Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

affirmation-of-death-penalty-in-farris-genner-morris-jr.-for-heinous Case Commentaries

“Presumed Jury Prejudice ≠ Presumed Ineffective Assistance” – A Commentary on Michael & Stewart Parnell v. United States (11th Cir. 2025)

“Presumed Jury Prejudice ≠ Presumed Ineffective Assistance” – A Commentary on Michael & Stewart Parnell v. United States (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Presumed Jury Prejudice ≠ Presumed Ineffective Assistance” – Commentary on Parnell v. United States, 79 F.4th ____ (11th Cir. 2025) Introduction The consolidated appeal of Stewart Parnell and...
“The Parnell Doctrine” – Why a Skilling Presumption of Jury Prejudice Does NOT Dispense with Strickland’s Performance Prong

“The Parnell Doctrine” – Why a Skilling Presumption of Jury Prejudice Does NOT Dispense with Strickland’s Performance Prong

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“The Parnell Doctrine” – Why a Skilling Presumption of Jury Prejudice Does NOT Dispense with Strickland’s Performance Prong 1. Introduction Stewart and Michael Parnell, former executives of Peanut...
Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms that Bankruptcy Rule 4007(c) Cannot Be Equitably Tolled: Actual Notice Alone Triggers the Creditor’s Duty to Act

Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms that Bankruptcy Rule 4007(c) Cannot Be Equitably Tolled: Actual Notice Alone Triggers the Creditor’s Duty to Act

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms that Bankruptcy Rule 4007(c) Cannot Be Equitably Tolled: Actual Notice Alone Triggers the Creditor’s Duty to Act 1. Introduction In TL90108 LLC v. Joseph Louis Ford, III,...
Clarifying Waiver of Speedy-Trial Act Rights and the Effect of COVID-19 Delays – Commentary on United States v. Francisco Louis

Clarifying Waiver of Speedy-Trial Act Rights and the Effect of COVID-19 Delays – Commentary on United States v. Francisco Louis

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Clarifying Waiver of Speedy-Trial Act Rights and the Validity of Pandemic-Related Delays – A Commentary on United States v. Francisco Louis (11th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction The Eleventh Circuit’s...
Intervening Misconduct and Temporal Distance: The Seventh Circuit Tightens Causation and Constructive-Discharge Standards in Retaliation Cases

Intervening Misconduct and Temporal Distance: The Seventh Circuit Tightens Causation and Constructive-Discharge Standards in Retaliation Cases

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Intervening Misconduct and Temporal Distance: The Seventh Circuit Tightens Causation and Constructive-Discharge Standards in Retaliation Cases Introduction In Alex Kedas v. Illinois Department of...
“No Place Like Home”: Seventh Circuit Confirms ADA Right to Paid Parental Attendant-Care When Needed to Avert Institutionalisation

“No Place Like Home”: Seventh Circuit Confirms ADA Right to Paid Parental Attendant-Care When Needed to Avert Institutionalisation

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“No Place Like Home”: Seventh Circuit Confirms ADA Right to Paid Parental Attendant-Care When Needed to Avert Institutionalisation 1. Introduction Indiana Protection and Advocacy Services Comm’n v....
Parents as Paid Attendant-Care Providers:  A New ADA Integration Mandate Precedent from Indiana Protection & Advocacy Services Comm’n v. FSSA

Parents as Paid Attendant-Care Providers: A New ADA Integration Mandate Precedent from Indiana Protection & Advocacy Services Comm’n v. FSSA

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Parents as Paid Attendant-Care Providers: Seventh Circuit Re-Affirms the ADA’s Integration Mandate in Indiana Protection & Advocacy Services Commission v. Indiana FSSA 1. Introduction The...
“Risk-of-Institutionalisation” Re-affirmed: Seventh Circuit Requires States to Pay Legally-Responsible Relatives for Attendant Care When Needed to Avoid Segregation

“Risk-of-Institutionalisation” Re-affirmed: Seventh Circuit Requires States to Pay Legally-Responsible Relatives for Attendant Care When Needed to Avoid Segregation

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Risk-of-Institutionalisation” Re-affirmed: Seventh Circuit Requires States to Pay Legally-Responsible Relatives for Attendant Care When Needed to Avoid Segregation 1. Introduction Indiana Protection...

        Passive Dissent and the “Pattern-or-Practice” Threshold:
        Seventh Circuit Tightens Asylum Standards in Rivas-Jarquin v. Bondi

Passive Dissent and the “Pattern-or-Practice” Threshold: Seventh Circuit Tightens Asylum Standards in Rivas-Jarquin v. Bondi

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Passive Dissent and the “Pattern-or-Practice” Threshold: Seventh Circuit Tightens Asylum Standards in Rivas-Jarquin v. Bondi 1. Introduction In Leonis Amanda Rivas-Jarquin & C.A.C-R. v. Pamela J....
Fine-Tuning Pike: The First Circuit Refines Dormant Commerce Clause Analysis for Local Cruise-Ship Disembarkation Caps

Fine-Tuning Pike: The First Circuit Refines Dormant Commerce Clause Analysis for Local Cruise-Ship Disembarkation Caps

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Fine-Tuning Pike: The First Circuit Refines Dormant Commerce Clause Analysis for Local Cruise-Ship Disembarkation Caps 1. Introduction Ass’n to Preserve and Protect Local Livelihoods v. Town of Bar...
“When a Town Draws the Line at the Pier” – The First Circuit’s Refashioning of Pike Balancing and the “Continuous-Flow” Doctrine in Ass’n to Preserve and Protect Local Livelihoods v. Sidman (2025)

“When a Town Draws the Line at the Pier” – The First Circuit’s Refashioning of Pike Balancing and the “Continuous-Flow” Doctrine in Ass’n to Preserve and Protect Local Livelihoods v. Sidman (2025)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“When a Town Draws the Line at the Pier” – The First Circuit’s Refashioning of Pike Balancing and the “Continuous-Flow” Doctrine in Ass’n to Preserve and Protect Local Livelihoods v. Sidman (1st Cir....
Pike Balancing Re-Energised: The First Circuit’s Refocus on Fact-Finding in Dormant Commerce Clause Cases – A Commentary on Penobscot Bay & River Pilots Ass’n v. Town of Bar Harbor

Pike Balancing Re-Energised: The First Circuit’s Refocus on Fact-Finding in Dormant Commerce Clause Cases – A Commentary on Penobscot Bay & River Pilots Ass’n v. Town of Bar Harbor

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Pike Balancing Re-Energised: The First Circuit’s Refocus on Fact-Finding in Dormant Commerce Clause Cases Commentary on Penobscot Bay & River Pilots Ass’n. v. Town of Bar Harbor, Nos. 24-1317 etc....
United States v. Hernandez-Rodriguez: First Circuit Clarifies Reach of the Vertical Collective Knowledge Doctrine in Automobile-Exception Searches

United States v. Hernandez-Rodriguez: First Circuit Clarifies Reach of the Vertical Collective Knowledge Doctrine in Automobile-Exception Searches

Date: Aug 13, 2025
United States v. Hernandez-Rodriguez: First Circuit Clarifies Reach of the Vertical Collective Knowledge Doctrine in Automobile-Exception Searches 1. Introduction United States v....
Walker v. Newell: Vermont Supreme Court Reinforces Trial Judges’ Continuing Rule-403 Discretion over Stale Conviction Evidence in Punitive-Damages Trials

Walker v. Newell: Vermont Supreme Court Reinforces Trial Judges’ Continuing Rule-403 Discretion over Stale Conviction Evidence in Punitive-Damages Trials

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Walker v. Newell: Vermont Supreme Court Reinforces Trial Judges’ Continuing Rule-403 Discretion over Stale Conviction Evidence in Punitive-Damages Trials 1. Introduction Case Name: Christina Walker...
Vermont Supreme Court Endorses Reliance on Non-Rule Agency Policy in Child-Abuse Substantiation Proceedings – Commentary on In re Appeal of T.J. (2025)

Vermont Supreme Court Endorses Reliance on Non-Rule Agency Policy in Child-Abuse Substantiation Proceedings – Commentary on In re Appeal of T.J. (2025)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Vermont Supreme Court Endorses Reliance on Non-Rule Agency Policy in Child-Abuse Substantiation Proceedings Commentary on In re Appeal of T.J., 2025 VT ___ (Aug. 8, 2025) 1. Introduction The Vermont...
Event-Triggered Permit Conditions Upheld: Vermont Supreme Court Clarifies “Material Change” and the Condition-Subsequent Doctrine under Act 250 – Commentary on In re Costco Wholesale Administrative Decision, 2025 VT 44

Event-Triggered Permit Conditions Upheld: Vermont Supreme Court Clarifies “Material Change” and the Condition-Subsequent Doctrine under Act 250 – Commentary on In re Costco Wholesale Administrative Decision, 2025 VT 44

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Event-Triggered Permit Conditions Upheld: Vermont Supreme Court Clarifies “Material Change” and the Condition-Subsequent Doctrine under Act 250 Introduction The Supreme Court of Vermont in In re...
“Stagnation Suffices” – Vermont Supreme Court Clarifies the Single-Step
Change-in-Circumstances Standard under 33 V.S.A. § 5113(b)

“Stagnation Suffices” – Vermont Supreme Court Clarifies the Single-Step Change-in-Circumstances Standard under 33 V.S.A. § 5113(b)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Stagnation Suffices” – Vermont Supreme Court Clarifies the Single-Step Change-in-Circumstances Standard under 33 V.S.A. § 5113(b) 1. Introduction The Vermont Supreme Court’s entry order in In Re...
“Partial Progress Is Not Enough” – Vermont Supreme Court Clarifies the Doctrine of Parental Stagnation and the “Reasonable-Time” Standard in Termination-of-Parental-Rights Cases

“Partial Progress Is Not Enough” – Vermont Supreme Court Clarifies the Doctrine of Parental Stagnation and the “Reasonable-Time” Standard in Termination-of-Parental-Rights Cases

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Partial Progress Is Not Enough” – Vermont Supreme Court Clarifies the Doctrine of Parental Stagnation and the “Reasonable-Time” Standard in Termination-of-Parental-Rights Cases 1. Introduction In In...
Clarifying ICWA Inquiry Duties and Putative Fathers’ Due-Process Rights in Vermont – A Commentary on In re O.L., Juvenile (2025)

Clarifying ICWA Inquiry Duties and Putative Fathers’ Due-Process Rights in Vermont – A Commentary on In re O.L., Juvenile (2025)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Clarifying ICWA Inquiry Duties and Putative Fathers’ Due-Process Rights in Vermont – A Commentary on In re O.L., Juvenile (Vt. 2025) Introduction The Vermont Supreme Court’s decision in In re O.L.,...
Twombly v. Horne: Reaffirming the Appellant’s Duty to Perfect the Record and the Automatic Writ of Possession under Vermont’s Rent-Escrow Statute

Twombly v. Horne: Reaffirming the Appellant’s Duty to Perfect the Record and the Automatic Writ of Possession under Vermont’s Rent-Escrow Statute

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Twombly v. Horne: Reaffirming the Appellant’s Duty to Perfect the Record and the Automatic Writ of Possession under Vermont’s Rent-Escrow Statute Introduction Oliver Twombly v. Marcia Horne, 2025 VT...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert