Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

Establishing Agency Relationships and Fiduciary Duties: Insights from MOSS v. VADMAN

Establishing Agency Relationships and Fiduciary Duties: Insights from MOSS v. VADMAN

Date: Dec 19, 1969
Establishing Agency Relationships and Fiduciary Duties: Insights from MOSS v. VADMAN Introduction MOSS v. VADMAN is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Washington in 1969. The plaintiffs,...
ANCHETA v. DALY (1969): Broadening Judicial Review and Refining Labor Dispute Disqualifications in Unemployment Compensation

ANCHETA v. DALY (1969): Broadening Judicial Review and Refining Labor Dispute Disqualifications in Unemployment Compensation

Date: Nov 21, 1969
ANCHETA v. DALY (1969): Broadening Judicial Review and Refining Labor Dispute Disqualifications in Unemployment Compensation Introduction ANCHETA v. DALY is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
Standing and Regulatory Exemptions in Public Utility Practices: Insights from Washington Natural Gas Co. v. Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County

Standing and Regulatory Exemptions in Public Utility Practices: Insights from Washington Natural Gas Co. v. Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County

Date: Oct 10, 1969
Standing and Regulatory Exemptions in Public Utility Practices: Insights from Washington Natural Gas Co. v. Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County Introduction The case of Washington...
Insufficient Evidence for Constructive Possession in Narcotics Cases: State v. Hutchinson

Insufficient Evidence for Constructive Possession in Narcotics Cases: State v. Hutchinson

Date: Oct 3, 1969
Insufficient Evidence for Constructive Possession in Narcotics Cases: State v. Hutchinson Introduction The case of State of Washington v. Michael Anthony Hutchinson presents a pivotal examination of...
STATE v. ADAMS: Admissibility of Autopsy Photographs and Waiver of Counsel Rights in Capital Murder Proceedings

STATE v. ADAMS: Admissibility of Autopsy Photographs and Waiver of Counsel Rights in Capital Murder Proceedings

Date: Sep 12, 1969
STATE v. ADAMS: Admissibility of Autopsy Photographs and Waiver of Counsel Rights in Capital Murder Proceedings Introduction State v. Jerry Ralph Adams is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Permissible Use of Photographic Identification and Lineups in Criminal Proceedings: Insights from STATE v. GEFELLER

Permissible Use of Photographic Identification and Lineups in Criminal Proceedings: Insights from STATE v. GEFELLER

Date: Aug 1, 1969
Permissible Use of Photographic Identification and Lineups in Criminal Proceedings: Insights from STATE v. GEFELLER Introduction State of Washington v. James Ely Gefeller, reported in 458 P.2d 17...
Ensuring Fairness and Preventing Spot Zoning: An Analysis of SMITH v. SKAGIT COUNTY (1969)

Ensuring Fairness and Preventing Spot Zoning: An Analysis of SMITH v. SKAGIT COUNTY (1969)

Date: Apr 18, 1969
Ensuring Fairness and Preventing Spot Zoning: An Analysis of SMITH v. SKAGIT COUNTY (1969) Introduction In the landmark case of N.L. Smith, Appellant, v. Skagit County et al., Respondents, and Evan...
Adoption of Strict Liability in Product Liability Cases: ULMER v. FORD MOTOR COmpany

Adoption of Strict Liability in Product Liability Cases: ULMER v. FORD MOTOR COmpany

Date: Mar 21, 1969
Adoption of Strict Liability in Product Liability Cases: ULMER v. FORD MOTOR COmpany Introduction ULMER v. FORD MOTOR COmpany is a landmark judgment delivered by the Supreme Court of Washington in...
Affirming Deed Validity to Pre-Incorporation Corporations and Mortgage Priority Principles in John Davis Co. v. Cedar Glen #4, Inc.

Affirming Deed Validity to Pre-Incorporation Corporations and Mortgage Priority Principles in John Davis Co. v. Cedar Glen #4, Inc.

Date: Jan 24, 1969
Affirming Deed Validity to Pre-Incorporation Corporations and Mortgage Priority Principles in John Davis Co. v. Cedar Glen #4, Inc. Introduction John Davis Co. v. Cedar Glen #4, Inc. is a significant...
Balancing Attorney-Client Privilege and Court's Authority: Insights from Charles A. Dike, Jr. v. Robbin Angela Dike

Balancing Attorney-Client Privilege and Court's Authority: Insights from Charles A. Dike, Jr. v. Robbin Angela Dike

Date: Dec 6, 1968
Balancing Attorney-Client Privilege and Court's Authority: Insights from Charles A. Dike, Jr. v. Robbin Angela Dike Introduction The case of Charles A. Dike, Jr. v. Robbin Angela Dike serves as a...
Impeachment of Witness Credibility and Constitutional Protections: Insights from STATE v. LAMPSHIRE

Impeachment of Witness Credibility and Constitutional Protections: Insights from STATE v. LAMPSHIRE

Date: Nov 22, 1968
Impeachment of Witness Credibility and Constitutional Protections: Insights from STATE v. LAMPSHIRE Introduction State of Washington v. Martha Kaye Lampshire, reported in 447 P.2d 727 (1968), is a...
STATE v. SMITH et al.: Establishing Unified Standards for Joinder of Offenses in Criminal Proceedings

STATE v. SMITH et al.: Establishing Unified Standards for Joinder of Offenses in Criminal Proceedings

Date: Oct 30, 1968
STATE v. SMITH et al.: Establishing Unified Standards for Joinder of Offenses in Criminal Proceedings Introduction The case of State of Washington v. Leodis Smith et al., reported in 446 P.2d 571 (74...
Prier v. Refrigeration Engineering Co.: Establishing Implied Warranties in Specialized Construction Contracts

Prier v. Refrigeration Engineering Co.: Establishing Implied Warranties in Specialized Construction Contracts

Date: Jun 21, 1968
Prier v. Refrigeration Engineering Co.: Establishing Implied Warranties in Specialized Construction Contracts Introduction The case of Prier et al. v. Refrigeration Engineering Company et al. (442...
Establishing Knowledge in Hit-and-Run Offenses: Insights from STATE v. MARTIN

Establishing Knowledge in Hit-and-Run Offenses: Insights from STATE v. MARTIN

Date: Apr 26, 1968
Establishing Knowledge in Hit-and-Run Offenses: Insights from STATE v. MARTIN Introduction State of Washington v. Claude W. Martin, reported in 440 P.2d 429 (73 Wn. 2d 616), is a landmark judgment by...
State Supremacy in Outdoor Advertising Regulation Affirmed: Markham Advertising Co. v. Washington

State Supremacy in Outdoor Advertising Regulation Affirmed: Markham Advertising Co. v. Washington

Date: Mar 27, 1968
State Supremacy in Outdoor Advertising Regulation Affirmed: Markham Advertising Co. v. Washington Introduction Markham Advertising Company, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. The State of Washington et...
Establishing Equitable Principles in Vacating Default Judgments: The WHITE v. HOLM Decision

Establishing Equitable Principles in Vacating Default Judgments: The WHITE v. HOLM Decision

Date: Mar 15, 1968
Establishing Equitable Principles in Vacating Default Judgments: The WHITE v. HOLM Decision Introduction The case of Etta A. White v. Richard B. Holm et al., reported in 438 P.2d 581 (73 Wn. 2d 348),...
Application of the Missing Witness Rule and Miranda Rights: The State v. Belknap Judgment

Application of the Missing Witness Rule and Miranda Rights: The State v. Belknap Judgment

Date: Mar 7, 1968
Application of the Missing Witness Rule and Miranda Rights: The State v. Belknap Judgment Introduction The case of The State of Washington v. Ronald E. Davis et al, Defendants, James L. Belknap,...
Protecting Common Carrier Permit Rights: Res Judicata and Due Process in Luisi Truck Lines v. WA Utilities & Transportation Commission

Protecting Common Carrier Permit Rights: Res Judicata and Due Process in Luisi Truck Lines v. WA Utilities & Transportation Commission

Date: Dec 29, 1967
Protecting Common Carrier Permit Rights: Res Judicata and Due Process in Luisi Truck Lines, Inc. v. Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission Introduction The case of Luisi Truck Lines, Inc....
Clarifying Negligent Homicide: 'Disregard for Safety of Others' as a Distinct Category under RCW 46.61.520

Clarifying Negligent Homicide: 'Disregard for Safety of Others' as a Distinct Category under RCW 46.61.520

Date: Dec 22, 1967
Clarifying Negligent Homicide: 'Disregard for Safety of Others' as a Distinct Category under RCW 46.61.520 Introduction The Supreme Court of Washington's decision in The State of Washington v. George...
Redefining the Standard of Care in Medical Malpractice: Moving Beyond the Locality Rule

Redefining the Standard of Care in Medical Malpractice: Moving Beyond the Locality Rule

Date: Sep 22, 1967
Redefining the Standard of Care in Medical Malpractice: Moving Beyond the Locality Rule Introduction Dorothy H. Pederson v. M.L. Dumouchell, et al., reported in 431 P.2d 973 (72 Wn.2d 73), is a...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert