Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

affirmation-of-death-penalty-in-farris-genner-morris-jr.-for-heinous Case Commentaries

Machineguns Beyond Second-Amendment Protection: The Sixth Circuit’s Post-Bruen Reaffirmation in United States v. Brown

Machineguns Beyond Second-Amendment Protection: The Sixth Circuit’s Post-Bruen Reaffirmation in United States v. Brown

Date: Aug 19, 2025
Machineguns Beyond Second-Amendment Protection: The Sixth Circuit’s Post-Bruen Reaffirmation in United States v. Brown 1. Introduction On 14 August 2025 the United States Court of Appeals for the...
“Harmless-Error” after Erlinger: The Sixth Circuit’s Two-Track Approach in United States v. Durham & Barnes

“Harmless-Error” after Erlinger: The Sixth Circuit’s Two-Track Approach in United States v. Durham & Barnes

Date: Aug 19, 2025
“Harmless-Error” after Erlinger: The Sixth Circuit’s Two-Track Approach in United States v. Nathaniel Durham 1. Introduction The consolidated appeal of United States v. Durham & Barnes (Nos....

    Sixth Circuit Refines Harmless-Error Doctrine after Erlinger:  
    A Two-Tier Approach to “Different Occasions” under the ACCA

Sixth Circuit Refines Harmless-Error Doctrine after Erlinger: A Two-Tier Approach to “Different Occasions” under the ACCA

Date: Aug 19, 2025
Sixth Circuit Refines Harmless-Error Doctrine after Erlinger: A Two-Tier Approach to “Different Occasions” under the ACCA Introduction In United States v. Phillip Barnes (consolidated with United...
“The Recency Rule” in Asylum Adjudication: A Commentary on Martinez-Martinez v. Bondi

“The Recency Rule” in Asylum Adjudication: A Commentary on Martinez-Martinez v. Bondi

Date: Aug 19, 2025
“The Recency Rule” in Asylum Adjudication: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Government-Protection and Internal-Relocation Standards Introduction In Dania Martinez-Martinez v. Pamela J. Bondi, No. 24-3281...
From Tinker to Kuhlmeier: Seventh Circuit Clarifies that Student Club Flyers on School Walls Are School-Sponsored Speech — A Commentary on E.D. v. Noblesville School District (2025)

From Tinker to Kuhlmeier: Seventh Circuit Clarifies that Student Club Flyers on School Walls Are School-Sponsored Speech — A Commentary on E.D. v. Noblesville School District (2025)

Date: Aug 19, 2025
From Tinker to Hazelwood: Seventh Circuit Clarifies that Student Club Flyers on School Walls Are School-Sponsored Speech — A Commentary on E.D. v. Noblesville School District (2025) 1. Introduction...
Seventh Circuit Clarifies Deferential Review of “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” Findings – Comment on Fidel Santos Mendoza v. Bondi

Seventh Circuit Clarifies Deferential Review of “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” Findings – Comment on Fidel Santos Mendoza v. Bondi

Date: Aug 19, 2025
“Between Substantial-Evidence and Clear-Error” – The Seventh Circuit’s Post-Wilkinson Roadmap for Reviewing Hardship Determinations Introduction Fidel Santos Mendoza, a long-time resident of Indiana...
Refining the Economic-Realities Test: When Hospitals Are Not “Employers” of Contract Physicians – A Commentary on Veerasikku Bommiasamy v. NES Oklahoma, Inc.

Refining the Economic-Realities Test: When Hospitals Are Not “Employers” of Contract Physicians – A Commentary on Veerasikku Bommiasamy v. NES Oklahoma, Inc.

Date: Aug 19, 2025
Refining the Economic-Realities Test: When Hospitals Are Not “Employers” of Contract Physicians Commentary on Veerasikku Bommiasamy v. NES Oklahoma, Inc. (7th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction The Seventh...
“Minor Policy Deviations Are Insufficient to Establish Pretext” – The New Threshold Clarified in Wendy Lohmeier v. Gottlieb Memorial Hospital

“Minor Policy Deviations Are Insufficient to Establish Pretext” – The New Threshold Clarified in Wendy Lohmeier v. Gottlieb Memorial Hospital

Date: Aug 19, 2025
“Minor Policy Deviations Are Insufficient to Establish Pretext” – Commentary on the Seventh Circuit’s Decision in Wendy Lohmeier v. Gottlieb Memorial Hospital 1. Introduction The Seventh Circuit’s...
The “Implicit Denial” Doctrine & A Re-affirmed Low Bar for Prison-Excessive-Force Claims – Commentary on Escobar-Salmeron v. Moyer (4th Cir. 2025)

The “Implicit Denial” Doctrine & A Re-affirmed Low Bar for Prison-Excessive-Force Claims – Commentary on Escobar-Salmeron v. Moyer (4th Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 19, 2025
The “Implicit Denial” Doctrine & A Re-affirmed Low Bar for Prison-Excessive-Force Claims – Commentary on Escobar-Salmeron v. Moyer (4th Cir. 2025) Introduction Escobar-Salmeron v. Moyer is a...
Fourth Circuit Clarifies Constructive Exhaustion in FOIA: Post-Lawsuit Partial Productions Neither Moot the Action nor Revive Administrative-Appeal Requirements

Fourth Circuit Clarifies Constructive Exhaustion in FOIA: Post-Lawsuit Partial Productions Neither Moot the Action nor Revive Administrative-Appeal Requirements

Date: Aug 19, 2025
Fourth Circuit Clarifies Constructive Exhaustion in FOIA: Post-Lawsuit Partial Productions Neither Moot the Action nor Revive Administrative-Appeal Requirements Introduction Louise Trauma Center LLC...
From “Significant Harm” to “Any Disadvantage”:  Fourth-Circuit Adoption of Muldrow’s Adverse-Action Standard in Herkert v. Bisignano

From “Significant Harm” to “Any Disadvantage”: Fourth-Circuit Adoption of Muldrow’s Adverse-Action Standard in Herkert v. Bisignano

Date: Aug 19, 2025
From “Significant Harm” to “Any Disadvantage”: Fourth-Circuit Adoption of Muldrow’s Adverse-Action Standard in Herkert v. Bisignano 1. Introduction Mary Frances Herkert, a disabled employee of the...
“Removal Is Not Enough” – Fourth Circuit Clarifies Mootness, Jurisdiction, and Standing in Terrorist Watch-List Litigation (Saadiq Long v. Bondi, 2025)

“Removal Is Not Enough” – Fourth Circuit Clarifies Mootness, Jurisdiction, and Standing in Terrorist Watch-List Litigation (Saadiq Long v. Bondi, 2025)

Date: Aug 19, 2025
“Removal Is Not Enough” – Fourth Circuit Clarifies Mootness, Jurisdiction, and Standing in Terrorist Watch-List Litigation I. Introduction In Saadiq Long v. Pamela Bondi, No. 24-1369/1403 (4th Cir....
Long v. Bondi: Watchlist-Driven Credential Denials Confer Standing and § 46110 Does Not Bar District-Court Review Once TSA Orders Are Superseded

Long v. Bondi: Watchlist-Driven Credential Denials Confer Standing and § 46110 Does Not Bar District-Court Review Once TSA Orders Are Superseded

Date: Aug 19, 2025
Long v. Bondi: Watchlist-Driven Credential Denials Confer Standing and § 46110 Does Not Bar District-Court Review Once TSA Orders Are Superseded Introduction The Fourth Circuit’s published decision...
The “Intentional-Withdrawal Waiver” Doctrine – Fourth Circuit confirms that a party who withdraws proffered evidence cannot challenge its exclusion on appeal (United States v. Breeland)

The “Intentional-Withdrawal Waiver” Doctrine – Fourth Circuit confirms that a party who withdraws proffered evidence cannot challenge its exclusion on appeal (United States v. Breeland)

Date: Aug 19, 2025
The “Intentional-Withdrawal Waiver” Doctrine Fourth Circuit confirms that a party who withdraws proffered evidence cannot challenge its exclusion on appeal (United States v. Bernard K. Breeland, Jr.,...
“Beyond Miller”: The Fourth Circuit Declines to Extend Juvenile-Sentencing Protections to 18-Year-Old Offenders and Clarifies Evidentiary & Joinder Standards in Large-Scale VICAR Prosecutions – A Commentary on United States v. Duglas Ferrera (2025)

“Beyond Miller”: The Fourth Circuit Declines to Extend Juvenile-Sentencing Protections to 18-Year-Old Offenders and Clarifies Evidentiary & Joinder Standards in Large-Scale VICAR Prosecutions – A Commentary on United States v. Duglas Ferrera (2025)

Date: Aug 19, 2025
“Beyond Miller”: The Fourth Circuit Declines to Extend Juvenile-Sentencing Protections to 18-Year-Old Offenders and Clarifies Evidentiary & Joinder Standards in Large-Scale VICAR Prosecutions – A...
No Safe Harbor in Fear: Fourth Circuit Narrows Duress Defence in Gang-Related VICAR Prosecutions

No Safe Harbor in Fear: Fourth Circuit Narrows Duress Defence in Gang-Related VICAR Prosecutions

Date: Aug 19, 2025
No Safe Harbor in Fear: Fourth Circuit Narrows Duress Defence in Gang-Related VICAR Prosecutions 1. Introduction United States v. Elmer Martinez (consolidated appeals Nos. 22-4745, 22-4746, 23-4005,...
United States v. Martinez (2025): Fourth Circuit Defines the Outer Limits of the Duress Defence in VICAR Murders and Clarifies Knock-and-Talk Doctrine

United States v. Martinez (2025): Fourth Circuit Defines the Outer Limits of the Duress Defence in VICAR Murders and Clarifies Knock-and-Talk Doctrine

Date: Aug 19, 2025
United States v. Martinez (4th Cir. 2025): Clarifying the Boundaries of Duress under 18 U.S.C. § 1959, the Admissibility of Gang-Violence Evidence, and the Proper Scope of Knock-and-Talk Searches...

Fourth Circuit Narrows “Gang-Duress” and Confirms Admissibility of Expert Gang Testimony after Crawford:
A Commentary on United States v. Pablo Velasco Barrera (2025)

Fourth Circuit Narrows “Gang-Duress” and Confirms Admissibility of Expert Gang Testimony after Crawford: A Commentary on United States v. Pablo Velasco Barrera (2025)

Date: Aug 19, 2025
Fourth Circuit Narrows “Gang-Duress” and Confirms Admissibility of Expert Gang Testimony after Crawford A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Pablo Velasco Barrera, 92 F.4th ___ (4th Cir....
“No Safe Harbor in Gang Coercion” – The Fourth Circuit’s Definitive Limits on Duress, Evidence, and Sentencing in United States v. Ronald Contreras (2025)

“No Safe Harbor in Gang Coercion” – The Fourth Circuit’s Definitive Limits on Duress, Evidence, and Sentencing in United States v. Ronald Contreras (2025)

Date: Aug 18, 2025
“No Safe Harbor in Gang Coercion” – The Fourth Circuit’s Definitive Limits on Duress, Evidence, and Sentencing in United States v. Ronald Contreras (2025) 1. Introduction United States v. Ronald...
United States v. Crawford: Clarifying the Obstruction-of-Justice Enhancement and Reaffirming Limits on “Reasonable Doubt” Definitions

United States v. Crawford: Clarifying the Obstruction-of-Justice Enhancement and Reaffirming Limits on “Reasonable Doubt” Definitions

Date: Aug 18, 2025
United States v. Crawford: Clarifying the Obstruction-of-Justice Enhancement and Reaffirming Limits on “Reasonable Doubt” Definitions 1. Introduction United States v. Stephen C. Crawford, No. 24-4243...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert