Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

Limiting Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Corporations: Insights from Tyyee Construction Co. v. Belyea Co.

Limiting Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Corporations: Insights from Tyyee Construction Co. v. Belyea Co.

Date: May 10, 1963
Limiting Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Corporations: Insights from Tyyee Construction Co. v. Belyea Co. Introduction The case of Tyyee Construction Company et al. v. Dulien Steel Products, Inc....
Standard for Considering Juror Misconduct in Motions for New Trial: GARDNER v. MALONE

Standard for Considering Juror Misconduct in Motions for New Trial: GARDNER v. MALONE

Date: Nov 30, 1962
Standard for Considering Juror Misconduct in Motions for New Trial: GARDNER v. MALONE Introduction In the landmark case of Arnie Gardner et al. v. John Malone, reported in 376 P.2d 651 (60 Wn. 2d...
State of Washington v. Don Anthony White: Upholding the M'Naghten Rule and Death Penalty Procedures

State of Washington v. Don Anthony White: Upholding the M'Naghten Rule and Death Penalty Procedures

Date: Sep 26, 1962
State of Washington v. Don Anthony White: Upholding the M'Naghten Rule and Death Penalty Procedures Introduction In the landmark case of State of Washington v. Don Anthony White (374 P.2d 942, 60...
Premises Liability and Voluntary Assumption of Risk: DeHEER v. SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER

Premises Liability and Voluntary Assumption of Risk: DeHEER v. SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER

Date: Jun 15, 1962
Premises Liability and Voluntary Assumption of Risk: DeHEER v. SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER Introduction The case of Cornelis DeHeer et al., Appellants, v. The Seattle Post-Intelligencer et al.,...
Limits on Attorney General’s Authority to Demand Accountings in Charitable Trusts – The State of Washington v. Harcourt M. Taylor

Limits on Attorney General’s Authority to Demand Accountings in Charitable Trusts – The State of Washington v. Harcourt M. Taylor

Date: May 19, 1961
Limits on Attorney General’s Authority to Demand Accountings in Charitable Trusts – The State of Washington v. Harcourt M. Taylor Introduction The State of Washington v. Harcourt M. Taylor et al.,...
Enforcing Arbitration in Interpretation Disputes: Insights from Hanford Guards Union v. General Electric Co.

Enforcing Arbitration in Interpretation Disputes: Insights from Hanford Guards Union v. General Electric Co.

Date: Jan 6, 1961
Enforcing Arbitration in Interpretation Disputes: Insights from Hanford Guards Union v. General Electric Co. Introduction The case of Hanford Guards Union of America Local 21 of the International...
Establishing Admissibility Standards for Breathalyzer Evidence: STATE v. BAKER

Establishing Admissibility Standards for Breathalyzer Evidence: STATE v. BAKER

Date: Oct 7, 1960
Establishing Admissibility Standards for Breathalyzer Evidence: State of Washington v. Charles E. Baker Introduction In the landmark case of The State of Washington v. Charles E. Baker, reported in...
Clarifying the Standards for Summary Judgment: Insights from ADA Preston v. William R. Duncan

Clarifying the Standards for Summary Judgment: Insights from ADA Preston v. William R. Duncan

Date: Feb 26, 1960
Clarifying the Standards for Summary Judgment: Insights from ADA Preston v. William R. Duncan Introduction ADA Preston v. William R. Duncan et al., reported in 349 P.2d 605 (55 Wn. 2d 678), is a...
Reaffirmation of Jury Instruction Standards in SHERMAN v. MOBBS et al.

Reaffirmation of Jury Instruction Standards in SHERMAN v. MOBBS et al.

Date: Dec 4, 1959
Reaffirmation of Jury Instruction Standards in SHERMAN v. MOBBS et al. Introduction James C. Sherman v. Lewis Mobbs et al. is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Washington in 1959....
Appellate Deference to Trial Court Fact-Finding in Thorney v. Hesperian Orchards

Appellate Deference to Trial Court Fact-Finding in Thorney v. Hesperian Orchards

Date: Aug 21, 1959
Appellate Deference to Trial Court Fact-Finding in Thorney v. Hesperian Orchards Introduction The case of David A. Thorndike et al. v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc. adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Validating Unilateral Stipulations in Eminent Domain: State of Washington v. Basin Development and Sales Co.

Validating Unilateral Stipulations in Eminent Domain: State of Washington v. Basin Development and Sales Co.

Date: Nov 29, 1958
Validating Unilateral Stipulations in Eminent Domain: State of Washington v. Basin Development and Sales Co. Introduction The case of State of Washington v. Basin Development and Sales Co. (1958)...
Governmental Immunity from Strikes: The Port of Seattle Decision

Governmental Immunity from Strikes: The Port of Seattle Decision

Date: May 3, 1958
Governmental Immunity from Strikes: The Port of Seattle Decision Introduction The case of The Port of Seattle v. International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union et al. (1958) addresses a...
State v. Earl C. Case: Establishing Boundaries of Prosecutorial Conduct in Ensuring a Fair Trial

State v. Earl C. Case: Establishing Boundaries of Prosecutorial Conduct in Ensuring a Fair Trial

Date: Jun 8, 1956
State v. Earl C. Case: Establishing Boundaries of Prosecutorial Conduct in Ensuring a Fair Trial Reported in 298 P.2d 500. (49 Wn. 2d 66) | Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc | June 7, 1956...
Establishing Contractual Obligations in Public Pensions: Insights from Bakenhus v. City of Seattle

Establishing Contractual Obligations in Public Pensions: Insights from Bakenhus v. City of Seattle

Date: Apr 20, 1956
Establishing Contractual Obligations in Public Pensions: Insights from Bakenhus v. City of Seattle Introduction The case of H.D. Bakenhus et al. v. The City of Seattle et al., decided by the Supreme...
Equal Protection in Criminal Classification: Washington Supreme Court Invalidates RCW 9.41.160

Equal Protection in Criminal Classification: Washington Supreme Court Invalidates RCW 9.41.160

Date: Mar 23, 1956
Equal Protection in Criminal Classification: Washington Supreme Court Invalidates RCW 9.41.160 Introduction The case of Stanley C. Olsen v. Lawrence Delmore, Jr. addressed a pivotal issue concerning...
State v. Samuel Emmanuel: Key Precedents on Bribery, Evidence, and Jury Instructions

State v. Samuel Emmanuel: Key Precedents on Bribery, Evidence, and Jury Instructions

Date: Jul 3, 1953
State v. Samuel Emmanuel: Key Precedents on Bribery, Evidence, and Jury Instructions Introduction State of Washington v. Samuel Emmanuel is a landmark case reported in 259 P.2d 845 (42 Wn. 2d 799) by...
Duty of School Districts to Foresee and Prevent Student Misconduct: McLEOD v. GRANT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTrict No. 128

Duty of School Districts to Foresee and Prevent Student Misconduct: McLEOD v. GRANT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTrict No. 128

Date: Mar 26, 1953
Duty of School Districts to Foresee and Prevent Student Misconduct: McLEOD v. GRANT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTrict No. 128 Introduction In McLEOD v. GRANT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTrict No. 128, 255 P.2d 360 (42 Wn....
Admissibility of Prior Confessions: Establishing Identity and Manner of Commission in STATE v. GOEBEL

Admissibility of Prior Confessions: Establishing Identity and Manner of Commission in STATE v. GOEBEL

Date: Jan 25, 1952
Admissibility of Prior Confessions: Establishing Identity and Manner of Commission in State of Washington v. Goebel Introduction State of Washington v. Lee Raymond Goebel, reported in 240 P.2d 251...
Cle Elum Ordinance Enforcement Upholds Municipal Police Power Over Commercial Property Rights

Cle Elum Ordinance Enforcement Upholds Municipal Police Power Over Commercial Property Rights

Date: Jan 13, 1951
Cle Elum Ordinance Enforcement Upholds Municipal Police Power Over Commercial Property Rights Introduction The case of Tony Sandona, Sr., et al. v. The City of Cle Elum et al. represents a pivotal...
Admissibility of Unrelated Crimes Evidence: Insights from STATE v. GOEBEL

Admissibility of Unrelated Crimes Evidence: Insights from STATE v. GOEBEL

Date: May 14, 1950
Admissibility of Unrelated Crimes Evidence: Insights from STATE v. GOEBEL Introduction State of Washington v. Lee Raymond Goebel is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Washington in...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert