “Step Two” of the MPPAA Formula – Commentary on Perfection Bakeries Inc. v. Retail, Wholesale & Department Store Int’l Union Pension Fund

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Partial-Withdrawal Credits Must Be Applied at “Step Two” of the MPPAA Formula (Perfection Bakeries Inc. v. Retail, Wholesale & Department Store International Union Pension Fund, 11th Cir., 2025)...
Clarifying Medical-Necessity & Qualified-Immunity Standards in Transgender Inmate Care: Bayse v. Philbin (11th Cir. 2025)

Clarifying Medical-Necessity & Qualified-Immunity Standards in Transgender Inmate Care: Bayse v. Philbin (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Clarifying Medical-Necessity & Qualified-Immunity Standards in Transgender Inmate Care: Bayse v. Philbin (11th Cir. 2025) Introduction In Bayse v. Philbin, No. 24-11299 (11th Cir. Aug. 1, 2025), the...
“No Right to a Parole Discharge Date for Lifers” – Commentary on Deckard v. Cotton (319 Neb. 615)

“No Right to a Parole Discharge Date for Lifers” – Commentary on Deckard v. Cotton (319 Neb. 615)

Date: Aug 6, 2025
“No Right to a Parole Discharge Date for Lifers” Commentary on Deckard v. Cotton, 319 Neb. 615 (2025) Introduction Deckard v. Cotton presented the Nebraska Supreme Court with the question whether the...
State v. Sutton: Nebraska Supreme Court Reinforces Strict Notice for All Constitutional Challenges under Rule § 2-109(E)

State v. Sutton: Nebraska Supreme Court Reinforces Strict Notice for All Constitutional Challenges under Rule § 2-109(E)

Date: Aug 6, 2025
State v. Sutton: Nebraska Supreme Court Reinforces Strict Notice for All Constitutional Challenges under Rule § 2-109(E) 1. Introduction In State v. Sutton, 319 Neb. 581 (2025), the Nebraska Supreme...
“The Post-Daubert Reasonable-Juror Threshold for Class Certification” – Commentary on City of Philadelphia v. Banc of Am. Securities LLC (2d Cir. 2025)

“The Post-Daubert Reasonable-Juror Threshold for Class Certification” – Commentary on City of Philadelphia v. Banc of Am. Securities LLC (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 6, 2025
“The Post-Daubert Reasonable-Juror Threshold for Class Certification” Commentary on City of Philadelphia v. Banc of Am. Securities LLC (2d Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction On 1 August 2025, the United...
“Chain-of-Speculation” Insufficiency and Minor-Service NTAs: A Commentary on Lopez-Avila v. Bondi

“Chain-of-Speculation” Insufficiency and Minor-Service NTAs: A Commentary on Lopez-Avila v. Bondi

Date: Aug 6, 2025
“Chain-of-Speculation” Insufficiency and Minor-Service NTAs: An In-Depth Commentary on Lopez-Avila v. Bondi 1. Introduction The Second Circuit’s summary order in Lopez-Avila v. Bondi (Aug. 1 2025)...
Second Circuit Re-Affirms § 922(g)(1) Constitutionality Post-Zherka: A Commentary on United States v. Martin (2025)

Second Circuit Re-Affirms § 922(g)(1) Constitutionality Post-Zherka: A Commentary on United States v. Martin (2025)

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Second Circuit Re-Affirms § 922(g)(1) Constitutionality Post-Zherka: Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Martin (2d Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction United States v. Martin, No. 23-7507-cr,...
Affirming Broad District Court Discretion in AVAA Restitution Calculations: United States v. Schmitt (2d Cir. 2025)

Affirming Broad District Court Discretion in AVAA Restitution Calculations: United States v. Schmitt (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Affirming Broad District Court Discretion in AVAA Restitution Calculations: United States v. Schmitt (2d Cir. 2025) Introduction United States v. Schmitt concerns the appeal of Michael Schmitt, who...
“Certifying Speech”: Volokh v. James and the Future Scrutiny of Social-Media Disclosure Mandates

“Certifying Speech”: Volokh v. James and the Future Scrutiny of Social-Media Disclosure Mandates

Date: Aug 6, 2025
“Certifying Speech”: Volokh v. James and the Future Scrutiny of Social-Media Disclosure Mandates I. Introduction Volokh v. James, No. 23-356 (2d Cir. Aug. 1, 2025), is the Second Circuit’s first deep...
“Contextual Conduct Comparator Doctrine” – Mann v. Koch Foods of Ashland LLC (11th Cir. 2025)

“Contextual Conduct Comparator Doctrine” – Mann v. Koch Foods of Ashland LLC (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 6, 2025
“Contextual Conduct Comparator Doctrine” – Mann v. Koch Foods of Ashland LLC (11th Cir. 2025) Introduction In Belinda Mann v. Koch Foods of Ashland LLC, No. 24-10709 (11th Cir. Aug. 1, 2025), the...
Eleventh Circuit Affirms Broad Judicial Discretion to Deny §1329 Modifications Seeking Post-Petition Personal-Injury Proceeds

Eleventh Circuit Affirms Broad Judicial Discretion to Deny §1329 Modifications Seeking Post-Petition Personal-Injury Proceeds

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Affirms Broad Judicial Discretion to Deny §1329 Modifications Seeking Post-Petition Personal-Injury Proceeds Introduction On 1 August 2025 the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert