Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

Appellate Deference to Trial Court Fact-Finding in Thorney v. Hesperian Orchards

Appellate Deference to Trial Court Fact-Finding in Thorney v. Hesperian Orchards

Date: Aug 21, 1959
Appellate Deference to Trial Court Fact-Finding in Thorney v. Hesperian Orchards Introduction The case of David A. Thorndike et al. v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc. adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Validating Unilateral Stipulations in Eminent Domain: State of Washington v. Basin Development and Sales Co.

Validating Unilateral Stipulations in Eminent Domain: State of Washington v. Basin Development and Sales Co.

Date: Nov 29, 1958
Validating Unilateral Stipulations in Eminent Domain: State of Washington v. Basin Development and Sales Co. Introduction The case of State of Washington v. Basin Development and Sales Co. (1958)...
Governmental Immunity from Strikes: The Port of Seattle Decision

Governmental Immunity from Strikes: The Port of Seattle Decision

Date: May 3, 1958
Governmental Immunity from Strikes: The Port of Seattle Decision Introduction The case of The Port of Seattle v. International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union et al. (1958) addresses a...
State v. Earl C. Case: Establishing Boundaries of Prosecutorial Conduct in Ensuring a Fair Trial

State v. Earl C. Case: Establishing Boundaries of Prosecutorial Conduct in Ensuring a Fair Trial

Date: Jun 8, 1956
State v. Earl C. Case: Establishing Boundaries of Prosecutorial Conduct in Ensuring a Fair Trial Reported in 298 P.2d 500. (49 Wn. 2d 66) | Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc | June 7, 1956...
Establishing Contractual Obligations in Public Pensions: Insights from Bakenhus v. City of Seattle

Establishing Contractual Obligations in Public Pensions: Insights from Bakenhus v. City of Seattle

Date: Apr 20, 1956
Establishing Contractual Obligations in Public Pensions: Insights from Bakenhus v. City of Seattle Introduction The case of H.D. Bakenhus et al. v. The City of Seattle et al., decided by the Supreme...
Equal Protection in Criminal Classification: Washington Supreme Court Invalidates RCW 9.41.160

Equal Protection in Criminal Classification: Washington Supreme Court Invalidates RCW 9.41.160

Date: Mar 23, 1956
Equal Protection in Criminal Classification: Washington Supreme Court Invalidates RCW 9.41.160 Introduction The case of Stanley C. Olsen v. Lawrence Delmore, Jr. addressed a pivotal issue concerning...
State v. Samuel Emmanuel: Key Precedents on Bribery, Evidence, and Jury Instructions

State v. Samuel Emmanuel: Key Precedents on Bribery, Evidence, and Jury Instructions

Date: Jul 3, 1953
State v. Samuel Emmanuel: Key Precedents on Bribery, Evidence, and Jury Instructions Introduction State of Washington v. Samuel Emmanuel is a landmark case reported in 259 P.2d 845 (42 Wn. 2d 799) by...
Duty of School Districts to Foresee and Prevent Student Misconduct: McLEOD v. GRANT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTrict No. 128

Duty of School Districts to Foresee and Prevent Student Misconduct: McLEOD v. GRANT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTrict No. 128

Date: Mar 26, 1953
Duty of School Districts to Foresee and Prevent Student Misconduct: McLEOD v. GRANT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTrict No. 128 Introduction In McLEOD v. GRANT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTrict No. 128, 255 P.2d 360 (42 Wn....
Admissibility of Prior Confessions: Establishing Identity and Manner of Commission in STATE v. GOEBEL

Admissibility of Prior Confessions: Establishing Identity and Manner of Commission in STATE v. GOEBEL

Date: Jan 25, 1952
Admissibility of Prior Confessions: Establishing Identity and Manner of Commission in State of Washington v. Goebel Introduction State of Washington v. Lee Raymond Goebel, reported in 240 P.2d 251...
Cle Elum Ordinance Enforcement Upholds Municipal Police Power Over Commercial Property Rights

Cle Elum Ordinance Enforcement Upholds Municipal Police Power Over Commercial Property Rights

Date: Jan 13, 1951
Cle Elum Ordinance Enforcement Upholds Municipal Police Power Over Commercial Property Rights Introduction The case of Tony Sandona, Sr., et al. v. The City of Cle Elum et al. represents a pivotal...
Admissibility of Unrelated Crimes Evidence: Insights from STATE v. GOEBEL

Admissibility of Unrelated Crimes Evidence: Insights from STATE v. GOEBEL

Date: May 14, 1950
Admissibility of Unrelated Crimes Evidence: Insights from STATE v. GOEBEL Introduction State of Washington v. Lee Raymond Goebel is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Washington in...
Washington Supreme Court Upholds Veterans' Bonus Act Under Special Fund Doctrine

Washington Supreme Court Upholds Veterans' Bonus Act Under Special Fund Doctrine

Date: Nov 6, 1949
Washington Supreme Court Upholds Veterans' Bonus Act Under Special Fund Doctrine Introduction In the landmark case of Charles H. Gruen v. The State Tax Commission et al., reported in 211 P.2d 651 (35...
Exclusive Witness Privilege Against Self-Incrimination and Recognition of De Facto Judicial Appointments

Exclusive Witness Privilege Against Self-Incrimination and Recognition of De Facto Judicial Appointments

Date: Mar 14, 1947
Exclusive Witness Privilege Against Self-Incrimination and Recognition of De Facto Judicial Appointments Introduction The case of The State of Washington v. Richard Britton, reported in 178 P.2d 341...
Estoppel and Contract Interpretation in J.W. Seavey Hop Corporation v. Pollock

Estoppel and Contract Interpretation in J.W. Seavey Hop Corporation v. Pollock

Date: Mar 24, 1944
Estoppel and Contract Interpretation in J.W. Seavey Hop Corporation v. Pollock Introduction The case of J.W. Seavey Hop Corporation v. Thomas H. Pollock et al. adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Limitation of Courts in Rewriting Contracts: Perry J. Chaffee v. Stephen E. Chaffee

Limitation of Courts in Rewriting Contracts: Perry J. Chaffee v. Stephen E. Chaffee

Date: Dec 10, 1943
Limitation of Courts in Rewriting Contracts: Perry J. Chaffee v. Stephen E. Chaffee Introduction The case of Perry J. Chaffee v. Stephen E. Chaffee deliberated before the Supreme Court of Washington...
Supersedeas Bonds and Constructive Trusts in Estate Proceedings: Analysis of RYAN v. PLATH

Supersedeas Bonds and Constructive Trusts in Estate Proceedings: Analysis of RYAN v. PLATH

Date: Aug 26, 1943
Supersedeas Bonds and Constructive Trusts in Estate Proceedings: Analysis of RYAN v. PLATH Introduction The case of Maude F. Ryan v. Fred B. Plath et al., reported in 140 P.2d 968 (18 Wn.2d 839),...
Limiting Unjust Enrichment Claims in Public Infrastructure Projects: Chandler v. Washington Toll Bridge Authority

Limiting Unjust Enrichment Claims in Public Infrastructure Projects: Chandler v. Washington Toll Bridge Authority

Date: Apr 27, 1943
Limiting Unjust Enrichment Claims in Public Infrastructure Projects: Chandler v. Washington Toll Bridge Authority Introduction Chandler v. Washington Toll Bridge Authority is a landmark case...
Survivorship Rights in Joint Savings Accounts: Tacoma Savings Loan Association v. McClintock Nadham

Survivorship Rights in Joint Savings Accounts: Tacoma Savings Loan Association v. McClintock Nadham

Date: Sep 10, 1942
Survivorship Rights in Joint Savings Accounts: Tacoma Savings Loan Association v. McClintock Nadham Introduction The case of Tacoma Savings Loan Association v. Ethel L. McClintock Nadham (Tolouse) et...
Establishing the Boundaries of Malicious Prosecution: The Peasley Decision

Establishing the Boundaries of Malicious Prosecution: The Peasley Decision

Date: May 10, 1942
Establishing the Boundaries of Malicious Prosecution: The PEASLEY v. PUGET SOUND TUG BARGE COmpany Decision Introduction The case of Jess PEASLEY v. PUGET SOUND TUG BARGE COmpany serves as a pivotal...
Trustee's Authority to Sue Without Joining Beneficiaries: Insights from EICHNER v. CAHILL

Trustee's Authority to Sue Without Joining Beneficiaries: Insights from EICHNER v. CAHILL

Date: Nov 1, 1941
Trustee's Authority to Sue Without Joining Beneficiaries: Insights from EICHNER v. CAHILL Introduction FRED EICHNER, as Trustee, Appellant, v. W.S. CAHILL et al., Respondents, reported in 118 P.2d...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert