Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

Piche v. State of Washington: Affirmation of Admissibility of Escape Evidence and Voluntariness of Confessions

Piche v. State of Washington: Affirmation of Admissibility of Escape Evidence and Voluntariness of Confessions

Date: Jul 14, 1967
Piche v. State of Washington: Affirmation of Admissibility of Escape Evidence and Voluntariness of Confessions Introduction In Piche v. State of Washington, 430 P.2d 522 (71 Wn. 2d 583), decided by...
Effective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from STATE v. STOCKMAN

Effective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from STATE v. STOCKMAN

Date: Mar 31, 1967
Effective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from STATE v. STOCKMAN Introduction State v. Vernon Russell Stockman is a seminal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Washington in 1967. The appellant,...
Corbit v. J.I. Case Company: Defining Civil Conspiracy and Contractual Boundaries

Corbit v. J.I. Case Company: Defining Civil Conspiracy and Contractual Boundaries

Date: Feb 24, 1967
Corbit v. J.I. Case Company: Defining Civil Conspiracy and Contractual Boundaries Introduction Corbit v. J.I. Case Company et al. is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Washington in...
Establishing Seaworthiness through Federal Safety Regulations: Insights from Vogel v. Alaska Steamship Co.

Establishing Seaworthiness through Federal Safety Regulations: Insights from Vogel v. Alaska Steamship Co.

Date: Oct 7, 1966
Establishing Seaworthiness through Federal Safety Regulations: Insights from Vogel v. Alaska Steamship Co. Introduction The case of HIENIE A. VOGEL et al. v. ALASKA STEAMSHIP COMPANY adjudicated by...
Limits on State Liability for Discretionary Acts: A Comprehensive Analysis of EVANGELICAL UNITED BRETHREN CHURCH OF ADNA v. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

Limits on State Liability for Discretionary Acts: A Comprehensive Analysis of EVANGELICAL UNITED BRETHREN CHURCH OF ADNA v. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

Date: Nov 5, 1965
Limits on State Liability for Discretionary Acts: A Comprehensive Analysis of EVANGELICAL UNITED BRETHREN CHURCH OF ADNA v. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON Introduction The case of EVANGELICAL UNITED...
Intentional Interference with Business Relationships: Analysis of CALBOM v. KNUDTZON

Intentional Interference with Business Relationships: Analysis of CALBOM v. KNUDTZON

Date: Oct 30, 1964
Intentional Interference with Business Relationships: Analysis of CALBOM v. KNUDTZON Introduction The case of Harry B. Calbom, Jr. v. Halvor Knudtzon, Sr. et al., reported in 396 P.2d 148 (1964),...
Enforcement of Conditional Sale Contracts: The Role of Conditions Precedent in ROSS v. HARDING

Enforcement of Conditional Sale Contracts: The Role of Conditions Precedent in ROSS v. HARDING

Date: Apr 17, 1964
Enforcement of Conditional Sale Contracts: The Role of Conditions Precedent in ROSS v. HARDING Introduction Thomas B. Ross et al. v. Charlotte M. Harding, Appellant, Max E. Lieb et al., Respondents,...
STATE v. BADDA: Safeguarding Defendants in Joint Trials and Addressing Accumulated Trial Errors

STATE v. BADDA: Safeguarding Defendants in Joint Trials and Addressing Accumulated Trial Errors

Date: Oct 25, 1963
STATE v. BADDA: Safeguarding Defendants in Joint Trials and Addressing Accumulated Trial Errors Introduction The State of Washington v. Edward Badda is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Leasehold Interests and Goodwill Recognized as Personal Property in Conditional Sale Contracts: Ferree v. The Doric Co. (1963)

Leasehold Interests and Goodwill Recognized as Personal Property in Conditional Sale Contracts: Ferree v. The Doric Co. (1963)

Date: Jul 19, 1963
Leasehold Interests and Goodwill Recognized as Personal Property in Conditional Sale Contracts: Ferree v. The Doric Co. (1963) Introduction Ferree v. The Doric Co. is a seminal case adjudicated by...
Confidentiality of Attorney-Client Communications Affirmed in STATE v. CORY

Confidentiality of Attorney-Client Communications Affirmed in STATE v. CORY

Date: Jun 21, 1963
Confidentiality of Attorney-Client Communications Affirmed in STATE v. CORY Introduction The State of Washington v. William F. Cory, 382 P.2d 1019 (1963), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
Scope of Employment and Credibility in Summary Judgment: Analysis of BALISE v. UNDERWOOD (1963)

Scope of Employment and Credibility in Summary Judgment: Analysis of BALISE v. UNDERWOOD (1963)

Date: May 24, 1963
Scope of Employment and Credibility in Summary Judgment: Analysis of BALISE v. UNDERWOOD (1963) Introduction BALISE v. UNDERWOOD is a pivotal 1963 Supreme Court of Washington decision that addresses...
Limiting Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Corporations: Insights from Tyyee Construction Co. v. Belyea Co.

Limiting Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Corporations: Insights from Tyyee Construction Co. v. Belyea Co.

Date: May 10, 1963
Limiting Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Corporations: Insights from Tyyee Construction Co. v. Belyea Co. Introduction The case of Tyyee Construction Company et al. v. Dulien Steel Products, Inc....
Standard for Considering Juror Misconduct in Motions for New Trial: GARDNER v. MALONE

Standard for Considering Juror Misconduct in Motions for New Trial: GARDNER v. MALONE

Date: Nov 30, 1962
Standard for Considering Juror Misconduct in Motions for New Trial: GARDNER v. MALONE Introduction In the landmark case of Arnie Gardner et al. v. John Malone, reported in 376 P.2d 651 (60 Wn. 2d...
State of Washington v. Don Anthony White: Upholding the M'Naghten Rule and Death Penalty Procedures

State of Washington v. Don Anthony White: Upholding the M'Naghten Rule and Death Penalty Procedures

Date: Sep 26, 1962
State of Washington v. Don Anthony White: Upholding the M'Naghten Rule and Death Penalty Procedures Introduction In the landmark case of State of Washington v. Don Anthony White (374 P.2d 942, 60...
Premises Liability and Voluntary Assumption of Risk: DeHEER v. SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER

Premises Liability and Voluntary Assumption of Risk: DeHEER v. SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER

Date: Jun 15, 1962
Premises Liability and Voluntary Assumption of Risk: DeHEER v. SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER Introduction The case of Cornelis DeHeer et al., Appellants, v. The Seattle Post-Intelligencer et al.,...
Limits on Attorney General’s Authority to Demand Accountings in Charitable Trusts – The State of Washington v. Harcourt M. Taylor

Limits on Attorney General’s Authority to Demand Accountings in Charitable Trusts – The State of Washington v. Harcourt M. Taylor

Date: May 19, 1961
Limits on Attorney General’s Authority to Demand Accountings in Charitable Trusts – The State of Washington v. Harcourt M. Taylor Introduction The State of Washington v. Harcourt M. Taylor et al.,...
Enforcing Arbitration in Interpretation Disputes: Insights from Hanford Guards Union v. General Electric Co.

Enforcing Arbitration in Interpretation Disputes: Insights from Hanford Guards Union v. General Electric Co.

Date: Jan 6, 1961
Enforcing Arbitration in Interpretation Disputes: Insights from Hanford Guards Union v. General Electric Co. Introduction The case of Hanford Guards Union of America Local 21 of the International...
Establishing Admissibility Standards for Breathalyzer Evidence: STATE v. BAKER

Establishing Admissibility Standards for Breathalyzer Evidence: STATE v. BAKER

Date: Oct 7, 1960
Establishing Admissibility Standards for Breathalyzer Evidence: State of Washington v. Charles E. Baker Introduction In the landmark case of The State of Washington v. Charles E. Baker, reported in...
Clarifying the Standards for Summary Judgment: Insights from ADA Preston v. William R. Duncan

Clarifying the Standards for Summary Judgment: Insights from ADA Preston v. William R. Duncan

Date: Feb 26, 1960
Clarifying the Standards for Summary Judgment: Insights from ADA Preston v. William R. Duncan Introduction ADA Preston v. William R. Duncan et al., reported in 349 P.2d 605 (55 Wn. 2d 678), is a...
Reaffirmation of Jury Instruction Standards in SHERMAN v. MOBBS et al.

Reaffirmation of Jury Instruction Standards in SHERMAN v. MOBBS et al.

Date: Dec 4, 1959
Reaffirmation of Jury Instruction Standards in SHERMAN v. MOBBS et al. Introduction James C. Sherman v. Lewis Mobbs et al. is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Washington in 1959....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert