Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

West Virginia Case Commentaries

Strict Enforcement of the Fifteen-of-Twenty-Two-Month Foster Care Cap Absent Clear and Convincing Compelling Circumstances: In re B.S. (W. Va. 2025)

Strict Enforcement of the Fifteen-of-Twenty-Two-Month Foster Care Cap Absent Clear and Convincing Compelling Circumstances: In re B.S. (W. Va. 2025)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Strict Enforcement of the Fifteen-of-Twenty-Two-Month Foster Care Cap Absent Clear and Convincing Compelling Circumstances: In re B.S. (W. Va. 2025) Introduction In In re B.S., No. 24-732 (W. Va....
Reaffirming the Rule 8 Presumption and Evidentiary Limits in Abuse–Neglect Adjudications: No Due Process Right to Confront Child Victims; Rape Shield and Discovery Constraints Clarified

Reaffirming the Rule 8 Presumption and Evidentiary Limits in Abuse–Neglect Adjudications: No Due Process Right to Confront Child Victims; Rape Shield and Discovery Constraints Clarified

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Reaffirming the Rule 8 Presumption and Evidentiary Limits in Abuse–Neglect Adjudications: No Due Process Right to Confront Child Victims; Rape Shield and Discovery Constraints Clarified Introduction...
Rule 5 Forbids Continuances for Pending Criminal Bond Proceedings; Acknowledgment of Neglect Is Prerequisite to Improvement Period — Commentary on In re N.S. (W. Va. 2025)

Rule 5 Forbids Continuances for Pending Criminal Bond Proceedings; Acknowledgment of Neglect Is Prerequisite to Improvement Period — Commentary on In re N.S. (W. Va. 2025)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Rule 5 Forbids Continuances for Pending Criminal Bond Proceedings; Acknowledgment of Neglect Is Prerequisite to Improvement Period — Commentary on In re N.S. (W. Va. 2025) Introduction In a...
Refusal to Engage in Reunification Services and Violations of Court Orders Permit Termination Without Less-Restrictive Alternatives and Justify Denial of Post‑Termination Visitation — In re G.J. (W. Va. 2025)

Refusal to Engage in Reunification Services and Violations of Court Orders Permit Termination Without Less-Restrictive Alternatives and Justify Denial of Post‑Termination Visitation — In re G.J. (W. Va. 2025)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Refusal to Engage in Reunification Services and Violations of Court Orders Permit Termination Without Less-Restrictive Alternatives and Justify Denial of Post‑Termination Visitation Introduction This...
Oral Requests Are Not Enough: West Virginia Reaffirms Written-Motion Requirement for Additional Improvement Periods and Permits Direct Termination When No Reasonable Likelihood of Correction (In re G.A.)

Oral Requests Are Not Enough: West Virginia Reaffirms Written-Motion Requirement for Additional Improvement Periods and Permits Direct Termination When No Reasonable Likelihood of Correction (In re G.A.)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Oral Requests Are Not Enough: West Virginia Reaffirms Written-Motion Requirement for Additional Improvement Periods and Permits Direct Termination When No Reasonable Likelihood of Correction (In re...
In re B.N.: Continued-Association Visitation May Be Ordered Without a Grandparent Visitation Act Motion; Non‑Intervenor Grandparents Cannot Challenge Reunification

In re B.N.: Continued-Association Visitation May Be Ordered Without a Grandparent Visitation Act Motion; Non‑Intervenor Grandparents Cannot Challenge Reunification

Date: Oct 1, 2025
In re B.N.: Continued-Association Visitation May Be Ordered Without a Grandparent Visitation Act Motion; Non‑Intervenor Grandparents Cannot Challenge Reunification Introduction In In re B.N., No....
Actual Notice Can Cure Rule 10 Witness-Disclosure Defects; Harmless Error Supports Termination in Abuse-and-Neglect Dispositions—Commentary on In re T.F., F.F., and C.F.

Actual Notice Can Cure Rule 10 Witness-Disclosure Defects; Harmless Error Supports Termination in Abuse-and-Neglect Dispositions—Commentary on In re T.F., F.F., and C.F.

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Actual Notice Can Cure Rule 10 Witness-Disclosure Defects; Harmless Error Supports Termination in Abuse-and-Neglect Dispositions—In re T.F., F.F., and C.F. Introduction In a memorandum decision...
Rapid Recidivism After Case Dismissal as Evidence of “No Reasonable Likelihood” — Denial of Improvement Period and Termination Without Less Restrictive Alternatives (In re R.D., P.D., and L.M.)

Rapid Recidivism After Case Dismissal as Evidence of “No Reasonable Likelihood” — Denial of Improvement Period and Termination Without Less Restrictive Alternatives (In re R.D., P.D., and L.M.)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Rapid Recidivism After Case Dismissal as Evidence of “No Reasonable Likelihood” — Denial of Improvement Period and Termination Without Less Restrictive Alternatives Commentary on In re R.D., P.D.,...
Credibility of Oral Modified‑Duty Offers Controls TTD Termination: West Virginia’s High Court Reaffirms Deference to the Board of Review Under § 23‑4‑7a(e)

Credibility of Oral Modified‑Duty Offers Controls TTD Termination: West Virginia’s High Court Reaffirms Deference to the Board of Review Under § 23‑4‑7a(e)

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Credibility of Oral Modified‑Duty Offers Controls TTD Termination: West Virginia’s High Court Reaffirms Deference to the Board of Review Under § 23‑4‑7a(e) Introduction In Dainel Nicole Smith v. West...
Credibility Over Formality: Verbal Light‑Duty Offers Do Not Automatically Terminate TTD; Deference to the Board of Review Controls under § 23‑4‑7a(e)

Credibility Over Formality: Verbal Light‑Duty Offers Do Not Automatically Terminate TTD; Deference to the Board of Review Controls under § 23‑4‑7a(e)

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Credibility Over Formality: Verbal Light‑Duty Offers Do Not Automatically Terminate TTD; Deference to the Board of Review Controls under § 23‑4‑7a(e) Introduction In Dainel Nicole Smith v. West...
State v. Rue: No plain‑error relief for felony‑murder instructional complaint under a general first-degree murder verdict; reaffirmation of trial courts’ discretion to give initial‑aggressor self‑defense instructions

State v. Rue: No plain‑error relief for felony‑murder instructional complaint under a general first-degree murder verdict; reaffirmation of trial courts’ discretion to give initial‑aggressor self‑defense instructions

Date: Sep 17, 2025
State v. Rue: No plain‑error relief for felony‑murder instructional complaint under a general first-degree murder verdict; reaffirmation of trial courts’ discretion to give initial‑aggressor...
Roberts Reaffirms Objective Pretext Doctrine and Recorded-Consent Vehicle Searches in West Virginia

Roberts Reaffirms Objective Pretext Doctrine and Recorded-Consent Vehicle Searches in West Virginia

Date: Sep 17, 2025
Roberts Reaffirms Objective Pretext Doctrine and Recorded-Consent Vehicle Searches in West Virginia Introduction In State of West Virginia v. Steven Verrell Roberts, No. 23-422 (W. Va. Sept. 16,...
State v. Austin: Voluntary Intoxication and Diminished Capacity Limits, Narrow “Opening the Door,” and What Counts as an Overt Act for Attempted First-Degree Murder

State v. Austin: Voluntary Intoxication and Diminished Capacity Limits, Narrow “Opening the Door,” and What Counts as an Overt Act for Attempted First-Degree Murder

Date: Sep 17, 2025
State v. Austin: Voluntary Intoxication and Diminished Capacity Limits, Narrow “Opening the Door,” and What Counts as an Overt Act for Attempted First-Degree Murder Introduction In State of West...
No “Child’s-Choice” Visitation Without Findings and a Plan: In re H.C. Reinforces Child-Centered Continued-Association Standards in Guardianship Cases

No “Child’s-Choice” Visitation Without Findings and a Plan: In re H.C. Reinforces Child-Centered Continued-Association Standards in Guardianship Cases

Date: Sep 17, 2025
No “Child’s-Choice” Visitation Without Findings and a Plan: In re H.C. Reinforces Child-Centered Continued-Association Standards in Guardianship Cases Introduction In a memorandum decision issued...
Counsel’s Verification Suffices to Satisfy Rule 32(c)(3)(A); Unraised PSI Objections Are Waived — State v. Layton

Counsel’s Verification Suffices to Satisfy Rule 32(c)(3)(A); Unraised PSI Objections Are Waived — State v. Layton

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Counsel’s Verification Suffices to Satisfy Rule 32(c)(3)(A); Unraised PSI Objections Are Waived — State v. Layton Introduction In State of West Virginia v. Thomas Layton, No. 24-685 (Sept. 10, 2025),...
Requesting FMLA Paperwork Is Not Protected Activity: West Virginia Supreme Court clarifies Harless retaliation and reinforces WVHRA prima facie and pretext standards

Requesting FMLA Paperwork Is Not Protected Activity: West Virginia Supreme Court clarifies Harless retaliation and reinforces WVHRA prima facie and pretext standards

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Requesting FMLA Paperwork Is Not Protected Activity: West Virginia Supreme Court clarifies Harless retaliation and reinforces WVHRA prima facie and pretext standards Introduction In Cindy Linger-Long...
Spears v. Frame: Habeas Orders Must Contain Petitioner-Specific Findings; Incorporating a Co‑Defendant’s Findings Is Insufficient for Meaningful Appellate Review

Spears v. Frame: Habeas Orders Must Contain Petitioner-Specific Findings; Incorporating a Co‑Defendant’s Findings Is Insufficient for Meaningful Appellate Review

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Spears v. Frame: Habeas Orders Must Contain Petitioner-Specific Findings; Incorporating a Co‑Defendant’s Findings Is Insufficient for Meaningful Appellate Review Court: Supreme Court of Appeals of...
Rule 35(b) in West Virginia: No Entitlement to Appointed Experts and Concise Orders Can Suffice — State v. Jeffery (W. Va. Sept. 10, 2025)

Rule 35(b) in West Virginia: No Entitlement to Appointed Experts and Concise Orders Can Suffice — State v. Jeffery (W. Va. Sept. 10, 2025)

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Rule 35(b) in West Virginia: No Entitlement to Appointed Experts and Concise Orders Can Suffice — State v. Jeffery Introduction In State of West Virginia v. Joey Keith Jeffery, No. 23-538 (Kanawha...
No Improvement Without Acknowledgment: West Virginia Affirms Denial of Improvement Period and Child-Specific Dispositions in Domestic-Violence-Based Abuse and Neglect

No Improvement Without Acknowledgment: West Virginia Affirms Denial of Improvement Period and Child-Specific Dispositions in Domestic-Violence-Based Abuse and Neglect

Date: Sep 11, 2025
No Improvement Without Acknowledgment: West Virginia Affirms Denial of Improvement Period and Child-Specific Dispositions in Domestic-Violence-Based Abuse and Neglect Case: In re T.B., T.D., J.C.-1,...
“Good Cause” Means More Than Docket Delay; Written Motion Required for Improvement Periods: Commentary on In re J.S.-1 and J.S.-2 (W. Va. Sept. 10, 2025)

“Good Cause” Means More Than Docket Delay; Written Motion Required for Improvement Periods: Commentary on In re J.S.-1 and J.S.-2 (W. Va. Sept. 10, 2025)

Date: Sep 11, 2025
“Good Cause” Means More Than Docket Delay; Written Motion Required for Improvement Periods: Commentary on In re J.S.-1 and J.S.-2 (W. Va. Sept. 10, 2025) Introduction In re J.S.-1 and J.S.-2 is a...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert